Bitcoin Forum
October 31, 2024, 12:20:26 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (0.8%)
7/28 - 11 (9.1%)
8/4 - 16 (13.2%)
8/11 - 7 (5.8%)
8/18 - 6 (5%)
8/25 - 8 (6.6%)
After August - 72 (59.5%)
Total Voters: 121

Pages: « 1 ... 14403 14404 14405 14406 14407 14408 14409 14410 14411 14412 14413 14414 14415 14416 14417 14418 14419 14420 14421 14422 14423 14424 14425 14426 14427 14428 14429 14430 14431 14432 14433 14434 14435 14436 14437 14438 14439 14440 14441 14442 14443 14444 14445 14446 14447 14448 14449 14450 14451 14452 [14453] 14454 14455 14456 14457 14458 14459 14460 14461 14462 14463 14464 14465 14466 14467 14468 14469 14470 14471 14472 14473 14474 14475 14476 14477 14478 14479 14480 14481 14482 14483 14484 14485 14486 14487 14488 14489 14490 14491 14492 14493 14494 14495 14496 14497 14498 14499 14500 14501 14502 14503 ... 33868 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26483808 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1802


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 07:01:58 AM

Coin



Explanation
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
January 11, 2016, 07:02:34 AM

Quote
At 2:30 this morning @petertoddbtc committed a double-spend attack on @Coinbase by buying me Reddit gold and then redirected the payment

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40ejy8/peter_todd_with_my_doublespendpy_tool_with/

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/686362883756695553

Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 07:14:21 AM

Quote
At 2:30 this morning @petertoddbtc committed a double-spend attack on @Coinbase by buying me Reddit gold and then redirected the payment

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40ejy8/peter_todd_with_my_doublespendpy_tool_with/

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/686362883756695553



They better publish a proof of solvency after this.

You never thought someone would order a plate of onion rings, eat them, and walk out the door? Think again...
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 07:55:20 AM

Quote
At 2:30 this morning @petertoddbtc committed a double-spend attack on @Coinbase by buying me Reddit gold and then redirected the payment

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40ejy8/peter_todd_with_my_doublespendpy_tool_with/

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/686362883756695553



They better publish a proof of solvency after this.

You never thought someone would order a plate of onion rings, eat them, and walk out the door? Think again...

whoulda thunk huh?  Roll Eyes

if it can be broken it will be broken, it's the mechanism by which an anti-fragile system evolves.

Coinbase has a deficient business model based on fictional technology that doesn't exist, the sooner they find out the better, they should be thanking petertodd.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1802


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 08:02:00 AM

Coin



Explanation
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 08:07:19 AM

Quote
At 2:30 this morning @petertoddbtc committed a double-spend attack on @Coinbase by buying me Reddit gold and then redirected the payment

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40ejy8/peter_todd_with_my_doublespendpy_tool_with/

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/686362883756695553



They better publish a proof of solvency after this.

You never thought someone would order a plate of onion rings, eat them, and walk out the door? Think again...

whoulda thunk huh?  Roll Eyes

if it can be broken it will be broken, it's the mechanism by which an anti-fragile system evolves.

Coinbase has a deficient business model based on fictional technology that doesn't exist, the sooner they find out the better, they should be thanking petertodd.

Of course it could be done, it's been that way all along. Chief Scientist Viacoin just made it a little easier. Before he makes it really easy.

For larger amounts Coinbase waits for 3 confirmations. It's just like a restaurant, the majority of honest customers will pick up the slack on the dine'n'dashers. If the burden of fraud is too great, they'll eliminate the option.

Peter and you thinking this is a surprise is the "whoulda thunk it" part.
yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511



View Profile
January 11, 2016, 08:34:50 AM

At the moment, seems all good to me.. and I see no major censorship, as seems to be implied by several posters who are asserting their opposition to recent administrator banning actions...

Sure, if you can stomach all of the ad campaigns and all of the disingenuous posts they generate.
Cconvert2G36
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 392
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 08:46:12 AM

At the moment, seems all good to me.. and I see no major censorship, as seems to be implied by several posters who are asserting their opposition to recent administrator banning actions...

Sure, if you can stomach all of the ad campaigns and all of the disingenuous posts they generate.

So... you think price may raise to $500 tonight? or tomorrow than?

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1802


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 09:01:59 AM

Coin



Explanation
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 09:09:51 AM

At the moment, seems all good to me.. and I see no major censorship, as seems to be implied by several posters who are asserting their opposition to recent administrator banning actions...

Sure, if you can stomach all of the ad campaigns and all of the disingenuous posts they generate.

So... you think price may raise to $500 tonight? or tomorrow than?



I too am having the same question in my mind. It is a question I think we all should be concerned with henceforth.

Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
January 11, 2016, 09:36:59 AM

At the moment, seems all good to me.. and I see no major censorship, as seems to be implied by several posters who are asserting their opposition to recent administrator banning actions...

Sure, if you can stomach all of the ad campaigns and all of the disingenuous posts they generate.

So... you think price may raise to $500 tonight? or tomorrow than?



I too am having the same question in my mind. It is a question I think we all should be concerned with henceforth.


I think it will be a while before that happens.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1802


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 10:01:58 AM

Coin



Explanation
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 10:11:26 AM

At the moment, seems all good to me.. and I see no major censorship, as seems to be implied by several posters who are asserting their opposition to recent administrator banning actions...

Sure, if you can stomach all of the ad campaigns and all of the disingenuous posts they generate.

So... you think price may raise to $500 tonight? or tomorrow than?



I too am having the same question in my mind. It is a question I think we all should be concerned with henceforth.


I think it will be a while before that happens.

That's some solid advice. Thx!

mybitcoincharts
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 45
Merit: 0



View Profile
January 11, 2016, 10:27:35 AM

Try this as a custom uBlock origin filter:

Code:
bitcointalk.org###quickModForm > .bordercolor > tbody .signature

This and generous use of the ignore button almost makes this forum readable Wink
celebreze32
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 296
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 10:54:50 AM

Quote
At 2:30 this morning @petertoddbtc committed a double-spend attack on @Coinbase by buying me Reddit gold and then redirected the payment

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40ejy8/peter_todd_with_my_doublespendpy_tool_with/

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/686362883756695553



There was someone here who claimed he had a Coinbase account and he discovered a vulnerability in their site which he told them about and got paid for. He said he discovered another vulnerability, told them about it, then his account was closed and he was banned.

If he was telling the truth Coinbase was asking for trouble.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 1802


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 11:01:59 AM

Coin



Explanation
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
January 11, 2016, 11:08:16 AM

Quote
At 2:30 this morning @petertoddbtc committed a double-spend attack on @Coinbase by buying me Reddit gold and then redirected the payment

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40ejy8/peter_todd_with_my_doublespendpy_tool_with/

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/686362883756695553



There was someone here who claimed he had a Coinbase account and he discovered a vulnerability in their site which he told them about and got paid for. He said he discovered another vulnerability, told them about it, then his account was closed and he was banned.

If he was telling the truth Coinbase was asking for trouble.

Nobody likes a clever dick. Grin
celebreze32
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 296
Merit: 250


View Profile
January 11, 2016, 11:40:15 AM

Quote
At 2:30 this morning @petertoddbtc committed a double-spend attack on @Coinbase by buying me Reddit gold and then redirected the payment

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40ejy8/peter_todd_with_my_doublespendpy_tool_with/

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/686362883756695553



There was someone here who claimed he had a Coinbase account and he discovered a vulnerability in their site which he told them about and got paid for. He said he discovered another vulnerability, told them about it, then his account was closed and he was banned.

If he was telling the truth Coinbase was asking for trouble.

Nobody likes a clever dick. Grin

I can't remember his bitcointalk username, but I found this post that could be about it.

Bitcoin exchange Coinbase has posted a comprehensive response to the recent bounty controversy. Yesterday, we first reported that the bitcoin exchange had surprisingly banned a user who helped them fix a vault bug that saved the San Francisco-based company from potential losses of millions of dollars.

Rob Witoff of Coinbase discussed the Company’s bug bounty program, which calls for a minimum of $100 reward for bringing coding bugs and possible exploits to notice. There is no higher end to the rewards as of yet, but identifying and demonstrating how Remote Code Execution vulnerability can be exploited leads the pack with a bounty of $10,000. The bitcoin exchange revealed that it has paid a total of $103,801 in bounties since beginning the program in 2013, and is even looking forward to expanding this program.


http://www.newsbtc.com/2015/12/22/bitcoin-exchange-coinbase-comes-clean-on-bounty-controversy/


Coinbase told Newsbtc that it had never banned anyone for reporting a bug, but Newsbtc posted this message sent to someone who said he was banned for it. Nobody likes a clever dick, but Coinbase should swallow its pride and pay white hat hackers, not ban them.

hdbuck
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002



View Profile
January 11, 2016, 11:50:29 AM

Quote
At 2:30 this morning @petertoddbtc committed a double-spend attack on @Coinbase by buying me Reddit gold and then redirected the payment

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40ejy8/peter_todd_with_my_doublespendpy_tool_with/

https://twitter.com/petertoddbtc/status/686362883756695553



There was someone here who claimed he had a Coinbase account and he discovered a vulnerability in their site which he told them about and got paid for. He said he discovered another vulnerability, told them about it, then his account was closed and he was banned.

If he was telling the truth Coinbase was asking for trouble.

Nobody likes a clever dick. Grin

I can't remember his bitcointalk username, but I found this post that could be about it.

Bitcoin exchange Coinbase has posted a comprehensive response to the recent bounty controversy. Yesterday, we first reported that the bitcoin exchange had surprisingly banned a user who helped them fix a vault bug that saved the San Francisco-based company from potential losses of millions of dollars.

Rob Witoff of Coinbase discussed the Company’s bug bounty program, which calls for a minimum of $100 reward for bringing coding bugs and possible exploits to notice. There is no higher end to the rewards as of yet, but identifying and demonstrating how Remote Code Execution vulnerability can be exploited leads the pack with a bounty of $10,000. The bitcoin exchange revealed that it has paid a total of $103,801 in bounties since beginning the program in 2013, and is even looking forward to expanding this program.


http://www.newsbtc.com/2015/12/22/bitcoin-exchange-coinbase-comes-clean-on-bounty-controversy/


Coinbase told Newsbtc that it had never banned anyone for reporting a bug, but Newsbtc posted this message sent to someone who said he was banned for it. Nobody likes a clever dick, but Coinbase should swallow its pride and pay white hat hackers, not ban them.



So the bit coin is dead?
equipoise
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 794
Merit: 1000


Monero (XMR) - secure, private, untraceable


View Profile WWW
January 11, 2016, 12:00:28 PM

Quote
and do that while maintaining the integrity of the system. Not people tinkering with an existing variable that has known tradeoffs if you set it lower or higher.
Because 1MB was not arrived at arbitrarily, but through exhaustive research and testing?
You're not saying that 1MB is simply a meaningless number Satoshi randomly selected because it was always meant to be increased long before it was reached, are you? Because that couldn't be the truth of the situation according to what blockstream says.
Satoshi selected a much bigger number originally (was it 32MB?). It was changed temporary to 1MB for reasons already in the past and not in effect at the current moment.
Pages: « 1 ... 14403 14404 14405 14406 14407 14408 14409 14410 14411 14412 14413 14414 14415 14416 14417 14418 14419 14420 14421 14422 14423 14424 14425 14426 14427 14428 14429 14430 14431 14432 14433 14434 14435 14436 14437 14438 14439 14440 14441 14442 14443 14444 14445 14446 14447 14448 14449 14450 14451 14452 [14453] 14454 14455 14456 14457 14458 14459 14460 14461 14462 14463 14464 14465 14466 14467 14468 14469 14470 14471 14472 14473 14474 14475 14476 14477 14478 14479 14480 14481 14482 14483 14484 14485 14486 14487 14488 14489 14490 14491 14492 14493 14494 14495 14496 14497 14498 14499 14500 14501 14502 14503 ... 33868 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!