thefunkybits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 03:29:19 PM |
|
looks like the triangle has broken down but it feels like technical traders are being fucked with.
when 460 resistance becomes a support line all hell will break loose
🙈🙉Best trading strategy. Haha pretty much...Ethereum is taking over, people. You can't even buy drugs or alpaca socks with that. I bet DAO will fail because there is literally no business on ether network. It'll take a couple of months before the poisonous bagholders show up. The Ethereum network is built for apps to be built on top of. We always hear Antonopolous talk about the first "killer app"...well DAO is it and it's only on Ethereum. The Ethereum platform will build many of these killer apps and these will create a network effect on the Ethereum network. You are already seeing this with the DAO and companies like slock.it and Mobotiq
|
|
|
|
thefunkybits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 03:43:49 PM |
|
I bet DAO will fail because there is literally no business on ether network.
You've clearly not done your research. Slock.it and Mobotiq compete with airbnb and UBER...both of these companies (and plenty of others) will be funded via the DAO and Ethereum. The network effects at play here are massive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49wHQoJxYPo
|
|
|
|
ssmc2
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2002
Merit: 1040
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 03:46:56 PM |
|
I bet DAO will fail because there is literally no business on ether network.
You've clearly not done your research. Slock.it and Mobotiq compete with airbnb and UBER...both of these companies (and plenty of others) will be funded via the DAO and Ethereum. The network effects at play here are massive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49wHQoJxYPoYou've clearly turned ETH shill from a look at your recent posts.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 1763
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 03:48:34 PM |
|
Isn't Moy the guy that was on the panel with Craig S Wright, Joseph VaughnPerling, Nick Szabo, and others hosted by Bitcoin Belle end of last calendar year - at the first outing of CSW? Despite the claim of first Bitcoin IRA, Broad financial has been working this space for some time. https://www.broadfinancial.com/self-directed/bitcoin-ira/
|
|
|
|
thefunkybits
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 03:51:30 PM |
|
I bet DAO will fail because there is literally no business on ether network.
You've clearly not done your research. Slock.it and Mobotiq compete with airbnb and UBER...both of these companies (and plenty of others) will be funded via the DAO and Ethereum. The network effects at play here are massive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49wHQoJxYPoYou've clearly turned ETH shill from a look at your recent posts. Whatever you want to call it dude, im adapting. Ethereum has more full nodes and more daily trading volume than BTC. Don't be butthurt if ETH goes to 0.1 BTC and youre still holding BTC
|
|
|
|
USB-S
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 574
Merit: 250
In XEM we trust
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 03:54:45 PM |
|
I bet DAO will fail because there is literally no business on ether network.
You've clearly not done your research. Slock.it and Mobotiq compete with airbnb and UBER...both of these companies (and plenty of others) will be funded via the DAO and Ethereum. The network effects at play here are massive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49wHQoJxYPoYou've clearly turned ETH shill from a look at your recent posts. Whatever you want to call it dude, im adapting. Ethereum has more full nodes and more daily trading volume than BTC. Don't be butthurt if ETH goes to 0.1 BTC and youre still holding BTC Yea, but you're literally saying that DAO has already succeeded, as the killer app. But you're far from the truth.
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 03:58:41 PM Last edit: May 19, 2016, 04:26:56 PM by r0ach |
|
A Bitcoin chart with to scale measurements for you dirtbags:
|
|
|
|
Mrpumperitis
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1075
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 04:04:53 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Gyrsur
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2856
Merit: 1520
Bitcoin Legal Tender Countries: 2 of 206
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 04:08:37 PM |
|
I bet DAO will fail because there is literally no business on ether network.
You've clearly not done your research. Slock.it and Mobotiq compete with airbnb and UBER...both of these companies (and plenty of others) will be funded via the DAO and Ethereum. The network effects at play here are massive https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=49wHQoJxYPoYou've clearly turned ETH shill from a look at your recent posts. Whatever you want to call it dude, im adapting. Ethereum has more full nodes and more daily trading volume than BTC. Don't be butthurt if ETH goes to 0.1 BTC and youre still holding BTC Yea, but you're literally saying that DAO has already succeeded, as the killer app. But you're far from the truth. a business modell which will foreseeable fail. https://youtu.be/49wHQoJxYPo?t=12m34s
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 04:26:00 PM Last edit: May 19, 2016, 04:54:50 PM by r0ach |
|
get ready  Gemini adding Eth did absolutely nothing for price. It's a fundamentally broken coin still in a bubble. The only reason Eth is being pumped is so the single entity Eth manipulator can attempt to exit before May 28th when the $130 million DAO denominated in Eth dumps and craters the market. That plus Bitcoin going up for halving is going to send eth to the toilet.
|
|
|
|
|
finkelsteinMonster
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 04:56:48 PM |
|
Investors in DAO pay ETH to create ''DAO tokens'' and those same guys having voting rights on witch projects will be funded, they need a shameless 20.1% only to work togther.
When ETH drops in value those investments projects will drop in value too, i dont know if that works out well.
That's why people invested in those projects won't allow ETH price to fall. Rational self-interest 
|
|
|
|
yefi
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2842
Merit: 1513
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 04:58:27 PM |
|
You've clearly not done your research. Slock.it and Mobotiq compete with airbnb and UBER... Blinky the Clown could compete with them from my garden shed, but that doesn't mean much.
|
|
|
|
bobabouey2
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 05:05:54 PM |
|
Great piece on some of the legal issues related to the DAO. http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-05-17/blockchain-company-wants-to-reinvent-companiesI particularly like this: But what if an impecunious owner of a Mobotiqmobile rents it to her impecunious peer, and it autonomously crashes into a bus full of children? What if they sue? What if Mobotiq, and the owner and the renter, don't have enough money to pay their damages? (Presumably the car has no money.) What if the insurance that Mobotiq is required to buy under the smart contract turns out to be worthless because someone filled out a form wrong? What if the only deep pockets anywhere near the accident are those of the DAO itself? What if the DAO has spent all its money on a pyramid scheme, and the only deep pockets are those of the DAO's individual investors? At that point, the DAO might want to know what its relationship is with Mobotiq, not in terms of "immutable, unstoppable, and irrefutable computer code," but in terms of traditional corporate structures under relevant local law. Is Mobotiq a division of the DAO, identical with the DAO for liability purposes? Is it a separate corporation in which the DAO has a (limited liability) equity investment? The DAO's investors, similarly, might now be keenly interested in whether they are in fact general partners in the DAO under local law. Because general partners tend to have unlimited liability for their partnership's misdeeds. Even if the smart contract says otherwise. Without the protections of limited liability based in local law, all you have to rely on is cryptography. I also think the potential legal liability of the "curators" is going to be interesting.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4200
Merit: 12841
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 05:18:21 PM |
|
looks like the triangle has broken down but it feels like technical traders are being fucked with.
when 460 resistance becomes a support line all hell will break loose
🙈🙉Best trading strategy. Haha pretty much...Ethereum is taking over, people. You can't even buy drugs or alpaca socks with that. I bet DAO will fail because there is literally no business on ether network. It'll take a couple of months before the poisonous bagholders show up. The Ethereum network is built for apps to be built on top of. We always hear Antonopolous talk about the first "killer app"...well DAO is it and it's only on Ethereum. The Ethereum platform will build many of these killer apps and these will create a network effect on the Ethereum network. You are already seeing this with the DAO and companies like slock.it and Mobotiq WOW!!! Even dee funky is turning into an ETH/DAO pumper. Yes, surely there can be a lot utility in respect to a lot of applications, and so many of these applications remain so much in their early stages, it is going to take several years for them to play out. They can definitely compliment bitcoin, but so far beyond hype, they are not really taking anything meaningful away from bitcoin. Some are going to argue price, but so what... Price takes a while to have its ups and downs, and BTC will remain successful whether or not it achieves a 5x or a 10x in the next 12 months. good luck to those pumping and dumping ETH, and you are likely in for a lot more short term volatility than bitcoin .. but yeah, let's see how the price directions and developments play out for each.
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 05:27:12 PM |
|
Non-stop spam of 1 star shill accounts spamming about Eth. Must mean the Ethereum price is maxed out and collapse imminent.
|
|
|
|
Denker
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1442
Merit: 1016
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 06:02:08 PM |
|
Good morning Bitcoinland. Massive $5 plummet overnight I see. I'm surprised the teddy trolls aren't picnicking.  Seems we've been hovering around $450 for 3 weeks now. It also seems every time some manipulator dumps thousands of coins at once in an attempt to start a panic, it fails and the price bounces back quickly to nearly where it started. Yepp that sums it up pretty good I think. First time I'm online today.Checked the price and saw we are a bit lower.Then I watched the charts of the big exchanges and was of the impression that this was just another attempt to dump the market.But the resistence is strong and the chinese are already back over $450/2960 CNY.
|
|
|
|
Hyperjacked
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1624
Merit: 1126
It's all mathematics...!
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 06:07:23 PM |
|
Good morning Bitcoinland. Massive $5 plummet overnight I see. I'm surprised the teddy trolls aren't picnicking.  Seems we've been hovering around $450 for 3 weeks now. It also seems every time some manipulator dumps thousands of coins at once in an attempt to start a panic, it fails and the price bounces back quickly to nearly where it started. Just another day in the life...Cheers BTC holders 
|
|
|
|
Andre#
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 06:13:51 PM |
|
Great piece on some of the legal issues related to the DAO. http://www.bloomberg.com/view/articles/2016-05-17/blockchain-company-wants-to-reinvent-companiesI particularly like this: But what if an impecunious owner of a Mobotiqmobile rents it to her impecunious peer, and it autonomously crashes into a bus full of children? What if they sue? What if Mobotiq, and the owner and the renter, don't have enough money to pay their damages? (Presumably the car has no money.) What if the insurance that Mobotiq is required to buy under the smart contract turns out to be worthless because someone filled out a form wrong? What if the only deep pockets anywhere near the accident are those of the DAO itself? What if the DAO has spent all its money on a pyramid scheme, and the only deep pockets are those of the DAO's individual investors? At that point, the DAO might want to know what its relationship is with Mobotiq, not in terms of "immutable, unstoppable, and irrefutable computer code," but in terms of traditional corporate structures under relevant local law. Is Mobotiq a division of the DAO, identical with the DAO for liability purposes? Is it a separate corporation in which the DAO has a (limited liability) equity investment? The DAO's investors, similarly, might now be keenly interested in whether they are in fact general partners in the DAO under local law. Because general partners tend to have unlimited liability for their partnership's misdeeds. Even if the smart contract says otherwise. Without the protections of limited liability based in local law, all you have to rely on is cryptography. I also think the potential legal liability of the "curators" is going to be interesting. Thanks! That's a great read.
|
|
|
|
doc12
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1284
Merit: 1043
|
 |
May 19, 2016, 06:17:37 PM |
|
Would you be so kind and post about Eth in the ALTCOIN-Section ? Thanks
|
|
|
|
|