[ANN][PASL]-[PASCAL Lite]-[The Future is Almost Here]

[ocminer]

Is true? I saw slack orig coin, many investor maybe angry dev because not listen? I also read there investor maybe abandon orig coin because that. May be good this coin, if our dev delivers what investors expect from this coin type. I dont know. Also maybe bad because investor move away completely. Good luck us. I looking at github of xiphon, many work good job, I think you very smart man, I think 100% you can deliver expectation. Smart man win always many time.  

Yes xiphon is making alot of changes to the code, we keep finding bugs with our testing thats why its taking such a long time to release the new wallet. Currently over 2000 lines of code was changed in the latest version.

I see the changes at github as well and think they're very positive to the coin, at least you guys seem to have found a dev who actually knows what he's doing and how a crypto works. Unlike the origin.

However with the catastrophic launch and the exploits used at this coin it's doomed already. You should consider a relaunch or a completely new launch with the fixed code. Pascal Plus or something..

[bitcoinwonders010]

When I look at the node list,
I can see 2 Servers v1.4.3 and 3 with v1.4.4.

Should I upgrade, and where 2 find ?

 

P.S. could someone donate me an account [9C5FA1300C6E084907F083E9A350BACF5C803E23DB846225B4F95B8AA15A2375] please ?

your key shows an error make sure its correct

[ulfsaar]

Is true? I saw slack orig coin, many investor maybe angry dev because not listen? I also read there investor maybe abandon orig coin because that. May be good this coin, if our dev delivers what investors expect from this coin type. I dont know. Also maybe bad because investor move away completely. Good luck us. I looking at github of xiphon, many work good job, I think you very smart man, I think 100% you can deliver expectation. Smart man win always many time.  

Yes xiphon is making alot of changes to the code, we keep finding bugs with our testing thats why its taking such a long time to release the new wallet. Currently over 2000 lines of code was changed in the latest version.

I see the changes at github as well and think they're very positive to the coin, at least you guys seem to have found a dev who actually knows what he's doing and how a crypto works. Unlike the origin.

However with the catastrophic launch and the exploits used at this coin it's doomed already. You should consider a relaunch or a completely new launch with the fixed code. Pascal Plus or something..

Ocminer i know you good man, read many comment you at slack and many bitcointalk post but I disagree with you no disrespect. I see this like small boy growing up. when you young you make mistake many. very many because you small, little knowledge, see only small world, but when you go bigger and older you become wiser. more wiser. you do right your wrong do before. you correct your mistake. now this coin growing up, mistakes are correcting. This cannot come to this wonderful pussy wolrd big already. It start small and very weak. We must learn accept what our past then we go on. That what make a man a man. Bitcoin started like that. now bitcoin very big. no more people take advantage of the blockchain, may be except some exchange thief, but that is it like to be great.

Also maybe i little unfair. I know we clone orig, but maybe our dev improve orig code then orig dev maybe copy us code to improve orig. maybe that bring this coin to next level. May have value, only market can tell. Ciao. I prophetic now.  

[bitcoinwonders010]

Is true? I saw slack orig coin, many investor maybe angry dev because not listen? I also read there investor maybe abandon orig coin because that. May be good this coin, if our dev delivers what investors expect from this coin type. I dont know. Also maybe bad because investor move away completely. Good luck us. I looking at github of xiphon, many work good job, I think you very smart man, I think 100% you can deliver expectation. Smart man win always many time.  

Yes xiphon is making alot of changes to the code, we keep finding bugs with our testing thats why its taking such a long time to release the new wallet. Currently over 2000 lines of code was changed in the latest version.

I see the changes at github as well and think they're very positive to the coin, at least you guys seem to have found a dev who actually knows what he's doing and how a crypto works. Unlike the origin.

However with the catastrophic launch and the exploits used at this coin it's doomed already. You should consider a relaunch or a completely new launch with the fixed code. Pascal Plus or something..

Dev been transparent with everything ofcourse the code is buggy but that is because we have copied the original code but like you said the code changes being made are positive. more bugs will be eliminated. we dont strive to be better than pascal but better together. if they have some code which benefits us we will take it, if we have code to benefit them they can take it. I'm seeing this as a good alternative

[adaseb]

I see the changes at github as well and think they're very positive to the coin, at least you guys seem to have found a dev who actually knows what he's doing and how a crypto works. Unlike the origin.

However with the catastrophic launch and the exploits used at this coin it's doomed already. You should consider a relaunch or a completely new launch with the fixed code. Pascal Plus or something..

Thanks for your comments.

Yes I agree the launch for this coin might of not been fair. However a few days after the launch when the difficulty finally stabilized the mining was pretty fair in my opinion.

The problem was that there was too many people who tried solomining with 1 or 2 GPUS against a network hashrate of 200,000MHS are the reason for most of the negative comments in this thread. That and I have reason to believe the Nvidia solo miner AND the PascalMiner 0.2 ( on RX series GPUs) were buggy from time to time when solo mining. Only the old Proxy miner was reliable.

After people started demanding "relaunch" I started getting PMs from the miners who showed me proof that they had 200 GPUs pointed at this coin. They sent me photos and everything.

After about 2 weeks the difficulty started to die down on this coin and you could of mined with a single GPU and been able to solve a few blocks per day.

2 weeks after that is when the software was upgraded and a network adjusted time was introduced along with a pool.

So even though the launch wasn't fair the majority of the mining time after that was pretty fair.

[ulfsaar]

I see the changes at github as well and think they're very positive to the coin, at least you guys seem to have found a dev who actually knows what he's doing and how a crypto works. Unlike the origin.

However with the catastrophic launch and the exploits used at this coin it's doomed already. You should consider a relaunch or a completely new launch with the fixed code. Pascal Plus or something..

Thanks for your comments.

Yes I agree the launch for this coin might of not been fair. However a few days after the launch when the difficulty finally stabilized the mining was pretty fair in my opinion.

The problem was that there was too many people who tried solomining with 1 or 2 GPUS against a network hashrate of 200,000MHS are the reason for most of the negative comments in this thread. That and I have reason to believe the Nvidia solo miner AND the PascalMiner 0.2 ( on RX series GPUs) were buggy from time to time when solo mining. Only the old Proxy miner was reliable.

After people started demanding "relaunch" I started getting PMs from the miners who showed me proof that they had 200 GPUs pointed at this coin. They sent me photos and everything.

After about 2 weeks the difficulty started to die down on this coin and you could of mined with a single GPU and been able to solve a few blocks per day.

2 weeks after that is when the software was upgraded and a network adjusted time was introduced along with a pool.

So even though the launch wasn't fair the majority of the mining time after that was pretty fair.

This true. i start honest then many are not honest. i try to do what they do and i do it successfuly. Now code change, I cannot do what i did and I cannot see any miner doing cheating. all user honest time in here now, This chain honesty policy best applied. Good work to our dev. I give you 10 very tight and very wet you know. you like very much.

[adaseb]

The only cheater in the last 30 days that I can recall is that "wetpussy" guy who was doing the timedrift cheat by setting his clock like +60 sec ahead.

However he only mined with like 1 or 2 GPUs and hardly solved any blocks. Yes there is a possibility that some other miner might of found the next block within 60 seconds that got rejected but since he seldom found blocks the cheating was kept to a minimum.

CMCMCMC never cheated he only used custom software and set his timestamp to equal the last solved blocks timestamp. However this didn't benefit him in any way.

[adaseb]

When I look at the node list,
I can see 2 Servers v1.4.3 and 3 with v1.4.4.

Should I upgrade, and where 2 find ?

 

P.S. could someone donate me an account [9C5FA1300C6E084907F083E9A350BACF5C803E23DB846225B4F95B8AA15A2375] please ?

By the way this isn't a public key its a private key. Erase your wallet file and create a new one. Don't use this one since your private key is exposed on the internet.

[ulfsaar]

I think when code change DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT better here than orig. Difficulty behaviour very good now. no swing big, not like when many cheat, difficulty like children ride "seesaw". Good work dev. I wish i put more gpu in here when hashrate low. Electricity very expensive in my place, If i put many I will negative everyday because this no value yet.

[adaseb]

I think when code change DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT better here than orig. Difficulty behaviour very good now. no swing big, not like when many cheat, difficulty like children ride "seesaw". Good work dev. I wish i put more gpu in here when hashrate low. Electricity very expensive in my place, If i put many I will negative everyday because this no value yet.

The difficulty adjustment still needs to be fixed. Its the same as the original. Its an easy fix we just need to tighten the factor.

[ulfsaar]

I think when code change DIFFICULTY ADJUSTMENT better here than orig. Difficulty behaviour very good now. no swing big, not like when many cheat, difficulty like children ride "seesaw". Good work dev. I wish i put more gpu in here when hashrate low. Electricity very expensive in my place, If i put many I will negative everyday because this no value yet.

The difficulty adjustment still needs to be fixed. Its the same as the original. Its an easy fix we just need to tighten the factor.

Ok. may be i see it wrong or may be only becuase all use honest time now. and only few miners. Continue good work dev.

[PanneKopp]

your key shows an error make sure its correct

TXS 4 the attempt,

hope this one is better:

[ 3GhhbojpMwPZtttUmDUNrkZsjVPNtgKE3EWTLvjQES2hSnE4jAio26pB8MXxSVjmF9CfT1psWhtj5AB MXCpsYr8ptsqPbXAg37ydeQ ]

 

[PanneKopp]

The only cheater in the last 30 days that I can recall is that "wetpussy" guy who was doing the timedrift cheat by setting his clock like +60 sec ahead.

However he only mined with like 1 or 2 GPUs and hardly solved any blocks. Yes there is a possibility that some other miner might of found the next block within 60 seconds that got rejected but since he seldom found blocks the cheating was kept to a minimum.

I guess, he introduced himself a few posts be4 ^^

[PanneKopp]

Only the old Proxy miner was reliable.

Could you pls. give a link ?

 

P.S. don´t you think it would be a good idea, 2 change default ports, e.G. -> 4005 + 4010 ?
P.P.S.: Clients: 2 x 1.4.3, 1 x 1.4.4 Servers: 2 x 1.4.3, 3 x 1.4.4 - my temp IP 79.230.11.128

[bitcoinwonders010]

your key shows an error make sure its correct

TXS 4 the attempt,

hope this one is better:

[ 3GhhbojpMwPZtttUmDUNrkZsjVPNtgKE3EWTLvjQES2hSnE4jAio26pB8MXxSVjmF9CfT1psWhtj5AB MXCpsYr8ptsqPbXAg37ydeQ ]

 

Sent you an account

[lockepi]

Pascal was very buggy in the beginning, it didn't relaunch it improved

[PanneKopp]

Dev been transparent with everything ofcourse the code is buggy but that is because we have copied the original code but like you said the code changes being made are positive. more bugs will be eliminated.

we dont strive to be better than pascal but better together.

if they have some code which benefits us we will take it, if we have code to benefit them they can take it.

I'm seeing this as a good alternative

... well said - this is, how community works.

Pascal was very buggy in the beginning, it didn't relaunch it improved

Is n´t that, what we are working 4 ?

[PanneKopp]

Sent you an account

THX, it´s yellow now.

Maybe next week, I can throw a few RX-470 2 the project.

[adaseb]

PanneKopp, did you read this reply???

When I look at the node list,
I can see 2 Servers v1.4.3 and 3 with v1.4.4.

Should I upgrade, and where 2 find ?

 

P.S. could someone donate me an account [9C5FA1300C6E084907F083E9A350BACF5C803E23DB846225B4F95B8AA15A2375] please ?

By the way this isn't a public key its a private key. Erase your wallet file and create a new one. Don't use this one since your private key is exposed on the internet.

[PanneKopp]

PanneKopp, did you read this reply???

yes, of course.

Did you see the correction ?

What do you think about default port change 4 PASL (=> 4005 + 4010) ?



Account Donation @ [ 3GhhbojpMwPZtttUmDUNrkZsjVPNtgKE3EWTLvjQES2hSnE4jAio26pB8MXxSVjmF9CfT1psWhtj5AB MXCpsYr8ptsqPbXAg37ydeQ ] welcome