|
spike420211
|
 |
August 14, 2015, 07:20:48 PM |
|
Are we more likely to see $230 or $315 first?
I'd like to think we're never seeing $230 again, except for freak occurrences. I'll be happy @ 265 for awhile, I might wanna reload @ betcoin. Hmm, while I'm here...
Any1 ever try purchasing BTC @ Coinbase [or any other service/wallet] thru PayPal?
It would save me trips in and out of my checking account [we're talking < 100$ transaction here] |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
 Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
August 14, 2015, 08:03:09 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 14, 2015, 09:02:58 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
elasticband
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1036
Merit: 1000
Nighty Night Don't Let The Trolls Bite Nom Nom Nom
|
|
August 14, 2015, 09:34:07 PM |
|
$254 the bullish line, cross it and may the bear inside eat your soul. $240 we see the real bears. $283 next week bullish  |
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
|
August 14, 2015, 09:37:37 PM |
|
Hehe. I believe that there must be a way to shake weak hands. Hope you sold already. 😊
The last 18 or more months haven't been enough to shake weak hands? If they're still here I think they've earned the right to not be called weak any more. Weak hands are always in the market. They never go away. Ultimately they all lose though. It's like a casino in where the house always wins. The reason the house wins is because mothafuckers keep comin back even if they, against all odds, turned a dollar into a fucking million dollars. |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 14, 2015, 10:02:57 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 14, 2015, 11:02:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
|
August 14, 2015, 11:36:55 PM |
|
And I'm guessing these are test trades?? Because buy prices are all over the place ... many over $300 and even one @ $847.
"Prices all over the place" was a characteristic of the pseudo-trades by which Willy the Goxbot's slave accounts transferred coins to the master account. Nothing to do with those Gemini trades, of course. |
|
|
|
|
inca
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1176
Merit: 1000
|
|
August 14, 2015, 11:56:45 PM |
|
Market flat. Troll is a repetitive bore. Zzz.
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 15, 2015, 12:02:55 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
August 15, 2015, 12:16:07 AM |
|
The bid tsunami on finex seems to have been gotten slightly shorter, 21k to ~18k protecting mid 240's. Ho-hum as jimbo would say, let's see if the weekend brings some volume.
Remember bitcoiners:
"There is neither happiness nor misery in the world; there is only the comparison of one state with another, nothing more. He who has felt the deepest grief is best able to experience supreme happiness."
See... dramatic unrealized losses are the key to true success! Chin up!
|
|
|
|
|
|
natewelt
|
|
August 15, 2015, 12:17:55 AM |
|
Anybody have an explanation as to why there is a huge bid wall of support on finex but stamp shows the bid wall is actually smaller than the ask wall? Seems like they should at least be close to agreeing with eachother? I feel like looking at finex can give bulls a false sense of security and that stamp is actually the better orderbook to look at when assessing the support and resistance with huge bids and asks? What do you all think? |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 15, 2015, 01:03:04 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1765
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
August 15, 2015, 01:43:09 AM |
|
Of course, some good, well structured, loose-coupled bitcoin core software will be created. Eventually. But these guys are creating their product not eventually, but today. And today they have a choice - to create it on top of well written ether or on top of badly written bitcoin-core.
I get your point now. But I don't get their decision. Seems like putting the cart before the horse. Shall I build my great new business upon: 1) the world's most hardened and secure crypto currency, with the proviso that I'll need to rewrite some of the lower-level code; or 2) some apparently well-written software without any real-world testing, implementing new and novel untested technology, dependent upon new untested economic concepts? Oh well, it's not my VC dollar... |
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 15, 2015, 02:03:53 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
August 15, 2015, 02:33:10 AM |
|
I want to see the entire order book only of the exchange I'm trading with! Where did I say that I want to see the order book of all the other hundreds of bitcoin exchanges simultaneously?
Then trade on a platform that allows that. As said not every stock/forex broker allows you to see their order books. Your argument doesn't make sense
No, your argument doesn't make sense. What you're basically saying is - blind people are more difficult to manipulate than people capable of seeing every activity around? Is that really what you're trying to convince me?
If the whole order book is hidden then there is no way at all to manipulate anybody just by using the order books. If you are able to see the entire books then there is the ability to manipulate people using the order books with fake orders that the owners have no intentions of being filled. Is this incorrect? |
|
|
|
|
|
Cconvert2G36
|
|
August 15, 2015, 02:43:02 AM |
|
I want to see the entire order book only of the exchange I'm trading with! Where did I say that I want to see the order book of all the other hundreds of bitcoin exchanges simultaneously?
Then trade on a platform that allows that. As said not every stock/forex broker allows you to see their order books. Your argument doesn't make sense
No, your argument doesn't make sense. What you're basically saying is - blind people are more difficult to manipulate than people capable of seeing every activity around? Is that really what you're trying to convince me?
If the whole order book is hidden then there is no way at all to manipulate anybody just by using the order books. If you are able to see the entire books then there is the ability to manipulate people using the order books with fake orders that the owners have no intentions of being filled. Is this incorrect?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
August 15, 2015, 03:02:54 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wary
|
|
August 15, 2015, 03:06:54 AM |
|
Of course, some good, well structured, loose-coupled bitcoin core software will be created. Eventually. But these guys are creating their product not eventually, but today. And today they have a choice - to create it on top of well written ether or on top of badly written bitcoin-core.
I get your point now. But I don't get their decision. Seems like putting the cart before the horse. Shall I build my great new business upon: 1) the world's most hardened and secure crypto currency, with the proviso that I'll need to rewrite some of the lower-level code; or 2) some apparently well-written software without any real-world testing, implementing new and novel untested technology, dependent upon new untested economic concepts? Oh well, it's not my VC dollar... IMO the problem is that it's nobody's VC dollars. Their total budget AFAIK is around 50K$ and given these limited resources and the unfortunate fact that building on bitcoin base takes order(s) of magnitude more resources, their real choice is: 1. Create nothing. 2. Create something. They have chosen "something" and I can't blame them for it. Probably what bitcoin needs most now is somebody investing 10M$ into refactoring/writing from scratch bitcoin core. Problem is that everybody needs it, but nobody in particular. The tragedy of the commons  |
|
|
|
|
|
Poll
