Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[BlindMayorBitcorn]

It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.         

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of programming of a bot(s) to trade BTC, so I do not understand those terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if you may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve your own objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error. 

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios.  You may have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no?   

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose to use because that's within my discretion.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, and you seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and assertions.  I used my discretion and prerogatives, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences, even though your practices, to the extent that any of it could be true seems to differ a bit from what I have been doing..  Furthermore, your choices regarding how you explain your supposed system seem to be a bit combative and annoying, so maybe it is not so interesting for me to ask for any more details than those sparse ones that you have already chosen to provide.

[1714742849]

1714742849

[1714742849]

1714742849

[1714742849]

1714742849

[soullyG]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if I may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve certain objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error.  

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances, which is posting long meandering posts, one of which I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My posts, such as they are, that is to say remaining invariably long under any and all circumstances, remain invariably long. You may or may not have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no? Or yes?    

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose, because, as I have emphatically stated and/or typed in this very post, which I am currently in the process of typing, I am currently in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My patterns never vary, fuckhead! To use many words is within my discretion, and that's what I discretion to do.
That's how I roll.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, to which I answered you that "I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post consequently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a different variety of scenarios." You seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and/or assertions.  I used my discretion and prerogatives, which is to day I typed, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances, which is posting long meandering posts, one of which I am in the process of currently posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios. My posts, such as they are, remain invariably long under any and all conditions. You, asshole, learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd possessing the consistency of clam chowder. It should be clear from my previous lengthy posts (of which this post, the one I am currently in the process of posting, or, rather, typing up the post which I will post presently, will soon become), if you have even bother to read them, which is unlikely, jusdging from the dum things you say because of your lack of comprehension, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences. Which you don't. So I won't. Fuck you.



“No one I know has listened to it all the way through, including myself. It is not meant to be.” --Lou Reed, liner notes

Well played Lambie, well played

[Elwar]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Stopped reading at trying too hard to sound smart.

[Darkbot]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Stopped reading at trying too hard to sound smart.

Lambie is a noob who's copy/paste other one's text. Pretty much pathetic little kid crying for here lollypop. This shill got hundreds of banned acounts under here name, makes me wonder how here social real-life looks like, it must be very bad.

[Fatman3001]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Stopped reading at trying too hard to sound smart.

Whooosh!

[USB-S]

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of brevity, which is to say terseness, to trade BTC, so I find it conducive to extensively expound those, my terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment or in foreseeable future, which is already priced in.

Stopped reading at trying too hard to sound smart.

Whooosh!

[JimboToronto]

Good morning Bitcoinland.

$455? Not much change and now it's Friday already.

[Globb0]

[Ultrafinery]

Dig the massive buy wall on bfx
Down we go.

[JayJuanGee]

It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.          

Fine, if you want specifics: I use a Classical 1, 4, 9 MacNeill-Schumann hybrid for the main engine, sinewave recursion on the re-entry and a modified Gauss to calculate relative oscillation weight to maximise profits on the downside. I didn't bother stating this in my previous post because I knew you wouldn't understand it. Still 3 sentences though.

You are correct.  I am not engaged in any kind of programming of a bot(s) to trade BTC, so I do not understand those terms or methodologies, and I don't feel inclined to look them up, at the moment.

Furthermore, I do not understand how or if you may have tailored any of those referred to methodologies to achieve your own objectives in any kind of meaningful way or if you may have screwed them up or learned them over time through trial and error.  

More or less, I explained my personally tailored approach in laymen's terms which boils down to what I tend to do mostly manually under various circumstances rather than some pattern that is programmed to repeat under a variety of scenarios.  You may have noticed that I am not a bot, even though you assert that you have been engaged in programming one or more bots, no?  

In any event, it doesn't really matter too much how many words I chose to use because that's within my discretion.

In your first post, you inquired regarding what I was doing, and you seemed to make a variety of incorrect assumptions and assertions.  I used my discretion and prerogatives, as a human, to attempt to respond to that.

Subsequently, I learned that you prefer to act a bit like a pretentious and self-righteous turd, and surely that is within your own discretion to determine your tone and your approach and to determine whether you want to explain your situation in terms of conclusions and abstractions, or to engage in any kind of meaningful attempt to explain with details what you are doing to the extent that anyone may be interested in your methodology, if it is actually true.

If you did not have such an asshole disposition, I might be curious to find out a bit more regarding what you are doing and your historical experiences, even though your practices, to the extent that any of it could be true seems to differ a bit from what I have been doing..  Furthermore, your choices regarding how you explain your supposed system seem to be a bit combative and annoying, so maybe it is not so interesting for me to ask for any more details than those sparse ones that you have already chosen to provide.

Yeah, it was gibberish. I was just making the point that I can say nothing in a single line, I don't need a wall of text. Supposed to be tongue-in-cheek, but whatever. Take it how you want.

In other words you have been trolling in order to repeatedly make a non substantive point.

I've been here roughly as long as you, though I only swing by occasionally and this kind of thing is why.

You cannot control yourself regarding style rather than substance.  You make a choice regarding whether to engage in a topic, and to see if the post relates to you, such as substantively my discussion of trading practices and strategies.  Your inability to engage substantively and focus on length of the text appears to be a sign of immaturity rather than enlightenment.

I do wonder whether you have the insight to recognise how much your personality has changed in the last 2 years, and whether that ever concerns you.

All of us change in some ways and stay the same in other ways over such a period of time.  In respect to bitcoin's I am largely the same person with 2 more years of experience.  I do not not like myself, so I am not sure about your point.

Feel free to use as many words to reply as you like, I'm checking out again and I doubt anyone else will read them either.

Yes, people chose whether to read or respond, whether that be contemporaneously or historically part of a thread (assuming that the post is not deleted).

[r0ach]

Oh, is Lambchop back shilling for the bankers again?  Ovey, invest in mortgage backed securities!

[2015Bubble]

Attacking 3000 yuan again. Hopefully this is  IT finally it and off we go to 650 dolla

[USB-S]

Attacking 3000 yuan again. Hopefully this is  IT finally it and off we go to 650 dolla

[elite3000]

Attacking 3000 yuan again. Hopefully this is  IT finally it and off we go to 650 dolla

from 450 to 650 is quite a big jump, will take much more than 1 or 2(or some dozens) of barriers to be broken until 600+ is reached, if it ever reaches such level any time soon

[Fatman3001]

@Cassius

It was a good try. I'm wondering if JJG is a bot. He is using the same words incorrectly over and over again. He is completely incapable of accurately grasping the content of other peoples texts, and his massive posts are often completely devoid of meaning. It would even sort of make sense to use the WO thread to test such a bot.

If so, it's accurate enough to sometimes spot that it is being ridiculed and programmed to respond to this in a very basic way. But it seems to give quite a few false positives.

Like this for instance:

It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

A reasonable response would be something like:

"Oh, I didn't know that was a thing. Thx man!"

Instead you get:

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.         

It doesn't make sense at all. It's the ramblings of an unfinished ai.

[USB-S]

Attacking 3000 yuan again. Hopefully this is  IT finally it and off we go to 650 dolla

from 450 to 650 is quite a big jump, will take much more than 1 or 2(or some dozens) of barriers to be broken until 600+ is reached, if it ever reaches such level any time soon

Do you have any proof to verify your ridiculous claims? Every shoulder midget pattern clearly states 650 dolla.

[JayJuanGee]

Attacking 3000 yuan again. Hopefully this is  IT finally it and off we go to 650 dolla

from 450 to 650 is quite a big jump, will take much more than 1 or 2(or some dozens) of barriers to be broken until 600+ is reached, if it ever reaches such level any time soon

In the past several weeks in the rise from $403 to $470, we've had relatively low trade volume, so it will be interesting to see at what point, the trade volume picks up...

Maybe we have to see the spurt from $470 to $650-ish and to see at some point therein a price battle may ensue... or maybe we will witness movement beyond $650 into the $700s?  I would be totally surprised if there was not a price battle and a very significant increase in trade volume before $800, however.  I may fall on the floor with giddy?

[JayJuanGee]

@Cassius

It was a good try. I'm wondering if JJG is a bot. He is using the same words incorrectly over and over again. He is completely incapable of accurately grasping the content of other peoples texts, and his massive posts are often completely devoid of meaning. It would even sort of make sense to use the WO thread to test such a bot.

If so, it's accurate enough to sometimes spot that it is being ridiculed and programmed to respond to this in a very basic way. But it seems to give quite a few false positives.

Like this for instance:

It's called grid trading. I do it with a bot on eth_btc. And I can tell you that in two sentences, or three if you count this one.

A reasonable response would be something like:

"Oh, I didn't know that was a thing. Thx man!"

Instead you get:

You can call it whatever you want, including uncle bob, if you chose not to explain specifics, which had included applying practice to theory and also responding to issues/questions raised by someone else on a forum.

And, by the way, you are welcome.         

It doesn't make sense at all. It's the ramblings of an unfinished ai.

Thanks for your assistance in trying to get to the bottom of this, fattypants. 

You are performing god's work.   

[Ultrafinery]

Oh, is Lambchop back shilling for the bankers again?  Ovey, invest in mortgage backed securities!

Unpleasant insectoid goy:
Don't envy us, we're totally poor and stupid, just like you

          Israelites

Ah get up in the morning, slaving for bread, Sir
So that every mouth can be fed
Poor me, Israelite

Get up in the morning, slaving for bread, Sir
So that every mouth can be fed
Poor me, the Israelite

My wife and my kids, they pack up and a'leave me
Darling she said, "I was yours to be seen"
Poor me, the Israelite

Shirts them's a'tear up, trousers are gone
I don't want to end up like Bonnie and Clyde
Poor me, the Israelite

After a storm there must be a calm
You catch me in your farm
You sound your alarm
Poor a poor a poor me, the Israelite

Ah said I get up in the morning, slaving for bread, Sir
So that every mouth can be fed
Poor me, Israelite

I said my wife and my kids, they are packed up and leave me
Darling, she said, I was yours to be seen
Poor me, Israelite

Look at me shirts them's a tear up
I don't wanna end up like Bonnie and Clyde
A poor a poor me, Israelite

After a storm there must be a calm
You catch me in the farm
You sound your alarm
Poor me, Israelite
A poor a poor a poor me, Israelite

A poor, a poor, a poor, a-poor me Israelites
I'm'a wondering a'working so hard
A poor, a poor. me Israelite
I look a'down and out, Sir
A poor...

[nanobtc]

Too many words, too much NLC. Desmond Dekker and the Aces reference was funny, though.