Bitcoin Forum
September 19, 2024, 05:07:40 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (1%)
7/28 - 11 (10.6%)
8/4 - 16 (15.4%)
8/11 - 7 (6.7%)
8/18 - 6 (5.8%)
8/25 - 7 (6.7%)
After August - 56 (53.8%)
Total Voters: 104

Pages: « 1 ... 23782 23783 23784 23785 23786 23787 23788 23789 23790 23791 23792 23793 23794 23795 23796 23797 23798 23799 23800 23801 23802 23803 23804 23805 23806 23807 23808 23809 23810 23811 23812 23813 23814 23815 23816 23817 23818 23819 23820 23821 23822 23823 23824 23825 23826 23827 23828 23829 23830 23831 [23832] 23833 23834 23835 23836 23837 23838 23839 23840 23841 23842 23843 23844 23845 23846 23847 23848 23849 23850 23851 23852 23853 23854 23855 23856 23857 23858 23859 23860 23861 23862 23863 23864 23865 23866 23867 23868 23869 23870 23871 23872 23873 23874 23875 23876 23877 23878 23879 23880 23881 23882 ... 33745 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26460729 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 4141



View Profile
June 03, 2019, 02:51:57 AM



If this little soiree is going to cost 400 fucking grand ...



Each?

A few seem to have settled on 10 grand a piece and 40 people. No idea why and it Weren't me. No, sir.


There was no settling and really the idea of charging a entrance fee is ludicrous. This is just low brow flights of fancy.

I think what we should really do is look into a pay per view type extravaganza with obstacle courses and medical teams on standby. I am sure the whole cost could be defrayed and the rest sent to a good charity.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3850
Merit: 10846


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 02:52:20 AM

It was always going to be very impractical opsec-wise to have one huge party.
We're going to have to decentralise this thing.

I think you're right...

All of us getting together in one place and time that is publicly known (or that could leak) will create a huge BTC honey pot. We could then be abducted, tortured and have our BTC wrenched out of us! OUCH!

Most of us already are, or will soon be millionaires, some even billionaires... This is no joke! Gotta organize this thing very carefully...

I agree with your overall sentiment, and the point(s) that you are making, AlcoHolDL; however, I am going to quibble a bit with your assessment that "most of us already are, or will soon be millionaires."  To be or soon be a millionaire, most of us would need to have in the territory of 100 coins or assuming that a BTC price of $20k is imminent, then "most of us" would need to have 50 coins or more.  I have my doubts about that assessment, at least in terms of the "most" categorization.
Sellman
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 406
Merit: 112



View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:00:57 AM

During such very sensitive period of the crypto market, of bitcoin, ups or downs are totally depends on sneeze of whales. Whenever whales  look into the sky and sneeze, bitcoin and market will move up; whenever whales look on the ground, and sneeze, bitcoin and market will move down.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3948
Merit: 5298


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:05:30 AM

If you guys ever decide on The Philippines, I could host private security. (I'd need to pay my small special forces team a little bit more than usual.) @mic has been there sooo ... everyone who donates a little bit gets a bodyguard for the duration of your stay in the country and escort all the way from and to the airport.

We do have San Miguel Beer.

Sounds good...UNTIL
Quote
P.S. I would not suggest any drugs in the party.

If I were to ever consider something like this I would need psychedelics. Cheesy


Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3948
Merit: 5298


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:07:39 AM







Fucking Aye!
jojo69
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3290
Merit: 4534


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:11:51 AM


yeah, that one is off the hook
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3976
Merit: 8622



View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:15:21 AM
Merited by Toxic2040 (1)

Jimbo, this hat has no white-space around it.  It's a minor upgrade.




I'd be much obliged for the upgrade Homer. You're a gentleman and a scholar.

 'Twas ever thus.



avatar-sized



WinslowIII
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 35


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:16:43 AM

It was always going to be very impractical opsec-wise to have one huge party.
We're going to have to decentralise this thing.

I think you're right...

All of us getting together in one place and time that is publicly known (or that could leak) will create a huge BTC honey pot. We could then be abducted, tortured and have our BTC wrenched out of us! OUCH!

Most of us already are, or will soon be millionaires, some even billionaires... This is no joke! Gotta organize this thing very carefully...

I agree with your overall sentiment, and the point(s) that you are making, AlcoHolDL; however, I am going to quibble a bit with your assessment that "most of us already are, or will soon be millionaires."  To be or soon be a millionaire, most of us would need to have in the territory of 100 coins or assuming that a BTC price of $20k is imminent, then "most of us" would need to have 50 coins or more.  I have my doubts about that assessment, at least in terms of the "most" categorization.
Maybe 1 btc will enter the milloinaire club within a few years. If that happens, maybe 2017 bitcoin dumping millionaires will end up hanging in the closet, because usd won't be worth shit.
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 4141



View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:20:42 AM
Merited by xhomerx10 (1)

Jimbo, this hat has no white-space around it.  It's a minor upgrade.




I'd be much obliged for the upgrade Homer. You're a gentleman and a scholar.

 'Twas ever thus.



avatar-sized





+10 WOsMerit's


xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3976
Merit: 8622



View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:24:09 AM

Jimbo, this hat has no white-space around it.  It's a minor upgrade.




I'd be much obliged for the upgrade Homer. You're a gentleman and a scholar.

 'Twas ever thus.



avatar-sized





+10 WOsMerit's




 Thanks! That clip brings back memories.
 CAR!
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 4141



View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:26:22 AM

yeah, that one is off the hook

you were saying?   Roll Eyes



 Thanks! That clip brings back memories.
 CAR!


Your art is improving sir. Thank you.

+1 WOsMerit for luck.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3948
Merit: 5298


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:26:35 AM

Actually 2011 vintage, but who is counting.

Congrats on hitting that Jr. Member Milestone!

Try for full member by 100k plz
Neo_Coin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 293


"Be Your Own Bank"


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:33:45 AM



"Nothing was more true in the history of the EarthShocked


realr0ach
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 311


#TheGoyimKnow


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:37:34 AM

I have trouble getting out of the US, might make it into Canada, the Caribbean would actually be the easiest to pull off for me.

Canada supposedly bans anyone from the US with a DUI from entering, but millions of brown people from 3rd world countries who they have no idea the history of is okay.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3850
Merit: 10846


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:41:25 AM

Actually I don't give a damn about the location - you see, if you'd receive a nice invitation signed by Bob wouldn't you attend no matter how far you'd have to travel?  Wink

No.
infofront (OP)
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2646
Merit: 2793


Shitcoin Minimalist


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:44:45 AM

I have trouble getting out of the US, might make it into Canada, the Caribbean would actually be the easiest to pull off for me.

Canada supposedly bans anyone from the US with a DUI from entering, but millions of brown people from 3rd world countries who they have no idea the history of is okay.

What are your preferences for the 100K party, r0ach?
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3850
Merit: 10846


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:48:07 AM

Well, this is putting the 100K party Vegas location in jeopardy.

I thought it was agreed that we wouldn't do the party in the US, for our various international friends who have problems stepping onto US soil ?

Canada in the summer is nice (British Columbia ?), although I think somewhere in Europe might be an alternative (Spain ? The Netherlands ? Belgium ? Someplace that has no trouble with English)

Mexico or anywhere South America are out of contention for security reasons.

I have trouble getting out of the US, might make it into Canada, the Caribbean would actually be the easiest to pull off for me.

It was always going to be very impractical opsec-wise to have one huge party.
We're going to have to decentralise this thing.
One in Vegas, one in Canada, one in Amsterdam, one in my garden if the weather's nice

You are suggesting a kind of simultaneous and multiple locations thingie-ma-jiggie?

Would that mean that a certain minimum number of WO peeps would have to be present at each location in order for that location to count as an official $100k WO "hotspot?"  It would seem kind of strange to me to allow only one person to be present, and for the spot to count, so I am having some trouble with the logistical and logical specifics in this regard, but I surely do like the idea of a kind of OpSec preservation attempt... I also believe in the concept of security through obscurity, so in that regards, OpSec would not have to be "perfect" in order for it to be substantially and materially sufficient.   So, in those kinds of circumstances, I might even agree to attend such a "party," when otherwise, I might have told you WO "goofballs" (endearment intended) to go fuck u r lil selfies.    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Security through obscurity?

Yeah.

You never heard of that concept?

It's the idea that you are less likely to be a victim of a robbery if you are not flaunting your wealth.  In that regard, you want to kind of blend in with the regular peeps and not show off too much.

Of course, if you happen to be a multi-millionnaire, then if you  are in a neighborhood of other multi-millionnaires, then you would just blend in and be able to flaunt a bit of wealth, but you still might not want to appear like a billionnaire in that kind of neighborhood.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3850
Merit: 10846


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:51:50 AM

Well, this is putting the 100K party Vegas location in jeopardy.

I thought it was agreed that we wouldn't do the party in the US, for our various international friends who have problems stepping onto US soil ?

Canada in the summer is nice (British Columbia ?), although I think somewhere in Europe might be an alternative (Spain ? The Netherlands ? Belgium ? Someplace that has no trouble with English)

Mexico or anywhere South America are out of contention for security reasons.

I have trouble getting out of the US, might make it into Canada, the Caribbean would actually be the easiest to pull off for me.

It was always going to be very impractical opsec-wise to have one huge party.
We're going to have to decentralise this thing.
One in Vegas, one in Canada, one in Amsterdam, one in my garden if the weather's nice

You are suggesting a kind of simultaneous and multiple locations thingie-ma-jiggie?

Would that mean that a certain minimum number of WO peeps would have to be present at each location in order for that location to count as an official $100k WO "hotspot?"  It would seem kind of strange to me to allow only one person to be present, and for the spot to count, so I am having some trouble with the logistical and logical specifics in this regard, but I surely do like the idea of a kind of OpSec preservation attempt... I also believe in the concept of security through obscurity, so in that regards, OpSec would not have to be "perfect" in order for it to be substantially and materially sufficient.   So, in those kinds of circumstances, I might even agree to attend such a "party," when otherwise, I might have told you WO "goofballs" (endearment intended) to go fuck u r lil selfies.    Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Fuck, that's honestly probably the realest way to make this happen. let's do it where there's a big TV and all the locations are streamed to each other.

I am not sure whether I am going to attend, but geez kingcolex, you gotta get a bit more physical than that, otherwise such a $100k party would not be much different from our regular WO thread participation time, except that we would be requesting that party attendees get on their video conference call connections at the same time.  That does not sound like a fun "party."  Gotta at least have hookers, blow and ways to show off the lambos.
Neo_Coin
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1204
Merit: 293


"Be Your Own Bank"


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:52:25 AM


 Shocked Shocked

Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3948
Merit: 5298


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
June 03, 2019, 03:53:14 AM






BAM A Nutter monster!
Pages: « 1 ... 23782 23783 23784 23785 23786 23787 23788 23789 23790 23791 23792 23793 23794 23795 23796 23797 23798 23799 23800 23801 23802 23803 23804 23805 23806 23807 23808 23809 23810 23811 23812 23813 23814 23815 23816 23817 23818 23819 23820 23821 23822 23823 23824 23825 23826 23827 23828 23829 23830 23831 [23832] 23833 23834 23835 23836 23837 23838 23839 23840 23841 23842 23843 23844 23845 23846 23847 23848 23849 23850 23851 23852 23853 23854 23855 23856 23857 23858 23859 23860 23861 23862 23863 23864 23865 23866 23867 23868 23869 23870 23871 23872 23873 23874 23875 23876 23877 23878 23879 23880 23881 23882 ... 33745 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!