I know bitcoin, and you, litecoin are no bitcoin.
Of course A is not equal to B, but they do share similarities in protocol design and proposed use/implementation.
I'd be very interested to hear your take on the differences between litecoin and bitcoin, jiggy.
Just like you really don't give any shits about what I think about litecoin, I don't give any shits about such topic.
I'm beginning to lose my patience with you, jiggy; are you able to have a rational, back and forth discussion without immediately going on the defensive and resorting to inflammatory accusations?
Stop proclaiming that you're the arbiter of my intentions, you aren't.
First of all, you already failed and refused to engage in genuine responses (rather than poo pooing like a typical troll/shill no coiner) regarding your previous quasi-irrelevant dumbass no coiner / bitcoin naysaying points that I already responded to.. and further, this is not a thread to compare and contrast various shit coins. Helrow?
Refuse to engage or respond? I'm on mobile most of the time, which makes it difficult to format long posts and reply to multiple users.
With regard to our previous discussion, I was asking questions while you would answer; you never actually responded by asking me any specific questions of your own.
If you would like me to answer some specific questions or provide information of some kind, please, ask away!
Don't force the matter, you diptwat. If you were to have anything that was to be worthy of a question then I am sure someone would ask you. I have not seen it, so far, but maybe at some point in the future, there might be something useful coming out of one or more of your posts. I am pretty skeptical, but I have not completely lost hope, yet.
But if you consider the one aspect of bitcoin that you proclaim to NOT accept or understand, you might want to look into network effects, but no, you claim to not understand or believe that such network effects are important in the discussion,
Incorrect, as I specifically acknowledged the network effect and first mover advantage that bitcoin has, in my previous posts.
Maybe you are making some progress, perhaps? I know that you want to present an aura that you are already wise, but something is definitely missing from your presentation.
I will grant that you seem to be doing both, 1) attempt to act like you don't know anything in order that you can present your trolling questions as if you are a newbie, and 2) when you are pointed out as being a retarded troll/shill then you shift gears to attempt to present as if you knew everything all along.
Largely you come off as full of shit and disingenuine, but there are probably either some newbies who might believe you or perhaps some other troll/shills who will seek common cause with your ongoing child-like nonsense.
instead you want to get caught up in distracting discussions about slight technical differences that may or may not exist
Protocol differences between projects definitely exist, you should be aware of this.
Yep. Of course.
and in the end don't even matter in the scheme of things.. because bitcoin is not broken, so you have to overcome that presumption of brokenness first,
I never claimed the bitcoin was broken in any way, you're simply being disingenuous.
That's part of my point, you dumb ass. If you cannot at least demonstrate that bitcoin is broken, then you have not even reached the first stage of being able to present some alternative as having any kind of meaningful relevance.
and you also have to show that your shitty ass project that you want to tout, whether litecoin or some other random project, whatever it is has sufficiently overcome whatever supposedly broken part of bitcoin that it is going to matter, instead of just being possibly absorbed into bitcoin as a tweak.
I'm not touting anything, I'm asking basic questions about the differences in protocol between projects.
Why would I need to answer any questions from you? If you have some project that you want to compare with bitcoin, then you have the burden to present your facts and your arguments. Why should anyone else be doing your work for you when there is nothing wrong with bitcoin, you diptwat?
Specifically, I've asked what makes bitcoin "better" or "best".
If your answer to this question is "it's more popular and it got there first", that's fine.
Bitcoin invented something meaningful. If something meaningful has been invented then it cannot be reinvented.. it can be imitated.. those are different concepts. So whether I am claiming bitcoin is better or best or not does not likely matter, because I have no burden to establish anything. Maybe in some circles I might just claim that bitcoin is not broken, so if you want to replace it with something the burden is on you to show with facts, logic and persuasion that whatever you have is sufficiently better to cause networking effects to move over... so get your burdens straight.. there is no burdens for the incumbent to prove itself in any kind of substantive way. The burden is on the wannabe.. like I already repeated many times...
Am I turning blue in the face yet?
Edit: What 600watt said..... hahahahahahahaha
Poll
