Bitcoin Forum
May 06, 2024, 02:56:02 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 15185 15186 15187 15188 15189 15190 15191 15192 15193 15194 15195 15196 15197 15198 15199 15200 15201 15202 15203 15204 15205 15206 15207 15208 15209 15210 15211 15212 15213 15214 15215 15216 15217 15218 15219 15220 15221 15222 15223 15224 15225 15226 15227 15228 15229 15230 15231 15232 15233 15234 [15235] 15236 15237 15238 15239 15240 15241 15242 15243 15244 15245 15246 15247 15248 15249 15250 15251 15252 15253 15254 15255 15256 15257 15258 15259 15260 15261 15262 15263 15264 15265 15266 15267 15268 15269 15270 15271 15272 15273 15274 15275 15276 15277 15278 15279 15280 15281 15282 15283 15284 15285 ... 33326 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26372664 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
spooderman
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022


View Profile WWW
May 06, 2016, 11:32:13 PM

hello gentlemen Smiley
1714964162
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714964162

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714964162
Reply with quote  #2

1714964162
Report to moderator
1714964162
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714964162

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714964162
Reply with quote  #2

1714964162
Report to moderator
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally controlled networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
May 06, 2016, 11:56:02 PM

Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they?

Or aren't they?  Undecided

You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. 

Or do you?

Why are you having such a difficult time with this?  You blind or something?

I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.
whoreble
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 12:00:23 AM

Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they?

Or aren't they?  Undecided

You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. 

Or do you?

Why are you having such a difficult time with this?  You blind or something?

I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.

Do you, Mister Jones?
alesx.onfire
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1000


It's Not Enough


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 12:02:08 AM

gentlement? Cheesy
DieJohnny
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1639
Merit: 1004


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 12:16:32 AM

Anyone else still think we are not mooning quite yet?.....

I feel like there is too much halving expectation out there, when everyone thinks we are launching, we simply won't.

I expect small increases in the next few weeks, maybe above $500 even, then a drop (could be a huge flash crash actually) right before or after the halving because expectations are simply too high...

r0ach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 12:25:41 AM

because expectations are simply too high...

No

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VEJ8lpCQbyw
whoreble
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 12:27:07 AM
Last edit: May 07, 2016, 12:47:39 AM by whoreble

Anyone else still think we are not mooning quite yet?.....

Yeah... a bit underchooched, a hair lean on enthusiasm for truly stoichiometric rocket blend.

Edit: The final piece of Satoshi puzzle click into place https://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/4i43gr/craig_wrights_sister_told_bitcoinbelle_that_he/
r0ach
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:00:20 AM


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UxpVwBzFAkw
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10212


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:13:31 AM

Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they?

Or aren't they?  Undecided

You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. 

Or do you?

Why are you having such a difficult time with this?  You blind or something?

I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.


O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll...    Cry Cry


In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. 

At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this time because Gavin had corroborated and gave credit to the story and a few other potentially credible sources were also involved in such corroboration efforts, yet it only took a few hours for the more sophisticated bitcoin folks to poke holes in the story in meaningful ways; however, it seems to have taken a few days to sink in regarding the level of rubbishness that we again had pushed upon us...   so the whole story is crap, and both Wright and Gavin have made retreats.. and such resolution seems to be decent for Bitcoin at the moment because it seems to resolve several matters not only including how much of a phoney is Wright but also sheds some light on Gavin's poor judgement and also his compromised judgement (which would also have the results of discrediting some of his XT and Classic promotional efforts).  A supposed Tulip Trust in intricately related to some of these Wright claims about being Satoshi, yet I have my suspicions that we may not have heard the last from Wright and the supposed existence of a Tulip Trust.

Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:21:55 AM

Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they?

Or aren't they?  Undecided

You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. 

Or do you?

Why are you having such a difficult time with this?  You blind or something?

I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.

Satoshi came out of the closet and "The Bitcoin Community" threw him back in again.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:23:57 AM

Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they?

Or aren't they?  Undecided

You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. 

Or do you?

Why are you having such a difficult time with this?  You blind or something?

I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.


O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll...    Cry Cry


In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. 

At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this ------stopped reading here



I don't think anybody needs a summary. You think the signed message for Gavin from block 1 was some MITM parlor trick then?
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10212


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:29:01 AM

Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they?

Or aren't they?  Undecided

You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. 

Or do you?

Why are you having such a difficult time with this?  You blind or something?

I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.


O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll...    Cry Cry


In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. 

At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this ------stopped reading here



I don't think anybody needs a summary. You think the signed message for Gavin from block 1 was some MITM parlor trick then?

It doesn't really matter because it was not made public, and Wright brags about having a big dick (in other words the 15th largest computer in the world, and the largest private computer in the world).  Maybe he hashed with that biggest dick computer some kind of information that appeared to be real, and any event there is no need to have individuals privately vouching when there are a variety of public methods that would be much less convoluted and much more verifiable, in the event that someone really wanted to show evidence of truth of this kind of Satoshi identity nature.
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072


Crypto is the separation of Power and State.


View Profile WWW
May 07, 2016, 01:30:06 AM

Cry where's segwit?  Cry

Segwit is (as promised) right here:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7910


every day without an inch of movement from Blockstream, increases the possibility. The fact that they start bringing up PoW changes when backed into a corner gives even more weight to the idea that they would rather go to war than compromise to 2MB.

Blockstream is moving rapidly on segwit, sidechains, and Lightning.  They are meticulously preparing Bitcoin to be carefully scaled ASAP.

Classic, OTOH, is spreading '2MB? Not much testing needed' nonsense.

And yes, we will "go to war" to defend Bitcoin's diverse/diffuse/defensible/resilient characteristics, from which its key interesting property of antifragility emerges.

Whine about it all you want.  Nothing you do can move our Honey Badger's needle one iota.  You have no power here.

You're the one whining. We're winning.

Now who is the one whining?  You.

Now who is the one winning?  Me.

I hope you've learned something here, besides what it feels like to be crushed by a 75,000 horsepower iCEBREAKER.

Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:32:29 AM
Last edit: May 07, 2016, 01:51:53 AM by Fatman3001

Cry where's segwit?  Cry

Segwit is (as promised) right here:

https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7910


every day without an inch of movement from Blockstream, increases the possibility. The fact that they start bringing up PoW changes when backed into a corner gives even more weight to the idea that they would rather go to war than compromise to 2MB.

Blockstream is moving rapidly on segwit, sidechains, and Lightning.  They are meticulously preparing Bitcoin to be carefully scaled ASAP.

Classic, OTOH, is spreading '2MB? Not much testing needed' nonsense.

And yes, we will "go to war" to defend Bitcoin's diverse/diffuse/defensible/resilient characteristics, from which its key interesting property of antifragility emerges.

Whine about it all you want.  Nothing you do can move our Honey Badger's needle one iota.  You have no power here.

You're the one whining. We're winning.

Now who is the one whining?  You.

Now who is the one winning?  Me.

I hope you've learned something here, besides what it feels like to be crushed by a 75,000 horsepower iCEBREAKER.


Cool! I managed to annoy wINDBREAKER!

Success!!!

Edit: a post from January? Man, I must really have gotten under his skin. This feels sooooo gooood!
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:35:05 AM

Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they?

Or aren't they?  Undecided

You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. 

Or do you?

Why are you having such a difficult time with this?  You blind or something?

I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.


O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll...    Cry Cry


In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. 

At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this ------stopped reading here



I don't think anybody needs a summary. You think the signed message for Gavin from block 1 was some MITM parlor trick then?

It doesn't really matter because it was not made public----- snipped here

It doesn't matter to the code, but it matters who has access to the coins and when. Maybe he doesn't give a shit if we believe him. Maybe he was using Gavin to confirm him for his Tulip Trustee. Idk.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115



View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:44:41 AM

I think the most sensible theory going is that Kleiman was the voice of Satoshi on this forum; the times during which our Satoshi posted seems to suggest he was doing it from the states. I think Wright probably wrote the white paper and had Kleiman edit it? And it was probably Wright communicating with Gavin by email.

Or not. But it has to have been someone, and a bunch of this stuff fits. Even if CSW happens to be some kind of nut. Let's face it...
Fatman3001
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013


Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:48:42 AM

I think the most sensible theory going is that Kleiman was the voice of Satoshi on this forum; the times during which our Satoshi posted seems to suggest he was doing it from the states. I think Wright probably wrote the white paper and had Kleiman edit it? And it was probably Wright communicating with Gavin by email.

Or not. But it has to have been someone, and a bunch of this stuff fits. Even if CSW happens to be some kind of nut. Let's face it...

JVP confirmed that CW was the Satashi Nakamoto he met in 2005. So if it's a scam then he's in on it too.
whoreble
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 42
Merit: 0


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:52:25 AM

I hope you've learned something here, besides what it feels like to be crushed by a 75,000 horsepower iCEMAKER.

What's the safe word again?

@Fatman & BMB, too many TLAs, getting confused.
European Central Bank
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1288
Merit: 1087



View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:56:03 AM


JVP confirmed that CW was the Satashi Nakamoto he met in 2005. So if it's a scam then he's in on it too.

https://bitcoinmagazine.com/articles/satoshi-saga-continues-tulip-trust-trustee-expected-to-appear-by-september-says-joseph-vaughnperling-1462467803

This interview with him sucks butt. I'm not interested in what he has to say after all this cryptic shit.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3710
Merit: 10212


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
May 07, 2016, 01:56:23 AM

Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they?

Or aren't they?  Undecided

You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. 

Or do you?

Why are you having such a difficult time with this?  You blind or something?

I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.


O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll...    Cry Cry


In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. 

At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this ------stopped reading here



I don't think anybody needs a summary. You think the signed message for Gavin from block 1 was some MITM parlor trick then?

It doesn't really matter because it was not made public----- snipped here

It doesn't matter to the code, but it matters who has access to the coins and when. Maybe he doesn't give a shit if we believe him. Maybe he was using Gavin to confirm him for his Tulip Trustee. Idk.

I'm not saying anything different than you, here.. in respect to what matters... Yes, if if he does have access to the coins, or anyone has access to the coins, then that does matter.  So far, no one has shown to have access to the coins whether directly or some kind of supposed Tulip Trust... or supposed Tulip Trustee....

There has not been any meaningful evidence to corroborate any of the claims within means that would truly be available if someone were to want to demonstrate an ability to control Satoshi coins.

In other words, there is not need to ascribe further uncertainties to the Satoshi coins than what previously existed and what had already likely been priced in.




Pages: « 1 ... 15185 15186 15187 15188 15189 15190 15191 15192 15193 15194 15195 15196 15197 15198 15199 15200 15201 15202 15203 15204 15205 15206 15207 15208 15209 15210 15211 15212 15213 15214 15215 15216 15217 15218 15219 15220 15221 15222 15223 15224 15225 15226 15227 15228 15229 15230 15231 15232 15233 15234 [15235] 15236 15237 15238 15239 15240 15241 15242 15243 15244 15245 15246 15247 15248 15249 15250 15251 15252 15253 15254 15255 15256 15257 15258 15259 15260 15261 15262 15263 15264 15265 15266 15267 15268 15269 15270 15271 15272 15273 15274 15275 15276 15277 15278 15279 15280 15281 15282 15283 15284 15285 ... 33326 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!