Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[akujin]

Party's over... dump dump dump  

Only people with coins can dump

Nope, i just took a dump

Ha. True.

In other news we can expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell

Not sure wtf these guys are talking about..
If you're one of the bulltards, then you should just click that logout button and come back when btc is worth $10k...
Can't understand why these guys argue with people who trade everyday.. LOL

I doubt this thread is ONLY useful or inviting to day traders.  Sounds a bit over the top.  

Also the fact that you refer to people who are bullish about BTC as "bulltards" demonstrates that you are lacking in some perspective regarding how you refer to people who may have a different perspective from you.

Even people who are bullish about the price direction of BTC may want to monitor this thread because they may want to continue to buy on dips and attempt to predict when those BTC price dips are going to occur based on ongoing market movements, news, TAs, FUD spreading, etc.

So, where did I say that those bullish about btc are bulltards? Stop making stories..  
For me, bulltards are those  who attack people when they say something like btc is going down and they think that the price should just shoot straight up.
And bullish are people who believe in bitcoin;s future and they aren't affected by these dumps .

Why call anyone "bulltards"?  Makes little sense to me, because NO matter what the term is inaccurate, even if you attempt to define who is in such a camp and who is NOT... .. .. but whatever, you feel it is helpful to categorize some posters as bulltards, then I suppose that is your choice.   

Why call them bulltards? Because they behave like retarded bulls.  
I searched what a "bulltard" is and here's what I found:
-a bull tard is person who is both retarded* and extremely aggressive. Often possesses "tard strength." This person would rather fight you than talk it out; would rather use violence than intellect
-An idiot who thinks that stock markets always rise.

From that, I could say, my own definition of "bulltard" is not far from what others think what a bulltard is.
I don't even understand why you're being affected with my post  

I am just responding to your perceived need to Name-call.  I don't see it as necessary, except maybe under rare circumstances.

Sometimes I have been accused of name calling; however, I deny employing such tactics because I usually, instead, describe the idiocy of the behavior that I witness rather than calling names... Anyhow, it may be merely a personal choice regarding the extent to which you think that it is fruitful to engage in calling people "bulltards," even if you believe that their conduct rises to the level to meet such definition...

Like i said, in the end, it is your choice regarding how you want to communicate in a public thread (even if you happen to be posting under a pseudo-anonymous name, which a large majority of us are).

So who among us started name-calling? Why didn't you react when he said "bear"?
From his post "expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell", I could clearly say he's one of the "bulltards". And I could feel the sarcasm in his post.
A normal person who uses his brain would usually ask the poster "why" he think the price would go down.
And a bulltard would just call people a "bear" and most would resort to personal attacks.

[1714888431]

1714888431

[1714888431]

1714888431

[findftp]

But but but they said bitcoin was dead.

O.k.  I am going to go on a limb and make a bold prediction. 

Five days from this post (date and time), we are going above 8,888 pages in this thread, unless the post-dumpers go on a dumping rampage, for shits and giggles, then INEVITABLY they will NOT be able to dump beyond 8 days - therefore, the outside INEVITABILITY will be that this thread will go above 8,888 pages in 8 days from this post (date and time). 

You heard it here, first!!!   

No, I was first because I came up with the 8888 because Christine Lagardes 7777 did not work.
I said it over and over again.
8888 will be the bubble start

[JayJuanGee]

Party's over... dump dump dump  

Only people with coins can dump

Nope, i just took a dump

Ha. True.

In other news we can expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell

Not sure wtf these guys are talking about..
If you're one of the bulltards, then you should just click that logout button and come back when btc is worth $10k...
Can't understand why these guys argue with people who trade everyday.. LOL

I doubt this thread is ONLY useful or inviting to day traders.  Sounds a bit over the top.  

Also the fact that you refer to people who are bullish about BTC as "bulltards" demonstrates that you are lacking in some perspective regarding how you refer to people who may have a different perspective from you.

Even people who are bullish about the price direction of BTC may want to monitor this thread because they may want to continue to buy on dips and attempt to predict when those BTC price dips are going to occur based on ongoing market movements, news, TAs, FUD spreading, etc.

So, where did I say that those bullish about btc are bulltards? Stop making stories..  
For me, bulltards are those  who attack people when they say something like btc is going down and they think that the price should just shoot straight up.
And bullish are people who believe in bitcoin;s future and they aren't affected by these dumps .

Why call anyone "bulltards"?  Makes little sense to me, because NO matter what the term is inaccurate, even if you attempt to define who is in such a camp and who is NOT... .. .. but whatever, you feel it is helpful to categorize some posters as bulltards, then I suppose that is your choice.   

Why call them bulltards? Because they behave like retarded bulls.  
I searched what a "bulltard" is and here's what I found:
-a bull tard is person who is both retarded* and extremely aggressive. Often possesses "tard strength." This person would rather fight you than talk it out; would rather use violence than intellect
-An idiot who thinks that stock markets always rise.

From that, I could say, my own definition of "bulltard" is not far from what others think what a bulltard is.
I don't even understand why you're being affected with my post  

I am just responding to your perceived need to Name-call.  I don't see it as necessary, except maybe under rare circumstances.

Sometimes I have been accused of name calling; however, I deny employing such tactics because I usually, instead, describe the idiocy of the behavior that I witness rather than calling names... Anyhow, it may be merely a personal choice regarding the extent to which you think that it is fruitful to engage in calling people "bulltards," even if you believe that their conduct rises to the level to meet such definition...

Like i said, in the end, it is your choice regarding how you want to communicate in a public thread (even if you happen to be posting under a pseudo-anonymous name, which a large majority of us are).

So who among us started name-calling? Why didn't you react when he said "bear"?
From his post "expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell", I could clearly say he's one of the "bulltards". And I could feel the sarcasm in his post.
A normal person who uses his brain would usually ask the poster "why" he think the price would go down.
And a bulltard would just call people a "bear" and most would resort to personal attacks.

I suppose name calling is all a matter of degree, and it is almost as bad to call someone a bull as it is to call them a bulltard, but of course the term bulltard is more derogatory... that should be obvious.. .. and the higher the level of derrogatory-ness may cause more attention.. and of course, each of us may NOT closely read every post.. especially if the post is NOT initially directed towards us....

A similar  problem in my thinking would be to call someone a bear or a beartard, both are bad, but calling someone a beartard would be more derogatory..which also should seem obvious... and unnecessary.. no? except maybe rare circumstances...

I would think that it would be better to criticize someone's view by describing their actions or the subject of their posts or to suggest that they cannot see the facts correctly because they are scewed by bearish or bullish preconceptions..

Anyhow, frequently, in my humble bumble opinion, there are better ways to criticize poster for their ideas or the scewed nature of their ideas rather than to getting into name calling. or categorizing people... sometimes I may refer to some poster as a bot.. which I suppose is a bit derrogatory, but many times it is said in jest... I suppose a poster could be a bot-tard, and maybe that could be funny too, if it is NOT over used... or used as a distraction from their ideas... truly there are some ideas that are circulated in this thread that seem to be somewhat devoid of meaning.. and are robotic in nature.. and other ideas are fleshed out more thoroughly...

[JayJuanGee]

But but but they said bitcoin was dead.

O.k.  I am going to go on a limb and make a bold prediction.  

Five days from this post (date and time), we are going above 8,888 pages in this thread, unless the post-dumpers go on a dumping rampage, for shits and giggles, then INEVITABLY they will NOT be able to dump beyond 8 days - therefore, the outside INEVITABILITY will be that this thread will go above 8,888 pages in 8 days from this post (date and time).  

You heard it here, first!!!    

No, I was first because I came up with the 8888 because Christine Lagardes 7777 did not work.
I said it over and over again.
8888 will be the bubble start

NO.... I am the first!!!!    I invented the number 8,888, or at least I was the first to identify it in the wild.  

[Torque]

Up or down in the next 24h hours? And, WHY?

I'm sure I am not going to become popular with my bearish sentiment here on this board full of bulls, especially when we just had that rally upwards. But I'll give it a try:

Up only if a whale decides to push us there, and only if those walls @ $465 and $500 (Bitstamp) belong to the whales so that they can be removed quickly in order to facilitate some quick price action upwards that finally triggers all those short margin calls.

But my guess is we will go down, even if we see another small rally beforehand. Buying action was surprisingly unimpressive after we dropped into the 370s, so it's probably going to be even worse now that we are back in the 440s - despite the paypal news, which is IMHO completely blown out of proportion and will probably fail to bring in a significant number of new buyers. So we'll probably get the same combination of slowly bleeding down together with some unexpected rapid dumps that we have seen in the last couple of weeks. This is still a bear market overall, and unless something fundamentally changes it's probably going to stay that way for the next weeks.

Next stop: 350s, maybe with a short-lived dip into the $320-$330 range. There we (and especially the whales) are going to find out if organic buying pressure will finally pick up, which would mean that the bottom is probably in. Otherwise we are going down even further into the 200s.

All IMHO, of course.

I'm a long term bull, but short term a little bearish.  I'm just not seeing the expected volume either.  So I do think it will grind back down again for a while.  Unless a few more whales come along and do again what happened today.

The only thing I disagree with is dip all the way down to 350's.  Just not seeing it, the market has some stubborn support down there.  I would buy heavily at that level.

So I think back to $380-390 is a possibility, but make take a few weeks.

[BitChick]

But but but they said bitcoin was dead.

O.k.  I am going to go on a limb and make a bold prediction.  

Five days from this post (date and time), we are going above 8,888 pages in this thread, unless the post-dumpers go on a dumping rampage, for shits and giggles, then INEVITABLY they will NOT be able to dump beyond 8 days - therefore, the outside INEVITABILITY will be that this thread will go above 8,888 pages in 8 days from this post (date and time).  

You heard it here, first!!!    

No, I was first because I came up with the 8888 because Christine Lagardes 7777 did not work.
I said it over and over again.
8888 will be the bubble start

NO.... I am the first!!!!    I invented the number 8,888, or at least I was the first to identify it in the wild.  

9999.

Wait.  No.  I really don't want to wait that long.

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
https://i.imgur.com/WeAxjut.png
https://i.imgur.com/BUbRFri.png

[akujin]

Party's over... dump dump dump  

Only people with coins can dump

Nope, i just took a dump

Ha. True.

In other news we can expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell

Not sure wtf these guys are talking about..
If you're one of the bulltards, then you should just click that logout button and come back when btc is worth $10k...
Can't understand why these guys argue with people who trade everyday.. LOL

I doubt this thread is ONLY useful or inviting to day traders.  Sounds a bit over the top.  

Also the fact that you refer to people who are bullish about BTC as "bulltards" demonstrates that you are lacking in some perspective regarding how you refer to people who may have a different perspective from you.

Even people who are bullish about the price direction of BTC may want to monitor this thread because they may want to continue to buy on dips and attempt to predict when those BTC price dips are going to occur based on ongoing market movements, news, TAs, FUD spreading, etc.

So, where did I say that those bullish about btc are bulltards? Stop making stories..  
For me, bulltards are those  who attack people when they say something like btc is going down and they think that the price should just shoot straight up.
And bullish are people who believe in bitcoin;s future and they aren't affected by these dumps .

Why call anyone "bulltards"?  Makes little sense to me, because NO matter what the term is inaccurate, even if you attempt to define who is in such a camp and who is NOT... .. .. but whatever, you feel it is helpful to categorize some posters as bulltards, then I suppose that is your choice.    

Why call them bulltards? Because they behave like retarded bulls.  
I searched what a "bulltard" is and here's what I found:
-a bull tard is person who is both retarded* and extremely aggressive. Often possesses "tard strength." This person would rather fight you than talk it out; would rather use violence than intellect
-An idiot who thinks that stock markets always rise.

From that, I could say, my own definition of "bulltard" is not far from what others think what a bulltard is.
I don't even understand why you're being affected with my post  

I am just responding to your perceived need to Name-call.  I don't see it as necessary, except maybe under rare circumstances.

Sometimes I have been accused of name calling; however, I deny employing such tactics because I usually, instead, describe the idiocy of the behavior that I witness rather than calling names... Anyhow, it may be merely a personal choice regarding the extent to which you think that it is fruitful to engage in calling people "bulltards," even if you believe that their conduct rises to the level to meet such definition...

Like i said, in the end, it is your choice regarding how you want to communicate in a public thread (even if you happen to be posting under a pseudo-anonymous name, which a large majority of us are).

So who among us started name-calling? Why didn't you react when he said "bear"?
From his post "expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell", I could clearly say he's one of the "bulltards". And I could feel the sarcasm in his post.
A normal person who uses his brain would usually ask the poster "why" he think the price would go down.
And a bulltard would just call people a "bear" and most would resort to personal attacks.

I suppose name calling is all a matter of degree, and it is almost as bad to call someone a bull as it is to call them a bulltard, but of course the term bulltard is more derogatory... that should be obvious.. .. and the higher the level of derrogatory-ness may cause more attention.. and of course, each of us may NOT closely read every post.. especially if the post is NOT initially directed towards us....

A similar  problem in my thinking would be to call someone a bear or a beartard, both are bad, but calling someone a beartard would be more derogatory..which also should seem obvious... and unnecessary.. no? except maybe rare circumstances...

I would think that it would be better to criticize someone's view by describing their actions or the subject of their posts or to suggest that they cannot see the facts correctly because they are scewed by bearish or bullish preconceptions..

Anyhow, frequently, in my humble bumble opinion, there are better ways to criticize poster for their ideas or the scewed nature of their ideas rather than to getting into name calling. or categorizing people... sometimes I may refer to some poster as a bot.. which I suppose is a bit derrogatory, but many times it is said in jest... I suppose a poster could be a bot-tard, and maybe that could be funny too, if it is NOT over used... or used as a distraction from their ideas... truly there are some ideas that are circulated in this thread that seem to be somewhat devoid of meaning.. and are robotic in nature.. and other ideas are fleshed out more thoroughly...

Ah! So you're trying to be the Guidance Counselor/prefect of discipline in this thread? The righteous one who protect the oppressed? How come I didn't see you protecting me when this guy called me cuntface. I don't think you didn't see what he posted.

troll bs

Hey cuntface!  

Please don't insult women's genitalia by using them to refer to this loser.

+1

+2  

The 4th member has now arrived  

I guess that post explains why you reacted with the word "bulltard"

Heh! I just said "570s" which is the price of btc at that time and someone called me cuntface and the O righteous one joined the bulltards..  


-------------------------


I'm outta here

[adamstgBit]

[adamstgBit]

still waiting for my funds to arrive 

[TsuyokuNaritai]

Goodbye Bitcoin it was nice knowing you !!!

Have just cashed out and dont think I will be coming back :-( seems like the whales are killing the geese that lay the golden eggs !!!

[adamstgBit]

[ChartBuddy]

Explanation
https://i.imgur.com/fOuIcrr.png
https://i.imgur.com/zjWCjIj.png

[Davyd05]

still waiting for my funds to arrive 

bro bro could've setup online banking by now lol, and interac'd online

[TsuyokuNaritai]

lol yeah he must get the award for worst timing trade haha.

Shorts are still over 10.5k, there's strong bid support, bears still think it's going down, things are looking good  

Indeed. When the Chinese shorts wake up and exit their shorts it'll drive the price up, then one after another the slower/dumber shorts will get squeeEEEEEeeezed and it'll force it up some more...

[Davyd05]

lol yeah he must get the award for worst timing trade haha.

Shorts are still over 10.5k, there's strong bid support, bears still think it's going down, things are looking good  

many people feel we still need to revisit low 360 ish territory and maybe crash through, I don't see a need in it...besides bears being negative to the year of forward progress in the fundamentals.

[adamstgBit]

still waiting for my funds to arrive  

bro bro could've setup online banking by now lol, and interac'd online

its all good, my fund transfer taking some time is preventing me from panic buying. soon the price will drop below 400 again! and i will buy buy buy!!! muahahaha

[criptix]

we need a new vote!!

whats the price tommorow?

[Davyd05]

still waiting for my funds to arrive  

bro bro could've setup online banking by now lol, and interac'd online

its all good, my fund transfer taking some time is preventing me from panic buying. soon the price will drop below 400 again! and i will buy buy buy!!! muahahaha

if we go back towards 400, I'd say pick em up near 3xx best of luck to you I got mine at 428cad and 455cad I could pick up more if the time occurs.

[JayJuanGee]

Party's over... dump dump dump  

Only people with coins can dump

Nope, i just took a dump

Ha. True.

In other news we can expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell

Not sure wtf these guys are talking about..
If you're one of the bulltards, then you should just click that logout button and come back when btc is worth $10k...
Can't understand why these guys argue with people who trade everyday.. LOL

I doubt this thread is ONLY useful or inviting to day traders.  Sounds a bit over the top.  

Also the fact that you refer to people who are bullish about BTC as "bulltards" demonstrates that you are lacking in some perspective regarding how you refer to people who may have a different perspective from you.

Even people who are bullish about the price direction of BTC may want to monitor this thread because they may want to continue to buy on dips and attempt to predict when those BTC price dips are going to occur based on ongoing market movements, news, TAs, FUD spreading, etc.

So, where did I say that those bullish about btc are bulltards? Stop making stories..  
For me, bulltards are those  who attack people when they say something like btc is going down and they think that the price should just shoot straight up.
And bullish are people who believe in bitcoin;s future and they aren't affected by these dumps .

Why call anyone "bulltards"?  Makes little sense to me, because NO matter what the term is inaccurate, even if you attempt to define who is in such a camp and who is NOT... .. .. but whatever, you feel it is helpful to categorize some posters as bulltards, then I suppose that is your choice.    

Why call them bulltards? Because they behave like retarded bulls.  
I searched what a "bulltard" is and here's what I found:
-a bull tard is person who is both retarded* and extremely aggressive. Often possesses "tard strength." This person would rather fight you than talk it out; would rather use violence than intellect
-An idiot who thinks that stock markets always rise.

From that, I could say, my own definition of "bulltard" is not far from what others think what a bulltard is.
I don't even understand why you're being affected with my post  

I am just responding to your perceived need to Name-call.  I don't see it as necessary, except maybe under rare circumstances.

Sometimes I have been accused of name calling; however, I deny employing such tactics because I usually, instead, describe the idiocy of the behavior that I witness rather than calling names... Anyhow, it may be merely a personal choice regarding the extent to which you think that it is fruitful to engage in calling people "bulltards," even if you believe that their conduct rises to the level to meet such definition...

Like i said, in the end, it is your choice regarding how you want to communicate in a public thread (even if you happen to be posting under a pseudo-anonymous name, which a large majority of us are).

So who among us started name-calling? Why didn't you react when he said "bear"?
From his post "expect the bears to start posting something, anything to encourage others to sell", I could clearly say he's one of the "bulltards". And I could feel the sarcasm in his post.
A normal person who uses his brain would usually ask the poster "why" he think the price would go down.
And a bulltard would just call people a "bear" and most would resort to personal attacks.

I suppose name calling is all a matter of degree, and it is almost as bad to call someone a bull as it is to call them a bulltard, but of course the term bulltard is more derogatory... that should be obvious.. .. and the higher the level of derrogatory-ness may cause more attention.. and of course, each of us may NOT closely read every post.. especially if the post is NOT initially directed towards us....

A similar  problem in my thinking would be to call someone a bear or a beartard, both are bad, but calling someone a beartard would be more derogatory..which also should seem obvious... and unnecessary.. no? except maybe rare circumstances...

I would think that it would be better to criticize someone's view by describing their actions or the subject of their posts or to suggest that they cannot see the facts correctly because they are scewed by bearish or bullish preconceptions..

Anyhow, frequently, in my humble bumble opinion, there are better ways to criticize poster for their ideas or the scewed nature of their ideas rather than to getting into name calling. or categorizing people... sometimes I may refer to some poster as a bot.. which I suppose is a bit derrogatory, but many times it is said in jest... I suppose a poster could be a bot-tard, and maybe that could be funny too, if it is NOT over used... or used as a distraction from their ideas... truly there are some ideas that are circulated in this thread that seem to be somewhat devoid of meaning.. and are robotic in nature.. and other ideas are fleshed out more thoroughly...

Ah! So you're trying to be the Guidance Counselor/prefect of discipline in this thread? The righteous one who protect the oppressed? How come I didn't see you protecting me when this guy called me cuntface. I don't think you didn't see what he posted.

troll bs

Hey cuntface!  

Please don't insult women's genitalia by using them to refer to this loser.

+1

+2  

The 4th member has now arrived  

I guess that post explains why you reacted with the word "bulltard"

Heh! I just said "570s" which is the price of btc at that time and someone called me cuntface and the O righteous one joined the bulltards..  


-------------------------


I'm outta here

You are sounding a bit delusional,  paranoid and self-absorbed in your attempts to justify your supposed important claims about BTC price movements. 

I barely remember the June 2014 dialogue to which you referred, until you now cited it.

It is possible ChrisML was on to something when he referred to you as cuntface.. and it appears that I was laughing at the seemingly clever comment JimboToronto regarding the inappropriate degrading of a woman's genitals..... I cannot even recall if I agreed substantively with him about to whom the content was directed.. ... I suppose it is possible that I did... . but in the context of any of my comments today, I forgot about all of that until you just reminding me of such... so that previous comment did NOT affect my earlier comment today... but it does seem to establish that you have some preoccupations with pettiness... and potentially taking matters too personally... and that may explain your tendency to call names rather than to engage on a more meaningful level.... possibly mom's basement is getting a little too claustrophobic for you?