JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10241
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
April 14, 2020, 08:37:51 PM |
|
One of the scary parts of the current Covid separating of people seems to be that even folks who are on their deathbeds seem to be less able to communicate with family members, which seems to have been partly true with Bruno, but is likely worse when some people end up getting intubated because they end up having the virus or even a quickly deteriorating physical condition and therefor are not really able to communicate last words (which does not seem to have been the case with Bruno from what information we have, and maybe we do not even need to know those kinds of details).
Surely if we do not know details regarding how much or how well that some people might not have been able to communicate in the end or even if they were able to communicate all of their final wishes regarding use of funds, the second best case scenario would be that someone in a situation like Bruno's would have been at least able to appoint someone that he trusted to handle those affairs and to carry out his intentions to the best of their abilities, including if there may have been some changes in circumstances or expected expenses...
For example, if Bruno's body is NOT going to be transported to Indiana, which seems to be the case because of the description of cremation, that expense is NOT there but there still might be other similar kinds of expenses or even some second level intentions that are known by the trustee that Bruno appointed and have not been communicated to us by Bruno, so even if Bruno may not have known how some of his death expenses were going to play out at least the person who he appointed would thereby try to carry out Bruno's wishes in other ways. It sounded like Bruno was soliciting funds (in the final "exit scam') to try to allay some his final death expenses from his next of kin.
In these kinds of circumstances, sometimes it is not easy to know what is going on exactly, which nutildah had mentioned, or even to anticipate what is going to happen with the funds with specifics, including whether the Corona virus situation had some unexpected turn of events for Bruno's specifics, and surely Bruno seemed to have ended up dying nearly 50 days sooner than what he had communicated to us.. which may have caused for some less preparations being carried out, perhaps? Anyhow, as I am trying to suggest, how donated funds are used would be a matter of concern for anyone who had donated to that fund** and should be alleviated somewhat, too, if Bruno, at least was able to ensure that someone he trusted had control over the funds, and without specifics nutildah seems to be assuring that a person that Bruno trusts had been assigned by Bruno.
**Similarly, anyone who might still be contemplating sending more funds to any of those addresses that Bruno had provided would reasonably have similar concerns.
FFS JJG, if you're not an AI, you're damn close to one. Anybody who donated, really doesn't give a fuck on how, when, and if, the funds are spent.Shouldn't anyways. You're totally missing the point here. PS: Make sure to DYOR next time. 50 days sooner? Corona? Not transported? You can be such a dick. You seem to be easily distracted into irrelevancy. Where is the sweet and attempting to be relevant Cryptotourist? Did such a persona ever exist, or was that online persona merely acting and playing around until he could muster enough merits to appear genuine and relevant?, and then he would devolve into nonsensical and irrelevant distracting attempts? Hopefully, at some point, you can grow the fuck up and try to get back to relevance (to the extent that I imagined you to have had been capable of such) rather than ongoingly childish, misleading presentations, ad hominem attacks and fact-denying behaviors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transactions must be included in a block to be properly completed. When you send a transaction, it is broadcast to miners. Miners can then optionally include it in their next blocks. Miners will be more inclined to include your transaction if it has a higher transaction fee.
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
OutOfMemory
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1540
Merit: 3009
Man who stares at charts
|
|
April 14, 2020, 08:42:45 PM |
|
^ Since SARS-CoV-2, changed a lot here, also behavioral. #nohomo I don't like this too, but this is the way it is. I can't change it, you can't either.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10241
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
April 14, 2020, 08:48:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
bkbirge
|
|
April 14, 2020, 08:50:40 PM Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
... in fact, there are decent odds that bearwhale manipulators are going to dump the fuck out of these times around the halvening in order to strive to manipulate BTC HODLers into believing that either the stock to flow model is broken or that it needs to be shifted in the downwards direction.
I'm fully expecting this attempt.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10241
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
April 14, 2020, 08:57:14 PM Last edit: April 14, 2020, 09:07:52 PM by JayJuanGee |
|
but now, I am thinking that even here is a fair price at halvening...
BTC will be over $10k when she halves. (my bet anyways) That's a pretty high expected return in less than a month. I am not going to complain if it happens, but I doubt that it is prudent to place very high odds of such.. even assigning higher than 35% odds to getting 45%-ish returns in 30 days seems more like gambling rather than attempting to really predict with realistic fact and logic based prudence. ... in fact, there are decent odds that bearwhale manipulators are going to dump the fuck out of these times around the halvening in order to strive to manipulate BTC HODLers into believing that either the stock to flow model is broken or that it needs to be shifted in the downwards direction.
I'm fully expecting this attempt. Exactly... whether it is successful is another story (or at least a related story).
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3710
Merit: 10241
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
April 14, 2020, 09:05:23 PM |
|
^ Since SARS-CoV-2, changed a lot here, also behavioral. #nohomo I don't like this too, but this is the way it is. I can't change it, you can't either.
Huh? I am not saying that covid is irrelevant in this thread or even its connection to bitcoin and/or current events that are relevant to our discussion including macro considerations. I am saying that the recent posts of cryptotourist have been devolving into mostly bullshit emotional irrelevance.. .anyhow, I believe that my earlier post, here speaks for itself, including the fact that cryptotourist is linking one of my posts from another thread (involving discussion of Bruno's death and circumstances surrounding Bruno's solicitation of donations to a death fund), which just shows that fucktwat cryptotourist has been becoming so damned emotional and wanting to engage in personal attacks rather than really giving any benefit of the doubt about what I had actually posted in regards to Bruno's situation in that other thread.
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
April 14, 2020, 09:23:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Last of the V8s
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1652
Merit: 4392
Be a bank
|
|
April 14, 2020, 09:58:16 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
|
April 14, 2020, 10:08:58 PM |
|
Heard an interesting theory today. What if the singularity is already here. And this whole thing is just some AI trying something out. I personally am impressed at how quickly whomever is behind all of this shut down the world so quickly and so easily. I would not be surprised if some very wealthy guy just won a bet.
|
|
|
|
lightfoot
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3108
Merit: 2240
I fix broken miners. And make holes in teeth :-)
|
|
April 14, 2020, 10:09:52 PM |
|
Going back to normal is an exceptionally bad idea: Normal is what got us here.
|
|
|
|
Elwar
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3598
Merit: 2386
Viva Ut Vivas
|
|
April 14, 2020, 10:20:42 PM |
|
Going back to normal is an exceptionally bad idea: Normal is what got us here. Definitely no normal please. End socialized medicine so we can adapt to the curve next time instead of letting government screw us. I seem to recall something about the American Revolution happening in the time of smallpox...
|
|
|
|
|
cAPSLOCK
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3738
Merit: 5127
Whimsical Pants
|
|
April 14, 2020, 11:31:59 PM |
|
Enough with this chop. We need a good pump and not a fake bullshit one.
Yeah, I expect 8000-9000 as we get to the halving, even with COVID19 stunting our growth. Anybody think we’ll see a significant pump before the halving? Sadly no. And I will surprised if we do not see a selloff around the halving. But I hope I am wrong.
|
|
|
|
Raja_MBZ
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1862
Merit: 1505
|
|
April 14, 2020, 11:35:01 PM |
|
I wish I was one of those guys, back in January, as afterwards BTC did reach sub-$4k levels. But I guess I'll never be bearish on BTC, not even for a single hour.
|
|
|
|
strawbs
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 868
Merit: 1340
|
|
April 15, 2020, 12:01:33 AM Last edit: April 15, 2020, 12:11:38 AM by strawbs Merited by JayJuanGee (1) |
|
Nice article. But in relation to my previous point, are you suggesting that the media are deliberately using ambiguous terms so that they can later claim that the number of deaths caused by COVID-19 was actually pretty small? I'm not sure I follow. EDIT: this is obviously quite a US-centric article. I would claim that the type of (extreme?) capitalism encountered in the US leads to a less caring society, when compared to the more social-capitalism encountered in western Europe (where the state directs more funds to welfare). But that's a bit tangental... EDIT 2: more claims of deaths 'linked to' COVID but not necessarily 'caused by' it: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52278825
|
|
|
|
jojo69
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3164
Merit: 4345
diamond-handed zealot
|
|
April 15, 2020, 12:09:37 AM |
|
the type of (extreme?) capitalism encountered in the US
oh god, that's funny
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
April 15, 2020, 12:09:52 AM |
|
Time to fear when drums stop.
.. because then the bass solo starts. zing! One for Jimbo.
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
... It's true that bars (especially live music bars), and by extension musicians, have been hurt by anti-smoking laws. ...
I respectfully disagree, Jimbo. And I'll respectfully disagree with your disagreement. 'Round these parts, it is hard to draw any certainty, as the last two decades have seen not only proliferation of anti-smoking laws, but also stepped up DUI enforcement, and a veritable plethora of entertainment options that don't involve leaving one's home. That said, there was a distinct step function in the drying up of night life that occurred exactly when the anti-smoking laws came this way. And we already had a situation where there were non-smoking venues existing alongside non-smoking venues. They both drew their interested clientele, and everyone got along splendidly. Nope. The do-gooders decided that they have the authority to tell everyone else what they are or are not allowed to do with their property and their lives. And several industries imploded. Just where from do you think the power to order others around derives?
|
|
|
|
jbreher
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 3038
Merit: 1660
lose: unfind ... loose: untight
|
|
April 15, 2020, 12:21:53 AM |
|
Probably not a joke. Then again, there are plenty of people who don't know WTF they are talking about. While he is well-versed in other areas, this opinion of his seems lunacy to me.
|
|
|
|
|