Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[Laosai]

Just something I saw. It would fit perfectly. To the Elliott Wave Pattern.
The 5th wave is the only thing which doesn't fit perfectly. Could have been a bit higher... But still.
I also like how it sold off after we barely touched 3000 CNY.

So huge drop incoming?

Well just oppened a huge short so I agree with you. We gonna see a small dumping in not long.

should this pattern hold i guess we'll see 420 maybe 410, before moving >750 ( given this the agreement holds together )

just keep that inmind.

Yeah of course. Unless btc sees a real failure, any drops can be nothing but temporary.

[adamstgBit]

... i want this resolved ASAP way more.

Not possible due to

...
☑  everyone loses. I win

if you win we all loss

i could not agree more

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

make note of anyone loudly expressing frustration with this agreement and actively trying to stop it

its likely they are stupid.

FFS

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1372397.0

strongly recommend moving your BTC out of coinbase
do not trust these spot light loving restarts, and show them your disuse for actively trying to stop what little progress we FINALLY have made, by leaving them.
if you leave coins on coinbase, you are supporting, another year of bitching and nothing getting done while bitcoin bleeds.

I checkid my coinbase app on my iPad to see price has raised sence community has reached uncotinshous concentsus. Then I red that CEO brian is trying to kill bit coins with more capacity before late 2017. Quickly, I moved my millis to my blockchain wallet, phew, thanks Adam, that guy is evil for real, tries to kill the bit coin concentsus.

This honey marmot don't care about capashity, price raised to $1000 in 2013 with 1MB, and wheel do again in 2016. Cheers, we can't loose.

Skål!!!

coinbase could get there way you two would be here telling us they are killing bitcoin
all you care about the entertainment value of disagreeing...
admit it.

I'm halfway in the "wait and see"-phase, but I'm glad there are central business actors in the Bitcoin space who's got the guts to tell the devs off when they deserve it. I still think the lot of them should be fired. At the very least, Wladimir should go. But it doesn't work that way, so having some big players calling them out is nice.

Besides, we all know you'll be here screaming like a little bitch when Wladimir refuses to implement the code 5-6 months from now. We wouldn't want to make you feel out of place.

Business actors are leeches. Bitcoin ain't for Wall Street. It never was. Lardo, you surprise me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PaoLy7PHwk

[Cconvert2G36]

Business actors are leeches. Bitcoin ain't for Wall Street. It never was. Lardo, you surprise me.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8PaoLy7PHwk

*clicks link to subversive ballad*

*Pre-roll ad for Wells Fargo plays*   

[brg444]

https://twitter.com/gavinandresen/status/701258037747646464

So.... what's the process for deciding what goes into Core hard fork and how it's deployed? Same way timeline was decided?

Burn?

burn indeed

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

We have recently become aware that your username [Brg444] is inconsistant with documentation you submitted upon registering. Your account with us has been locked pending authentication of your identity.

In the space provided, please type in your IP address, Mother's maiden name, date of birth, place of residence, current combined annual household income, and shirt size.

[blunderer]

https://twitter.com/gavinandresen/status/701258037747646464

So.... what's the process for deciding what goes into Core hard fork and how it's deployed? Same way timeline was decided?

Burn?

burn indeed

Yeah, well, Gavin is the Chief Scientist of Bitcoin. Who, exactly, are your lame friends again?

[brg444]

https://twitter.com/gavinandresen/status/701258037747646464

So.... what's the process for deciding what goes into Core hard fork and how it's deployed? Same way timeline was decided?

Burn?

burn indeed

Yeah, well, Gavin is the Chief Scientist of Bitcoin. Who, exactly, are your lame friends again?

Lol, Lambie you've been losing your edge lately. What happened?

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[mavericklm]

We have recently become aware that your username [Brg444] is inconsistant with documentation you submitted upon registering. Your account with us has been locked pending authentication of your identity.

In the space provided, please type in your IP address, Mother's maiden name, date of birth, place of residence, current combined annual household income, and shirt size.

nice!!!

[adamstgBit]

you know this agreement is the best thing we've ever seen when brg444 and I agree on it.

[billyjoeallen]

make note of anyone loudly expressing frustration with this agreement and actively trying to stop it

its likely they are stupid.

FFS

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1372397.0

strongly recommend moving your BTC out of coinbase
do not trust these spot light loving restarts, and show them your disuse for actively trying to stop what little progress we FINALLY have made, by leaving them.
if you leave coins on coinbase, you are supporting, another year of bitching and nothing getting done while bitcoin bleeds.

I think it was a bad move on the part of Armstrong. We need the miners on the big block side and opposing their deal alienates them.  He's right though that we still need to run our Classic nodes but as a deal enforcement mechanism. You know damn well Core will renege if we don't have leverage on them.

I'm just wondering how Back is going to sell this to the true believers without have them ragequit.  They see themselves as making a principled stand on engineering integrity. They are, but they also don't understand that it doesn't matter.  A top security network isn't possible as long as majority hashpower is concentrated in China.  A value network, not a quality network is our only option.

[Cconvert2G36]

We have recently become aware that your username [Brg444] is inconsistant with documentation you submitted upon registering. Your account with us has been locked pending authentication of your identity.

In the space provided, please type in your IP address, Mother's maiden name, date of birth, place of residence, current combined annual household income, and shirt size. employer.

[mavericklm]

fuck blockstream!!! & the rest of the pussies!

[blunderer]

https://twitter.com/gavinandresen/status/701258037747646464

So.... what's the process for deciding what goes into Core hard fork and how it's deployed? Same way timeline was decided?

Burn?

burn indeed

Yeah, well, Gavin is the Chief Scientist of Bitcoin. Who, exactly, are your lame friends again?

Lol, Lambie you've been losing your edge lately. What happened?

Yeah, just like i thought, you got nothing. Gavin's the Chief Scientist, and your friends just cruise toilets & collect welfare

[adamstgBit]

make note of anyone loudly expressing frustration with this agreement and actively trying to stop it

its likely they are stupid.

FFS

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1372397.0

strongly recommend moving your BTC out of coinbase
do not trust these spot light loving restarts, and show them your disuse for actively trying to stop what little progress we FINALLY have made, by leaving them.
if you leave coins on coinbase, you are supporting, another year of bitching and nothing getting done while bitcoin bleeds.

I think it was a bad move on the part of Armstrong. We need the miners on the big block side and opposing their deal alienates them.  He's right though that we still need to run our Classic nodes but as a deal enforcement mechanism. You know damn well Core will renege if we don't have leverage on them.

I'm just wondering how Back is going to sell this to the true believers without have them ragequit.  They see themselves as making a principled stand on engineering integrity. They are, but they also don't understand that it doesn't matter.  A top security network isn't possible as long as majority hashpower is concentrated in China.  A value network, not a quality network is our only option.

now we fully understand why we need at least 1 competing impl.

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

make note of anyone loudly expressing frustration with this agreement and actively trying to stop it

its likely they are stupid.

FFS

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1372397.0

strongly recommend moving your BTC out of coinbase
do not trust these spot light loving restarts, and show them your disuse for actively trying to stop what little progress we FINALLY have made, by leaving them.
if you leave coins on coinbase, you are supporting, another year of bitching and nothing getting done while bitcoin bleeds.

I think it was a bad move on the part of Armstrong. We need the miners on the big block side and opposing their deal alienates them.  He's right though that we still need to run our Classic nodes but as a deal enforcement mechanism. You know damn well Core will renege if we don't have leverage on them.

I'm just wondering how Back is going to sell this to the true believers without have them ragequit.  They see themselves as making a principled stand on engineering integrity. They are, but they also don't understand that it doesn't matter.  A top security network isn't possible as long as majority hashpower is concentrated in China.  A value network, not a quality network is our only option.

now we fully understand why we need at least 1 competing impl.

Competing implementations that didn't threaten to break the protocol would be nice.

Am I asking too much?

[adamstgBit]

make note of anyone loudly expressing frustration with this agreement and actively trying to stop it

its likely they are stupid.

FFS

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1372397.0

strongly recommend moving your BTC out of coinbase
do not trust these spot light loving restarts, and show them your disuse for actively trying to stop what little progress we FINALLY have made, by leaving them.
if you leave coins on coinbase, you are supporting, another year of bitching and nothing getting done while bitcoin bleeds.

I think it was a bad move on the part of Armstrong. We need the miners on the big block side and opposing their deal alienates them.  He's right though that we still need to run our Classic nodes but as a deal enforcement mechanism. You know damn well Core will renege if we don't have leverage on them.

I'm just wondering how Back is going to sell this to the true believers without have them ragequit.  They see themselves as making a principled stand on engineering integrity. They are, but they also don't understand that it doesn't matter.  A top security network isn't possible as long as majority hashpower is concentrated in China.  A value network, not a quality network is our only option.

now we fully understand why we need at least 1 competing impl.

Competing implementations that didn't threaten to break the protocol would be nice.

Am I asking too much?

lol agreed.

[billyjoeallen]

make note of anyone loudly expressing frustration with this agreement and actively trying to stop it

its likely they are stupid.

FFS

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1372397.0

strongly recommend moving your BTC out of coinbase
do not trust these spot light loving restarts, and show them your disuse for actively trying to stop what little progress we FINALLY have made, by leaving them.
if you leave coins on coinbase, you are supporting, another year of bitching and nothing getting done while bitcoin bleeds.

I think it was a bad move on the part of Armstrong. We need the miners on the big block side and opposing their deal alienates them.  He's right though that we still need to run our Classic nodes but as a deal enforcement mechanism. You know damn well Core will renege if we don't have leverage on them.

I'm just wondering how Back is going to sell this to the true believers without have them ragequit.  They see themselves as making a principled stand on engineering integrity. They are, but they also don't understand that it doesn't matter.  A top security network isn't possible as long as majority hashpower is concentrated in China.  A value network, not a quality network is our only option.

now we fully understand why we need at least 1 competing impl.

Competing implementations that didn't threaten to break the protocol would be nice.

Am I asking too much?

Yes. An empty threat is worthless. 

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

The threat would be the change in management. Seems like that ought to be enough.