loads of garbage so I just pick out the important parts.
JJG claim he EDITED OUT nutildahs post because .....errr reasons. LOL yeah like you wanted to make it appear I just pulled that list up on my own.
Surely, you appear to be an expert at attempting to confuse matters. Even I had to go
look back at my post (linked here) to attempt to figure out what the fuck you are talking about.
Anyhow, even though I already explained, I will state it again, just to clarify, again.
I was responding to goofball you. Not Nutildah. The only reason that I kept any reference to Nutildah in that particular post was to show that you were responding to him.
In any event it is a BIG so fucking what? You are the diptwat who posted the list and made dumbass claims about those folks being paid off. My reposting of your post is accurate, you infantile baboon.
He presented that LIST in his link as evidence of bob paying up after he says he will.
It's your post of the list, so fuck off with your claims of "he" being responsible. You posted the list you diptwat.
That is the point of him posting it there. We had no knowledge of any list or any interest.
Part of the point. Yes. You had no knowledge of shit, and you were just making shit up, and as soon as you thought that you had information, you posted the list and drew incorrect inferences and expected others to accept your misrepresentations about the list that you posted.
It was only when we noticed several names on that list were leaving red trust that it stood out.
It stood out that you wanted to be a drama queen.. more of a drama queen for any possible reason, and the list provided you a hook in order that you could make up bullshit.
Regarding your red trust, are you trying to proclaim that you don't deserve red trust? You are lucky not to be banned for your various ongoing stupid.
Nutildahs post implied and was presented as evidence of bob being trustworthy??? Why nutildah post a list of people bob has said he would pay or shout for a party as proof of being trustworthy if it had not happened.
He is implying that.
Who cares? You are getting lost in irrelevancies. You are already lost, and you are getting more lost, if that is possible? Go figure. The lost becoming more lost.. that's a concept for you.
You deleted nutildahs post because you want it to appear that I randomly made that up. FUCKING SNEAKY
I already responded to this.. but anyhow I will state one more time, that I was responding to your posting of the list, and Nutildah was largely irrelevant to the point. You posted the list, diptwat. Repeat... repeat.. repeat after me.
"I, The-One-Above-All, am a diptwat. I posted the list."
(You see? Doesn't that feel better to take responsibility for your own actions?) You will thank me later.
You don't also note that nutildah does not even deny it he just says that was a year earlier.
I note that a few times I said that I could give less than two ratt's asses about Nutildah. So there is that.
I NOTICE ALSO YOU did not note that was correct after nutildah pointed it out IMMEDIATELY and quote the old version your quote does not reflect that post since about 5 mins after it was made. Since that was done with in minutes you must have been lurking there.
Sounds like you are "on to something," here.
NOT. 
I haven't played around with that little NEGATIVE communicative instrument for a while.So your ONLY valid gripe could be we should not have taken nutildahs implication as true without investigating it. THAT IS IT.
I did not have any "gripe" whether valid or not. I was just pointing out how retarded you were for posting a list and making dumbass, invalid and wrong
(am I being redundant? that's fine. A little repetition might help the numbskull to absorb the points.. I doubt it, but never losing hope.) inferences from such list.
Nothing deceptive about it. Names on the LIST NUTILDAH linked to were appearing on trust list leaving red BEFORE we mentioned it.
You have been doing a great investigation here. Revealing all kinds of important connections, so it seems...
(For a visual, I am holding my breath, here).
Since it was noted it was a year before then that already nulled the CONNECTION with any possible financial reward. You are pretending that our post still implies this.
I am pretending that you posted a list.
and.......
wait for it......
wait for it......
You did.
That is sneaky too since about 5 mins after it was said to be a year earlier it was ALTERED to not even make that possible connection. Hence the time machine post and the adaption on our post.
Sure. You are in some kind of a fantasy machine. May as well be a time machine.
Do you have a selfie pic? or link for your time machine?
It does not AT ALL invalidate the rest of the thread.
Of course, you and your team are completely valid. That is why everyone around here loves you and your purported team so much.
That is based upon independently verifiable observable instances. If you want to claim this I will create a thread where I will pull you weak ass arguments and excuses to pieces ... YES OR NO want that thread
?? YES OR NO?
Seems like I already said no. Did I not?
You are like a fat girl who wants to go on a date, and won't stop asking.
I bet we get a lot of excuse from JJG now and he will not have a thread just me and him debating the original trust abuse from bbl. JUST YOU AND ME JJG you sneaky little scammer supporting pleb.
I barely want to hang out with you in public for short periods of having to. Why would I want to make any private date with you? That sounds like absolutely no fun at all. Like torture.
What you give or do not give a fuck about is of no concern of mine you non achieving fucking loser.
Now you are starting to make me feel bad about myself, and what I have accomplished so far in life. Stop it.
You're nothing here on this board and nothing would have been any different if you had never joined. Got it you servile scammers supporting pleb??
That's a real low blow, The-One-Above-All, especially coming from someone like yourself.
Good now that is sorted out you sneaky peace of shit.
You seem to be getting upset with me. Can we start over?
We can all discuss bitcoins price direction. Not listen to your slanted and sneaky accounts of events where you like to prevent the full context being presented.
I am sure that members would appreciate your input about bitcoin's price movements.
Anyway come to a thread YOU AND ME JJG you waste of board space and debate the entire debacle from the start or stfu you sneaky cunt.
Seems to me that we have already debated this to oblivion. Is it just me, or are we already devolving into repetitions, here?
I'm not really seeing anything drastic (upwards bitcoin price) until well into new year now.
Could be. Who knows? The new year is only 3 weeks away, so prices could go up, they could go down or they might go sideways for the rest of the year and maybe even longer? Maybe we could watch the walls, together? I am feeling a bit nauseous.... but hey.. a little sacrifice for our little buddy,
BTC?
Poll
