Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2296
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:01:09 PM |
|
So it looks like were going to generally trend upwards on low volume. Im feeling a big surge upwards once the voume picks up.
How were things looking this time last year?
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:02:25 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:03:10 PM |
|
I exclude trust in the system here,
This is where you slip up. It is an IOU from the state which people trust enough to trade between themselves as if it had value. Exactly, trust is the only thing that backs the IOU and gives you confidence enough to accept it.
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:04:43 PM |
|
So it looks like were going to generally trend upwards on low volume. Im feeling a big surge upwards once the voume picks up.
How were things looking this time last year? It is hard to ignore the similarities
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:05:56 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Erdogan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:07:08 PM |
|
I exclude trust in the system here,
This is where you slip up. It is an IOU from the state which people trust enough to trade between themselves as if it had value. No, if you trade one work hour for a dinner, indirectly using money, at the money stage the state does not owe you neither the work hour nor the dinner. The system trust I talk about, falls on the state, in case of fiat money, only because they produce the money and manage the supply. In other kinds of money, like gold or bitcoin, the state is not involved in the production or the management, therefore it is easier to see the difference between trust between traders, and trust to the system.
|
|
|
|
dreamspark
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:10:46 PM |
|
I exclude trust in the system here,
This is where you slip up. It is an IOU from the state which people trust enough to trade between themselves as if it had value. No, if you trade one work hour for a dinner, indirectly using money, at the money stage the state does not owe you neither the work hour nor the dinner. The system trust I talk about, falls on the state, in case of fiat money, only because they produce the money and manage the supply. In other kinds of money, like gold or bitcoin, the state is not involved in the production or the management, therefore it is easier to see the difference between trust between traders, and trust to the system. Could you clarify what you mean by indirectly using money? In the case of doing an hour work for dinner then there is no money involved and there is trust between both parties that the work will be completed and the dinner promise will be fulfilled.
|
|
|
|
MoreFun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003
WePower.red
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:19:43 PM |
|
Someone is regularly dumping in $640.
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2604
Merit: 2296
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:21:02 PM |
|
No, if you trade one work hour for a dinner, indirectly using money, at the money stage the state does not owe you neither the work hour nor the dinner. The system trust I talk about, falls on the state, in case of fiat money, only because they produce the money and manage the supply. In other kinds of money, like gold or bitcoin, the state is not involved in the production or the management, therefore it is easier to see the difference between trust between traders, and trust to the system.
But if I give it back to them when they come calling, I get to stay out of jail. It's not unusual for debts to change form and ownership. I could buy somebody's poker markers and they might negotiate to pay me back by mowing my lawn. Of course, there's not much negotiating with the government.
|
|
|
|
KeyserSoze
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:28:52 PM |
|
Stolfi trying to argue the internet has less impact than French Revolution, World War II, or the end of Apartheid... almost as bad as Richy trying to persuade us the world doesn't need roads.
|
|
|
|
MoreFun
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1008
Merit: 1003
WePower.red
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:35:47 PM |
|
https://xapo.comA new wallet service which offers an insurance for a 0.12% annual fee. Sounds interesting... If they lose your coins and go backrupt your coins are still insured. Yea right...
|
|
|
|
derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:36:09 PM |
|
Despite the [small] dumps in the last hour, bid depth still getting better. Before, ask was 7.6k to 700 and bid 8k to 600 now, ask is 7.7k to 700 and bid 9.2k to 600
|
|
|
|
Serge
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1050
Merit: 1000
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:41:44 PM |
|
this new exchange coming up is a mega bullish news, hopefully few more spring up here in the states
|
|
|
|
macsga
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1484
Merit: 1002
Strange, yet attractive.
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:49:21 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Erdogan
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1512
Merit: 1005
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:55:17 PM |
|
Damn, all this philosophy in last 10-15 pages makes this thread boring I could make ChartBuddy repost "Favourite charts from the booms and busts of 2013" if you'd like Chartbuddy's Greatest Hits. I like it. Beats recent discussion on issue number one that never goes anywhere on public forums: political philosophy. Number two is religion. gotta say i am impressed with our forum though, it has been about ten pages of this argument and Hitler has not been mention yet, correct? what's that fundemental rule of internet forums, all arguments eventually devolve into invoking of hitler? but not here. : -) Since the question of dictatorship is now drawn in, I would like to rant: In computer models, it has been shown that in a population of beings, it is possible to have a balance between the "always attack" personality and a "try cooperation first, then fight if necessary". In the stable configuration, the "attack first" personality is in minority. A sociopath will attack always, but being smart about it and hide it to avoid retaliation from the others. We could live in such a society of a balance between nonviolent, self defending people and dominators. If we have a sociobiologist here, I would like her to comment. Now, sosiopaths exist plenty, but they are really not a problem as long as you can see it and therefore not give them power over yourself or give them your resources (and make sure you tell others and protect his victims). So if freedom, that is sovereignty over yourself, knowledge and saying no! is prevalent in a society, a sociopath can not rise to be a tyrant. If people generally are willing to give away freedoms and money, someone is sure to rise to be a dictator. This is why vigilance about freedom and the principle of self defense is so important to keep a free society. This goes both for a society with no rulers, and a society which is relatively free.
|
|
|
|
cbutters
|
|
March 13, 2014, 10:57:46 PM |
|
this new exchange coming up is a mega bullish news, hopefully few more spring up here in the states Anyone here sign up on this exchange? I did just to check things out and see how it looks. Looks promising, not much volume yet, I'm not verified or anything yet so I couldn't tell you how it is to trade on. Everything looks TOO simple on the site though. I can state that 2 factor authentication and api enable disable controls are there and easy to use with little confusion. However, It is nice to see a list of about 15 people with their profiles, actual names and credentials on an exchange. Doesn't really feel like bitcoin if I'm not sending my coins to an invisible mysterious entity.....
|
|
|
|
|
smiley123
Member
Offline
Activity: 101
Merit: 10
|
|
March 13, 2014, 11:08:10 PM |
|
Someone is regularly dumping in $640.
It's Bill Gates. He said 640 is enough for everyone.
|
|
|
|
PoolMinor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1843
Merit: 1338
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
|
|
March 13, 2014, 11:12:41 PM |
|
Welcome to Bitcoinia!
|
|
|
|
|