Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[USB-S]

This is the best you bears can do? I get to be unimpressed




Now we still need to get to $1mil by the end of the century.

[glendall]

I think this is my favorite thread of my life.  The meme to noise ratio is incredibly high and amusing.

[barbs]

400 is gonna get sliced through like a knife through butter 

[dloghwak]

400 is gonna get sliced through like a knife through butter 

Not gonna happen

[Mrpumperitis]

http://www.coindesk.com/coinbase-exchange-rebrand-ethereum-trading/



 
"White also suggested that the company was paying close attention to The DAO", a decentralized organization built on top of Ethereum that acts as a funding vehicle for related projects.

[USB-S]

If ether were to crash, I bet their community would react the same way we just did.

[peonminer]

http://www.coindesk.com/coinbase-exchange-rebrand-ethereum-trading/



 
"White also suggested that the company was paying close attention to The DAO", a decentralized organization built on top of Ethereum that acts as a funding vehicle for related projects.

[Mrpumperitis]

https://twitter.com/Dustin_Byington/status/733310478080860160

get ready 


https://www.reddit.com/r/ethtrader/comments/4k1uz3/coinbase_added_a_new_endpoint_for_their_api/

sup pump! Been a long time...Cheers

yoyo hows things m8.
Bet u glad u got in ETH back in jan , 0.002 was it we got em for 

[JayJuanGee]

Remember, Litecoin went to $50 on nothing

Goodluck to all BTC hodlerz

So what, bitcoin went to $1k on nothing.

I believe that Funky meant that Litecoin went to $1billion ($50) on nothing because largely Litecoin adds little value to what bitcoin was then providing.

The same cannot be said about bitcoin - because not only was bitcoin the first, but it plowed the way for a lot of this other copy cat (and even possible improvements upon) its base model and solving a (double spend coupled with decentralization) problem that had previously NOT been resolved (and evasive to many who had previously attempted to figure out a solution).

So bitcoin was adding value, even in the bubble to $1,200 - even though it was then (and subsequently discovered) not able to then sustain a $1,200 value.

[barbs]

400 is gonna get sliced through like a knife through butter 

Not gonna happen

up what 55% in 7 months or so?

Anything can happen.

[USB-S]

Remember, Litecoin went to $50 on nothing

Goodluck to all BTC hodlerz

So what, bitcoin went to $1k on nothing.

I believe that Funky meant that Litecoin went to $1billion ($50) on nothing because largely Litecoin adds little value to what bitcoin was then providing.

The same cannot be said about bitcoin - because not only was bitcoin the first, but it plowed the way for a lot of this other copy cat (and even possible improvements upon) its base model and solving a (double spend coupled with decentralization) problem that had previously NOT been resolved (and evasive to many who had previously attempted to figure out a solution).

So bitcoin was adding value, even in the bubble to $1,200 - even though it was then (and subsequently discovered) not able to then sustain a $1,200 value.

Oh so, ethereum is riding on this nothing wave as well? Does this nothing we speak of ever run out?
Bitcoin has darknet markets and alpaca socks.

[JayJuanGee]

BTC looks sooo fucking weak right now and that only few weeks apart from Halving, not the best sign imo.

You really have not substantiated your claim in the above post...

you are right, i havent. its just an impression based for biggest parts on the complete lack of any volume and "action". BTC seems so bloodless right now it should be somehow vibrant right beneath such an important resistance and just weeks before the Halvening, but instead it seems sleeping.
another bad sign imo is that we have basically a very good sentiment, everybody is lookin forward with positive expectations to the Halvening. if nothing happens or the weeks before price might even start to decline we might see a big move south just out of disappointment.

shit is dead. halving will certainly help but those effects need months to kick in.

You can pretty much go back to the points of my previous post... In which I have asserted that you seem to be way too overly invested in the upward direction.

Current market performance doesn't mean much of anything about bitcoin, only that the price is currently not ready for upwards.

[dumbfbrankings]

Remember, Litecoin went to $50 on nothing

Goodluck to all BTC hodlerz

So what, bitcoin went to $1k on nothing.

I believe that Funky meant that Litecoin went to $1billion ($50) on nothing because largely Litecoin adds little value to what bitcoin was then providing.

The same cannot be said about bitcoin - because not only was bitcoin the first, but it plowed the way for a lot of this other copy cat (and even possible improvements upon) its base model and solving a (double spend coupled with decentralization) problem that had previously NOT been resolved (and evasive to many who had previously attempted to figure out a solution).

So bitcoin was adding value, even in the bubble to $1,200 - even though it was then (and subsequently discovered) not able to then sustain a $1,200 value.

Lessee if JJG will buy the tippy top of the ETH trade too.

Watching others get the gains you were chasing three years ago... but with a different token... while you hodl your decentralized Core coins on an exchange. It's gotta sting... a little?

[Mrpumperitis]

BIG Hot news! From Russia!

Prime Minister of Russia Medvedev:

I have some DAO tokens!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Zd966hNLTc

WOW

[JayJuanGee]

Remember, Litecoin went to $50 on nothing

Goodluck to all BTC hodlerz

So what, bitcoin went to $1k on nothing.

I believe that Funky meant that Litecoin went to $1billion ($50) on nothing because largely Litecoin adds little value to what bitcoin was then providing.

The same cannot be said about bitcoin - because not only was bitcoin the first, but it plowed the way for a lot of this other copy cat (and even possible improvements upon) its base model and solving a (double spend coupled with decentralization) problem that had previously NOT been resolved (and evasive to many who had previously attempted to figure out a solution).

So bitcoin was adding value, even in the bubble to $1,200 - even though it was then (and subsequently discovered) not able to then sustain a $1,200 value.

Oh so, ethereum is riding on this nothing wave as well? Does this nothing we speak of ever run out?
Bitcoin has darknet markets and alpaca socks.

In that post, I did not say anything about whether ETH is adding value.  I attempting to clarify the point about Litecoin versus BTC. 

BTW, I largely agree with Funky's earlier point that ETH seems to be adding more value than what litecoin was adding; however, I have not taking any kind of position to assess that value exactly, and I have no kind of real idea about the extent to which ETH is going to be pumped or to be able to sustain  its pumped price.  Nonetheless, I do have the sense that ETH is quite overvalued, especially compared with bitcoin, but my sense of it does not mean that I know for sure what ETH's price is going to do in the coming months.. but for my own comfort, I feel much better investing in bitcoin rather than ETH.. and maybe that's just me?

[JayJuanGee]

Remember, Litecoin went to $50 on nothing

Goodluck to all BTC hodlerz

So what, bitcoin went to $1k on nothing.

I believe that Funky meant that Litecoin went to $1billion ($50) on nothing because largely Litecoin adds little value to what bitcoin was then providing.

The same cannot be said about bitcoin - because not only was bitcoin the first, but it plowed the way for a lot of this other copy cat (and even possible improvements upon) its base model and solving a (double spend coupled with decentralization) problem that had previously NOT been resolved (and evasive to many who had previously attempted to figure out a solution).

So bitcoin was adding value, even in the bubble to $1,200 - even though it was then (and subsequently discovered) not able to then sustain a $1,200 value.

Lessee if JJG will buy the tippy top of the ETH trade too.

Watching others get the gains you were chasing three years ago... but with a different token... while you hodl your decentralized Core coins on an exchange. It's gotta sting... a little?

I've already addressed these various point several times previously, and why don't you explain to us what you have been doing related to bitcoin, dumbfbrankings? 

Oh yeah, I almost forgot, you are not here to provide any substance or information about your BTC own strategies, to the extent you have any, but just to attempt to ridicule, criticize and Monday morning quarter back the behaviors of others who are actually attempting to contribute content?

[doc12]

No pump without a dump 

[doc12]

I feel much better investing in bitcoin rather than ETH.. and maybe that's just me?

All depends on what you're looking for.
ETH is clearly better when it comes to making money, while bitcoin is better at other things. Like being boring and losing money.
But you you don't need me to tell you this stuff.

Oh shit you just posted the same shit with your other sockpuppet acc.

[USB-S]

I feel much better investing in bitcoin rather than ETH.. and maybe that's just me?

All depends on what you're looking for.
ETH is clearly better when it comes to making money, while bitcoin is better at other things. Like being boring and losing money.
But you you don't need me to tell you this stuff.

Lambie, I bet you know more than I do, but I know that you know that Ethereum is full shit.

Oh shit you just posted the same shit with your other sockpuppet acc.

Second that.

[JayJuanGee]

Current market performance doesn't mean much of anything about bitcoin, only that the price is currently not ready for upwards.

U think 440 will hold? bcz it okay if it dont more cheep coinz 4 me. bitcoin tres popularo in my gosudarstvo.

How am I supposed to know, exactly? 

I am getting the sense that $440 will probably not hold, especially since we are currently at $441 and relatively low volume, yet I also understand that price trends change back and forth at unpredictable times, therefore I continue to prepare for both price directions and try to take precautionary measures to the extent feasible. 

At this time, I am continuing to buy on the way down, at this point, and I have projected the possibility of going down into my buying scenario.. but I may have to continue to adapt as prices go down... $430 seems very feasible at the moment, but yeah we could even go further.. I don't know.  Does anyone know or have a better strategy?  We each have to decide for ourselves what we believe works, no?