EWBF's CUDA Zcash miner

[stash2coin]

Is EWBF compiled for 32bit or 64bit?  It says it is running on C:\windows\system32\cmd.exe  Obviously that is 32bit  does it matter?  (I'm on win10 64 bit)
thanks

Its a x64 bit application what your looking at is windows command prompt and not related directly to ewbf miner

[1714814854]

1714814854

[1714814854]

1714814854

[Gaglam]

An update would be great

[wudafuxup]

5x 1080 rig, trying to mine BitcoinZ. Power target@80%, core +110, mem +800. Forced P0 state.

One of my GPUs is gradually losing speed using EWBF.
I've been mining other algos for days without interruption but as I tried to switch to mining equihash with EWBF this crap starts happening. Hashrate goes down, lower and lower until it crashes the rig. Any ideas what might cause it?

Do you guys know whether this could be either Cuda9 or driver related? It just makes no sense to me...

That's really interesting. I have had this issue for a while now. I have 2 Z97 Extreme 4 boards mining some Zencash. The first one had six GTX1060 and the 2nd one had six GTX1080tis. Both run windows 10, but the miner with my GTX1060s stopped working with 6 cards randomly. It does exactly what you explained. It works with 5 perfectly (even though it used to work with 6 for about 3 months) but once you install the 6th it slowly drops and eventually crashes the system. I have tested all the cards and they all work perfectly individually. I'm starting to think it might be a windows corruption issue of some sort. Would be cool if anyone has found a way to fix this issue.

I can confirm that too, I have strange behavior with one 1070 which works like in half power
other coins seems do not have such issue with that card, it is working on full speed and without issues.
bit when it working on ewbf it srats to do act like that and I do not remember it was acting like this before?  

Glad I'm not the only one.
For everyone's benefit, I switched to DSTM's miner, and I am glad to report the slowdown/crashing issue does not happen with that miner, and hashrates are very similar to EWBF's.

So people, just do the switcharoo.

I'll have to give it a try, this issue has been hampering my miners for a while now. I keep having to move my cards around to accommodate. Thanks for the suggestion, I'll give it a try in a few days and let you know if it works.

[Voltar]

I am glad I am not the only one having these problems.

[Voltar]

I think one of the issues is driver related because it seemed to start after I updated to the newest one I couldn't add any more than 4 1060's but it's fricking late i'll check in the morning.

[Atexor]

What new version ?
the developer has not been active for quite some time.

Last time when I looked at that thread he said something that he will think about one improvements. Here. Also EWBF often visits bitcointalk. He just doesn't posting, so I hope he will read and maybe implement my idea.

[sublimus]

Has anybody else been getting the BSOD error once you launch the miner?  Been having serious problems getting my rig to be stable.  It BSOD's after about 3 seconds

I would bet on a bad memory stick.

[Voltar]

I meant the newest driver.  But I have been having a lot of random problems since getting this ram. 

[jpl]

Any riser cable suggestions?  I just went through 12 and finally got my cards to read.  (using Mintcell)

[Vispilio]

don't believe the DSTM fan boys, that product has a rigid 2 % for roughly equivalent hash rate compared to EWBF. EWBF still remains boss if --fee 0 really removes the dev fees without hurting the hashrate, if someone can confirm this would be great.

[sublimus]

don't believe the DSTM fan boys, that product has a rigid 2 % for roughly equivalent hash rate compared to EWBF. EWBF still remains boss if --fee 0 really removes the dev fees without hurting the hashrate, if someone can confirm this would be great.

I have the feeling that EWBF sold his code to DTSM.

[jpl]

don't believe the DSTM fan boys, that product has a rigid 2 % for roughly equivalent hash rate compared to EWBF. EWBF still remains boss if --fee 0 really removes the dev fees without hurting the hashrate, if someone can confirm this would be great.

I have the feeling that EWBF sold his code to DTSM.

https://steemit.com/hush/@joseph/effective-immediately-david-mercer-radix42-is-the-new-lead-dev-for-hush

This was like 6 months ago,. so I'm sure he cannot develop outside of Hush.  Depending on NDA etc

but he is talking over here..  https://forum.z.cash/t/zcash4win-beta-is-out/14155/725

[crypper]

don't believe the DSTM fan boys, that product has a rigid 2 % for roughly equivalent hash rate compared to EWBF. EWBF still remains boss if --fee 0 really removes the dev fees without hurting the hashrate, if someone can confirm this would be great.

Not confirmed: for me dstm with 2% fee is slightly more profitable (>hash + < power) than ewbf with 0% fee. Unfortunately dstm is not stable for me (gtx 1070, 70%, +150, +500) and I'm loosing more on restarts, so mining with ewbf.

[NoOneLt]

Guys, i can not find any failover examples, could someone help me?

[meesmustas]

What means CUDA miner error code number 73? Can not find error code explanations.

[vladimir4504]

385.69 looks betterhttps://ibb.co/gG4NXb

[xenonwon]

Hello, I have been mining for months and have now tried to put --fee 0 and there is no change in the mining speed, it works at exactly the same speed, is not that command supposed to lower the mining speed?

[1234xm]

Hello, I have been mining for months and have now tried to put --fee 0 and there is no change in the mining speed, it works at exactly the same speed, is not that command supposed to lower the mining speed?

how can you put 0 fee?

is there any better mnet then EWBF? well, it is just strange,that there are not nay updates anymore.

[cpmcgrat]

Hello, I have been mining for months and have now tried to put --fee 0 and there is no change in the mining speed, it works at exactly the same speed, is not that command supposed to lower the mining speed?

how can you put 0 fee?

is there any better mnet then EWBF? well, it is just strange,that there are not nay updates anymore.

The way the fees work is depending on the x% you are paying every x/100 shares you generate goes to a PPLNS system mining for EWBF's wallet. If you turn the fee off, you are now getting all of those shares put towards your wallet. So you should see no change in hashrate when scaling the fees.

[cyberspacemonkey]

Is this miner still under ongoing development? anyone know if the hash rate is better that Claymore's?