Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 09:37:31 PM *
News: Voting for pizza day contest
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 14573 14574 14575 14576 14577 14578 14579 14580 14581 14582 14583 14584 14585 14586 14587 14588 14589 14590 14591 14592 14593 14594 14595 14596 14597 14598 14599 14600 14601 14602 14603 14604 14605 14606 14607 14608 14609 14610 14611 14612 14613 14614 14615 14616 14617 14618 14619 14620 14621 14622 [14623] 14624 14625 14626 14627 14628 14629 14630 14631 14632 14633 14634 14635 14636 14637 14638 14639 14640 14641 14642 14643 14644 14645 14646 14647 14648 14649 14650 14651 14652 14653 14654 14655 14656 14657 14658 14659 14660 14661 14662 14663 14664 14665 14666 14667 14668 14669 14670 14671 14672 14673 ... 33465 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26403909 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 10:48:33 PM


everyone can see as clear as day there is some power struggle with bitcoin dev. and the solution to block limit is hard to see.
i'm not / no one is denying that
the speculations that bitcoin is about to fork as a result, and the dire consequences that ensue,  are largely exaggerated.
so what, the big picture looks gr8, segwit is a huge improvement, MUCH better solution then simply upping the limit.
and to me the fact that "the community has been tearing itself to pieces like a mental patient on bath salts." is just fucking bullish...

yep, and I know who my money is on in this game ... it will be the cypherpunks and cryptogeeks who built this thing and truly understand its subtle nuances and well-balanced incentive structures rather the CoinBase brian armstrong's R3 Hearn's and sundry govt toady boot-licker johnny-come-latelys who want a new PayPal for Big Bruh data-harvesting and black-listing.

the cypherpunks have more tricks up their sleeves in regards to hard forking POW, sybill attacks than you have half heard about ... if these wiener VCs and guvcorpro-bully boyz want a fork intrigue over this they better show up well prepared ... it's not about the money, it's about sending a message, choose your team wisely.

So you`re siding with Gavin? Well I`ll be...

you're probably too late an arrival to know up from down ... let's just say Gavin crapped in the nest, he was a useful steward and clean-cut kind face for Big Brah when bitcoin needed to front the first media shitstorms but now he's just embarassing himself amongst the adults. Satoshi knows and you do not want to be on the fork satoshi dumps on ...
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2016, 10:52:08 PM
Last edit: January 28, 2016, 11:05:27 PM by sAt0sHiFanClub

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

segwit *always* needed to be hard forked.  The soft fork dream was never going to float if anyone valued decent software design.

btw - Can you source that?  Wink
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2016, 10:52:14 PM

let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



I feel like maybe you haven't been paying attention to the fact that the community has been tearing itself to pieces like a mental patient on bath salts?

everyone can see as clear as day there is some power struggle with bitcoin dev. and the solution to block limit is hard to see.
i'm not / no one is denying that
the speculations that bitcoin is about to fork as a result, and the dire consequences that ensue,  are largely exaggerated.
so what, the big picture looks gr8, segwit is a huge improvement, MUCH better solution then simply upping the limit.
and to me the fact that "the community has been tearing itself to pieces like a mental patient on bath salts." is just fucking bullish...

yep, and I know who my money is on in this game ... it will be the cypherpunks and cryptogeeks who built this thing and truly understand its subtle nuances and well-balanced incentive structures rather the CoinBase brian armstrong's R3 Hearn's and sundry govt toady boot-licker johnny-come-latelys who want a new PayPal for Big Bruh data-harvesting and black-listing.

the cypherpunks have more tricks up their sleeves in regards to hard forking POW, sybill attacks than you have half heard about ... if these wiener VCs and guvcorpro-bully boyz want a fork intrigue over this they better show up well prepared ... it's not about the money, it's about sending a message, choose your team wisely.

It's you who want to turn Bitcoin into PayPal by pushing users off the main chain and out onto settlement layers. You're the people that want to have the centralized power in the system. You think we don't understand the delicate balance of features at play, but you are sadly mistaken.  If Bitcoin can't survive a hard fork, then it wasn't worth investing in in the first place.  I think it will survive and thrive but one way or another, we're gonna find out because it damn sure won't survive being run by a bunch of ideological codemonkeys without the business sense to run a lemonade stand.

I got into this game because I'm a hard core anarcho-capitalist, but I'm not going to pretend to know that I know what's better for the customer than the customer. The Market is God and always always has the last word.
billyjoeallen
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1106
Merit: 1007


Hide your women


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2016, 10:56:12 PM

let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



Still stand by that call?  I think there is a one hundred and eleventeen percent chance that you are wrong.  I will bet my last satoshi on it.


There you go... not making sense, again....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Huh?  He was right, though? went to 379 briefly about 10 mins later....

Now Stamp is under as well. My last satoshi is safe.
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2016, 11:00:07 PM


yep, and I know who my money is on in this game ... it will be the cypherpunks and cryptogeeks who built this thing and truly understand its subtle nuances and well-balanced incentive structures rather the CoinBase brian armstrong's R3 Hearn's and sundry govt toady boot-licker johnny-come-latelys who want a new PayPal for Big Bruh data-harvesting and black-listing.

the cypherpunks have more tricks up their sleeves in regards to hard forking POW, sybill attacks than you have half heard about ... if these wiener VCs and guvcorpro-bully boyz want a fork intrigue over this they better show up well prepared ... it's not about the money, it's about sending a message, choose your team wisely.

But adam said bitcoin is for Banks and BigBusiness...  Where the f*ck do you think you are going to fit in that vision? Shining their shoes, perhaps? Bringing the sandwiches?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2212
Merit: 1779


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:01:31 PM

Coin



Explanation
CuntChocula
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:01:51 PM

*cough*
fucking cheap coin if you ask me, and billy being bearish is a pretty darn good indicator, we're going up.

Adam simply posting is best indicator.
Down we go.
ImI
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1946
Merit: 1019



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:02:46 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:07:08 PM


everyone can see as clear as day there is some power struggle with bitcoin dev. and the solution to block limit is hard to see.
i'm not / no one is denying that
the speculations that bitcoin is about to fork as a result, and the dire consequences that ensue,  are largely exaggerated.
so what, the big picture looks gr8, segwit is a huge improvement, MUCH better solution then simply upping the limit.
and to me the fact that "the community has been tearing itself to pieces like a mental patient on bath salts." is just fucking bullish...

yep, and I know who my money is on in this game ... it will be the cypherpunks and cryptogeeks who built this thing and truly understand its subtle nuances and well-balanced incentive structures rather the CoinBase brian armstrong's R3 Hearn's and sundry govt toady boot-licker johnny-come-latelys who want a new PayPal for Big Bruh data-harvesting and black-listing.

the cypherpunks have more tricks up their sleeves in regards to hard forking POW, sybill attacks than you have half heard about ... if these wiener VCs and guvcorpro-bully boyz want a fork intrigue over this they better show up well prepared ... it's not about the money, it's about sending a message, choose your team wisely.

So you`re siding with Gavin? Well I`ll be...

you're probably too late an arrival to know up from down ... let's just say Gavin crapped in the nest, he was a useful steward and clean-cut kind face for Big Brah when bitcoin needed to front the first media shitstorms but now he's just embarassing himself amongst the adults. Satoshi knows and you do not want to be on the fork satoshi dumps on ...

Relax. Just teasing.

As an old-timer, how would you say Gavin crapped in the nest?
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:09:26 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Agree 100%. Put yer gunz down and fork this here shit!
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:10:28 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:11:51 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?
coins101
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1456
Merit: 1000



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:14:39 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?

They will still manage to fuck up a potential deal by talking about details leading to them falling out over something else, delaying things for so long we will need a 50mb block size increase?
sAt0sHiFanClub
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 546
Merit: 500


Warning: Confrmed Gavinista


View Profile WWW
January 28, 2016, 11:15:45 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?

I dunno, but I reckon lunch money would be easy to come by there.

CuntChocula
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:22:12 PM

Looks like segwit will need to be hard forked. That should finally bring this issue to a close.

why? just combine it with a 2MB hardfork and everybody is happy.

Because segwit will need a hard fork is exactly the reason why the uncertainty over increasing the blocksize will be over soon.  

We will soon enter political negotiations between the main camps where they will horse trade a 'peace' deal which will result in unity, therefore bringing things to a head.

Yah...one problem. They're all nerds. Do you know what that means?

http://31.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m0myttPy9N1qzr9qko1_500.gif
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:23:49 PM

       ^GMax                             Gavin^
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:26:26 PM

Is the war is over NOW?

https://github.com/gavinandresen/bips/blob/92e1efd0493c1cbde47304c9711f13f413cc9099/bip-bump2mb.mediawiki
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:26:37 PM

ok looks the trolls, tryhards and simply bored chattering classes are sufficiently stirred up again ... bye.
DaRude
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2833
Merit: 1851


In order to dump coins one must have coins


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:28:41 PM

let me say it again


 less than 380, NEVER AGAIN.



Still stand by that call?  I think there is a one hundred and eleventeen percent chance that you are wrong.  I will bet my last satoshi on it.


There you go... not making sense, again....  Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes


Huh?  He was right, though? went to 379 briefly about 10 mins later....

Now Stamp is under as well. My last satoshi is safe.

Thought everyone is following btc-e now  Cheesy
rdnkjdi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1256
Merit: 1009


View Profile
January 28, 2016, 11:30:03 PM


I would be shocked if this doesn't drag on for three more months with nothing being decided.
Pages: « 1 ... 14573 14574 14575 14576 14577 14578 14579 14580 14581 14582 14583 14584 14585 14586 14587 14588 14589 14590 14591 14592 14593 14594 14595 14596 14597 14598 14599 14600 14601 14602 14603 14604 14605 14606 14607 14608 14609 14610 14611 14612 14613 14614 14615 14616 14617 14618 14619 14620 14621 14622 [14623] 14624 14625 14626 14627 14628 14629 14630 14631 14632 14633 14634 14635 14636 14637 14638 14639 14640 14641 14642 14643 14644 14645 14646 14647 14648 14649 14650 14651 14652 14653 14654 14655 14656 14657 14658 14659 14660 14661 14662 14663 14664 14665 14666 14667 14668 14669 14670 14671 14672 14673 ... 33465 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!