Bitcoin Forum
May 03, 2026, 03:10:55 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 31492 31493 31494 31495 31496 31497 31498 31499 31500 31501 31502 31503 31504 31505 31506 31507 31508 31509 31510 31511 31512 31513 31514 31515 31516 31517 31518 31519 31520 31521 31522 31523 31524 31525 31526 31527 31528 31529 31530 31531 31532 31533 31534 31535 31536 31537 31538 31539 31540 31541 [31542] 31543 31544 31545 31546 31547 31548 31549 31550 31551 31552 31553 31554 31555 31556 31557 31558 31559 31560 31561 31562 31563 31564 31565 31566 31567 31568 31569 31570 31571 31572 31573 31574 31575 31576 31577 31578 31579 31580 31581 31582 31583 31584 31585 31586 31587 31588 31589 31590 31591 31592 ... 35748 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26966627 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Gachapin
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 2968


bitcoin retard


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 05:35:09 AM
Merited by xhomerx10 (1)



  Look at the size of his sack.  Imagine waking up to that?


#TeaBagging
xhomerx10
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4564
Merit: 11072



View Profile
December 22, 2022, 05:51:06 AM



  Look at the size of his sack.  Imagine waking up to that?


#TeaBagging

  Cheesy
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 06:01:21 AM


Explanation
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 07:01:16 AM


Explanation
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4480
Merit: 6170



View Profile
December 22, 2022, 07:08:17 AM

@OP (Santa poster) and WO gays...sorry, I have no idea what "muscled" Santa manifested, lol.
Perhaps, I can guess, though.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 14400


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 07:08:31 AM

...if I'm not mistaken SBF gets charged in the same Southern District of NY as Jeffrey Epstein...
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/20/technology/sam-bankman-fried-bail.html
let's see if the security cams are working this time  Cheesy

But I doubt that he has nearly as much dirty material on big players as Epstein... so he will be fine, I guess.

Those NY Times links that you have been providing suck.

NYT articles are behind paywalls.

Here's some links in OmegaStarScream's post in another thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5419710.msg61480281#msg61480281

As far as suiciding himself.. SBF seems way more unstable.. but yeah of course, the connection that you are making has to do with how much SBF might know, and the theory that Epstein knew too much.. which yes, that seems to be a valid angle.. and I doubt that SBF knows too much.... just a fucking dumb kid bribing to get political influence and achieving it... so that dirt may likely end up coming out.. no one likes it when politician fawn over schemes like this that are so obviously corrupt, and some of them are likely going to find it necessary to change their tunes a bit, at least in terms of recognizing the outrageous bullshit that was going on in terms of attempts to buy influence and actually buying influence (which is so far alleged as ONLY one charge.. yet we will see how much some of that information ends up getting unravelled).. like I mentioned earlier.. I give little shits about which side this is on, and I do not see it as one side versus the other.. but just a bunch a bullshit when there are these kinds of buying of influence behaviors... and yeah, maybe I don't know enough at this time if some individuals might be wanting to skew matters to protect their own heads from rolling if the evidence is coming out too specifically in regards to involvement of some specific individuals.

By the way Gachapin, you did not notice my earlier attempt in this post to suck you into another BTC price-related bet?   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Gachapin
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 2968


bitcoin retard


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 07:48:13 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

...if I'm not mistaken SBF gets charged in the same Southern District of NY as Jeffrey Epstein...
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/12/20/technology/sam-bankman-fried-bail.html
let's see if the security cams are working this time  Cheesy

But I doubt that he has nearly as much dirty material on big players as Epstein... so he will be fine, I guess.

Those NY Times links that you have been providing suck.

NYT articles are behind paywalls.

Here's some links in OmegaStarScream's post in another thread:  https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5419710.msg61480281#msg61480281

It seems to depend from which country you watch these links. It is perfectly visible for me..  
I surely wouldn't pay a dime for this cancer outlet


As far as suiciding himself.. SBF seems way more unstable.. but yeah of course, the connection that you are making has to do with how much SBF might know, and the theory that Epstein knew too much.. which yes, that seems to be a valid angle.. and I doubt that SBF knows too much.... just a fucking dumb kid bribing to get political influence and achieving it... so that dirt may likely end up coming out.. no one likes it when politician fawn over schemes like this that are so obviously corrupt, and some of them are likely going to find it necessary to change their tunes a bit, at least in terms of recognizing the outrageous bullshit that was going on in terms of attempts to buy influence and actually buying influence (which is so far alleged as ONLY one charge.. yet we will see how much some of that information ends up getting unravelled).. like I mentioned earlier.. I give little shits about which side this is on, and I do not see it as one side versus the other.. but just a bunch a bullshit when there are these kinds of buying of influence behaviors... and yeah, maybe I don't know enough at this time if some individuals might be wanting to skew matters to protect their own heads from rolling if the evidence is coming out too specifically in regards to involvement of some specific individuals.

Can't say anything against that... share most of it 1:1


By the way Gachapin, you did not notice my earlier attempt in this post to suck you into another BTC price-related bet?   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy

Yes I got that. Thanks for your effort  Cheesy

Actually I was more interested in the guy stating we will see 20k+ on Christmas day. (Not bothering to search his comment, sorry)

However since shahzadafzal didn't answer my proposal for a bet yet, I was hesitant to poke the next guy with a bet, as I'm by no means a betting person and I didn't want to come off as one...  

but some price predictions seem quite delicious for taking the opposite side of a bet.  ...like 20k+ by Christmas or new ATH in 1st quarter of 2023  Smiley



ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 08:01:16 AM


Explanation
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4438
Merit: 14400


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 08:06:46 AM

By the way Gachapin, you did not notice my earlier attempt in this post to suck you into another BTC price-related bet?   Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy Cheesy
Yes I got that. Thanks for your effort  Cheesy

Actually I was more interested in the guy stating we will see 20k+ on Christmas day. (Not bothering to search his comment, sorry)

However since shahzadafzal didn't answer my proposal for a bet yet, I was hesitant to poke the next guy with a bet, as I'm by no means a betting person and I didn't want to come off as one...  

however some price predictions seem quite delicious for taking the opposite side of a bet.  ...like 20k+ by Christmas or new ATH in 1st quarter of 2023  Smiley

I feel that I am not really very much of a betting person either.. but members here make it so damned tempting when they are expressing pretty high level events with very high levels of certainty - so it may not even matter which direction in respect that they are making such strong proclamations - it becomes almost a bet that anyone could take - because the odds are against very strong proclamations coming true.

There are some fairly strong proclamations that are either far into the future or within a kind of framework in which it is a bit more difficult to take the other side of the bet.. so maybe the proclamation has to cross a certain threshold before I suggest a bet... and I have actually never had anyone take the other side of any suggested bet that I have made (which is usually in response to what another member states) - so maybe it is me?   Cry Cry Cry Cry

I do think it is a decently good exercise to see if we might be able to get members to stand behind their claims when they become so strong - and even feeling kind of outrageous.. which maybe in that sense getting into the details of structuring a bet is not easy, either. 

You might be familiar with some of my outrageous BTC price & timeline claims from my December 6, 2021 assignment off probabilities, and I even had something nearing a 0.5% chance that BTC prices could reach more than $1.5 million by mid-2023.. or something like that.. but no one was trying to bet me regarding those kinds of time and price framings... and I believe that you could fairly read my odds of 55% that the $69k top of November 9 was "not in".. and so I guess I was spewing out some kinds of specifics that were ultimately whimpy rather than strong, so no one really asserted that I was being outrageous, and I expected a wee bit more pushback that I did not get.. not that I can remember.
LFC_Bitcoin
Diamond Hands
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 4256
Merit: 12788



View Profile
December 22, 2022, 08:27:07 AM
Merited by fillippone (3), JayJuanGee (1), jojo69 (1), d_eddie (1), DdmrDdmr (1), serveria.com (1), Gachapin (1)

To keep with Bob’s tradition of gay Christmas, please accept my gay Christmas cards WO’s.
Merry Xmas to you & yours, hopefully a better 2023 than 2022, hey.




ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 09:01:20 AM


Explanation
serveria.com
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2744
Merit: 1370


Privacy Servers. Since 2009.


View Profile WWW
December 22, 2022, 09:08:56 AM



  Look at the size of his sack.  Imagine waking up to that?


serveria.com
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2744
Merit: 1370


Privacy Servers. Since 2009.


View Profile WWW
December 22, 2022, 09:24:28 AM
Merited by El duderino_ (10), LFC_Bitcoin (3), JayJuanGee (1), Gachapin (1)

@OP (Santa poster) and WO gays...sorry, I have no idea what "muscled" Santa manifested, lol.
Perhaps, I can guess, though.

Ho-ho-homo! I don't think many WOers are actually gay (apart from Bawb obviously). It's just a good old tradition which is believed to help Bitcoin rise!

ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 10:01:17 AM


Explanation
BitcoinBunny
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1736
Merit: 2976


Far, Far, Far Right Thug


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 11:01:14 AM
Merited by LFC_Bitcoin (1), jojo69 (1), Gachapin (1)

Merry Christmas to all you homos and Bawb.


ImThour
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1669


Bitcoin Bottom was at $15.4k


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 11:28:21 AM

Merry Christmas! 🎅🎄BTC
shahzadafzal
Copper Member
Legendary
*
Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 3216



View Profile
December 22, 2022, 11:51:04 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

You must not understand DCA.

DCA in respect to BTC does not give any shits about short term prices - except perhaps retaining a presumption that in the long term 4-10 years or more (or whatever is your holding timeline) bitcoin is likely to have prices that are higher than they are today, so in that sense that it is likely to be a good investment and profitable in the long term.

Buying on the dip is another dynamic that can be used to supplement DCA.. but it is not DCA... 

No no JJG you got me wrong, I understand DCA and you explained this on WO like how many times? 465? Starting in 2014

So by now I think we on WO should know DCA like palm of our hand Tongue 

Even I personally got some 1-1 JJG DCA Lectures


However since shahzadafzal didn't answer my proposal for a bet yet, I was hesitant to poke the next guy with a bet, as I'm by no means a betting person and I didn't want to come off as one... 

That was a bet? I mean that was just a sarcastic smiley.. look..

Regardless of who you support, I think we can all agree (except for the odd alpaca) that BTC should have made a new ATH by the latter. Smiley
First Quarter of 2023
wanna bet some BTCSmiley

I mean I could take it like you meant... it will be ATH even before first quarter of 2023.

Btw since BitcoinBunny mentioned alpaca aka llama, I was poking this singing llama with that comment Cheesy

Antisthenes
Copper Member
Jr. Member
*
Offline

Activity: 115
Merit: 5

JJG AI, is an attack vector on humanity. Beware.


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 11:52:51 AM

Hello Wall Observers, glad to be here. Cool

Great poster that Cryptotourist guy, shame he had to go.
I’ll try my best to walk in his shoes.



Finally, thanks God!



You’re funny.
BTW, you wouldn’t happen to be from the country that wants to steal the identity of another neighbouring country would you?
Boy, has he hurt you.



Wait!  What do you mean stacked address?!  How big of a stack?!  What do we ask about it??  AWww... damn!  It's too late; he's gone.  We may never know.

Good thing he didn’t say “baked” or similar, obviously he must have meant “staked” my Homer dude.
+1 WO’s merit.



"Let's" not and say that we did.

Remember that - when I drag your spineless ass across the forum.



No skin off my back.

Is this a joke? What skin?



Ok.  We've exhausted the topic.  I was merely responding to uie-pooie..

No we haven’t, we’re only getting started.



I did not say that, and I am not saying that.  The China mining ban is 2021 is an interesting point though in regards to a lot of bitcoin-related matters - but such "ban" did seems to temporarily affect the hashrate in a negative way with a near halvening of the hashrate that largely sprung back within about 4-6 months (and largely sprung back way more quickly than a lot of folks had expected).. .it also seemed to contribute towards already existing miners to have become extremely profitable and inspired a lot of new mining entrance - and perhaps overly leveraging.. and we see some of the fall out from that overleveraging and perhaps even overbuilding today.. ...and it seemed to inspire greater geographical diversity..  .. so yeah of course, BTC price was not unaffected by some of those matters.. but it would likely lead many folks to wrongedly assessments to attempt to hitch whatever various relationships of BTC price to hashrate during that period as if BTC prices were following hashrate.. but hey, believe whatevers you would like.. those are your choices.

Do you always use this many words to claim the obvious?
Hashrate affects the price - not the other way round - period.



Aren't you Mr. Wonderful and such a genius too?

If you thought Cryptotourist was such a great guy, just wait till we get acquainted.



Who cares whether you were right or not about the "scamdemic?"  For argument sake, let's assume that you were right about the "scamedemic from day one", as you put it.   You are trying to argue that if you happen to be right about one topic, then all of a sudden you are right (or an expert) on all topics.  That makes a lot of sense.

First things first, it’s scamdemic without the brackets.
I by no means claim to be expert on anything, but I always - and constantly - do my own research, instead of believing useful idiots such as yourself.



Is your dog friendly?  Or mean like you?

My dog is one of the friendliest dogs alive, apparently like Cryptotourist’s dog too.
BTW, I don’t think he was mean, he just had zero tolerance for bullshit, especially coming from wordy AI’s. Wink



I retract all semblance of permission from that earlier statement, if any "permission" had previously existed therein.

You will retract much more than that Jay, promise.



For the sake of which others?  Are you now speaking on behalf of readers of the WO?

I speak for myself, and myself only.



Now you are talking.

My great great great, great great great great, great great great great great, great great great great great great, great great great great great great great grandfather once said:

Quote
I’d rather rather fall among crows (korakes), than flatterers (kolakes), for the one devour the dead, but the other the living.
Antisthenes [446-366 BC]
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 2898
Merit: 2496


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
December 22, 2022, 12:01:21 PM


Explanation
Unknown Op
Hero Member
*****
Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 811


Pakistan Local Board Request


View Profile WWW
December 22, 2022, 12:19:16 PM

BitcoinBTC  is the only gift that keeps giving 🌟



https://twitter.com/TheBitcoinConf/status/1605900293387886595?t=WJGy4ipPdFk6j-_g6egdUA&s=19
Pages: « 1 ... 31492 31493 31494 31495 31496 31497 31498 31499 31500 31501 31502 31503 31504 31505 31506 31507 31508 31509 31510 31511 31512 31513 31514 31515 31516 31517 31518 31519 31520 31521 31522 31523 31524 31525 31526 31527 31528 31529 31530 31531 31532 31533 31534 31535 31536 31537 31538 31539 31540 31541 [31542] 31543 31544 31545 31546 31547 31548 31549 31550 31551 31552 31553 31554 31555 31556 31557 31558 31559 31560 31561 31562 31563 31564 31565 31566 31567 31568 31569 31570 31571 31572 31573 31574 31575 31576 31577 31578 31579 31580 31581 31582 31583 31584 31585 31586 31587 31588 31589 31590 31591 31592 ... 35748 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!