Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion

[VB1001]

^
This would be the rational way to do it.

[1714049058]

1714049058

[1714049058]

1714049058

[1714049058]

1714049058

[1714049058]

1714049058

[Last of the V8s]

Thanks JSRAW nice to see you make an effort pretty interesting too.
sorry out of merits, maybe someone will help you out...

[afbitcoins]

Bitcoin can't even agree a block size modification without splitting into multiple parts. In fact BCH and BSV are bitcion. Your idea makes no sense.

Sell, wait for 3200 and then buy bitcoins. In altcoins there is no sense at all, bitcoin will screw everything if necessary: masternodes and instantsend from DASH, side chains and DEX from Komodo, a large block from BSV, smart contracts from BCH, etc. Altcoins are only needed for testing new technologies

[serveria.com]

^
This would be the rational way to do it.

As you know, BTC is not always rational... 

[LFC_Bitcoin]

finally there is some volume. big pump incoming.

Bitcoin can't even agree a block size modification without splitting into multiple parts. In fact BCH and BSV are bitcion. Your idea makes no sense.

Sell, wait for 3200 and then buy bitcoins. In altcoins there is no sense at all, bitcoin will screw everything if necessary: masternodes and instantsend from DASH, side chains and DEX from Komodo, a large block from BSV, smart contracts from BCH, etc. Altcoins are only needed for testing new technologies

[Arriemoller]

^
That’s a wine dumbass 

No, it's a white russian with a glass of champagne.

[Negotiation]

finally there is some volume. big pump incoming.

Waiting for big pump $100k soon same to hoping that follow with 4hour candle.

[Negotiation]

This article mentioned only one name and left out other Main conspirators. One "collaborator" was Mir Jafar who was the key person. just to give you example how important this details is, if you want to piss any one from Indian subcontinent (Indian, Paki, Bangladeshi) just say " you are Mir Jafar" they would lose their shit. But History is game of Narrative so not surprised how he left other names and connected the dot from Banker to corporate etc.

If "Mir Jafar" were alive today, he would have given you a Nobel by seeing this post  very historically added new one "Ghaseti Begum"

[El duderino_]

Not being to much on the forum, but having an very nice day hanging around with Globb0 and his better half in Holland

 

[El duderino_]

Lebanon in Crisis, the people with money in banks are likely going to be taking a "hair cut". Nassim Taleb recommends Bitcoin.

https://twitter.com/redditbtc/status/1195999403653390336?s=21

[JayJuanGee]

Whats up Cryptotourist.

Can we have the old Lambie back now?

Yep... it can be a bit strange that some of the down-caller wanna be sorcerers come in to this thread and amp up their BTC DOWN calling after there has already been a considerable correction, as if they were trying to get others to sell at the bottom, and surely they could end up  being correct (but not high odds of such like they are trying to proclaim "inevitable down"), but they seem to be trying to get the BTC price to go down rather than really making any kind of meaningful accurate and/or objective BTC price prediction as they are trying to portray.  

And, part of the problem is that the BTC price may or may not go down further, but if anyone was going to sell some or all (never go full fiat), they should have done so before the then current correction location, which was already considerably down.  In this case, we had an upsurge from $7,300 to $10,300, so if there is a lot of calling of down in the price range of $8,450, then there has already been a short term BTC price correction, from that spot of 18%, and if we are looking at the other more recent tops of $13,880 and $19,666 then we are seeing correction ranges of 40% and 67% respectively, which should cause inspiration to act upon or create BTC buying plans (even at the then current price) rather than any kind of thoughts about selling BTC or waiting to buy.


Anyhow, TLDR, if they are effectives in their bullshit convincing of others to either sell BTC or wait to buy BTC at a lower price (that never comes), they are seemingly more likely to cause scared peeps to sell at the bottom or to fail to buy a sufficient amount of BTC rather than causing those same scared peeps to be able to buy BTC lower, as they fantasize about both not losing more value and trying to make some more BTC (which has decent chances of the opposite results).

[JayJuanGee]

Bitcoin can't even agree a block size modification without splitting into multiple parts. In fact BCH and BSV are bitcion. Your idea makes no sense.

Sell, wait for 3200 and then buy bitcoins. In altcoins there is no sense at all, bitcoin will screw everything if necessary: masternodes and instantsend from DASH, side chains and DEX from Komodo, a large block from BSV, smart contracts from BCH, etc. Altcoins are only needed for testing new technologies

There is no need for unity.

That was the great forkening of 2017.  Old news, and the dumbass forkers lost, which largely demonstrated that no such blocksize modification was necessary, beyond what was achieved.  Remember segwit?  That ended up facilitating a decent amount of block size modification, amiNOTrite?

[edited out]

What LFC said.

[gembitz]

Whats up Cryptotourist.

Can we have the old Lambie back now?

Yep... it can be a bit strange that some of the down-caller wanna be sorcerers come in to this thread and amp up their BTC DOWN calling after there has already been a considerable correction, as if they were trying to get others to sell at the bottom, and surely they could end up  being correct (but not high odds of such like they are trying to proclaim "inevitable down"), but they seem to be trying to get the BTC price to go down rather than really making any kind of meaningful accurate and/or objective BTC price prediction as they are trying to portray.  

And, part of the problem is that the BTC price may or may not go down further, but if anyone was going to sell some or all (never go full fiat), they should have done so before the then current correction location, which was already considerably down.  In this case, we had an upsurge from $7,300 to $10,300, so if there is a lot of calling of down in the price range of $8,450, then there has already been a short term BTC price correction, from that spot of 18%, and if we are looking at the other more recent tops of $13,880 and $19,666 then we are seeing correction ranges of 40% and 67% respectively, which should cause inspiration to act upon or create BTC buying plans (even at the then current price) rather than any kind of thoughts about selling BTC or waiting to buy.


Anyhow, TLDR, if they are effectives in their bullshit convincing of others to either sell BTC or wait to buy BTC at a lower price (that never comes), they are seemingly more likely to cause scared peeps to sell at the bottom or to fail to buy a sufficient amount of BTC rather than causing those same scared peeps to be able to buy BTC lower, as they fantasize about both not losing more value and trying to make some more BTC (which has decent chances of the opposite results).

rebuy under 1k reeee

[Negotiation]

Lebanon in Crisis, the people with money in banks are likely going to be taking a "hair cut". Nassim Taleb recommends Bitcoin.

https://twitter.com/redditbtc/status/1195999403653390336?s=21

Yaeh i also recommended store bitcoin   ignored Tax 
No Tax, No fees used bitcoin .
  1Bitcoin=1Bitcoin

[OROBTC]

Lebanon in Crisis, the people with money in banks are likely going to be taking a "hair cut". Nassim Taleb recommends Bitcoin.

https://twitter.com/redditbtc/status/1195999403653390336?s=21

For years I have had the highest respect for N. N. Taleb.  He was the guy who wrote the book (The Black Swan), as well as some others on finance and how so many "experts" are complete phonies.

Fooled by Randomness (I would start with this one if interested in his ideas) and Antifragile are also extremely good reads of his.

A "Black Swan" is an unexpected, low probability event (usually negative) that has a large impact.  Think 9/11...  Unexpected.  "Low Probability" (impossible to predict).  HUGE impact.

[Negotiation]

Bitcoin miners don't "solve complicated math problems."
They make 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 guesses per second @ permutations of an 80 byte block header until they find one with a hash that has enough leading zeroes.
Not complicated.
Not a math problem.
Just a lot of hard work.
Source: https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1196061031979765761


any one explain me '80 byte block' means?

[fillippone]

Bitcoin miners don't "solve complicated math problems."
They make 100,000,000,000,000,000,000 guesses per second @ permutations of an 80 byte block header until they find one with a hash that has enough leading zeroes.
Not complicated.
Not a math problem.
Just a lot of hard work.
Source: https://twitter.com/lopp/status/1196061031979765761


any one explain me '80 byte block' means?

The block header is made of 80 bytes.




The miner can change a few things in that header (version, time, nonce and a few other things) so they can get the hash with enough leading zeroes.

https://bitcoin.org/en/developer-reference

[Globb0]

Saturday food’Booz
But what for Sunday let see....
Probably Haarlem!

Fishy behaviour  

xxxx
Gooed

[Hueristic]

this sucks

Yeah, I get online check price and then don't feel like posting.

[El duderino_]

Saturday food’Booz
But what for Sunday let see....
Probably Haarlem!

Fishy behaviour  

xxxx
Gooed

Lovely meet, damn I shouldn’t text and drive