Bitcoin Forum
December 05, 2021, 06:07:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 22.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Will we close Nov. at or above Plan B's posited minimum of $98K?
Yes - 43 (37.1%)
No - 73 (62.9%)
Total Voters: 116

Pages: « 1 ... 22914 22915 22916 22917 22918 22919 22920 22921 22922 22923 22924 22925 22926 22927 22928 22929 22930 22931 22932 22933 22934 22935 22936 22937 22938 22939 22940 22941 22942 22943 22944 22945 22946 22947 22948 22949 22950 22951 22952 22953 22954 22955 22956 22957 22958 22959 22960 22961 22962 22963 [22964] 22965 22966 22967 22968 22969 22970 22971 22972 22973 22974 22975 22976 22977 22978 22979 22980 22981 22982 22983 22984 22985 22986 22987 22988 22989 22990 22991 22992 22993 22994 22995 22996 22997 22998 22999 23000 23001 23002 23003 23004 23005 23006 23007 23008 23009 23010 23011 23012 23013 23014 ... 29946 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 25495526 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (158 posts by 14 users with 9 merit deleted.)
jojo69
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2296
Merit: 3015


1/21000000 , the only math you need to know


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 05:06:52 PM

What are the odds that the police had the app designed/produced specifically to entrap marijuana users?

I'd put that in the 90th percentile.

1638684458
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638684458

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638684458
Reply with quote  #2

1638684458
Report to moderator
1638684458
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638684458

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638684458
Reply with quote  #2

1638684458
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1638684458
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1638684458

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1638684458
Reply with quote  #2

1638684458
Report to moderator
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 2086



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 05:13:21 PM
Last edit: March 13, 2019, 05:59:44 PM by Biodom

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  Grin

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3122
Merit: 3210


Volcano Corn!


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 05:52:21 PM

Interesting the word "Bitcoin" was never in it...
bitcoinPsycho
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 960


THE NEXT 2.4 YEARS ARE CRITICAL🍄💊


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 05:54:09 PM

No, I likely wouldn't. To the extent that it may mean what you are implying*, it would mean I have failed as a father. For not instilling a foundation upon which she might lead a happy, fulfilling, and helpful life.

Relevance to my observation that dishonest and dishonorable opponents are once again using falsehoods to try to taint a coin by association? None.


Your relentless defensiveness and apologism for creepy people and aspects of things you have no influence over is really bleedin' weird.
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 2386



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 06:00:34 PM
Merited by Biodom (1), JayJuanGee (1)

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  Grin

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant  bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

I would have to say 86.89% unlikely, 10.11% possible; but not likely and 3% likely. I would further add that I think after this cycle ends there is a good chance the next cycle will be much shorter as in the 2013-2014 run up/dip/run up.
W

#stronghands'19
VB1001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 938
Merit: 2480


<<CypherPunkCat>>


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2019, 06:32:04 PM

House Lawmakers Pass Bill Targeting Bitcoin and Crypto Asset Use by Terrorists

New legislation affecting Bitcoin and crypto just passed the US House of Representatives. The FinCen Improvement Act, introduced on February 27 by representative Jennifer Wexton (D-VA), passed the House on Monday and was received in the Senate on Tuesday.

https://dailyhodl.com/2019/03/13/house-lawmakers-pass-bill-targeting-bitcoin-and-crypto-asset-use-by-terrorists/

They do not know what to do to have more control in BTC.

This rabble shop and sell with undeclared fiat money, not with Bitcoin.
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 2386



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 06:44:33 PM

Good afternoon all.

Increasing support has developed around the 0.382 fib seeming to indicate we might try another run at the $4k resistance level. #dyor
1h


Slow sideways ladder until the end of the month.
4


For all of you waiting for a lower low...scheduling a -20%+ drop between now and the end of the year is becoming increasingly difficult in my mind. I am not saying it cant happen, just that it is becoming less probable each day.
D

#strongerhands'19
Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4390


Be a bank


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 06:51:00 PM
Merited by Raja_MBZ (1)

https://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/bcause-the-worlds-first-fullstack-cryptocurrency-ecosystem-to-launch-on-nasdaq-market-technology-20190313-00218
-more people from away
-stock up now!
JohnUser
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1022
Merit: 721


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2019, 07:02:53 PM


Our way isn't to move them off ?
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1484
Merit: 2021


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:16:31 PM
Merited by GrosWesh (1), nanobtc (1)

I didn't even know Calvin Ayre before viewing his photo with the underage girls... What a sick f*ck!

I quickly browsed through his Twitter account. There are literally dozens of similar photos of him with little girls, mostly of Asian and African origin. In some of these photos you can also see Craig Wright, Roger Ver and other members of the BCash / BCH and BSV teams. Wright & Ver are also featured in several other posts.

Calvin Ayre is clearly associated with, and heavily promotes BSV/BCH.

It just goes to show what sick minds are behind those shitcoins...
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2828
Merit: 5163


ESG, KYC & AML are attack vectors on Bitcoin


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:30:27 PM

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  Grin

On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.


Certainly, I am NOT opposed to attempting to figure out longer term waves of BTC price and assigning probabilities to various scenarios, and to me there seems to b almost no great chance that anyone (even whales) can predict exact BTC price waves or even manipulate the price to such an extent to actually cause the wave that they would like to happen, so in that regard, a scenario in which BTC price approaches ATH but only gets within a 10% to 25% range of it and does not breach it remains decently likely, perhaps within a 30% or so arena. 

Of course, the overall sentiment remains that when momentum bring BTC within a 10% to 20% range of the previous ATH, then momentum is going to bring it over such previous ATH, and likely surpass such previous ATH by at least 50%, and that common sentiment drives what actually ends up happening and causes any alternative scenario to be really capitally intensive to carry out, so that is why I suggest 30% as the highest of such probability, but likely, a realistic probability would be below 15%.

So, even though the odds are against breaking back down after getting so close to the previous ATH, there is going to b a whole hell of a lot of FUD spreading and misinformation that actually describes such low probability scenario as if it is much more likely to happen than it is.. and that is likely to be a dominant narrative that tries (and will be somewhat successful) to trick HODLers out of some or all of their coins.
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 2386



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:48:54 PM

-snip-
On a separate issue:

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.


Certainly, I am NOT opposed to attempting to figure out longer term waves of BTC price and assigning probabilities to various scenarios, and to me there seems to b almost no great chance that anyone (even whales) can predict exact BTC price waves or even manipulate the price to such an extent to actually cause the wave that they would like to happen, so in that regard, a scenario in which BTC price approaches ATH but only gets within a 10% to 25% range of it and does not breach it remains decently likely, perhaps within a 30% or so arena. 

Of course, the overall sentiment remains that when momentum bring BTC within a 10% to 20% range of the previous ATH, then momentum is going to bring it over such previous ATH, and likely surpass such previous ATH by at least 50%, and that common sentiment drives what actually ends up happening and causes any alternative scenario to be really capitally intensive to carry out, so that is why I suggest 30% as the highest of such probability, but likely, a realistic probability would be below 15%.

So, even though the odds are against breaking back down after getting so close to the previous ATH, there is going to b a whole hell of a lot of FUD spreading and misinformation that actually describes such low probability scenario as if it is much more likely to happen than it is.. and that is likely to be a dominant narrative that tries (and will be somewhat successful) to trick HODLers out of some or all of their coins.

So you would describe the possibility as somewhere between 15% and 3% of a pull back from the breaching the next ATH? or between 30% and 15%?  or between 30% and 3%? You might be able to deduce why I am asking for something more specific. The ranges you postulate are fairly broad imho and I would really like to put you more on the spot with posting such a prediction.   Smiley
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 2086



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:49:00 PM

Question to TA experts: how likely would be a situation when we try to get to ATH, then fail (around, say, 15-18K) and revert to at least a short term, but significant  bear?
Unlikely; possible, but not likely; likely (if you can show %% in your opinion)?
I am no TA expert, but my own estimate of those probabilities is 70%-20%-10%

In stocks, this happens all the time, witness the famous SP500 double top in 2000 and 2007-2008 at above 1500.
The reason I am asking is because essentially all predictions are showing the same fractal with $1600-3122 low, then a smooth increase (by an exponent) to 80K-400K.
The alternative take would be that in this (or next) cycle this pattern would be broken.

I would have to say 86.89% unlikely, 10.11% possible; but not likely and 3% likely. I would further add that I think after this cycle ends there is a good chance the next cycle will be much shorter as in the 2013-2014 run up/dip/run up.
W

#stronghands'19

Does the intercept of the exponent and logarithmic regression curves represents the likely future peak (at around 80K)?
jbreher
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2912
Merit: 1515


lose: unfind ... loose: untight


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 07:53:02 PM

No, I likely wouldn't. To the extent that it may mean what you are implying*, it would mean I have failed as a father. For not instilling a foundation upon which she might lead a happy, fulfilling, and helpful life.

Relevance to my observation that dishonest and dishonorable opponents are once again using falsehoods to try to taint a coin by association? None.


Your relentless defensiveness and apologism for creepy people and aspects of things you have no influence over is really bleedin' weird.

If you had a point you wished to make, it did not make it into your post.
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 2386



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 08:07:31 PM

Does the intercept of the exponent and logarithmic regression curves represents the likely future peak (at around 80K)?

That is how I am interpreting the data though I would like to note that I tend to be very conservative in most of my projections. I am a firm believer in the hope for the best, prepare for the worst mentality.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 08:29:32 PM

My crack about Calvin Ayre being CEO of BSV was a crack at Ricky Falconwings calling himself CEO of Bcash.  

Notwithstanding the above, we all know that Calvin Ayre funded the mining equipment that got BSV off the ground and it would not have existed without Ayre’s money.  Whether that was a profitable venture for Ayre remains to be seen.  

Certainly BSV is sinking faster than a 737 Max.
BitcoinGirl.Club
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1960
Merit: 1870


Quote me if you want a response


View Profile WWW
March 13, 2019, 08:54:46 PM

Good evening WO fams.
After a long day I am home and going to watch Liverpool match.

Come on Liverpool. Just a win please.

Where is LFC?
mindrust
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2366
Merit: 2181



View Profile
March 13, 2019, 09:07:33 PM
Merited by cAPSLOCK (1), JayJuanGee (1)


Does the intercept of the exponent and logarithmic regression curves represents the likely future peak (at around 80K)?

That $80k peak makes me drool.



I also expect the top to be at between $80k and 100k and time frame looks alright too. 2022 is also pretty OK for me.

If you haven't yet, you should also see Trace Mayer's interview from 21st Feb '19.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vC5im-hiHXo

The institutional money is still not in the game and they won't be till they fix the legal stuff. Be glad, even at these price levels, we are still the early adopters.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1328


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 09:10:13 PM

House in Australia-being auctioned in crypto:
https://www.realestate.com.au/property-house-nsw-casuarina-129081390

Not sure if any dolphins would qualify, but whales would do, probably  Grin


That's some quality real estate porn.

Last of the V8s
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1652
Merit: 4390


Be a bank


View Profile
March 13, 2019, 09:11:02 PM

Quote from: A Simple Guide to British Parliamentary Procedure
You have two sides, one out in the field and one in. Each man that's in the side that's in goes out, and when he's out he comes in and the next man goes in until he's out. When they are all out, the side that's out comes in and the side that's been in goes out and tries to get those coming in, out. Sometimes you get men still in and not out.
When a man goes out to go in, the men who are out try to get him out, and when he is out he goes in and the next man in goes out and goes in. There are two men called umpires who stay out all the time and they decide when the men who are in are out. When both sides have been in and all the men have been out, and both sides have been out twice after all the men have been in, including those who are not out, that is the end of the game.
Pages: « 1 ... 22914 22915 22916 22917 22918 22919 22920 22921 22922 22923 22924 22925 22926 22927 22928 22929 22930 22931 22932 22933 22934 22935 22936 22937 22938 22939 22940 22941 22942 22943 22944 22945 22946 22947 22948 22949 22950 22951 22952 22953 22954 22955 22956 22957 22958 22959 22960 22961 22962 22963 [22964] 22965 22966 22967 22968 22969 22970 22971 22972 22973 22974 22975 22976 22977 22978 22979 22980 22981 22982 22983 22984 22985 22986 22987 22988 22989 22990 22991 22992 22993 22994 22995 22996 22997 22998 22999 23000 23001 23002 23003 23004 23005 23006 23007 23008 23009 23010 23011 23012 23013 23014 ... 29946 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!