Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
|
February 26, 2016, 02:09:15 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Laosai
|
|
February 26, 2016, 02:10:05 PM |
|
The fact that 90% of bitcoin holders bought bitcoins just to "get more fiat money" means that they all have a sell point and there will be very few huge run-ups.
But that's ok because it creates liquidity and stabilizes the price so bitcoin can actually be used as a currency.
Perfectly correct statement. Most people are not really in btc itself. But it avoids huge buble inflation it stabilizes the price and the inflation of btc so it's a rather good thing.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
February 26, 2016, 02:21:52 PM |
|
Wow! Listening to normal people talk about Bitcoin is weird.
|
|
|
|
Tzupy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1074
|
|
February 26, 2016, 02:26:19 PM |
|
Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.
I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.
The bulls have a couple of days to break resistance at 450$. If they fail, there will be a lot of panicky downtrend.
|
|
|
|
bargainbin
|
|
February 26, 2016, 02:26:53 PM |
|
...It's a slidebar situation, not a binary one. The more you push the slidebar higher, the more problems you create. And pushing it just to satisfy the need for spam is irrational.
Yes, why others can't see it is beyond me. How much of centralization are you willing to sacrifice in order to support more dust transactions? Good question. It's more of a silly question. Or, dare I say it? A frickin' stupid question. Because it presupposes that centralization will be altered in a meaningful way. Let me use the "two wolves and one sheep deciding on dinner" analogy smalblockers have run into the ground: Right now, it's not 2 wolves and a sheep, it's NINE wolves and a sheep. You're the sheep. The wolves are all friends, they hang together, already shook hands on having you for dinner. Here, sheep: Now tell me more about slidebars.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
February 26, 2016, 02:44:27 PM |
|
Lambie, you’re becoming a bully like iCEBREAKER
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
February 26, 2016, 02:53:54 PM |
|
Lambie, you’re becoming a bully like iCEBREAKER Now you're being unfair. Lambie has always been an asshole. iCEBREAKER is the pretender. And not a very good one. But seriously, eli5 it to me now. How will decentralization be altered in a meaningful way if the number of nodes go down from 6000 to 2000 (I don't think it would, but I'm curious nonetheless)?
|
|
|
|
Spaceman_Spiff
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
|
|
February 26, 2016, 02:56:37 PM |
|
Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.
I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.
The bulls have a couple of days to break resistance at 450$. If they fail, there will be a lot of panicky downtrend. Or not
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1779
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
February 26, 2016, 03:00:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
February 26, 2016, 03:01:22 PM Last edit: February 26, 2016, 03:12:35 PM by BlindMayorBitcorn |
|
Lambie, you’re becoming a bully like iCEBREAKER Now you're being unfair. Lambie has always been an asshole. iCEBREAKER is the pretender. And not a very good one. But seriously, eli5 it to me now. How will decentralization be altered in a meaningful way if the number of nodes go down from 6000 to 2000 (I don't think it would, but I'm curious nonetheless)? Good question. I don't know. I'm blind as a bat over here.
|
|
|
|
Laosai
|
|
February 26, 2016, 03:02:40 PM |
|
Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.
I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.
The bulls have a couple of days to break resistance at 450$. If they fail, there will be a lot of panicky downtrend. Especially considering the hope from the halving price rise has decreased a lot since everyone is waiting it :-/
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1037
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
|
February 26, 2016, 03:15:44 PM |
|
classic core head and shoulders pattern about to complete, targeting just under 400.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2226
Merit: 1779
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
February 26, 2016, 04:00:50 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
|
February 26, 2016, 04:17:12 PM |
|
Blocks are full again. I think this will now probably happen any time the market tries to pump.
I don't see much upside but there's a lot of potential downside.
The bulls have a couple of days to break resistance at 450$. If they fail, there will be a lot of panicky downtrend. Especially considering the hope from the halving price rise has decreased a lot since everyone is waiting it :-/ The miners will pump the jam or loose money.
|
|
|
|
toknormal
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3066
Merit: 1188
|
|
February 26, 2016, 04:19:12 PM |
|
Launch window opening in a couple of days for Bitcoin Earth to Mars minimum energy transit and escape from the $500 sphere of gravity.
All lights continue to be green.
|
|
|
|
bakingbad
|
|
February 26, 2016, 04:26:28 PM |
|
the price is pretty stable right now, im wondering if it will stay like that for a while, im looking to buy some bitcoins but honestly i dont have the courage to do that now
|
|
|
|
|
Armando
|
|
February 26, 2016, 04:32:56 PM |
|
...It's a slidebar situation, not a binary one. The more you push the slidebar higher, the more problems you create. And pushing it just to satisfy the need for spam is irrational.
Yes, why others can't see it is beyond me. How much of centralization are you willing to sacrifice in order to support more dust transactions? Good question. It's more of a silly question. Or, dare I say it? A frickin' stupid question. Because it presupposes that centralization will be altered in a meaningful way. Let me use the "two wolves and one sheep deciding on dinner" analogy smalblockers have run into the ground: Right now, it's not 2 wolves and a sheep, it's NINE wolves and a sheep. You're the sheep. The wolves are all friends, they hang together, already shook hands on having you for dinner. Here, sheep: Now tell me more about slidebars. Who are these people? Upper picture dunno chinese miners maybe? And the second one? Sorry for prob stupid question I'm just curious who the "wolves" are ))))
|
|
|
|
gentlemand
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2590
Merit: 3014
Welt Am Draht
|
|
February 26, 2016, 04:35:21 PM |
|
Who are these people? Upper picture dunno chinese miners maybe? And the second one? Sorry for prob stupid question I'm just curious who the "wolves" are ))))
They know who you are. That's the important thing. Go out and have fun tonight. Let them do the worrying.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
February 26, 2016, 04:37:37 PM |
|
Lots of "if's" there. When every number in a calculation is an unknown...
|
|
|
|
|