Bitcoin Forum
September 09, 2025, 07:39:49 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 14573 14574 14575 14576 14577 14578 14579 14580 14581 14582 14583 14584 14585 14586 14587 14588 14589 14590 14591 14592 14593 14594 14595 14596 14597 14598 14599 14600 14601 14602 14603 14604 14605 14606 14607 14608 14609 14610 14611 14612 14613 14614 14615 14616 14617 14618 14619 14620 14621 14622 [14623] 14624 14625 14626 14627 14628 14629 14630 14631 14632 14633 14634 14635 14636 14637 14638 14639 14640 14641 14642 14643 14644 14645 14646 14647 14648 14649 14650 14651 14652 14653 14654 14655 14656 14657 14658 14659 14660 14661 14662 14663 14664 14665 14666 14667 14668 14669 14670 14671 14672 14673 ... 34898 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26837408 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:01:31 PM

Coin



Explanation
CuntChocula
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:01:51 PM

*cough*
fucking cheap coin if you ask me, and billy being bearish is a pretty darn good indicator, we're going up.

Adam simply posting is best indicator.
Down we go.
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:02:46 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:07:08 PM


everyone can see as clear as day there is some power struggle with bitcoin dev. and the solution to block limit is hard to see.
i'm not / no one is denying that
the speculations that bitcoin is about to fork as a result, and the dire consequences that ensue,  are largely exaggerated.
so what, the big picture looks gr8, segwit is a huge improvement, MUCH better solution then simply upping the limit.
and to me the fact that "the community has been tearing itself to pieces like a mental patient on bath salts." is just fucking bullish...

yep, and I know who my money is on in this game ... it will be the cypherpunks and cryptogeeks who built this thing and truly understand its subtle nuances and well-balanced incentive structures rather the CoinBase brian armstrong's R3 Hearn's and sundry govt toady boot-licker johnny-come-latelys who want a new PayPal for Big Bruh data-harvesting and black-listing.

the cypherpunks have more tricks up their sleeves in regards to hard forking POW, sybill attacks than you have half heard about ... if these wiener VCs and guvcorpro-bully boyz want a fork intrigue over this they better show up well prepared ... it's not about the money, it's about sending a message, choose your team wisely.

So you`re siding with Gavin? Well I`ll be...

you're probably too late an arrival to know up from down ... let's just say Gavin crapped in the nest, he was a useful steward and clean-cut kind face for Big Brah when bitcoin needed to front the first media shitstorms but now he's just embarassing himself amongst the adults. Satoshi knows and you do not want to be on the fork satoshi dumps on ...

Relax. Just teasing.

As an old-timer, how would you say Gavin crapped in the nest?
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:09:26 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Agree 100%. Put yer gunz down and fork this here shit!
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:10:28 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:11:51 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1001



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:14:39 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?

They will still manage to fuck up a potential deal by talking about details leading to them falling out over something else, delaying things for so long we will need a 50mb block size increase?
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2016, 11:15:45 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?

I dunno, but I reckon lunch money would be easy to come by there.

CuntChocula
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:22:12 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?

http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0myttPy9N1qzr9qko1_500.gif
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:23:49 PM

       ^GMax                             Gavin^
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:26:26 PM

Is the war is over NOW?

https://github.com/gavinandresen/bips/blob/92e1efd0493c1cbde47304c9711f13f413cc9099/bip-bump2mb.mediawiki
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:26:37 PM

ok looks the trolls, tryhards and simply bored chattering classes are sufficiently stirred up again ... bye.
DaRude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3138
Merit: 2007


In order to dump coins one must have coins


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:28:41 PM

let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



Still stand by that call?  I think there is a one hundred and eleventeen percent chance that you are wrong.  I will bet my last satoshi on it.


There you go... not making sense, again....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Huh?  He was right, though? went to 379 briefly about 10 mins later....

Now Stamp is under as well. My last satoshi is safe.

Thought everyone is following btc-e now  Cheesy
rdnkjdi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1257
Merit: 1009


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:30:03 PM


I would be shocked if this doesn't drag on for three more months with nothing being decided.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12852


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:42:16 PM

let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



Still stand by that call?  I think there is a one hundred and eleventeen percent chance that you are wrong.  I will bet my last satoshi on it.


There you go... not making sense, again....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Huh?  He was right, though? went to 379 briefly about 10 mins later....

BullyJA may have been right, but hopefully you get my point. 

Both of them were asserting exaggerations, but at least Adam's exaggeration was logically possible (even though fairly unlikely). 

I mean in bitcoinlandia you gotta be careful with some of the "never" and "for sure" assertions, even though in normal culture people like to talk like that... but in markets, such as bitcoin prices, a lot of this is probabilities and expectations and timeline...

Anyhow, some people go way overboard in their assertions,  yet I understand the point, as well, that we may get annoyed if everyone posted their view of numbers 99.99999935696124%... blah blah blah... because even logical numbers can be quite exaggerated and confusing and phrased in ways that are deceptive.




ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:57:00 PM


tbh with all this forking-crap i expected bitcoin to be sub 300$ anytime soon. that we are still around 380$ really surprises me. either i am ahead of the market or i am wrong by the market.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 29, 2016, 12:01:36 AM

Coin



Explanation
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 29, 2016, 12:03:01 AM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?

They will still manage to fuck up a potential deal by talking about details leading to them falling out over something else, delaying things for so long we will need a 50mb block size increase?

DING!! DING!! DING!! WE HAVE A WINNER!!!
TReano
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 256



View Profile
January 29, 2016, 12:04:37 AM


tbh with all this forking-crap i expected bitcoin to be sub 300$ anytime soon. that we are still around 380$ really surprises me. either i am ahead of the market or i am wrong by the market.


true. It's a total fuck up mess. I wouldn't be surprised at all if we end up at 200$ again...

I guess the reason why we are still so high is that most people from outside have no idea what is really going on. The further the price falls the more people will look into it and start understanding the mess.
If this keeps on going like this Bitcoin is really not that robust and could get thrown back a couple years...


I mean the question is simple: 1, 2 or even more MB and people already start a civil war. It's plain stupid.
Pages: « 1 ... 14573 14574 14575 14576 14577 14578 14579 14580 14581 14582 14583 14584 14585 14586 14587 14588 14589 14590 14591 14592 14593 14594 14595 14596 14597 14598 14599 14600 14601 14602 14603 14604 14605 14606 14607 14608 14609 14610 14611 14612 14613 14614 14615 14616 14617 14618 14619 14620 14621 14622 [14623] 14624 14625 14626 14627 14628 14629 14630 14631 14632 14633 14634 14635 14636 14637 14638 14639 14640 14641 14642 14643 14644 14645 14646 14647 14648 14649 14650 14651 14652 14653 14654 14655 14656 14657 14658 14659 14660 14661 14662 14663 14664 14665 14666 14667 14668 14669 14670 14671 14672 14673 ... 34898 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!