Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[suda123]

1st coin ive been buying for my basket...ETH, for many reasons,  the contracts, IOT is here..samsung fridge and many more household devices going on the web. Then the ETH  pos stage in sep. With btc mining going 1/2 (fud time) it could become too centralised ( this could affect most pow coins ) and miners/users will look to get coins another way...this could b the year pos goes mainstream.
$10+ for 1 eth by sep ....defo
if eth is added to one of the big exchanges...$20+ by sep

Yo yo pump meister...! You might have point...btc is getting boring

Cheers m8

btw , 1500 eth minimum if u wana stake    ( me  sits back and watches the rush to buy  )

how do you stake ethreuem

A mechanism is built into the Ethereum protocol to make PoW (GPU) mining insanely difficult sometime in mid-2016, which will force miners to switch to Proof of Stake if they hope to stay competitive.

The main developer for the proposed proof-of-stake algorithm (CASPER) is Vlad Zamfir. Radio interview: https://www.reddit.com/r/ethereum/comments/3t2cph/vlad_zamfir_bringing_ethereum_towards/ Slide deck from DEVCON day 1: https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1bV_vXJBko-DmhAgnOFYg8ZNbAvCZCZrlf0KBFPqwVIw (The DEVCON day 1 video was removed by Youtube for some reason.)

I own eth but what does proof of stake mean?

the 1500 Eth stake minimum ?

Im more concerned with the Eth im holding now

[1714811346]

1714811346

[1714811346]

1714811346

[1714811346]

1714811346

[1714811346]

1714811346

[Mrpumperitis]

I own eth but what does proof of stake mean?
 

ill pm u a few links on pos, or just google and learn...which is what you should be doing if you have invested in a coin.

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[galdur]

[Richy_T]

The furor on reddit over whether Peter Todd has broken laws with his double spend through RBF, and the calls for Coinbase to pursue a legal case against him are hilarious.

Which is the better approach for a cutting edge digital currency -

• Fraud (double spend) protected by the existing legal structure (no different from laws trying to prevent various forms of credit card fraud, or)
• Accepting that zero-conf transactions on main bitcoin layer have risk, and working on technical workarounds to truly solve that issue for people who want to accept zero-conf without risk

Why not both?

[Mrpumperitis]

The furor on reddit over whether Peter Todd has broken laws with his double spend through RBF, and the calls for Coinbase to pursue a legal case against him are hilarious.

Which is the better approach for a cutting edge digital currency -

• Fraud (double spend) protected by the existing legal structure (no different from laws trying to prevent various forms of credit card fraud, or)
• Accepting that zero-conf transactions on main bitcoin layer have risk, and working on technical workarounds to truly solve that issue for people who want to accept zero-conf without risk

Why not both?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40iktd/peter_todd_suspended_from_reddit/

[marcus_of_augustus]

The furor on reddit over whether Peter Todd has broken laws with his double spend through RBF, and the calls for Coinbase to pursue a legal case against him are hilarious.

Which is the better approach for a cutting edge digital currency -

• Fraud (double spend) protected by the existing legal structure (no different from laws trying to prevent various forms of credit card fraud, or)
• Accepting that zero-conf transactions on main bitcoin layer have risk, and working on technical workarounds to truly solve that issue for people who want to accept zero-conf without risk

Why not both?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40iktd/peter_todd_suspended_from_reddit/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40jbdi/upetertodd_unsuspended_from_reddit/

[Proxiebuier]

i sell my BTC then waiting bitcoin price down again

i think we will down to $400 

[JayJuanGee]

i sell my BTC then waiting bitcoin price down again

i think we will down to $400  

You sold all of them?    

 or did you hold onto some?  


how long are you going to wait for prices to go to $400?

What if the price goes up?  


At what point will you buy back in, if at all?


Do you have other investments?  Did you put your BTC proceeds in the dollar  or some other fiat?

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[Mrpumperitis]

my eth buy walls 

[JayJuanGee]

[https://i.imgur.com/shFV5lV.gif[/img]

my eth buy walls  

I don't understand how your eth buy walls supposedly relate to this thread?

Why don't you take your discussion of such to some ETH thread or some other possibly relevant thread?

[Mrpumperitis]

[https://i.imgur.com/shFV5lV.gif[/img]

my eth buy walls 

I don't understand how your eth buy walls supposedly relate to this thread?

agreed ,lol wont do it again.

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[suda123]

Where the hell is r0ach?

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[flagpara]

i sell my BTC then waiting bitcoin price down again

i think we will down to $400  

You sold all of them?    

 or did you hold onto some?  


how long are you going to wait for prices to go to $400?

What if the price goes up?  


At what point will you buy back in, if at all?


Do you have other investments?  Did you put your BTC proceeds in the dollar  or some other fiat?

They are good questions but that can be applied to each and everyone trading ^^

These are limits you put yourself. And lots of time they're rather shady, dependents on your state of mind and the moment!

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

The furor on reddit over whether Peter Todd has broken laws with his double spend through RBF, and the calls for Coinbase to pursue a legal case against him are hilarious.

Which is the better approach for a cutting edge digital currency -

• Fraud (double spend) protected by the existing legal structure (no different from laws trying to prevent various forms of credit card fraud, or)
• Accepting that zero-conf transactions on main bitcoin layer have risk, and working on technical workarounds to truly solve that issue for people who want to accept zero-conf without risk

Why not both?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40iktd/peter_todd_suspended_from_reddit/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40jbdi/upetertodd_unsuspended_from_reddit/

Peter Todd is the new boogeyman then.

Wasn't it always possible with the right know-how to double-spend a TX with zero confrms?

[Fatman3001]

The furor on reddit over whether Peter Todd has broken laws with his double spend through RBF, and the calls for Coinbase to pursue a legal case against him are hilarious.

Which is the better approach for a cutting edge digital currency -

• Fraud (double spend) protected by the existing legal structure (no different from laws trying to prevent various forms of credit card fraud, or)
• Accepting that zero-conf transactions on main bitcoin layer have risk, and working on technical workarounds to truly solve that issue for people who want to accept zero-conf without risk

Why not both?

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40iktd/peter_todd_suspended_from_reddit/

https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/40jbdi/upetertodd_unsuspended_from_reddit/

He should probably be careful with that stuff. That's only funny once.