Bitcoin Forum
November 17, 2024, 09:28:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: Price Target for Nov. 30, 2024:
<$75K - 3 (3.8%)
$75K to $80K - 1 (1.3%)
$80K to $85K - 2 (2.6%)
$85K to $90K - 9 (11.5%)
$90K to $95K - 12 (15.4%)
$95K to $100K - 12 (15.4%)
>$100K - 39 (50%)
Total Voters: 78

Pages: « 1 ... 15962 15963 15964 15965 15966 15967 15968 15969 15970 15971 15972 15973 15974 15975 15976 15977 15978 15979 15980 15981 15982 15983 15984 15985 15986 15987 15988 15989 15990 15991 15992 15993 15994 15995 15996 15997 15998 15999 16000 16001 16002 16003 16004 16005 16006 16007 16008 16009 16010 16011 [16012] 16013 16014 16015 16016 16017 16018 16019 16020 16021 16022 16023 16024 16025 16026 16027 16028 16029 16030 16031 16032 16033 16034 16035 16036 16037 16038 16039 16040 16041 16042 16043 16044 16045 16046 16047 16048 16049 16050 16051 16052 16053 16054 16055 16056 16057 16058 16059 16060 16061 16062 ... 33950 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26497047 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3906
Merit: 11194


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
December 11, 2016, 10:59:33 PM
Last edit: December 12, 2016, 12:00:41 AM by JayJuanGee

They already have all loosed in Bitfinex ...  Grin


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN4RdrN80ic

[http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img921/333/Phjezl.jpg[/img]
What happen with bitfinex??? Some thread with a good resume?

They said they have been "hacked". Months ago. Were you asleep ?
People who still store any amount over there deserve to lose it all. It will happen.

ghdp:  I doubt that the Bitfinex situation is as gloomy and doomy as you are making it out to be.

Yeah, there is considerable potential for considerable and ongoing shenanigans going on with regards to Bitfinex, but there is also a very interesting scenario, as well.

Factually speaking, this whole Bitfinex situation is playing out in a very unique kind of way and a bit innovative and outside of normal scenarios and even normal expectations.

Sure, there are a lot of folks who are suggesting that Bitfinex is running one scam over another scam over another scam in order to divert attention while they run off with the coins, but it seems also clear that if they had wanted to run off with a significant number of coins, they would have already been able to do that in August - but yeah, maybe they are still working on perfecting their exit strategy... who knows?  I kind of doubt that the situation is either as dire as the bitfinex naysayers are describing it to be (which you seem to be in that camp) nor as rosey as the bitfinex public relations folks like to attempt to make out.


Regarding the actual heist, whether that was an inside job or not remains a bit of a mystery.

They had nearly 120,000 user coins go missing, which represented about $72 million dollars in value at the time (120k x $600).  They stated that represented about 36% of all user assets/funds on their site, which would be about $2billion $200 million (Edited correction to my napkin math).

Their innovative step was to cause the users to bear the loss, while creating a compensation system that would in theory allow the potential for users to be compensated or to potentially trade the assets, representing the measured compensation, measured in BFX tokens.  Yeah, sure a bit of a clusterfuck because "compensated" users would come to varying decisions regarding the present or future value of the "compensation" and some users would have different terms than others (for example, USA customers could sell their "compensation" but they could not buy back).  They have also created an equity system in which users could trade their BFX for RRT, and yeah, additional complication and potential for confusion regarding present or future value of such additional tokens.

Over the past 5 months, Bitfinex has paid out about 5.5% of the outstanding BFX tokens at 100% of their initial assessment value, which creates additional possibilities for insider trading, yet has served as a kind of tangible compensation mechanism.

Whether Bitfinex is going to "go under" or not or be hacked again remain decent questions, yet those outcomes are no way near any kind of certainty such as hypothesized by ghdp.

There certainly seem to have been some changes in Bitfinex, and their relative trading volume seems to returned to very similar pre-"hack" levels..  We cannot really know for sure if some of those measurements are fake or not, but their "recovery" plan does seem to continue to have some legs and some potential for success...   There remains a risk with holding coins on any exchange, and probably the risk on Bitfinex is a bit greater than some of the other major exchanges, yet it is likely not so significant of a risk differential on Bitfinex to cause a blanket conclusion against holding coins  there because there seem to remain considerable ways to profit from trading some coins there (and also some arbitrage opportunities from time to time).  

I personally had thought that it would have been good for Bitfinex to employ some additional low fee trading strategies and other mechanisms to attempt to attract new users and to increase retention of old user, but maybe in the end, those kinds of incentive mechanisms play out as a kind of double edged sword in which they may not necessarily cause the expected results.  It is quite likely that Bitfinex managers have employed considerable breadth in their deliberations about going forward strategies (whether there was some kind of insider jobs going on or not) - by the way with the present price of bitcoin hovering around $770, and the fact that the hack caused BTC prices to drop into the mid $400s (very temporarily), caused additional ways that insiders could have schemed bitfinex customers (these are potential bitfinex corruption and disingenuousness scenarios, but currently, they are not conclusively demonstrated by any tangible evidence).

rjclarke2000
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1358
Merit: 1016



View Profile
December 11, 2016, 11:04:01 PM

I bought thousands of pounds worth of silver when it was at $30.



What a dickhead

Patience. You'll have thousand % profit in just 2-3 years.



Well I can't afford to sell it all anyway. It was a large amount.

Stupid really


Edit. I should have said I can't afford to sell it at a loss knowing it will go up eventually

Where do you safely store such a large amount of silver?



In more than one place and not even easy for me to get my hands on it
AlexGR
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1708
Merit: 1049



View Profile
December 11, 2016, 11:23:58 PM

Regarding the actual heist, whether that was an inside job or not remains a bit of a mystery.

They had nearly 120,000 user coins go missing, which represented about $72 million dollars in value at the time (120k x $600).  They stated that represented about 36% of all user assets/funds on their site, which would be about $2billion.

Minus a zero (200mn).
bitebits
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2263
Merit: 3640


Top-tier crypto casino and sportsbook


View Profile
December 11, 2016, 11:32:07 PM
Last edit: December 12, 2016, 08:53:44 PM by bitebits


The 'war on cash' is really starting. Can recommend watching Andrea's Antonopoulos recent talk about this very subject.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3906
Merit: 11194


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
December 11, 2016, 11:47:37 PM

Regarding the actual heist, whether that was an inside job or not remains a bit of a mystery.

They had nearly 120,000 user coins go missing, which represented about $72 million dollars in value at the time (120k x $600).  They stated that represented about 36% of all user assets/funds on their site, which would be about $2billion.

Minus a zero (200mn).


Oh... woops.. thanks for that correction.  I was thinking that $2billion seemed like quite a lot.    I'm gonna  correct it in the original post in order to not accidentally mislead anyone.
Fakhoury
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1386
Merit: 1027


Permabull Bitcoin Investor


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 12:06:09 AM


And it's all for our favor, in our bullish thread, I've submitted a ZH article about why there is war on cash.
Meuh6879
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1512
Merit: 1012



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 12:58:15 AM

The 'war on cash' is really starting. Can recommend watching Andrea's Antonopolous recent talk about this very subject.

Yes, i have seen this : https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6ZCVQHtD2l4





But, Saxo bank is right ... 2000 USD for 1 bitcoin at the end of January 2017 ?









Fuck, it's real ... it's currency WAR.
DARKHOLDER
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 659
Merit: 500


Zepher is scammer!:)


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 07:09:26 AM

Bitfinex hacked again? Huh
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3906
Merit: 11194


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 09:13:10 AM

They already have all loosed in Bitfinex ...  Grin


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CN4RdrN80ic

[http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img921/333/Phjezl.jpg[/img]
What happen with bitfinex??? Some thread with a good resume?

They said they have been "hacked". Months ago. Were you asleep ?
People who still store any amount over there deserve to lose it all. It will happen.

ghdp:  I doubt that the Bitfinex situation is as gloomy and doomy as you are making it out to be.

Some people said the same thing about gox.
Other people said it could only end badly.

In the end, people who did not listen lost money.

"Innovative accounting" does not change the fact that they scammed people. One shouldn't deal with scammers. Period.



Yes. You are responding very conclusively about a situation that is much more nuanced than you are making it out to be.

People say all kinds  of shit and make all kinds of comparisons and conclusions, but if you fail and refuse to grapple with some of the details then you are likely going to fail to distinguish between situations that are different by over generalizing.

If you acknowledge some of the details of my response, you should recognize that I am accepting that there are some potential for shenanigans going on in the Bitfinex situation, such as an insider job.. and sure you can remain adamant and engage in absolutist thinking, and even if you end up being correct, it is much more likely that you are incorrect.  

Since you seem to have a tendency to overreact and overgeneralize, I don't really feel like going back to read your posts, but I suspect that you were one of those who was asserting that bitcoin was going to die because of the bitfinex "hack", and you were asserting that they were NEVER NEVER NEVER going to reopen 

(Edit, I did go back and look at a little bit of your post history, and you do seem to have a pattern of providing little to no substance to back up your "contributions" to the forum, and you do seem to be a kind of doomer and gloomer in respect to lack of acknowledgment of the complexity of the bitcoin space and the many players in the space.. hahahahaha... good luck with that perspective in respect to bitcoin Roll Eyes Roll Eyes Roll Eyes    Tongue Tongue ).

Well, I hate to break the news to you that they did devise a plan, they did reopen, they are operating at very similar trade volume levels as they had prior to the "hack," bitcoin is living on and we will find out the extent to which bitfinex continues to be a significant player in the bitcoin space down the road (3-5 years from now, for example).  

I suspect that chances are pretty decent that bitfinex is going to continue to be one of the significant players in the bitcoin scene, and they may need to continue to adapt their offerings in order to adapt to the bitcoin space, as bitcoin evolves with further adoption, increasing prices and increasing attacks on vulnerabilities, including attacks on various centralized systems, such as exchanges.
julian071
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1132
Merit: 818



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:37:22 AM

It's happening.
SnokkomBTC
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 559
Merit: 500


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:43:47 AM

It's happening.
We must break 780 soon..
petahashminer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1890
Merit: 1037


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:44:45 AM

is this gentleman?
Ted E. Bare
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Bear with me


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 10:45:57 AM

Yes! Take out 800, do it.
yefi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2842
Merit: 1511



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:30:14 AM

Let's not see 777 become the new 666 Tongue
600watt
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 2106



View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:31:39 AM

Let's not see 777 become the new 666 Tongue

man... 777 on stamp. i cannot leave the fucking monitor.

marcus_of_augustus
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3920
Merit: 2349


Eadem mutata resurgo


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:33:29 AM

780 == 800 ... and 780 is a done deal already peeps, how many times do you need to hear it?? psychologically it has been ~800 for a month so done deal.

next stop 800.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3906
Merit: 11194


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:37:27 AM

Let's not see 777 become the new 666 Tongue

man... 777 on stamp. i cannot leave the fucking monitor.




I know the feeling.

Only about 200 coins blocking our reaching 34 month high (ATH).

We don't want to count our chickens before they are hatched... but the wall of coins is getting very reachable to overcome.

(Edit:  woops.. more reachable...... well broke through $777 and currently less than 120 coins to breach $778.85)
ErisDiscordia
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1133
Merit: 1163


Imposition of ORder = Escalation of Chaos


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:45:45 AM

We're at 778 on stamp again...get to the happening bunker!
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3906
Merit: 11194


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:50:27 AM

We're at 778 on stamp again...get to the happening bunker!

$778.28  ----- $.57 to go in order to break out of $778.85



Edit:   and it's gone.........  $779 reached...


CCMF!!!!!!!!!!!!!
BldSwtTrs
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 861
Merit: 1010


View Profile
December 12, 2016, 11:50:42 AM

Choo Choo
Pages: « 1 ... 15962 15963 15964 15965 15966 15967 15968 15969 15970 15971 15972 15973 15974 15975 15976 15977 15978 15979 15980 15981 15982 15983 15984 15985 15986 15987 15988 15989 15990 15991 15992 15993 15994 15995 15996 15997 15998 15999 16000 16001 16002 16003 16004 16005 16006 16007 16008 16009 16010 16011 [16012] 16013 16014 16015 16016 16017 16018 16019 16020 16021 16022 16023 16024 16025 16026 16027 16028 16029 16030 16031 16032 16033 16034 16035 16036 16037 16038 16039 16040 16041 16042 16043 16044 16045 16046 16047 16048 16049 16050 16051 16052 16053 16054 16055 16056 16057 16058 16059 16060 16061 16062 ... 33950 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!