xiphon
|
|
March 01, 2017, 09:23:58 AM |
|
This is like dancing but the dancers have different tunes. Its fun right xiphon?
Bullshit. Sending transactions will not forbid to you to mine block with previous block timestamp. It is obvious. I don't know how mmcmc coded his pool but it is pretty easy to take timestamp from preious block header, but not from getwork RPC reply from daemon. It is pretty easy and not a problem for network. Nothing to say to you. You misunderstanding how any decentralized system works, essentially cryptocurrencies. It seems to me that you have plans to confuse readers about how the coin is functioning. Or maybe you are failed with starting your own coin and now you are trying to stop PascalLite? All "problems" that you are "flooding" about is totally bullshit. Nothing to explain here. "Cheating" in a such way how you are talking about in your posts is not exists. One problem that coin have right now it - is having very small amount of miners. So a guy with 10 GH/s can mine all blocks and build his own blockchain faster than all other miners can build together. I explained it very clear but you don't understand that. But it is not PascalLite problem. As network will grow this would not be an issue. Anyway, don't know why you want to bring that disinformation here and don't want to know. You are just a troll.
|
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 09:30:58 AM |
|
This is like dancing but the dancers have different tunes. Its fun right xiphon?
Bullshit. Sending transactions will not forbid to you to mine block with previous block timestamp. It is obvious. I don't know how mmcmc coded his pool but it is pretty easy to take timestamp from preious block header, but not from getwork RPC reply from daemon. It is pretty easy and not a problem for network. Nothing to say to you. You misunderstanding how any decentralized system works, essentially cryptocurrencies. It seems to me that you have plans to confuse readers about how the coin is functioning. Or maybe you are failed with starting your own coin and now you are trying to stop PascalLite? All "problems" that you are "flooding" about is totally bullshit. Nothing to explain here. "Cheating" in a such way how you are talking about in your posts is not exists. One problem that coin have right now it - is having very small amount of miners. So a guy with 10 GH/s can mine all blocks and build his own blockchain faster than all other miners can build together. I explained it very clear but you don't understand that. But it is not PascalLite problem. As network will grow this would not be an issue. Anyway, don't know why you want to bring that disinformation here and don't want to know. You are just a troll. The more you reveal what you are doing the better for us. Keep talking.
|
|
|
|
xiphon
|
|
March 01, 2017, 10:01:14 AM |
|
@adaseb if somebody is going to create block explorer
Ok, i will. The more you reveal what you are doing the better for us. Keep talking.
Take it easy. You can't stop the coin if it will be good enough. Anyway we all know that the concept of the coin is perfect. Having human-readable accounts. No need to keep blockchain, that can be removed at any time with safety for all balances. Is not it amazing? Yes!
|
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 10:24:39 AM |
|
@adaseb if somebody is going to create block explorer
Ok, i will. The more you reveal what you are doing the better for us. Keep talking.
Take it easy. You can't stop the coin if it will be good enough. Anyway we all know that the concept of the coin is perfect. Having human-readable accounts. No need to keep blockchain, that can be removed at any time with safety for all balances. Is not it amazing? Yes! I am not against the coin, I am against those types who keep on cheating because the code is bugged. There are honest miners and this coin is not intended for the cheating ones. its for decentralized, honest and fair distribution. If adaseb will permit, we will hardfork this coin, and block those cheating accounts. If i have to do it alone then so be it. Goodluck to you. If your account is flagged as malicious, I am sorry but it will be blocked.
|
|
|
|
adaseb (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3878
Merit: 1733
|
|
March 01, 2017, 10:46:25 AM |
|
@adaseb if somebody is going to create block explorer
Ok, i will. The more you reveal what you are doing the better for us. Keep talking.
Take it easy. You can't stop the coin if it will be good enough. Anyway we all know that the concept of the coin is perfect. Having human-readable accounts. No need to keep blockchain, that can be removed at any time with safety for all balances. Is not it amazing? Yes! I am not against the coin, I am against those types who keep on cheating because the code is bugged. There are honest miners and this coin is not intended for the cheating ones. its for decentralized, honest and fair distribution. If adaseb will permit, we will hardfork this coin, and block those cheating accounts. If i have to do it alone then so be it. Goodluck to you. If your account is flagged as malicious, I am sorry but it will be blocked. There is a lot of controversy that comes with blocking accounts/addresses/transaction or performing blockchain rollbacks. Reason being that crytocurrencies are suppose to be immutable and decentralized. Suppose, I'm not saying I will do this, but suppose we block certain accounts that cheated on Pascal Lite. If we do this, how will the coin have any trust when we can at anytime in the future block some whale who owns a substancial part of the coin from accessing to their account? Nobody will buy PascalLite because one developer has too much control and the coin is very centralized. This is actually the very reason why Ethereum lost a large part of their marketcap during the summer by how they handled the DAO hack situation. And alot of people lost faith in Ethereum simply because one developer has too much control.
|
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 10:51:47 AM Last edit: March 01, 2017, 11:12:05 AM by code_honesty |
|
@adaseb if somebody is going to create block explorer
Ok, i will. The more you reveal what you are doing the better for us. Keep talking.
Take it easy. You can't stop the coin if it will be good enough. Anyway we all know that the concept of the coin is perfect. Having human-readable accounts. No need to keep blockchain, that can be removed at any time with safety for all balances. Is not it amazing? Yes! I am not against the coin, I am against those types who keep on cheating because the code is bugged. There are honest miners and this coin is not intended for the cheating ones. its for decentralized, honest and fair distribution. If adaseb will permit, we will hardfork this coin, and block those cheating accounts. If i have to do it alone then so be it. Goodluck to you. If your account is flagged as malicious, I am sorry but it will be blocked. There is a lot of controversy that comes with blocking accounts/addresses/transaction or performing blockchain rollbacks. Reason being that crytocurrencies are suppose to be immutable and decentralized. Suppose, I'm not saying I will do this, but suppose we block certain accounts that cheated on Pascal Lite. If we do this, how will the coin have any trust when we can at anytime in the future block some whale who owns a substancial part of the coin from accessing to their account? Nobody will buy PascalLite because one developer has too much control and the coin is very centralized. This is actually the very reason why Ethereum lost a large part of their marketcap during the summer by how they handled the DAO hack situation. And alot of people lost faith in Ethereum simply because one developer has too much control. The only accounts that will cease of operations are those of the cheaters. if we hardfork i dont think there will be much malicious miner then as now. the new code will be improved to prevent these bad actors and im confident that whale acquires his part of the coin fairly through the improved code. Im also looking at assets on top of pascal chain. But coding it on pascal will be a challenge. eventually we'll figure it out.
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
March 01, 2017, 12:23:31 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
|
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 12:46:10 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain.
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
March 01, 2017, 01:07:38 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp
|
|
|
|
anorganix
Copper Member
Sr. Member
Offline
Activity: 970
Merit: 287
Per aspera ad astra
|
|
March 01, 2017, 01:12:39 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp It's nice how your payload (miner name) has the 2nd digit incremented after each block.
|
I will never send private messages with payment requests for my auctions. I only communicate transparently via the forum (not Telegram, Discord, Skype & others). Please be wary of scammers.
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 01:15:16 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp @demaroz That is not the explanation i expect from you. How do you inject wrong time that is accepted by the daemon and blockchain? I know how its done but i want you to explain this bug.
|
|
|
|
ocminer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2688
Merit: 1240
|
|
March 01, 2017, 01:20:01 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp @demaroz That is not the explanation i expect from you. How do you inject wrong time that is accepted by the daemon and blockchain? I know how its done but i want you to explain this bug. That's very easy, the daemon accepts any time later than last blocks timestamp and not later than +380 sek or so... So you can just send blocks with the same timestamp as the last Block +1 second for example and lower yourself the diff for the next Block a lot (or raise)
|
suprnova pools - reliable mining pools - #suprnova on freenet https://www.suprnova.cc - FOLLOW us @ Twitter ! twitter.com/SuprnovaPools
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 01:23:41 PM Last edit: March 01, 2017, 11:52:09 PM by code_honesty |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp @demaroz That is not the explanation i expect from you. How do you inject wrong time that is accepted by the daemon and blockchain? I know how its done but i want you to explain this bug. That's very easy, the daemon accepts any time later than last blocks timestamp and not later than +380 sek or so... So you can just send blocks with the same timestamp as the last Block +1 second for example and lower yourself the diff for the next Block a lot (or raise) @ocminer care to explain what you mean by lowering for yourself the difficulty for the next block and raising it for the other miner? this is newsworthy. prepare to be quoted btw.
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
March 01, 2017, 01:54:48 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp @demaroz That is not the explanation i expect from you. How do you inject wrong time that is accepted by the daemon and blockchain? I know how its done but i want you to explain this bug. pascalwallet send me this: {"method":"miner-notify","params":[{"block":9816,"version":1,"part1":"58260000CA0220001D17CCB36C9013D8C1EADAD8464912A55142E5E54B1682717A022B7CC198BCA 72000F479055B7199CB14F96401FD68006978B4110B9D5D5653C078DF12931241F2CC20A1070000 000000010001004C6F922A","payload_start":"6D6D636D63","part3":"DFF30B788D9086AB994A81D6641EA3C7295908CFB555006FC25B0EF1BEBFEFDCE3B0C44298FC1C1 49AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7852B85500000000","target":714239820,"target_pow":"00000000002DB216600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","timestamp":1488361931}],"id":null} i have static timestamp (not incremented, this is bug) "timestamp":1488361931 and i changing only payload and nonce, if i found block, i send input data back to pascalwallet and i get BLOCK, thats all. No cheating, you are crazy man OMG!
|
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 02:39:11 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp @demaroz That is not the explanation i expect from you. How do you inject wrong time that is accepted by the daemon and blockchain? I know how its done but i want you to explain this bug. pascalwallet send me this: {"method":"miner-notify","params":[{"block":9816,"version":1,"part1":"58260000CA0220001D17CCB36C9013D8C1EADAD8464912A55142E5E54B1682717A022B7CC198BCA 72000F479055B7199CB14F96401FD68006978B4110B9D5D5653C078DF12931241F2CC20A1070000 000000010001004C6F922A","payload_start":"6D6D636D63","part3":"DFF30B788D9086AB994A81D6641EA3C7295908CFB555006FC25B0EF1BEBFEFDCE3B0C44298FC1C1 49AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7852B85500000000","target":714239820,"target_pow":"00000000002DB216600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","timestamp":1488361931}],"id":null} i have static timestamp (not incremented, this is bug) "timestamp":1488361931 and i changing only payload and nonce, if i found block, i send input data back to pascalwallet and i get BLOCK, thats all. No cheating, you are crazy man OMG! Ok. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Im inclined to let you off that list. Be cooperative with us and answer our questions sometime later. Adaseb will get in touch with you. Btw, how good are you at pascal programming?
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
March 01, 2017, 02:42:50 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp @demaroz That is not the explanation i expect from you. How do you inject wrong time that is accepted by the daemon and blockchain? I know how its done but i want you to explain this bug. pascalwallet send me this: {"method":"miner-notify","params":[{"block":9816,"version":1,"part1":"58260000CA0220001D17CCB36C9013D8C1EADAD8464912A55142E5E54B1682717A022B7CC198BCA 72000F479055B7199CB14F96401FD68006978B4110B9D5D5653C078DF12931241F2CC20A1070000 000000010001004C6F922A","payload_start":"6D6D636D63","part3":"DFF30B788D9086AB994A81D6641EA3C7295908CFB555006FC25B0EF1BEBFEFDCE3B0C44298FC1C1 49AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7852B85500000000","target":714239820,"target_pow":"00000000002DB216600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","timestamp":1488361931}],"id":null} i have static timestamp (not incremented, this is bug) "timestamp":1488361931 and i changing only payload and nonce, if i found block, i send input data back to pascalwallet and i get BLOCK, thats all. No cheating, you are crazy man OMG! Ok. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Im inclined to let you off that list. Be cooperative with us and answer our questions sometime later. Adaseb will get in touch with you. Btw, how good are you at pascal programming? in software are amateur, pascal is too compicated for me, my job is low level hardware programming
|
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 02:43:16 PM |
|
Any one here in touch with a crypto news? writer blogger of any sort? This is the very same thing that is happening on the main pascal coin. lets start tweeting.
|
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 02:52:39 PM |
|
Im CMCMC miner, im not cheater, im using my own mining software and its bug with timestamp.
I read timestamp from last block, but not incremented, it is only bug not cheating, i fix this bug this weekend, i dont have time now...
I have a lot of hashingpower, around 8GH/s it is 70-80% pascalhasrate
I helping this coin and i pay electric bill for this.
I repeat: Im not a cheater!
Im listening: You're still not off the hook. On my list you are the number 1. Now explain. wait a few days to fix the errors in my mining software and you see the correct timestamp @demaroz That is not the explanation i expect from you. How do you inject wrong time that is accepted by the daemon and blockchain? I know how its done but i want you to explain this bug. pascalwallet send me this: {"method":"miner-notify","params":[{"block":9816,"version":1,"part1":"58260000CA0220001D17CCB36C9013D8C1EADAD8464912A55142E5E54B1682717A022B7CC198BCA 72000F479055B7199CB14F96401FD68006978B4110B9D5D5653C078DF12931241F2CC20A1070000 000000010001004C6F922A","payload_start":"6D6D636D63","part3":"DFF30B788D9086AB994A81D6641EA3C7295908CFB555006FC25B0EF1BEBFEFDCE3B0C44298FC1C1 49AFBF4C8996FB92427AE41E4649B934CA495991B7852B85500000000","target":714239820,"target_pow":"00000000002DB216600000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000","timestamp":1488361931}],"id":null} i have static timestamp (not incremented, this is bug) "timestamp":1488361931 and i changing only payload and nonce, if i found block, i send input data back to pascalwallet and i get BLOCK, thats all. No cheating, you are crazy man OMG! Ok. Thank you very much for your cooperation. Im inclined to let you off that list. Be cooperative with us and answer our questions sometime later. Adaseb will get in touch with you. Btw, how good are you at pascal programming? in software are amateur, pascal is too compicated for me, my job is low level hardware programming I see. Thanks. Adaseb and I are actually looking for 1 programmer that is good in pascal. Hope someone volunteers.
|
|
|
|
dedmaroz
|
|
March 01, 2017, 03:02:14 PM |
|
I can donate some pascalLite coins for development
|
|
|
|
code_honesty
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
March 01, 2017, 03:06:39 PM |
|
I can donate some pascalLite coins for development Good. that is much needed help. Thank you. To all those miner we labeled cheater follow dedmaroz lead. We might come to an agreement. Ray_____ New Node 2017/2/2 Beta x?---- I have my list. Do it voluntarily. Please.
|
|
|
|
|