Hunyadi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1281
Merit: 1000
☑ ♟ ☐ ♚
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:14:44 PM |
|
Current bitcoin hodlers are surprisingly 'strong hands'. There is so much FUD and pessimism currently that the situation is quite scary for some, I'm sure. On the other hand, there is Ethereum's amazing bull run...which surely attracts some greedy btc hodlers. I hope I didn't speak too early, though  Why would those of us who are still here quit now? That was my point...kind of 
|
|
|
|
TakeTheSkyRoad
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:16:21 PM |
|
I'm not interested in the war, more thoughts on the current "issues" being discussed in a more open forum.
Also consider that in that reddit sub there are alot of potential future bitcoin users.
|
|
|
|
ahpku
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:17:19 PM |
|
No love for Night Mare  
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:17:31 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:36:27 PM |
|
eth down 10% in 2 minutes and still falling.
Stick with your legacy banking system. Crypto doesn't want you.
Edit: 15% in 3 minutes. Magnificent crash!
eth+15% in the last 24h. What the crash are you saying? He was referring to the drop that was quick from 0.023 to 0.019. I'm surprised it bounced and held. I thought the bubble was about to burst.
|
|
|
|
Sitarow
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1792
Merit: 1047
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:41:32 PM |
|
eth down 10% in 2 minutes and still falling.
Stick with your legacy banking system. Crypto doesn't want you.
Edit: 15% in 3 minutes. Magnificent crash!
eth+15% in the last 24h. What the crash are you saying? He was referring to the drop that was quick from 0.023 to 0.019. I'm surprised it bounced and held. I thought the bubble was about to burst. We may know by next week Thursday 
|
|
|
|
bitebits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2317
Merit: 3791
Flippin' burgers since 1163.
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:50:16 PM Last edit: April 10, 2016, 07:44:10 AM by bitebits |
|
If I were a market maker and want to accumulate more btc before the inevitable halving and 'consensus' price rise, I would definitely:
0. Accumulate on the almost forgotten alt coin market 1. Spread FUD so people sell their btc, btc price drops 2. Pump altcoins. People sell their btc in the chase, btc price drops further (<--- we are here) 3. Dump expensive altcoins for cheap bitcoins. 4. Let the bitcoin bubble occur because of 'consensus' and halving 5. People sell cheap altcoins for chasing expensive bitcoins 5. Sell expensive bitcoins for cheap altcoins 6. Spread FUD 7. Rinse, repeat.
|
|
|
|
rebuilder
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1615
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 07:51:39 PM |
|
Becoin: the 21 mil. cap is a different issue because Bitcoin was set up from the very start to divorce the issuance rate from resources expended by anyone. However much miners may toil, they can not significantly affect the amount of BTC issued during any given timeframe, and that's how it was from day one. (you know the caveats that apply, I'm sure.)
I put it to you that what the miners produce isn't BTC, it's the processing of transactions. I think you'll find my assertion is backed up by pretty much everything going back to the original whitepaper.
To reiterate: While changing the issuance cap is possible, everything down to the difficulty balancing shows the cap is a fundamentally hardcoded feature of BTC that isn't meant to be subject to market forces, and this is known by all participants in the economy. A cap on TX rates, instead, is a new development and a direct attempt to control the miners business practices.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 2176
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 08:00:40 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
hdbuck
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1002
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 08:09:14 PM Last edit: March 03, 2016, 09:00:45 PM by hdbuck |
|
Becoin: the 21 mil. cap is a different issue because Bitcoin was set up from the very start to divorce the issuance rate from resources expended by anyone. However much miners may toil, they can not significantly affect the amount of BTC issued during any given timeframe, and that's how it was from day one. (you know the caveats that apply, I'm sure.)
I put it to you that what the miners produce isn't BTC, it's the processing of transactions. I think you'll find my assertion is backed up by pretty much everything going back to the original whitepaper.
To reiterate: While changing the issuance cap is possible, everything down to the difficulty balancing shows the cap is a fundamentally hardcoded feature of BTC that isn't meant to be subject to market forces, and this is known by all participants in the economy. A cap on TX rates, instead, is a new development and a direct attempt to control the miners business practices.
nope, it was not, there is no mention of such cap in the original wp. ironically the fixed limit of 21m coins was implemented in 2014 - with Hearnia's contribution!  Although it is widely believed that Satoshi was an inflation-hating goldbug he never said this, and in fact programmed Bitcoin's money supply to grow indefinitely, forever. He modeled the monetary supply as 4 gold mines being discovered per mibillenium (1024 years), with equal intervals between them, each one being depleted over the course of 140 years.
This poses obvious problems, however. Prominent among them is the discussion on what to call 1 billion Bitcoin, which symbol color to use for it, and when wallet clients should switch to it by default.
To combat this, this document proposes a controversial change: making Bitcoin's monetary supply finite.
...
Given the moderate time frame over which this change is to be implemented, we expect all miners to choose to screw themselves and deploy this change before 2214.
If they don't, and a minority remains on the old code base, a fork may occur. Essentially, they'll be mining fool's gold after that time. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0042.mediawikinow that's an example of a non contentious fork. nobody hardly opposed it, and most people did not even noticed it. ergo. consensus. anyway, as History shows, honeybadger is all what matters here and inflationists are free to either rage quit or fork off.  ps: or buy ethereum?! whatever, you are free, but bitcoin clearly is not.. 
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 2176
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 09:00:42 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 09:09:55 PM |
|
Will $400 hold? 
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1014
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 09:14:32 PM |
|
Will $400 hold?  Mempool is clearing up. That should be enough for speculators to pump some more.
|
|
|
|
becoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3431
Merit: 1233
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 09:15:16 PM |
|
Will $400 hold?  No. Sell now. Hurry! We need all your bitcoins.
|
|
|
|
bambou
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 09:24:49 PM |
|
Becoin: the 21 mil. cap is a different issue because Bitcoin was set up from the very start to divorce the issuance rate from resources expended by anyone. However much miners may toil, they can not significantly affect the amount of BTC issued during any given timeframe, and that's how it was from day one. (you know the caveats that apply, I'm sure.)
I put it to you that what the miners produce isn't BTC, it's the processing of transactions. I think you'll find my assertion is backed up by pretty much everything going back to the original whitepaper.
To reiterate: While changing the issuance cap is possible, everything down to the difficulty balancing shows the cap is a fundamentally hardcoded feature of BTC that isn't meant to be subject to market forces, and this is known by all participants in the economy. A cap on TX rates, instead, is a new development and a direct attempt to control the miners business practices.
nope, it was not, there is no mention of such cap in the original wp. ironically the fixed limit of 21m coins was implemented in 2014 - with Hearnia's contribution!  Although it is widely believed that Satoshi was an inflation-hating goldbug he never said this, and in fact programmed Bitcoin's money supply to grow indefinitely, forever. He modeled the monetary supply as 4 gold mines being discovered per mibillenium (1024 years), with equal intervals between them, each one being depleted over the course of 140 years.
This poses obvious problems, however. Prominent among them is the discussion on what to call 1 billion Bitcoin, which symbol color to use for it, and when wallet clients should switch to it by default.
To combat this, this document proposes a controversial change: making Bitcoin's monetary supply finite.
...
Given the moderate time frame over which this change is to be implemented, we expect all miners to choose to screw themselves and deploy this change before 2214.
If they don't, and a minority remains on the old code base, a fork may occur. Essentially, they'll be mining fool's gold after that time. https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0042.mediawikinow that's an example of a non contentious fork. nobody hardly opposed it, and most people did not even noticed it. ergo. consensus. anyway, as History shows, honeybadger is all what matters here and inflationists are free to either rage quit or fork off.  ps: or buy ethereum?! whatever, you are free, but bitcoin clearly is not..  
|
|
|
|
marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349
Eadem mutata resurgo
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 09:27:36 PM |
|
Looks like the anomalous transaction increase that prompted the timely March 1 chaos might have subsided. I predict that in keeping with the problem-crisis-solution spook playbook we will soon see a blog post or tweet or similar controversial statement from Gavin (big block solution now super-duper urgent) with his smiling face promptly upvoted to the top of the front page on r/Bitcoin ... a silent "beautiful settlement network you got there, be a shame to lose it ..."
https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/48srb6/onedollar_lulz_gavin_andresen/... and just like clockwork there's gavin's smiling dial on the top of reddit with the "solution" to the manufactured "crisis"
|
|
|
|
BitconAssociation
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 09:54:40 PM |
|
I was thinking, wouldn't it be fun if we transacted with each other by using a proof-of-work currency of some sort, only the work part wasn't burning shitloads of electricity with Chinese silicon in Chinese chicken coops located in rural China like we have now, but, like, an actual job? So PoW would be, like, our paychecks, i.e. real folding money? Our friends & neighbors might stop avoiding us, and nasty children won't point their pudgy little fingers and laugh? How would that be? ...guys?
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2534
Merit: 2176
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 10:00:38 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4074
Merit: 12146
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 10:05:43 PM |
|
You should change your name, from "TakeTheSkyRoad" to "TheSkyIsFallingRoad" The information contained within the link is filled with total bullshit. The worst problems in bitcoin, at the moment is that some people are believing propaganda regarding supposed technical problems in bitcoin. In that regard, any problems are people screaming really loud about make believe technical problems.
|
|
|
|
2015Bubble
|
 |
March 03, 2016, 10:09:02 PM |
|
Why is btc volume so high today? I hope that eth will get dumped soon so btc can test 500 lvls and maybe a test moonshot.
|
|
|
|
|