|
|
|
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
RobFordWotWot
Sr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
time
|
 |
June 14, 2014, 06:24:32 AM |
|
You don't have to go home but you can't stay here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mythul
|
|
June 14, 2014, 06:36:27 AM |
|
Ah well, lost all profit I've made in the last month....guess I have to get used to the Bitcoin roller coaster.
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
June 14, 2014, 07:01:07 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parazyd
|
|
June 14, 2014, 07:18:48 AM |
|
Adam, told you that you're wrong  It's gonna be like this until the auction. |
|
|
|
|
|
segeln
|
|
June 14, 2014, 07:23:55 AM |
|
Why the sudden gloom? Price is falling a bit but still way up from April.
Some bad news that I did not see? Karpelès bought GHash.io? The FBI seized the blockchain? Satoshi committed seppuku?
+1 |
|
|
|
|
Searing
Copper Member
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2898
Merit: 1464
Clueless!
|
|
June 14, 2014, 07:27:38 AM |
|
Why the sudden gloom? Price is falling a bit but still way up from April.
Some bad news that I did not see? Karpelès bought GHash.io? The FBI seized the blockchain? Satoshi committed seppuku?
+1 yeah imagine if 'mark karpeles had GHash.io!....it is a 2 part process....1) have the capablity as a pool to muck up and fork the network and 2) have 'someone' dumb enough to try to 'game the system' and flush the bitcoin network down the toliet when he messes up again look at GOX a money makiing machine if ever there was one..and he still managed to flush it Searing |
|
|
|
|
N12
Donator
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1610
Merit: 1010
|
|
June 14, 2014, 07:51:45 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
nioc
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1008
|
|
June 14, 2014, 07:59:04 AM |
|
also withholding blocks, to manipulate the perceived hashrate and effectively attack other mining pools, is a problem The block withholding attack might actually end up being what limits the size of pools in the end. If it's no longer safe to accept random members of the public into a pool, then the pool membership needs to be limited to trusted hashers. This means a larger number of pools for a given number of hashers. +1 Block withholding attack far more serious issue I think than people realize. @justusranvier, it doesn't work that way. It's the pool that is holding back the blocks not the members. ORLY? https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=441465.msg7282674#msg7282674 |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2170
Merit: 1776
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:00:59 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
blatchcorn
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:01:59 AM |
|
Their perceived likelihood of a 51% attack is way too high for my likings |
|
|
|
|
|
akujin
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:07:01 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Parazyd
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:09:43 AM |
|
Yet another entry opportunity  |
|
|
|
|
sidhujag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:11:17 AM |
|
also withholding blocks, to manipulate the perceived hashrate and effectively attack other mining pools, is a problem The block withholding attack might actually end up being what limits the size of pools in the end. If it's no longer safe to accept random members of the public into a pool, then the pool membership needs to be limited to trusted hashers. This means a larger number of pools for a given number of hashers. +1 Block withholding attack far more serious issue I think than people realize. I keep reading this. Its a far less serious issue than I think YOU and most people like you realize. BTW there are 2 types of block withholding attacks you know? |
|
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:13:10 AM |
|
Bottom catchers get ready for the next 50-100$ candle!
Gravity still seems to work. Finix trying to catch up with Stamp. Gogogo margin calls.
|
|
|
|
|
sidhujag
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2044
Merit: 1005
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:13:25 AM |
|
also withholding blocks, to manipulate the perceived hashrate and effectively attack other mining pools, is a problem The block withholding attack might actually end up being what limits the size of pools in the end. If it's no longer safe to accept random members of the public into a pool, then the pool membership needs to be limited to trusted hashers. This means a larger number of pools for a given number of hashers. +1 Block withholding attack far more serious issue I think than people realize. @justusranvier, it doesn't work that way. It's the pool that is holding back the blocks not the members. Go back to school fool. |
|
|
|
|
|
Parazyd
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:17:53 AM |
|
Reading this it feels like bitcoin is bound to fail   Anything from the Bitcoin Foundation seems like a fail. |
|
|
|
|
|
akujin
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:19:17 AM
Last edit: June 14, 2014, 08:34:32 AM by akujin |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
the_sunship
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:19:58 AM |
|
Whether the 51% attack is a real threat or not makes no difference. Perception is all that matters, and that is affecting the price right now. The perception of bitcoin in the media has improved dramatically, but this could set off another round of FUD articles.
Clever arguments to the contrary won't matter. Finding a solution to this perceived threat will. It can also show how the greater bitcoin community can fix its own issues, which any long term investor would find compelling.
|
|
|
|
|
Dotto
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 981
Merit: 1005
No maps for these territories
|
|
June 14, 2014, 08:22:41 AM |
|
I smell the panic all over thread in the last days... a good indicator that we can be closer to the rally that people thinks.
Strong buy zone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
