Bitcoin Forum
May 01, 2024, 09:40:21 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 [385] 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 ... 1135 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [ANN] cudaMiner & ccMiner CUDA based mining applications [Windows/Linux/MacOSX]  (Read 3426872 times)
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:29:40 PM
 #7681

oh look what I just got from nVidia:

Quote
Attaching the modified keccak.cu. I just got 144 MH/s on a 750 Ti with it (compiled natively for sm_50 with 80 registers). The results should be correct, but I’m not completely sure – can you verify them on a pool?

I received this update after exchanging some discussion about the nvcc compiler's possible use of the funnel shifter on 64 bit rotate/shift instructions.

I will try this out after work - 144 MHash/s on a 750 Ti sounds like a dream come true. And maybe the gain carries over to Compute 3.5,  too.

so far I've seen only 80 MHash/s...

1714556421
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714556421

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714556421
Reply with quote  #2

1714556421
Report to moderator
Once a transaction has 6 confirmations, it is extremely unlikely that an attacker without at least 50% of the network's computation power would be able to reverse it.
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
1714556421
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714556421

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714556421
Reply with quote  #2

1714556421
Report to moderator
patoberli
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:31:24 PM
 #7682

Would say the GT-640. Some 72 kh/s with scrypt, but still some 1.45 kh/s with keccak. While a 780 Ti (this is now only a guess from reading past posts!) manages around 700 kh/s scrypt and around 4-5 kh/s keccak.

[Edit]
Or do I currently mix up keccak with an other algorithm?  Huh

YAC: YA86YiWSvWEGSSSerPTMy4kwndabRUNftf
BTC: 16NqvkYbKMnonVEf7jHbuWURFsLeuTRidX
LTC: LTKCoiDwqEjaRCoNXfFhDm9EeWbGWouZjE
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:33:10 PM
 #7683

Would say the GT-640. Some 72 kh/s with scrypt, but still some 1.45 kh/s with keccak. While a 780 Ti (this is now only a guess from reading past posts!) manages around 700 kh/s scrypt and around 4-5 kh/s keccak.

confusing Keccak and Yacoin's scrypt-jane:14, maybe?
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:44:45 PM
 #7684

you can run autotune with the -D flag and abort as soon as you see that there's not much to be gained from waiting longer. It's also a good idea to log the output to a file for later review.

the 2>&1 syntax merges stderr and stdout into a single output stream.

cudaminer.exe  -D -d 0 -l T   2>&1 >autotune_logfile.txt

Only partly logs output to the file on Windows 7...
I noticed the best autotune from -L 4 so far.

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:50:15 PM
 #7685

I noticed the best autotune from -L 4 so far.

I think you haven't mentioned yet which hardware you are tuning for.

I was seeing about one kHash/s gain on my GTX 780, for example. My formerly 13 kHash/s 3x 780Ti rig is now pulling 15.6 kHash/s.

Christian
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:51:10 PM
 #7686

I noticed the best autotune from -L 4 so far.

I think you haven't mentioned yet which hardware you are tuning for.

I was seeing about one kHash/s gain on my GTX 780, for example. My formerly 13 kHash/s 3x 780Ti rig is now pulling 15.6 kHash/s.

Christian

I have just one card, Asus GTX 780 Smiley

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
myagui
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1154
Merit: 1001



View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:52:53 PM
 #7687

oh look what I just got from nVidia:

Quote
Attaching the modified keccak.cu. I just got 144 MH/s on a 750 Ti with it (compiled natively for sm_50 with 80 registers). The results should be correct, but I’m not completely sure – can you verify them on a pool?

I received this update after exchanging some discussion about the nvcc compiler's possible use of the funnel shifter on 64 bit rotate/shift instructions.

I will try this out after work - 144 MHash/s on a 750 Ti sounds like a dream come true. And maybe the gain carries over to Compute 3.5,  too.

so far I've seen only 80 MHash/s...



Can't wait to try that out on my 750 TI, would be awesome to have this for the Helixcoin launch tonight!!!

cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:53:05 PM
 #7688

I have just one card, Asus GTX 780 Smiley

weird. I am running mine on -L 6.
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:53:32 PM
 #7689

Can't wait to try that out on my 750 TI, would be awesome to have this for the Helixcoin launch tonight!!!

if the nVidia code is free of errors, you will have it for the Helixcoin launch tonight.
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 01:57:18 PM
 #7690

My autotune results for Asus GTX 780 OC:
Code:
-L 4 = -l t128x2 = 5-5.5khash/s pretty much 50/50
-L 5 = -l t79x4 = ~5khash/s
-L 6 = -l t191x2 = 4.3-5khash/s
-L 7 = -l t118x4 = 4-5khash/s more often closer to 4 than 5
Maybe some memory limitation by windows, or maybe the fact that my PCI runs on 2.0 x 16

Edit:
Correct output to file syntax appears to be cudaminer.exe > autotune.txt 2>&1

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
cbuchner1 (OP)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 502


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 02:06:20 PM
 #7691

Correct output to file syntax appears to be cudaminer.exe > autotune.txt 2>&1

oh I did not know the order mattered that much Wink

should cudaminer maybe automatically save autotune logs? maybe with autotune date and GPU model in the file name and the given command line arguments in a comment line in the log file ?

Christian
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 02:11:01 PM
 #7692


should cudaminer maybe automatically save autotune logs? maybe with autotune date and GPU model in the file name and the given command line arguments in a comment line in the log file ?

Christian

This could be very useful, both for troubleshooting and general launch configs, perhaps it's possible to obtain the hardware id aswell? We all say GTX 780 but there's 4 different ones.
Or perhaps the clock speeds?

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
liomojo1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 676
Merit: 500


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 02:12:28 PM
 #7693

Can't wait to try that out on my 750 TI, would be awesome to have this for the Helixcoin launch tonight!!!

if the nVidia code is free of errors, you will have it for the Helixcoin launch tonight.


Superb , i hope you will compile it ready for use , cause i can`t compile form github? Pleaseee!!! Grin Grin Grin Grin Grin
bigjme
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 350
Merit: 250


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 02:24:29 PM
 #7694

Correct output to file syntax appears to be cudaminer.exe > autotune.txt 2>&1

oh I did not know the order mattered that much Wink

should cudaminer maybe automatically save autotune logs? maybe with autotune date and GPU model in the file name and the given command line arguments in a comment line in the log file ?

Christian


I attempted to get autotune to save its results to a file. It worked for the first 13 runs of any scrypt and then cudaminer would crash. This was on a launch about a month ago

Owner of: cudamining.co.uk
lordaccess
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 02:50:26 PM
 #7695

Why are everyone's 780s or Titans so slow? :p

Mine can do 700kh/s without breaking a sweat...and more.  Huh

Teach me master!

YinCoin YangCoin ☯☯First Ever POS/POW Alternator! Multipool! ☯ ☯ http://yinyangpool.com/ 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623937
Bwincoin - 100% Free POS. BRz1SNnSs6bGkJkG4kvw5ADSin5dBat3Cx
patoberli
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 106
Merit: 10


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 03:33:01 PM
 #7696

Even better, save it in a csv format to make it maybe comparable.

And you're right, I mixed keccak with scrypt-jane, silly me.

YAC: YA86YiWSvWEGSSSerPTMy4kwndabRUNftf
BTC: 16NqvkYbKMnonVEf7jHbuWURFsLeuTRidX
LTC: LTKCoiDwqEjaRCoNXfFhDm9EeWbGWouZjE
trancelord
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 19
Merit: 0


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:03:10 PM
 #7697

Hey guys, I have a question.

how do you set cudaminer to switch to pools automatically?

like say a pool doesnt reconnect, you can autoswitch to another pool after a while.

i know cg miner does it.. but how can u do it on cuda? what is the command?

tryin to set it up and run it automatically cuz i gotta work tonight and im mining something.

thanks
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:07:14 PM
 #7698

Hey guys, I have a question.

how do you set cudaminer to switch to pools automatically?

like say a pool doesnt reconnect, you can autoswitch to another pool after a while.

i know cg miner does it.. but how can u do it on cuda? what is the command?

tryin to set it up and run it automatically cuz i gotta work tonight and im mining something.

thanks
You can set a specific amount of retries, and then make cudaminer terminate automatically when those retries have ran out.
Use -r # for the retry count and -R # for retry seconds

Examples:
Code:
:loop
cudaminer.exe -R 5 -r 10 -o pool1.com -O Acc.Worker:Pass
cudaminer.exe -R 10 -r 5 -o pool2.com -O Acc.Worker:Pass
cudaminer.exe -R 15 -r 2 -o pool3.com -O Acc.Worker:Pass
goto loop

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
Silverwolf_Ru
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 120
Merit: 100

Astrophotographer and Ham Radioist!


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:10:21 PM
 #7699

Good evening everyone. Nice to see you all again. Ready for the Helixcoin launch? I might only have a 560 Ti but I will mine mine mine. Won't settle until I have at least one hundred thousand coins. All thanks to Mister Christian here. Should I try and compile the current branch Christian, or will you do it? Five hours until launch.

PS! Any chance of further Fermi optimizations? Even GTX 750 Ti are bloody expensive over here in Russia.

Bitcoin: 17kz4pWKoMoVupGUYgj8kGomxXUkDHNtVe
Shadowcoin: Seta8CFwP6yvbeCkgfjxXjpkokrQMQovGF ~Coin of the Future!
ManIkWeet
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 182
Merit: 100


View Profile
February 28, 2014, 04:12:19 PM
 #7700

Ready for the Helixcoin launch?
Yep, though they haven't released any nodes to use for "addnode=IP" configs Sad

BTC donations: 18fw6ZjYkN7xNxfVWbsRmBvD6jBAChRQVn (thanks!)
Pages: « 1 ... 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 [385] 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404 405 406 407 408 409 410 411 412 413 414 415 416 417 418 419 420 421 422 423 424 425 426 427 428 429 430 431 432 433 434 435 ... 1135 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!