spooderman
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1022
|
|
May 06, 2016, 11:32:13 PM |
|
hello gentlemen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"Governments are good at cutting off the heads of a centrally
controlled
networks like Napster, but pure P2P networks like Gnutella and Tor seem
to be holding their own." -- Satoshi
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
May 06, 2016, 11:56:02 PM |
|
Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they? Or aren't they? You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. Or do you? Why are you having such a difficult time with this? You blind or something? I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is.
|
|
|
|
whoreble
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2016, 12:00:23 AM |
|
Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they? Or aren't they? You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. Or do you? Why are you having such a difficult time with this? You blind or something? I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is. Do you, Mister Jones?
|
|
|
|
|
DieJohnny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1639
Merit: 1004
|
|
May 07, 2016, 12:16:32 AM |
|
Anyone else still think we are not mooning quite yet?.....
I feel like there is too much halving expectation out there, when everyone thinks we are launching, we simply won't.
I expect small increases in the next few weeks, maybe above $500 even, then a drop (could be a huge flash crash actually) right before or after the halving because expectations are simply too high...
|
|
|
|
|
|
r0ach
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:00:20 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10212
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:13:31 AM |
|
Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they? Or aren't they? You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. Or do you? Why are you having such a difficult time with this? You blind or something? I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is. O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll... In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this time because Gavin had corroborated and gave credit to the story and a few other potentially credible sources were also involved in such corroboration efforts, yet it only took a few hours for the more sophisticated bitcoin folks to poke holes in the story in meaningful ways; however, it seems to have taken a few days to sink in regarding the level of rubbishness that we again had pushed upon us... so the whole story is crap, and both Wright and Gavin have made retreats.. and such resolution seems to be decent for Bitcoin at the moment because it seems to resolve several matters not only including how much of a phoney is Wright but also sheds some light on Gavin's poor judgement and also his compromised judgement (which would also have the results of discrediting some of his XT and Classic promotional efforts). A supposed Tulip Trust in intricately related to some of these Wright claims about being Satoshi, yet I have my suspicions that we may not have heard the last from Wright and the supposed existence of a Tulip Trust.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:21:55 AM |
|
Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they? Or aren't they? You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. Or do you? Why are you having such a difficult time with this? You blind or something? I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is. Satoshi came out of the closet and "The Bitcoin Community" threw him back in again.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:23:57 AM |
|
Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they? Or aren't they? You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. Or do you? Why are you having such a difficult time with this? You blind or something? I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is. O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll... In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this ------ stopped reading hereI don't think anybody needs a summary. You think the signed message for Gavin from block 1 was some MITM parlor trick then?
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10212
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:29:01 AM |
|
Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they? Or aren't they? You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. Or do you? Why are you having such a difficult time with this? You blind or something? I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is. O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll... In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this ------ stopped reading hereI don't think anybody needs a summary. You think the signed message for Gavin from block 1 was some MITM parlor trick then? It doesn't really matter because it was not made public, and Wright brags about having a big dick (in other words the 15th largest computer in the world, and the largest private computer in the world). Maybe he hashed with that biggest dick computer some kind of information that appeared to be real, and any event there is no need to have individuals privately vouching when there are a variety of public methods that would be much less convoluted and much more verifiable, in the event that someone really wanted to show evidence of truth of this kind of Satoshi identity nature.
|
|
|
|
iCEBREAKER
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2156
Merit: 1072
Crypto is the separation of Power and State.
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:30:06 AM |
|
where's segwit? Segwit is (as promised) right here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7910every day without an inch of movement from Blockstream, increases the possibility. The fact that they start bringing up PoW changes when backed into a corner gives even more weight to the idea that they would rather go to war than compromise to 2MB.
Blockstream is moving rapidly on segwit, sidechains, and Lightning. They are meticulously preparing Bitcoin to be carefully scaled ASAP. Classic, OTOH, is spreading '2MB? Not much testing needed' nonsense. And yes, we will "go to war" to defend Bitcoin's diverse/diffuse/defensible/resilient characteristics, from which its key interesting property of antifragility emerges. Whine about it all you want. Nothing you do can move our Honey Badger's needle one iota. You have no power here. You're the one whining. We're winning. Now who is the one whining? You. Now who is the one winning? Me. I hope you've learned something here, besides what it feels like to be crushed by a 75,000 horsepower iCEBREAKER.
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:32:29 AM Last edit: May 07, 2016, 01:51:53 AM by Fatman3001 |
|
where's segwit? Segwit is (as promised) right here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/7910every day without an inch of movement from Blockstream, increases the possibility. The fact that they start bringing up PoW changes when backed into a corner gives even more weight to the idea that they would rather go to war than compromise to 2MB.
Blockstream is moving rapidly on segwit, sidechains, and Lightning. They are meticulously preparing Bitcoin to be carefully scaled ASAP. Classic, OTOH, is spreading '2MB? Not much testing needed' nonsense. And yes, we will "go to war" to defend Bitcoin's diverse/diffuse/defensible/resilient characteristics, from which its key interesting property of antifragility emerges. Whine about it all you want. Nothing you do can move our Honey Badger's needle one iota. You have no power here. You're the one whining. We're winning. Now who is the one whining? You. Now who is the one winning? Me. I hope you've learned something here, besides what it feels like to be crushed by a 75,000 horsepower iCEBREAKER. Cool! I managed to annoy wINDBREAKER! Success!!! Edit: a post from January? Man, I must really have gotten under his skin. This feels sooooo gooood!
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:35:05 AM |
|
Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they? Or aren't they? You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. Or do you? Why are you having such a difficult time with this? You blind or something? I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is. O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll... In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this ------ stopped reading hereI don't think anybody needs a summary. You think the signed message for Gavin from block 1 was some MITM parlor trick then? It doesn't really matter because it was not made public----- snipped hereIt doesn't matter to the code, but it matters who has access to the coins and when. Maybe he doesn't give a shit if we believe him. Maybe he was using Gavin to confirm him for his Tulip Trustee. Idk.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1115
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:44:41 AM |
|
I think the most sensible theory going is that Kleiman was the voice of Satoshi on this forum; the times during which our Satoshi posted seems to suggest he was doing it from the states. I think Wright probably wrote the white paper and had Kleiman edit it? And it was probably Wright communicating with Gavin by email.
Or not. But it has to have been someone, and a bunch of this stuff fits. Even if CSW happens to be some kind of nut. Let's face it...
|
|
|
|
Fatman3001
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1526
Merit: 1013
Make Bitcoin glow with ENIAC
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:48:42 AM |
|
I think the most sensible theory going is that Kleiman was the voice of Satoshi on this forum; the times during which our Satoshi posted seems to suggest he was doing it from the states. I think Wright probably wrote the white paper and had Kleiman edit it? And it was probably Wright communicating with Gavin by email.
Or not. But it has to have been someone, and a bunch of this stuff fits. Even if CSW happens to be some kind of nut. Let's face it...
JVP confirmed that CW was the Satashi Nakamoto he met in 2005. So if it's a scam then he's in on it too.
|
|
|
|
whoreble
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:52:25 AM |
|
I hope you've learned something here, besides what it feels like to be crushed by a 75,000 horsepower iCEMAKER. What's the safe word again? @Fatman & BMB, too many TLAs, getting confused.
|
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10212
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
May 07, 2016, 01:56:23 AM |
|
Now that the world knows the Satoshi coins are safely tucked away in the bosom of the Tulip Trust...
Are they? Or aren't they? You gotta buy into Wright's phoney story and lacking evidence if you are going to go with the seemingly made up Tulip Trust scenario. Or do you? Why are you having such a difficult time with this? You blind or something? I know something's happening here, but I don't know what it is. O.k.... I will bite... BMB seemingly turned into a troll... In essence, the summary is that Wright has been making the shit up for his own self-interests, and possibly he's got a few screws loose.... This story has been posted all over various bitcoin forums and even received some mainstream media attention. At first, when the story broke, a few days ago, a considerable amount of credibility was given to the possibility that the story could be true this ------ stopped reading hereI don't think anybody needs a summary. You think the signed message for Gavin from block 1 was some MITM parlor trick then? It doesn't really matter because it was not made public----- snipped hereIt doesn't matter to the code, but it matters who has access to the coins and when. Maybe he doesn't give a shit if we believe him. Maybe he was using Gavin to confirm him for his Tulip Trustee. Idk. I'm not saying anything different than you, here.. in respect to what matters... Yes, if if he does have access to the coins, or anyone has access to the coins, then that does matter. So far, no one has shown to have access to the coins whether directly or some kind of supposed Tulip Trust... or supposed Tulip Trustee.... There has not been any meaningful evidence to corroborate any of the claims within means that would truly be available if someone were to want to demonstrate an ability to control Satoshi coins. In other words, there is not need to ascribe further uncertainties to the Satoshi coins than what previously existed and what had already likely been priced in.
|
|
|
|
|