Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[hdbuck]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

Consensus is reached every new block since 2009.

[1714849950]

1714849950

[1714849950]

1714849950

[1714849950]

1714849950

[Gyrsur]

satoshi makes history again

[bargainbin]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

[arandy]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

[Dekker3D]

BTC price is going strong still despite of the sell orders that was triggered when it hit the $450 mark. Lets all hope that there'll be a new floor brought to us by the 'consensus'.

[LMGTFY]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

The title is slightly misleading talking about miners, but the article is clear enough - developers and pools representing a majority of miners have agreed a roadmap. They've got consensus in as much as they've agreed the roadmap. But it's not until that roadmap is complete, and miners* can be seen to clearly support a hard-fork that consensus in the Bitcoin-protocol sense occurs.

* and nodes? I used to be a miner, long ago, but never really paid much attention to nodes.

[bargainbin]

satoshi makes history again

[bargainbin]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a stump speech document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

[Gyrsur]

satoshi makes history again

thanks for the quote. will make history. 

[ChartBuddy]

Coin



Explanation

[hdbuck]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a stump speech document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document"  

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

[bargainbin]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a stump speech document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document"  

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Because unsigned non-violent non-aggressive non-contracts have proven themselves to be 100% effective throughout history. With Bitcoin in particular.

[aztecminer]

We've been getting full blocks all day.  Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

imo that is #incompetence ...

[Karartma1]

I think I know why satoshi decided to be out of the game: that photograph is so scary  
Damn..... This is getting so lame

[aztecminer]

We've been getting full blocks all day.  Armstrong may be right that a HF in 2017 is too little too late.

wheres brg444 when you need him

full blocks != end of the world

if we actually start filling 4MB blocks completely full by 2017

how high is price going to be?

 

yeah but... bitcoin doesnt have 4MB blocks. #incompetence

[Tzupy]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

The poll results look like two wolves and a lamb voting what to have for lunch.

[aztecminer]

Coin



Explanation

lol at 94% full blocks this morning. #GimpCoined ...

[hdbuck]

With Consensus reached wouldn't it be time we get above the $500 mark this week?

I guess it depends on what you mean by "consensus."

I was talking about this consensus. Maybe i don't read enough but isn't this the thing that gets everything back on track into 1 camp again?
https://www.cryptocoinsnews.com/bitcoin-core-miners-agree-hard-fork-code-comes-july-2016-activation-in-2017/

Well, if you feel that a bunch of pool owners meeting behind closed doors with Core reps & signing a stump speech document makes for consensus, I guess it's moon time Edit:
Please read the thing that was signed, and examine each item on the list.
Even if we construe this as a legally binding document, what, other than "[limit won't be more than] 4MB," did Core commit to? What did the miners?

ROFL at "legally binding document"  

whatever rocks your statist governance creepy boat troll.

Because unsigned non-violent non-aggressive non-contracts have proven themselves to be 100% effective throughout history. With Bitcoin in particular.

What are you talking about??!

It is all in the code here, like, you know, in the protocol you just cannot change you pedo freak  

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

I think I know why satoshi decided to be out of the game: that photograph is so scary  
Damn..... This is getting so lame

Totally. If I hadn’t needed to use Bitcoin for my online drugs business I would never have got involved with you toxic lot.

[aztecminer]

i think this weekends pump causing the blocks to fill up proves that bitcoin is without a doubt #paralyzed... and i'm going to laugh at it! .. that is some funny shiat! without the ability to scale bitcoin cant win. lol. too funny.... i doubt bitcoin can withstand much more pumping without completely freezing up . that really is hilarious.. #GimpedCoin