kcanup
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1000
|
|
October 09, 2015, 09:30:56 PM |
|
Why the FTC price is still falling day by day with so many good news? Too many coins bro, also asic scrypt miners hashing hard Scrypt asics? Ftc is neoscrypt, I'm confused. Oops sorry its neoscrypt now since 2014 but think it was launched as scrypt coin first that was in my mind still lol
|
|
|
|
surfguy72
|
|
October 12, 2015, 03:22:55 PM |
|
Why the FTC price is still falling day by day with so many good news? Too many coins bro, also asic scrypt miners hashing hard Scrypt asics? Ftc is neoscrypt, I'm confused. Oops sorry its neoscrypt now since 2014 but think it was launched as scrypt coin first that was in my mind still lol Haha yes indeed
|
|
|
|
alt19
|
|
October 24, 2015, 11:01:42 AM |
|
FTC is a significant coin, it's included in the ALT19 Index and has been there since the beginning. Estimated altcoin inflation or total supply over the next 10 years? The information is needed for http://alt19.com/19/cryptocurrency.phpThank you
|
|
|
|
|
BitcoinNational
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
|
|
October 24, 2015, 12:55:45 PM |
|
hello. outsider stopping in for random suggestion. why doesn't FTC consider side-chain / merge mine tech? i believe VTC has established MM side chain options. no fork needed. but will require coding a new code base for Neo that can launch new coins that MM.
|
|
|
|
IncludeBeer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1164
Merit: 1010
|
|
October 24, 2015, 07:17:12 PM |
|
I'm having an issue with ccMiner after adding 2x GTX 750ti. Any ideas? *** ccminer 1.5.69-git(SP-MOD) for nVidia GPUs by sp-hash@github *** Built with VC++ 2013 and nVidia CUDA SDK 6.5
Based on pooler cpuminer 2.3.2 and the tpruvot@github fork CUDA support by Christian Buchner, Christian H. and DJM34 Includes optimizations implemented by sp, klaust, tpruvot, tsiv and pallas.
[2015-10-24 12:09:28] Starting Stratum on stratum+tcp://coinotron.com:3337 [2015-10-24 12:09:28] NVAPI GPU monitoring enabled. [2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 0 to cpu 0 (mask 1) [2015-10-24 12:09:28] 3 miner threads started, using 'neoscrypt' algorithm. [2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 1 to cpu 1 (mask 2) [2015-10-24 12:09:28] Binding thread 2 to cpu 2 (mask 4) [2015-10-24 12:09:28] Stratum difficulty set to 64 Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory. Cuda error in func 'scanhash_neoscrypt' at line 48 : out of memory. [2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991 [2015-10-24 12:09:29] coinotron.com:3337 neoscrypt block 932991
|
|
|
|
ChekaZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1884
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 25, 2015, 01:42:34 PM |
|
hello. outsider stopping in for random suggestion. why doesn't FTC consider side-chain / merge mine tech? i believe VTC has established MM side chain options. no fork needed. but will require coding a new code base for Neo that can launch new coins that MM.
We've discussed merged-mining and didnt agree on that plan. We had offers from Litecoin to be their sidechain, but that isnt our goal. Other Sidechains were also in our minds, like bitshares, but we also couldnt agree on that plan. Short explanation but I hope it helps. Regards, ChekaZ
|
BTC: 1Ges1taJ69W7eEMbQLcmNGnUZenBkCnn45 FTC: 6sxjM96KMZ7t4AmDTUKDZdq82Nj931VQvY
|
|
|
Eastwind
|
|
October 25, 2015, 04:50:47 PM |
|
hello. outsider stopping in for random suggestion. why doesn't FTC consider side-chain / merge mine tech? i believe VTC has established MM side chain options. no fork needed. but will require coding a new code base for Neo that can launch new coins that MM.
We've discussed merged-mining and didnt agree on that plan. We had offers from Litecoin to be their sidechain, but that isnt our goal. Other Sidechains were also in our minds, like bitshares, but we also couldnt agree on that plan. Short explanation but I hope it helps. Regards, ChekaZ FTC is neoscrypt, litecoin is scrypt. Can FTC merge mine with litecoin? Do you need to change the algorithm?
|
|
|
|
coinyoo
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 210
Merit: 100
★YoBit.Net★ 350+ Coins Exchange & Dice
|
|
October 25, 2015, 05:33:29 PM |
|
I have gained my first Feathercoin. Is there a list of shops which accept Feathercoins? I would like to spend them for some real stuff. Even if it would be a coffee
|
|
|
|
ChekaZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1884
Merit: 1005
|
|
October 27, 2015, 11:11:07 PM |
|
I have gained my first Feathercoin. Is there a list of shops which accept Feathercoins? I would like to spend them for some real stuff. Even if it would be a coffee Nice to hear! Here: https://www.feathercoin.com/merchants-who-accept-ftc/hello. outsider stopping in for random suggestion. why doesn't FTC consider side-chain / merge mine tech? i believe VTC has established MM side chain options. no fork needed. but will require coding a new code base for Neo that can launch new coins that MM.
We've discussed merged-mining and didnt agree on that plan. We had offers from Litecoin to be their sidechain, but that isnt our goal. Other Sidechains were also in our minds, like bitshares, but we also couldnt agree on that plan. Short explanation but I hope it helps. Regards, ChekaZ FTC is neoscrypt, litecoin is scrypt. Can FTC merge mine with litecoin? Do you need to change the algorithm? We've declined merged mining with Litecoin. - But yeah, it wouldnt fit either. Regards, ChekaZ
|
BTC: 1Ges1taJ69W7eEMbQLcmNGnUZenBkCnn45 FTC: 6sxjM96KMZ7t4AmDTUKDZdq82Nj931VQvY
|
|
|
BitcoinNational
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
|
|
October 28, 2015, 05:20:56 AM |
|
I have gained my first Feathercoin. Is there a list of shops which accept Feathercoins? I would like to spend them for some real stuff. Even if it would be a coffee Nice to hear! Here: https://www.feathercoin.com/merchants-who-accept-ftc/hello. outsider stopping in for random suggestion. why doesn't FTC consider side-chain / merge mine tech? i believe VTC has established MM side chain options. no fork needed. but will require coding a new code base for Neo that can launch new coins that MM.
We've discussed merged-mining and didnt agree on that plan. We had offers from Litecoin to be their sidechain, but that isnt our goal. Other Sidechains were also in our minds, like bitshares, but we also couldnt agree on that plan. Short explanation but I hope it helps. Regards, ChekaZ FTC is neoscrypt, litecoin is scrypt. Can FTC merge mine with litecoin? Do you need to change the algorithm? We've declined merged mining with Litecoin. - But yeah, it wouldnt fit either. Regards, ChekaZ Sorry, I wasn't suggesting merged mining with Litecoin. Rather developing MM for Neoscrypt so other coins could consider joining the network and lend hash power to FTC pools (and visa versa).
|
|
|
|
ghostlander
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1241
Merit: 1020
No surrender, no retreat, no regret.
|
|
October 28, 2015, 06:10:23 PM |
|
I have gained my first Feathercoin. Is there a list of shops which accept Feathercoins? I would like to spend them for some real stuff. Even if it would be a coffee Nice to hear! Here: https://www.feathercoin.com/merchants-who-accept-ftc/hello. outsider stopping in for random suggestion. why doesn't FTC consider side-chain / merge mine tech? i believe VTC has established MM side chain options. no fork needed. but will require coding a new code base for Neo that can launch new coins that MM.
We've discussed merged-mining and didnt agree on that plan. We had offers from Litecoin to be their sidechain, but that isnt our goal. Other Sidechains were also in our minds, like bitshares, but we also couldnt agree on that plan. Short explanation but I hope it helps. Regards, ChekaZ FTC is neoscrypt, litecoin is scrypt. Can FTC merge mine with litecoin? Do you need to change the algorithm? We've declined merged mining with Litecoin. - But yeah, it wouldnt fit either. Regards, ChekaZ Sorry, I wasn't suggesting merged mining with Litecoin. Rather developing MM for Neoscrypt so other coins could consider joining the network and lend hash power to FTC pools (and visa versa). The other NeoScrypt coins are rather small. Orbitcoin seems the largest, but it's 33% PoW and 67% PoS. Halcyon is even more into PoS (20% / 80%). Phoenixcoin is pure PoW now, but it could change depending on opportunities.
|
|
|
|
BitcoinNational
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1010
Join The Blockchain Revolution In Logistics
|
|
October 29, 2015, 05:10:14 AM Last edit: October 30, 2015, 10:54:16 AM by BitcoinNational |
|
I get that too ghostlander. It's not so much the immediate gain. More looking down the road. 3-5 year plan ... FTC still here? In order to thrive your gonna need an awesome possum network. The anti-ASIC POW sector is a bit crowded. How can FTC stand out from the competition? This is not forking FTC, but getting NeoScrypt as smart place to launch new POW projects in years 2017-2025. Feather takes the lead to make Neo MM "friendly/plug-n-play" for other coins. That makes FTC is a mighty big oak tree that lots of microcoins can take shade under. Anyways, the move is a necessary must have feather in your cap since your most immediate competitor already has MM ... that side projects called monocle? You can launch a new coin that's MM as a beta test before forking a already functioning project ... say UFO or whoever in the Neoscrypt that is in need of a hash boost. Again this is long term vision, and likely won't garner much public attention right now, it is about being positioned right for the future. Going to neoScrypt was the first step, finding the best way to build up that network is the next step. BONUS ... a few well branded POW scrypts would likely come over to your side as well since the ASICs are slowly squeezing in and will have the same effect as what happened to SHA256 alts. NeoScrypt is to FTC as SHA256 is to bitcoin ... and it be wisest to have lots of friends merge mining at your side ... besides the Doge coin in this scenario is evident
|
|
|
|
crypto_currency
|
|
October 29, 2015, 07:13:54 AM |
|
FTC wallet is the most fuctional wallet I've ever used.
|
|
|
|
Don007
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1007
Live like there is no tomorrow!
|
|
November 03, 2015, 01:40:08 PM |
|
FTC wallet is the most fuctional wallet I've ever used.
I just downloaded the latest version in order to synch my wallet. It looks fine to me! Unfortunately it has to 're-index the blocks' of more than 2½ years now, but I guess that will be done quite fast.
|
{Curently quite inactive as I'm really busy in my private life. I will get back soon!} -> Your line here during my inactivity? Feel free to PM <-
|
|
|
Conqueror
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1020
I was diagnosed with brain parasite
|
|
November 08, 2015, 04:01:44 PM |
|
I have gained my first Feathercoin. Is there a list of shops which accept Feathercoins? I would like to spend them for some real stuff. Even if it would be a coffee With Coinpayments its fair enough to say that you can use FTC anywhere BTC is accepted. That's pretty huge list
|
|
|
|
Conqueror
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1020
I was diagnosed with brain parasite
|
|
November 08, 2015, 04:10:11 PM |
|
I get that too ghostlander. It's not so much the immediate gain. More looking down the road. 3-5 year plan ... FTC still here? In order to thrive your gonna need an awesome possum network. The anti-ASIC POW sector is a bit crowded. How can FTC stand out from the competition? This is not forking FTC, but getting NeoScrypt as smart place to launch new POW projects in years 2017-2025. Feather takes the lead to make Neo MM "friendly/plug-n-play" for other coins. That makes FTC is a mighty big oak tree that lots of microcoins can take shade under. Anyways, the move is a necessary must have feather in your cap since your most immediate competitor already has MM ... that side projects called monocle? You can launch a new coin that's MM as a beta test before forking a already functioning project ... say UFO or whoever in the Neoscrypt that is in need of a hash boost. Again this is long term vision, and likely won't garner much public attention right now, it is about being positioned right for the future. Going to neoScrypt was the first step, finding the best way to build up that network is the next step. BONUS ... a few well branded POW scrypts would likely come over to your side as well since the ASICs are slowly squeezing in and will have the same effect as what happened to SHA256 alts. NeoScrypt is to FTC as SHA256 is to bitcoin ... and it be wisest to have lots of friends merge mining at your side ... besides the Doge coin in this scenario is evident Hi, thank you for interesting input. I think main goal for FTC should be fix all what BTC is doing wrong in as currency. With that said, its fine to ignore most of 2.0 garbage and focus on basics. There are 3 huge problems BTC is facing right now: scalability, speed, miners FTC is already better with first 2 issues, 3rd is bit more complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
entertheabyss
|
|
November 10, 2015, 12:41:19 AM Last edit: November 10, 2015, 01:04:21 AM by entertheabyss |
|
i am having an issue building feathercoin: base58_tests.cpp:93:10: note: bool base58_tests::TestAddrTypeVisitor::operator()(const CNoDestination&) const bool operator()(const CNoDestination &no) const ^ base58_tests.cpp:93:10: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘CStealthAddress’ to ‘const CNoDestination&’ Makefile:881: recipe for target 'test_bitcoin-base58_tests.o' failed make[4]: *** [test_bitcoin-base58_tests.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Makefile:923: recipe for target 'test_bitcoin-bloom_tests.o' failed make[4]: *** [test_bitcoin-bloom_tests.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/user/apps/Feathercoin/src/test' Makefile:700: recipe for target 'all' failed make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/user/apps/Feathercoin/src/test' Makefile:913: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/apps/Feathercoin/src' Makefile:666: recipe for target 'all' failed make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/user/apps/Feathercoin/src' Makefile:502: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
|
|
|
|
Conqueror
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1354
Merit: 1020
I was diagnosed with brain parasite
|
|
November 10, 2015, 08:00:40 AM |
|
i am having an issue building feathercoin: base58_tests.cpp:93:10: note: bool base58_tests::TestAddrTypeVisitor::operator()(const CNoDestination&) const bool operator()(const CNoDestination &no) const ^ base58_tests.cpp:93:10: note: no known conversion for argument 1 from ‘CStealthAddress’ to ‘const CNoDestination&’ Makefile:881: recipe for target 'test_bitcoin-base58_tests.o' failed make[4]: *** [test_bitcoin-base58_tests.o] Error 1 make[4]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... Makefile:923: recipe for target 'test_bitcoin-bloom_tests.o' failed make[4]: *** [test_bitcoin-bloom_tests.o] Error 1 make[4]: Leaving directory '/home/user/apps/Feathercoin/src/test' Makefile:700: recipe for target 'all' failed make[3]: *** [all] Error 2 make[3]: Leaving directory '/home/user/apps/Feathercoin/src/test' Makefile:913: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory '/home/user/apps/Feathercoin/src' Makefile:666: recipe for target 'all' failed make[1]: *** [all] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/user/apps/Feathercoin/src' Makefile:502: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed make: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
What version are you trying to compile?
|
|
|
|
|