Bitcoin Forum
April 23, 2026, 10:18:13 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 30.2 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 17211 17212 17213 17214 17215 17216 17217 17218 17219 17220 17221 17222 17223 17224 17225 17226 17227 17228 17229 17230 17231 17232 17233 17234 17235 17236 17237 17238 17239 17240 17241 17242 17243 17244 17245 17246 17247 17248 17249 17250 17251 17252 17253 17254 17255 17256 17257 17258 17259 17260 [17261] 17262 17263 17264 17265 17266 17267 17268 17269 17270 17271 17272 17273 17274 17275 17276 17277 17278 17279 17280 17281 17282 17283 17284 17285 17286 17287 17288 17289 17290 17291 17292 17293 17294 17295 17296 17297 17298 17299 17300 17301 17302 17303 17304 17305 17306 17307 17308 17309 17310 17311 ... 35722 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26962666 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
B1tUnl0ck3r
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 277

liife threw a tempest at you? be a coconut !


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 12:57:20 PM

Btw how to profit from segwit? setup a node a get some fees? that simple?

That will be the Lightning Network. You'll have to have bitcoins to feed the channel.

So it's really a scam. I feed the chanel btc (what's the minimum to hold to have a node) and get a fee in return. What's the expected ROI?
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 12:59:00 PM

I really wish Roger Ver would kill himself.

He already did. He character-assassinated himself, losing all credibility.
Ludwig Von
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 854
Merit: 307



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 12:59:18 PM

As soon as world countries start investing in space faring again.

That sounds convincing, it means never.  Grin
gentlemand
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2604
Merit: 3090


Welt Am Draht


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 01:02:30 PM

No. I mean, 6 feet under. No biological function. Cold to the touch.

Maggot food.

That's not very nice. All he needs is a few months of intense breastfeeding and he'll be right as rain again. Let's send him to an isle of wet nurses and welcome him back at the appropriate time.
El duderino_
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3220
Merit: 15491


“They have no clue”


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 01:10:20 PM

ANALYSIS: WHY AUGUST 3rd?
(micgoossens's prediction game)

(SNIP)
TL;DR.
Fear of Aug 1st dissipates slowly while the wounded lick their wounds. New week, new life starting on Friday Thursday.



Sounds Good 
Let see to 3th of August

Glad you like it  Grin

and still feeling lucky with the small dip Wink
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3584
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
July 25, 2017, 01:16:29 PM

Btw how to profit from segwit? setup a node a get some fees? that simple?

That will be the Lightning Network. You'll have to have bitcoins to feed the channel.

So it's really a scam. I feed the chanel btc (what's the minimum to hold to have a node) and get a fee in return. What's the expected ROI?

Yep. One big scam, everyone's going to get so screwed. lol


If person A is opening a channel to person C and you are in the middle, person B you need to cover the amount that they are transferring back and forth. The person in the middle can charge whatever percent they want, but once there is a large network of providers the cheapest route will be used.

Person A is basically "sending" you bitcoins and you're "sending" bitcoins back to them, you are "sending" bitcoins to person C and they're "sending" bitcoins back to you. Now Person A can send to Person C as many times as they want and Person C can send to Person A as many times as they want. The transactions are "recorded" by you and settled at any time or at the end of the lock-in period.

Depending upon how much they want to open the channel for, you need to have enough bitcoins to cover both sides. So twice the size of the channel.

Many people will be opening free channels at first though I imagine...to become trusted channels so they can charge down the line.
Ted E. Bare
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Bear with me


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 01:20:24 PM

What's wrong with btc-e?
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 01:22:29 PM

What's wrong with btc-e?

Offline it seems.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1772


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 01:55:32 PM

I don't think I'm winning micro's ATH game.

I told you... 4 AUG.

There's no way the ATH is broken before 1 AUG has passed away. Also we needed some little correction after the recent surge from the lows of $1900-.
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1772


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:18:12 PM

Relax guys, even ViaBTC is now saying that they intend to adhere to the Segwit2x agreement:

https://www.bitcoin.com/public-service-announcement

As suspected, it was just a game theory move (a ridiculous one though) to exercise some pressure to "guarantee" the second part of the agreement (2x blocksize).

I don't even think the drop has been due to this... it's just a minor correction before propeling to new highs early August.
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3822
Merit: 5504



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:21:14 PM

Relax guys, even ViaBTC is now saying that they intend to adhere to the Segwit2x agreement:

https://www.bitcoin.com/public-service-announcement

As suspected, it was just a game theory move (a ridiculous one though) to exercise some pressure to "guarantee" the second part of the agreement (2x blocksize).

I don't even think the drop has been due to this... it's just a minor correction before propeling to new highs early August.

Are you kidding? They propped this BCC altcoin up for one purpose. As the 2X date approaches, they are going to have loads of fun switching their hashrate back and forth from Bitcoin to BCC blockchain, in an attempt to strong arm the core developers/community and FUD the shit out of the market and cause massive amounts of hysteria, fear and price volatility.

Mark my words. Roger and Jihan will be cackling with glee the whole time.
Ted E. Bare
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 658
Merit: 503


Bear with me


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:29:00 PM

Anyone sold at the bottom? What a scam. Cheesy
FractalUniverse
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1031
Merit: 558



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:31:02 PM

Anyone sold at the bottom? What a scam. Cheesy
not me, I didn't buy yet  Smiley
bitserve
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2072
Merit: 1772


Self made HODLER ✓


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:32:44 PM

Relax guys, even ViaBTC is now saying that they intend to adhere to the Segwit2x agreement:

https://www.bitcoin.com/public-service-announcement

As suspected, it was just a game theory move (a ridiculous one though) to exercise some pressure to "guarantee" the second part of the agreement (2x blocksize).

I don't even think the drop has been due to this... it's just a minor correction before propeling to new highs early August.

Are you kidding? They propped this BCC altcoin up for one purpose. As the 2X date approaches, they are going to have loads of fun switching their hashrate back and forth from Bitcoin to BCC blockchain, in an attempt to strong arm the core developers/community and FUD the shit out of the market and cause massive amounts of hysteria, fear and price volatility.

Mark my words. Roger and Jihan will be cackling with glee the whole time.

Not kidding, yet you are probabilistically right. That's why I am NOW (after Segwit passed with flying colors) in favor of the FIXED 2MB blocksize increase. It won't do any harm if done right and it will remove any standing argument for their FUD attempts. Win-Win.
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:44:11 PM
Last edit: July 25, 2017, 02:56:59 PM by BlindMayorBitcorn

The shit winds have started to blow. Batten down the hatches.

https://www.reddit.com/r/btc/comments/6peqwr/if_the_2x_portion_of_segwit2x_fails_to_activate/
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 5377



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:47:34 PM

Relax guys, even ViaBTC is now saying that they intend to adhere to the Segwit2x agreement:

https://www.bitcoin.com/public-service-announcement

As suspected, it was just a game theory move (a ridiculous one though) to exercise some pressure to "guarantee" the second part of the agreement (2x blocksize).

I don't even think the drop has been due to this... it's just a minor correction before propeling to new highs early August.

Are you kidding? They propped this BCC altcoin up for one purpose. As the 2X date approaches, they are going to have loads of fun switching their hashrate back and forth from Bitcoin to BCC blockchain, in an attempt to strong arm the core developers/community and FUD the shit out of the market and cause massive amounts of hysteria, fear and price volatility.

Mark my words. Roger and Jihan will be cackling with glee the whole time.

Not kidding, yet you are probabilistically right. That's why I am NOW (after Segwit passed with flying colors) in favor of the FIXED 2MB blocksize increase. It won't do any harm if done right and it will remove any standing argument for their FUD attempts. Win-Win.

Reasonable thoughts, but I am wary of any on-chain scaling solution that makes it harder to run a full node.

My position is: with segwit working, comes the Lightning Network. With the LN, many more people will want to run a full node, if only to have a LN node up. LN routes on Tor, so the more we are, the merrier. Besides, several small channels can help decentralize the LN, should any bank or similar wish to stake serious collateral to open lots of channels.

Additionally, on the LN there's a chance to collect small fees: for channel operation (they will probably be low or zero, at least at the beginning), or for LN watching, ready to issue a penalty transaction if someone tries to cheat. Stifling growth of the number of nodes at this stage seems unwise to me.
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4424
Merit: 14341


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:49:43 PM

What's wrong with btc-e?

Offline it seems.

Down for a few hours, now.

Latest update, about an hour ago.

https://twitter.com/btcecom/status/889840066297724928?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Etweet
d_eddie
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3206
Merit: 5377



View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:54:25 PM

I don't think I'm winning micro's ATH game.

I told you... 4 AUG.

There's no way the ATH is broken before 1 AUG has passed away. Also we needed some little correction after the recent surge from the lows of $1900-.

After Aug 1st, right. But they will hurry up to Aug 3rd  Tongue Tongue
savetherainforest
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1876
Merit: 612


Plant 1xTree for each Satoshi earned!


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 02:55:35 PM

The shit winds have started to blow. Batten down the hatches.


Its good that bitcoin is predictable in these kind of matters... Cheesy Cheesy
aesma
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2963
Merit: 1087


fly or die


View Profile
July 25, 2017, 03:14:12 PM

Some of you doing dollar cost averaging ?

How do you choose your trades ?
Pages: « 1 ... 17211 17212 17213 17214 17215 17216 17217 17218 17219 17220 17221 17222 17223 17224 17225 17226 17227 17228 17229 17230 17231 17232 17233 17234 17235 17236 17237 17238 17239 17240 17241 17242 17243 17244 17245 17246 17247 17248 17249 17250 17251 17252 17253 17254 17255 17256 17257 17258 17259 17260 [17261] 17262 17263 17264 17265 17266 17267 17268 17269 17270 17271 17272 17273 17274 17275 17276 17277 17278 17279 17280 17281 17282 17283 17284 17285 17286 17287 17288 17289 17290 17291 17292 17293 17294 17295 17296 17297 17298 17299 17300 17301 17302 17303 17304 17305 17306 17307 17308 17309 17310 17311 ... 35722 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!