Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[HairyMaclairy]

GODDAMIT WHO WAS WATCHIGN THE POT!?

[HairyMaclairy]

I GO OUR FOR FIVE MINUTES FOE A NICE CHAT WITH GLADYS ANS COME HOME TO ATH ALL OVER MY CELING

[jojo69]

whistle'n like a motherfucker over here

[Syke]

There seems to be a wee wall on Stamp at 20k.

[bones261]

whistle'n like a motherfucker over here

[jojo69]

wait

I thought tat was supposed to be the top earlier...confirmed sources and everything??

[HairyMaclairy]

I’m back to all in. Bought shortly before I put the kettle on. Let’s see where this leads us.

[bones261]

I’m back to all in. Bought shortly before I put the kettle on. Let’s see where this leads us.

[jojo69]

GDAX catching up now

[nikauforest]

30 Minute chart going positive and recharged again on Bitstamp.

[bones261]

GDAX catching up now

30 Minute chart going positive and recharged again on Bitstamp.

[jojo69]

'bout time for Jimbo to wander in from last call

[Icygreen]

You're taking on societies entire value constructs with your argument which is ironically one of the largest utilities of bitcoin today.   Borderless, trustless, deflationary, voluntary participation, secure, indiscriminate, and unrevocable. All the things central banking can't be. It offers peaceful participation of choice in the monetary revolution we're seeing today and that sir is a massive utility towards positive change.  I participate because I believe this.

You people cannot be serious.  You're reading off a fictional list of traits from pumpers like Andreas Antonopolous.  It's NOT possible to create a decentralized digital currency, only ones that either start completely centralized from day one, or centralize more by the day.  In other words, you're either lying to people on purpose to try and profit from pump and dumps, or you don't know enough about the subject to comment.  I used to believe there may be some type of way to fix things, but no, there's not.  Bitcoin doesn't even remove counter party risk.  The amount of lies surrounding bitcoin is honestly astonishing.

O'rly, that's all you got? Seems like you'd rather squelch any hope and belief in folks rather than support a positive idea in which you certainly cannot predict the outcome and then shill for PM's which are proven to be cornered and manipulated.   It's not like we believe you genuinely care about us and our finances. You don't, you just really want to be right. Well, there's a lot of money and attention flowing into BTC over the past 7 years that says GFY. Sorry, not sorry, you got r0ached.  

[TERA2]

[Phil_S]

WO thread from 1 year ago is a fun read: 

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.321420

[ErisDiscordia]

It's a matter of basic axioms. Lefties are weak and they know it so they want to rely on someone to care for them. Righties are strong and they know, instinctively, that they are strong, so they want to compete.

This was exactly my thought process when I was 18. Righties = strong, want freedom and self-reliance. Lefties = weak, want others to take care of them.

I'm not young enough anymore to know everything, though.

In the real world, after meeting countless people suffering the effects of systemic inequality, injustice and oppression I had to change my mind and discover that it's not that simple.

There are two types of people: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.

[ayesha201009]

I think today price on bitstamp will surpass 20k$ for each bitcoin... stay tuned and buy more

[jbreher]

one that can scale right now to peak-time VISA levels, by design.

Y'all realizer yer fabled LN can't scale to Visa levels without a huge block size increase, right?

I can't prove to you that it can, but I believe that it is several orders of magnitude better than a mere block size increase.

LN allows the same number of actors to engage in roughly unlimited numbers of transactions with each other. What it does not allow is more actors engaging in transactions.

If you think the future is properly just us assholes already in engaging in scads of trades with each other (how many transactions do you do per day?), then LN is probably for you.

If instead, you think that the 99.99% of the world that have not yet bought in might possibly be interesting to Bitcoin, then LN has essentially zero to offer you.

[Ibian]

It's a matter of basic axioms. Lefties are weak and they know it so they want to rely on someone to care for them. Righties are strong and they know, instinctively, that they are strong, so they want to compete.

This was exactly my thought process when I was 18. Righties = strong, want freedom and self-reliance. Lefties = weak, want others to take care of them.

I'm not young enough anymore to know everything, though.

In the real world, after meeting countless people suffering the effects of systemic inequality, injustice and oppression I had to change my mind and discover that it's not that simple.

There are two types of people: those who divide people into two types and those who don't.

You were smarter when you were younger.

Life is not complicated. People just pretend it is so if they cannot compete. It's just another defense mechanism.

[Ibian]

one that can scale right now to peak-time VISA levels, by design.

Y'all realizer yer fabled LN can't scale to Visa levels without a huge block size increase, right?

I can't prove to you that it can, but I believe that it is several orders of magnitude better than a mere block size increase.

LN allows the same number of actors to engage in roughly unlimited numbers of transactions with each other. What it does not allow is more actors engaging in transactions.

If you think the future is properly just us assholes already in engaging in scads of trades with each other (how many transactions do you do per day?), then LN is probably for you.

If instead, you think that the 99.99% of the world that have not yet bought in might possibly be interesting to Bitcoin, then LN has essentially zero to offer you.

Yogi is right. SHIT YOU GUYS, YOGI IS RIGHT! WHAT DO?!