Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[XxionxX]

It's just someone promoting cannabis.

Got it, will spend my money and blazeit instead of buying the dip.

[1714897170]

1714897170

[1714897170]

1714897170

[1714897170]

1714897170

[1714897170]

1714897170

[1714897170]

1714897170

[isov]

Adam, you should do a poll: "when btc price is going to be bigger than number of pages in this thread."

[gog1]

So is this wall at 420 bear bait or what? At least this is interesting, the last few months have been boring as hell.

I think it'll be eaten live!

[Dump3er]

what if its sold into in a panic liquidity grab but then we see there isn't much poeple willing to sell below 420, and buyers slowly bring use back over 425.

[Richy_T]

lol

The longer one was better and more appropriate but the bitcointalk image proxy didn't like it.

http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view1/4310385/old-ladies-handbag-o.gif

[Dump3er]

...Or maybe the poster just have some sort of a mental disorder.
Honestly, I find JorgeStolfi's long-winded post more interesting than yours. At least he's talking about bitcoin on a thread which is about bitcoin..

When you are referring to "the poster," you are referring to me.

This is the speculation forum, so I suppose it remains fair to speculate; however, your evidence regarding the extent to which I could have a mental disorder seems to be sparse, at best.  In other words, you seem to be engaged in gratuitous name-calling without any evidence and very little substantive discussion of anything of any relevance.

Regarding Jorge as compared with me:  I have NO problem with you finding him relatively more interesting than me.  That is your personal choice.  Also, it does NOT seem to serve any purpose to discuss your personal preferences, so a bit difficult to understand what point you are attempting to get at, here.

Actually when I said "the poster", I was referring to people who posts lengthy and unnecessary replies  
It's not my fault if you feel like you're one of those people which could possibly have some mental disorder...  

The discussion is not about my personal preferences... It's about the content of his post compared to yours and the thread where you are posting.  I guess you really does have some problems understanding things.

You are sounding a bit delusional,  paranoid and self-absorbed in your attempts to justify your supposed important claims about BTC price movements.  

Nope. If I am, I would have posted long winded post explaining it like what you do 
And aren't we talking about the "bulltard" thingy and about the "name calling"  

I believe that was the main topic that we started with was my comment that it seemed inflammatory to be throwing out the term bulltard, when there may be better ways to express some of your ideas, to the extent that you may have substantive ideas, which I am beginning to have my doubts.

Yup. You were lecturing me how bad name-calling is and how you dislike such behavior...
Until I remember one of your post that condone such behavior.
Yes.. "Bulltard" seemed insulting but not "cuntface" or "loser"..  LOL!

Well, at least you have an ability to kind of remember how we began to go down this rabbit hole of a topic; however, you do seem to have a tendency to get caught up into trivial technicalities.  Hopefully, you will grow out of this at some point, but probably NOT in the short-term context of our exchanging texts.  Sometimes it takes years and experiences to grow out of bad and/or immaturity habits.

Of course I remember it.. It's only you who keeps mentioning about unnecessary things. So, what does "attempts to justify your supposed important claims about BTC price movements" has to do with name-calling? And if you actually checked that post, you'd see that I merely posted the current price of btc at that time when the bulltards started posting insulting language. You also mentioned that "the higher the level of derrogatory-ness may cause more attention", how come I didn't see you trying to approach them and lecture them about their improper behavior?  I don't think you were not able to read their posts since it's just a few words.

I don't think I need to explain this further.. Let's not forget this one so people would see it clearly:

 

Yes.. more examples of your triviality and your getting caught up in unimportant and NON-substantive points.

It's not unimportant.. That's where I realized the real reason why you approached me  

You seem to be devolving into a status of wanting to argue, just for the sake of it... and even using the lines that I had used on you, directed towards me?  At least you could come up with something a little more substantive and/or original.

Says the guy who suddenly pop out of nowhere and started arguing with me. LOL!

I find some of your logic to be quite strange, and maybe at some point you will understand that there is a difference between substantive and productive engaging and inflammatory engaging?   You seem to NOT really recognize the extent to which you have a tendency to employ what appears to be inflammatory engaging.  I doubt that you are going to change these ways anytime soon, especially, if you seem to conclude that your purposes are served by such.

Well isn't arguing with me the main purpose why you approached me? Probably you got butthurt when I mentioned "THOSE bulltards" and maybe you're one of them.
I doubt you approached me to discuss about name-calling in this thread and because you dislike such behavior in this thread because this posts: (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg7298719#msg7298719)
clearly shows that you aren't concerned about that.

and even using the lines that I had used on you, directed towards me?

Because it suits you better than me..   
It seems like you were locked up in the basement with nothing but your laptop and desperately seeking for attention in the interwebs 
 

You are NOT really saying much, here.
 

Yeah right  

-------------------------


I'm outta here

Oh.. and one more thing that is probably a psychological problem for you is that you seem to be viewing your interactions here on the interwebs as some kind of competition, including these recent posts with me.  There may be some posters who are competing, but I am NOT one of them..    So step back from the keyboard, sir, ma'am or bot!!!!!!  

Heh I posted that when I got bored waiting for a reply   I can't believe you'd even say something about that... I guess that is probably a psychological problem for you... LOL!
You step away from the keyboard bulltard...  

Again, you do NOT seem to be saying anything new, here.  You are merely taking the lines that I used that were directed towards you, and then directing the lines towards me.  Seems like you are running on pure emotion rather than reason.  Maybe on the positive shows that you are a human rather than a bot...?   And, if you are a bot, you are sure seeming to be an emotional one.. that is lashing out and grasping at straws....   

Because there's really nothing to talk about that... LOL! I can't believe you'd even react with my exit phrase/image.. LOL!
I guess it's probably some sort of a psychological problem.. You'd always find a reason to slap your long-winded post. 
I wouldn't be surprised if we later end up with you lecturing me about my grammatical errors. 

You wouldn't be surprised if I were to attempt to correct your grammar because again you are engaging in what seems to be pure speculation that has little to no basis in reality.  I hope that your attempts to forecast the price direction of BTC are better than your whimsical attempts to analyze and predict the personalities and behaviors of pseudo-anonymous persons on the internet?

Well based on how you react with a single image and a three letter sentence, and how it ended up with something like "psychological problem", "competition", "bot", "emotion", etc. , there's a posibillity that we end up with that since you already mentioned about my sentences not comprehensible  

There seems to be quite a bit stream of consciousness going on here, and loose connections, and seems like you are getting a bit worked up over this, at least to the extent that your sentences are NOT really comprehensible in a self-contained manner, but hinge on a form of fill-in-the-blank puzzle.

This might need a new thread judging only by its length.

There's no way I'm gonna attempt reading all that.

QFF

[adamstgBit]

omg let it go!

[Raystonn]

omg let it go!

Queue "Frozen" music.

[Richy_T]

omg let it go!

For all the complaining about direct insults, sometimes it's better just to call someone a c**t and move on.

[adamstgBit]

omg let it go!

Queue "Frozen" music.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk

who doesn't love this song?

its AWESOME

[adamstgBit]

market says : DROP YOUR BAGS BITCHES~!

market speaks to me...

[akujin]

finex doesn't have the spikes they used to have anymore  
Perhaps I should just move to btce. Moves like 385 to 449 to 406 looks attracting

[cbeast]

All of these big walls are gambits and nothing to fear. Call their bluff.

[EuroTrash]

Or maybe it's just old style manipulation and a dumper is simply selling over 420 with no slippage.

[edwardspitz]

Or maybe it's just old style manipulation and a dumper is simply selling over 420 with no slippage.

Bears fear it is real. Maybe bulls should test it instead? If they confirm it is real shorters begin to panic.

[adamstgBit]

[spooderman]

How does a bull test a bidwall (without temporarily becoming a bear)?

[kodtycoon]

How does a bull test a bidwall (without temporarily becoming a bear)?

put up a far bigger ask wall?

[adamstgBit]

How does a bull test a bidwall (without temporarily becoming a bear)?

through leading?

[edwardspitz]

How does a bull test a bidwall (without temporarily becoming a bear)?

Yes it is a bit of a head fuck