Bitcoin Forum
October 06, 2024, 08:08:12 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: When will BTC get back above $70K:
7/14 - 0 (0%)
7/21 - 1 (0.9%)
7/28 - 11 (10.1%)
8/4 - 16 (14.7%)
8/11 - 7 (6.4%)
8/18 - 6 (5.5%)
8/25 - 8 (7.3%)
After August - 60 (55%)
Total Voters: 109

Pages: « 1 ... 20206 20207 20208 20209 20210 20211 20212 20213 20214 20215 20216 20217 20218 20219 20220 20221 20222 20223 20224 20225 20226 20227 20228 20229 20230 20231 20232 20233 20234 20235 20236 20237 20238 20239 20240 20241 20242 20243 20244 20245 20246 20247 20248 20249 20250 20251 20252 20253 20254 20255 [20256] 20257 20258 20259 20260 20261 20262 20263 20264 20265 20266 20267 20268 20269 20270 20271 20272 20273 20274 20275 20276 20277 20278 20279 20280 20281 20282 20283 20284 20285 20286 20287 20288 20289 20290 20291 20292 20293 20294 20295 20296 20297 20298 20299 20300 20301 20302 20303 20304 20305 20306 ... 33798 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26470383 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3962
Merit: 5377


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 12:56:45 AM

Wow don't insult that scammer Vitalik Buterin or you'll be assaulted with unintelligible insults by his hoodwinked serfs.

My bad, I see the light now. Smiley

Wow don't insult that scammer Vitalik Buterin or you'll be assaulted with unintelligible insults by his hoodwinked serfs.
Wah wah code is law Vitalik is a meany

Sure it is until it's not and the Centralize it! Great plan that one. Who the fuck needs immutability anyway?

Here's some classic Vitalik:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwfYG6FG71Y

If you've never seen it, it does not disappoint.

This will be the first time I will waste my time to hear a word he says, if this shitty connection at the casino ever loads the goddamn thing. I'm sure it won't disappoint. (waited 5 minutes didn't load will have to wait till I get home).

https://www.coindesk.com/short-ether-bitcoin-says-citrons-andrew-left/

"I Would Short Ether Before Bitcoin", Says Citron's Andrew Left

It would be nice to see that shitcoin crash and burn. It will be epic the gnashing of teeth and wailing of hands. Smiley
mymenace
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1061


Smile


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:00:24 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2018, 01:11:13 AM by mymenace

What do we think of the Georgia Guidestones?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georgia_Guidestones

Whoever conceived this crap should  put their money where their mouths are and start by ending their own cancerous existence.
What are your specific objections?

This:
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.

If we're talking Logan's Run type culling bullshit, then good luck with that.
It's not just food that matters, humans have a psychological need for space as well. The more people there are, the more we end up like Calhouns rats - dying from a lack of reproduction, even when the numbers start to drop after major dieoffs. The rodents never recovered, who is to say that we will?

Balance with Nature

We act more like a virus than a natural inhabitant

Remember we are running out of resources too many people

As they keep telling us

The most precious resource water we are running out of




ROFL

http://www.bbc.com/future/story/20170412-is-the-world-running-out-of-fresh-water

Where does fresh water come from. sometimes you need a gun...
Drinking water comes from human labor today. We can't drink directly from the local creek like we used to.

And one thing we really are running out of is fish. If the descriptions of early american explorers and settlers are to be believed, we have maybe 1% of 1% of what used to live in the sea. If we go much further then most of it is not coming back.


Agree, not to say any of these things are not happening, actually the opposite, they are happening by design

Ecology, sustainability and environment issues were well known over 50 years ago, even 50000 years ago

Do you think anybody has actually done anything?





...."What do we think of the Georgia Guidestones?"....


It is being fully implemented and it is not what the stone says that will be implemented but a New World Order that will create what the stone says.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Council_on_Foreign_Relations

Remember in the Western world you do not get to vote on foreign policy, only domestic


Derpinheimer2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:07:11 AM

Wow don't insult that scammer Vitalik Buterin or you'll be assaulted with unintelligible insults by his hoodwinked serfs.

My bad, I see the light now. Smiley

Wow don't insult that scammer Vitalik Buterin or you'll be assaulted with unintelligible insults by his hoodwinked serfs.
Wah wah code is law Vitalik is a meany

Sure it is until it's not and the Centralize it! Great plan that one. Who the fuck needs immutability anyway?

Here's some classic Vitalik:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DwfYG6FG71Y

If you've never seen it, it does not disappoint.

This will be the first time I will waste my time to hear a word he says, if this shitty connection at the casino ever loads the goddamn thing. I'm sure it won't disappoint. (waited 5 minutes didn't load will have to wait till I get home).

https://www.coindesk.com/short-ether-bitcoin-says-citrons-andrew-left/

"I Would Short Ether Before Bitcoin", Says Citron's Andrew Left

It would be nice to see that shitcoin crash and burn. It will be epic the gnashing of teeth and wailing of hands. Smiley

Salty eth haters never disappoint. What part is it you hate so much? That its stealing bitcoins market cap? That it has a real plan to address scaling on chain? If you want to hate something, make it garbage like btrash, which while having no use, no purpose, no anything - is worth $25 billion. And it doesn't solve or attempt to solve anything.

The vast majority of you seem to be stuck on the ETC fork and now hate it because you didn't invest. Maybe consider diversifying instead of crying.
Hueristic
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3962
Merit: 5377


Doomed to see the future and unable to prevent it


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:10:42 AM
Last edit: May 04, 2018, 01:23:48 AM by Hueristic

You know, that login captcha really tests me sometimes....

...

I also have a hard time solving captchas sometimes. It is reaching ridiculous levels. Soon it will be above human "processing" ability and only a new generation of very specialized bots will be able to solve them. Ironic, isn't it?...
...

I have found blocking the correct IP's and or domains will allow one to bypass many of the google captcha tests. Noscript and peerblock work well together.

...

Salty eth haters never disappoint. What part is it you hate so much? That its stealing bitcoins market cap? That it has a real plan to address scaling on chain? If you want to hate something, make it garbage like btrash, which while having no use, no purpose, no anything - is worth $25 billion. And it doesn't solve or attempt to solve anything.

The vast majority of you seem to be stuck on the ETC fork and now hate it because you didn't invest. Maybe consider diversifying instead of crying.

I have only shorted it and enjoyed it every time as it is not decentralized and now mutable and therefore not cryto currency at all. It was a premine scam and still is no matter how big it gets and I don't hate on it because I am a Bitcoin holder as my stake in BTC is insignificant and when it came out I was running folding at home for those years rather than mining (my mistake).

The hate comes from seeing the idea itself become twisted to a centralized fucking bank, the exact opposite of what this scene exists for. And guess what you can have no use for btrash and also none for eth or etc, why would you think there must be a choice in there are you so myoptic in your thinking?

Hah, boogerboy finally downloaded. Lol
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:11:32 AM

Nonsense. The climate is always changing. The assertion that humans are the main driving force behind it, however, that is bullshit.

+1 on that

Exactly.  Just because 98% of the worlds scientific community agrees on it doesn’t make it true.  Science is just made up numbers. They even admit to having imaginary numbers, which just proves they are making it up.  It’s time to fight back. We can start with that Galileo guy. 
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:22:45 AM

Nonsense. The climate is always changing. The assertion that humans are the main driving force behind it, however, that is bullshit.

+1 on that

Exactly.  Just because 98% of the worlds scientific community agrees on it doesn’t make it true.  Science is just made up numbers. They even admit to having imaginary numbers, which just proves they are making it up.  It’s time to fight back. We can start with that Galileo guy. 
Lefties gonna leftie. Regardless, extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Or at least a reasonable estimate that the trillions they want the world governments to spend on affecting the global climate will be worth it. Still waiting.
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:29:20 AM

So far as I can tell, you are an old white guy.

New ideas don’t persuade people. It’s just the opponents die out.  The progressives always win in the long run.  
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 5286



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:32:16 AM

So far as I can tell, you are an old white guy.

New ideas don’t persuade people. It’s just the opponents die out.  The progressives always win in the long run. 

It's human hubris to believe that humans can some how control climate change.

Effect? Maybe.

Control? No.

Mother Gaia will re-balance on her own schedule, thank you.  Grin
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:37:05 AM
Merited by josephpogi (2)

Im not going to argue with people who don’t believe in science.

That cake was baked long ago.
josephpogi
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 168



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:39:27 AM

Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 5286



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:46:22 AM

Im not going to argue with people who don’t believe in science.

That cake was baked long ago.

So people who don't believe climate change can be controlled by humans are automatically thrown in the 'they don't believe in science' bucket? Wow
HairyMaclairy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1414
Merit: 2174


Degenerate bull hatter & Bitcoin monotheist


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:48:45 AM

There is an overwhelming global scientific consensus on this point.  So yes.  
jojo69
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3318
Merit: 4597


diamond-handed zealot


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:49:10 AM

Nonsense. The climate is always changing. The assertion that humans are the main driving force behind it, however, that is bullshit.

+1 on that

Exactly.  Just because 98% of the worlds scientific community agrees on it doesn’t make it true.  Science is just made up numbers. They even admit to having imaginary numbers, which just proves they are making it up.  It’s time to fight back. We can start with that Galileo guy. 

relax Hairy

at least this is a misconception that will cause those holding it to make poor survival choices

nothing to see here folks, plenty of everything, please continue your petroleum dependent lifestyles
Torque
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3710
Merit: 5286



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 01:50:32 AM

There is an overwhelming global scientific consensus on this point.  So yes.  

I think you are really not understanding me.

There may be overwhelming scientific consensus that humans "are contributing to climate change".

But please point me to all the studies and data showing that humans can CONTROL climate change. And of course the executable master plan that I'm sure all countries of the world are just chomping at the bit to put into action.

I'll wait...

for another two decades...

to watch nothing change on this.

Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 02:14:11 AM

There is an overwhelming global scientific consensus on this point.  So yes.  
Science is not a democratic process.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2018, 02:26:45 AM

There is an overwhelming global scientific consensus on this point.  So yes.  


Much of science has so many similarities with religion that it is not all too different.

If someone believed in science as something where people should continue to ask questions and hypothesize on just about anything, then questioning the consensus certainly falls within the nature of science. Had we all agreed, due to consensus, that smoking is good for you then we would all be a lot worse off right now.

Challenge the accepted norms, question everything even if "the majority" believes it to be different. This is science.

But you probably don't believe in such science. Only the religion.
Derpinheimer2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 02:28:40 AM

You know, that login captcha really tests me sometimes....

...

I also have a hard time solving captchas sometimes. It is reaching ridiculous levels. Soon it will be above human "processing" ability and only a new generation of very specialized bots will be able to solve them. Ironic, isn't it?...
...

I have found blocking the correct IP's and or domains will allow one to bypass many of the google captcha tests. Noscript and peerblock work well together.

...

Salty eth haters never disappoint. What part is it you hate so much? That its stealing bitcoins market cap? That it has a real plan to address scaling on chain? If you want to hate something, make it garbage like btrash, which while having no use, no purpose, no anything - is worth $25 billion. And it doesn't solve or attempt to solve anything.

The vast majority of you seem to be stuck on the ETC fork and now hate it because you didn't invest. Maybe consider diversifying instead of crying.

I have only shorted it and enjoyed it every time as it is not decentralized and now mutable and therefore not cryto currency at all. It was a premine scam and still is no matter how big it gets and I don't hate on it because I am a Bitcoin holder as my stake in BTC is insignificant and when it came out I was running folding at home for those years rather than mining (my mistake).

The hate comes from seeing the idea itself become twisted to a centralized fucking bank, the exact opposite of what this scene exists for. And guess what you can have no use for btrash and also none for eth or etc, why would you think there must be a choice in there are you so myoptic in your thinking?

Hah, boogerboy finally downloaded. Lol

You making money on shorts doesnt really matter. It's performed very well - you could have done much better on other cryptos (or really, any during the crash). So whats your point?

Mining pools do not make it centralized, especially since PoS is coming.
How on earth can you call it a central bank? Because of a single hard fork to undo a hack? Insanity. Head in sand and then buried under a dump truck for good measure.

What do you mean by "you can have no use for eth or etc"? The point is, it (ETH) attempts to solve something. It has its plan. Same with XRP - do I like it? No. But it does have a game plan. ETC, BCH, and many others are simply garbage with absolutely no potential for adoption.
Derpinheimer2
Jr. Member
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 69
Merit: 4


View Profile
May 04, 2018, 02:33:00 AM
Merited by vapourminer (1), HairyMaclairy (1)

There is an overwhelming global scientific consensus on this point.  So yes.  

I think you are really not understanding me.

There may be overwhelming scientific consensus that humans "are contributing to climate change".

But please point me to all the studies and data showing that humans can CONTROL climate change. And of course the executable master plan that I'm sure all countries of the world are just chomping at the bit to put into action.

I'll wait...

for another two decades...

to watch nothing change on this.


Because the best option to being uncertain is to say, "lets do nothing and wait"

"You can't prove this o-ring is going to fail, even if the engineers say so - go on with that launch!" That has worked well historically, hasn't it? It's called preventative measures. Maybe in 20 years we learn the impact was minimal. Its better to be on the safe side, especially considering most of these measures are good for the world anyway - improve air quality, reduce waste, etc. It's not like you're writing a check to the gods (aka climate scientists) saying "please stop the damage Sad"
Ibian
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2268
Merit: 1278



View Profile
May 04, 2018, 02:52:32 AM

There is an overwhelming global scientific consensus on this point.  So yes.  

I think you are really not understanding me.

There may be overwhelming scientific consensus that humans "are contributing to climate change".

But please point me to all the studies and data showing that humans can CONTROL climate change. And of course the executable master plan that I'm sure all countries of the world are just chomping at the bit to put into action.

I'll wait...

for another two decades...

to watch nothing change on this.


Because the best option to being uncertain is to say, "lets do nothing and wait"

"You can't prove this o-ring is going to fail, even if the engineers say so - go on with that launch!" That has worked well historically, hasn't it? It's called preventative measures. Maybe in 20 years we learn the impact was minimal. Its better to be on the safe side, especially considering most of these measures are good for the world anyway - improve air quality, reduce waste, etc. It's not like you're writing a check to the gods (aka climate scientists) saying "please stop the damage Sad"
General reminder that co2 is not a pollutant, comrade.
Elwar
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386


Viva Ut Vivas


View Profile WWW
May 04, 2018, 03:20:31 AM
Merited by infofront (1), Ibian (1), Anon136 (1)

If the solution to global warming was "oh shit, looks like we'll need to shut down governments and implement anarcho-capitalism to save the planet"...then I might be more inclined to believe the scientists that are paid by the government.

When the solution to global warming (science funded by governments) is "we need to give more power to governments" makes a fella go...hmmm....
Pages: « 1 ... 20206 20207 20208 20209 20210 20211 20212 20213 20214 20215 20216 20217 20218 20219 20220 20221 20222 20223 20224 20225 20226 20227 20228 20229 20230 20231 20232 20233 20234 20235 20236 20237 20238 20239 20240 20241 20242 20243 20244 20245 20246 20247 20248 20249 20250 20251 20252 20253 20254 20255 [20256] 20257 20258 20259 20260 20261 20262 20263 20264 20265 20266 20267 20268 20269 20270 20271 20272 20273 20274 20275 20276 20277 20278 20279 20280 20281 20282 20283 20284 20285 20286 20287 20288 20289 20290 20291 20292 20293 20294 20295 20296 20297 20298 20299 20300 20301 20302 20303 20304 20305 20306 ... 33798 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!