Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[T.Stuart]

It's bullshit! Don't fall for it! HODL!

[1715082900]

1715082900

[1715082900]

1715082900

[1715082900]

1715082900

[1715082900]

1715082900

[1715082900]

1715082900

[windjc]

Bitpay hacked? https://twitter.com/search?q=bitpay%20hacked&src=typd&f=realtime

oh wow and so sad if true

FUD

[fluidjax]

Apparently this is the 80k just stolen from bitpay hack - https://blockchain.info/address/1Facb8QnikfPUoo8WVFnyai3e1Hcov9y8T

I don't see 80k gone today or yesterday from it , but from early December.
Also this is the total amount ever received , not how much was on it.

I smell FUD

All looks like FUD to me also, there is nothing strange going on at those addresses, just large transactions going back weeks.
About $1Million has been transferred out a few hours ago in multiple transactions to multiple addresses, but  leaving $1million still there... this isn't a hack

[ablewasiereisawelba]

Stolen BTC never went into selloff, if I remember correctly.

doesn't matter, if/when this gets to mainstream news if it's true, price will plummet

edit: i think it's just FUD tbh, price went up to quick, someone probably wants cheap coins

btc-e is dropping already, wonder why thats the first exchange to drop 

btc-e is not dropping. Stop spreading FUD.

[molecular]

I am bullish, if we break through the 940 level with out much hesitation I think we are well on our way to 1500

we are well on our way to 1500 no doubt. but will be be days or months? who knows

weeks, quite clearly

but: fractions or multiples of weeks?

[niothor]

Bitpay hacked? https://twitter.com/search?q=bitpay%20hacked&src=typd&f=realtime

Keep hodling folks. This is Bitpay's problem only.

So I tried to follow that link and then this happened:



Is that what I think it is?

Is this something I don't have a clue what it is? Yup.
Please enlighten a fellow bit coiner who hasn't yet recover from the new year party.

[BitChick]

Apparently this is the 80k just stolen from bitpay hack - https://blockchain.info/address/1Facb8QnikfPUoo8WVFnyai3e1Hcov9y8T

I don't see 80k gone today or yesterday from it , but from early December.
Also this is the total amount ever received , not how much was on it.

I smell FUD

All looks like FUD to me also, there is nothing strange going on at those addresses, just large transactions going back weeks.
About $1Million has been transferred out a few hours ago in multiple transactions to multiple addresses, but  leaving $1million still there... this isn't a hack

People buying up more Lamborghinis?  

[bibib]

Panic! Drama!
Everything seems to be fine according to this post: https://twitter.com/lightcoin/status/419579403283480576

[justusranvier]

Is this something I don't have a clue what it is? Yup.
Please enlighten a fellow bit coiner who hasn't yet recover from the new year party.

Something interesting is happening.

When I visit Twitter with one web browser, I get an SSL connection with a certificate signed by VeriSign, the same one that I've always seen from Twitter.

However, when I visit Twitter using Firefox, then the connection is inexplicably signed from a new CA. It's almost as if there's something in the middle of the connection trying to do something nefarious.

[adsdas]

Yeah It's probably fud, sorry for posting it but I wasn't sure back then

[fotosonics]

How will you guys feel about bitcoin when 99% of it is owned by 3 banks and they sparingly distribute it among whomever they deem worthy?

How will 3 banks acquire 99% unless people are stupid enough to sell?

It won't be stupid to sell when it becomes apparent the 1% are trying to acquire 99% of bitcoin.

lol. we'll just switch to litecoin. Let the 3 banks have fun with bitcoin and use it to prop up their balance sheets or whatever these people do.

EDIT: how did you leave my ignore list?

I PRAY for the bitcoin is adopted by big fellas. Even if they acquire the 99% of it, they will be OBLIGED to pay for services and the circulation will begin again. What's NOT gonna happen, is the extra-super-duper inflation we have now. Only 21mn there EVER will be. That's all. You can't keep them all. You need money to make the world go around...

The bolded part cannot be said often enough.

Even if governments / banks / rotshilds / big corps / and all the other fucktards adopt bitcoin and manage to grab a sizable chunk... they will henceforth have to be fiscally responsible and suffer the consequences of their actions just as everyone else. That's the way it should be. Not bail-out and lender of last resort bullshit we have now.

Amen! You said it right.

Meanwhile I won't have any more to buy til the 9th, so hoping for at least a dip before the Big One. That rocket train to 1500.

PS - This is the most thoughtful and entertaining *and educational* thread in a long time.

[pietje]

Stolen BTC never went into selloff, if I remember correctly.

doesn't matter, if/when this gets to mainstream news if it's true, price will plummet

edit: i think it's just FUD tbh, price went up to quick, someone probably wants cheap coins

btc-e is dropping already, wonder why thats the first exchange to drop 

btc-e is not dropping. Stop spreading FUD.

I was just informing that it went from 825 to 810 in a few minutes, so far as i know thats a drop.
Luckily for everyone it turned out to be FUD. Even if your a bear you dont want this, as it destroyes bitcoins image.

[molecular]

Is this something I don't have a clue what it is? Yup.
Please enlighten a fellow bit coiner who hasn't yet recover from the new year party.

Something interesting is happening.

When I visit Twitter with one web browser, I get an SSL connection with a certificate signed by VeriSign, the same one that I've always seen from Twitter.

However, when I visit Twitter using Firefox, then the connection is inexplicably signed from a new CA. It's almost as if there's something in the middle of the connection trying to do something nefarious.

the cert is just for *.twimg.com, though.

It seems I'm getting yet another one for that domain: Cybertrust Public SureServer SV CA



EDIT: akamai is an organizational unit of twitter now?

These content delivery servers are all over the world. Maybe there's a reason for a large network of those to have certificates from different authorities and your ip range got switched to a different one or something.

[virtualfaqs]

Mtgox Buy Wall @ $910 is magnificent! I salute you, wall! 

[niothor]

Is this something I don't have a clue what it is? Yup.
Please enlighten a fellow bit coiner who hasn't yet recover from the new year party.

Something interesting is happening.

When I visit Twitter with one web browser, I get an SSL connection with a certificate signed by VeriSign, the same one that I've always seen from Twitter.

However, when I visit Twitter using Firefox, then the connection is inexplicably signed from a new CA. It's almost as if there's something in the middle of the connection trying to do something nefarious.

Check with all my browsers I get the same certificate.
Tried even your plugin , seems ok for me.

Interesting

[justusranvier]

the cert is just for *.twimg.com, though.

It seems I'm getting yet another one for that domain: Cybertrust Public SureServer SV CA

The really strange thing is that Chrome sees the expected Verisign certificate, while Firefox is being given one signed by a different CA.

[justusranvier]

Tried even your plugin , seems ok for me.

Certificate Patrol can't tell you if a cert is valid or not, but what it does do is remember which CA signed a certificate and warn you of something changes in a way that looks suspicious.

[molecular]

the cert is just for *.twimg.com, though.

It seems I'm getting yet another one for that domain: Cybertrust Public SureServer SV CA

The really strange thing is that Chrome sees the expected Verisign certificate, while Firefox is being given one signed by a different CA.

have you tried shift-reload (or clearing browser cache) in both browsers to see if that changes anything?

[niothor]

Tried even your plugin , seems ok for me.

Certificate Patrol can't tell you if a cert is valid or not, but what it does do is remember which CA signed a certificate and warn you of something changes in a way that looks suspicious.

What I meant is that I see the same info as displayed by chrome , not what you have posted in the screen.

[Miz4r]

So we saw a $10 drop on Bitstamp because of an unsubstantiated rumour, the FUD worked a little bit better on btc-e but even there not that many people fell for it. If Bitpay really was hacked we would have probably seen a 50% drop in price within a couple hours.