derpinheimer
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 896
Merit: 1000
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 10:16:57 PM |
|
Wow, this volume..
Im no TA guy but it looks like it wants to shoot down.
As always, hope I'm wrong.
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 10:19:48 PM |
|
they actually lost coins?? loaded and risto? a large percentage?
Yes they lost coins, so they said. Do not know how much. I imagine Loaded is still loaded and Risto apparently just bought a big house he likes to call a castle, so they both seem to be chugging along OK. It was not sizable enough to warrant a flight to Japan. However, it is sizable enough to ruin my weekend.
Less than the cost of a flight to japan, i don't know how much a weekend is to him though. Mine have been around 10 btc lately... spring break 14! 
|
|
|
|
arepo
Sr. Member
  
Offline
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
this statement is false
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 10:20:36 PM |
|
Wow, this volume..
Im no TA guy but it looks like it wants to shoot down.
As always, hope I'm wrong.
low volume is not necessarily bearish, but we're sure as hell not going to be able to break above the mid-term resistance on this slow boat.
|
|
|
|
manfred
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1001
Energy is Wealth
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 10:43:32 PM |
|
they actually lost coins?? loaded and risto? a large percentage?
Yes they lost coins, so they said. Do not know how much. I imagine Loaded is still loaded and Risto apparently just bought a big house he likes to call a castle, so they both seem to be chugging along OK. Dont know about loaded, but Risto lost some small change ( BTC 250) by the looks of things when gox went down. https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg5355884#msg5355884somewhere else he mentioned that he lost BTC 400....
|
|
|
|
podyx
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 11:09:35 PM |
|
holy shit, i have never seen this low volume
this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe
|
|
|
|
meanig
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 11:26:46 PM |
|
holy shit, i have never seen this low volume
this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe
Stock up on the Red Bull and get some sleep. The fireworks always start when you least expect it.
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 11:37:28 PM |
|
holy shit, i have never seen this low volume
this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe
Looking at Huobi (whose volume seems less "random" than Bitstamp), the volume was this low on Feb/06, Feb/19, and Mar/02 (UTC; may be 1 less in your local time) The first two low-volume dates were followed by large price drops: 110 USD (on Bitstamp, 800 to 690) and 70 USD (630 to 560). The third date was follwed by a large price increase: 110 USD (~560 to ~670)
|
|
|
|
FTWbitcoinFTW
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 11:40:31 PM |
|
2 firsts we're waiting for some news from gox
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 4200
Merit: 12849
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 11:50:28 PM |
|
holy shit, i have never seen this low volume
this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe
Looking at Huobi (whose volume seems less "random" than Bitstamp), the volume was this low on Feb/06, Feb/19, and Mar/02 (UTC; may be 1 less in your local time) The first two low-volume dates were followed by large price drops: 110 USD (on Bitstamp, 800 to 690) and 70 USD (630 to 560). The third date was follwed by a large price increase: 110 USD (~560 to ~670) Let us say for example that the lull were to be followed by more lull? Then when the more lull is over, you would describe the situation that the lull was "followed by" ___(choose one: "Increase" or "decrease"), and "more lull" would NOT be one of the options that you provide... right?
|
|
|
|
mb300sd
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000
Drunk Posts
|
 |
March 15, 2014, 11:55:20 PM |
|
holy shit, i have never seen this low volume
this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe
Its spring break. Half the normal traders are out gettin hammered, I know I am.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 12:02:18 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 12:39:50 AM |
|
Let us say for example that the lull were to be followed by more lull? Then when the more lull is over, you would describe the situation that the lull was "followed by" ___(choose one: "Increase" or "decrease"), and "more lull" would NOT be one of the options that you provide... right? I see what you mean  But today is not merely a "lull" in the price (of which there have been many in a row), it is one of 4 minimum volume days at Huobi since the New Year Week; the 3 previous being well-separated, and followed by large, sudden and persistent price changes. [ in the first two we were ] waiting for some news from gox Indeed, for the first and second press releases, due Feb/10 and Feb/20; the drops were clearly due to disappointment and the claim of "bug in bitcoin" (Although the tense wait for the first was on Sun Feb/09 not Thu Feb/06, right?). There seems to be no consensus about the causes of the third minimum-volume day Mar/02 and the rally on Mar/03. The immediate cause of the latter was a huge buy in Bitstamp. However I recall that there were big expectations about an upcoming Bloomberg TV announcement; could that be it? (But that was a flop, and yet the price rallied...) Its spring break. Half the normal traders are out gettin hammered, I know I am. Ah! "Fundamentals"! 
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 01:02:17 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
Richy_T
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2870
Merit: 2614
1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 01:24:44 AM |
|
holy shit, i have never seen this low volume
this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe
Looking at Huobi (whose volume seems less "random" than Bitstamp), the volume was this low on Feb/06, Feb/19, and Mar/02 (UTC; may be 1 less in your local time) The first two low-volume dates were followed by large price drops: 110 USD (on Bitstamp, 800 to 690) and 70 USD (630 to 560). The third date was follwed by a large price increase: 110 USD (~560 to ~670) Let us say for example that the lull were to be followed by more lull? Then when the more lull is over, you would describe the situation that the lull was "followed by" ___(choose one: "Increase" or "decrease"), and "more lull" would NOT be one of the options that you provide... right? I did it for the lulls.
|
|
|
|
|
JorgeStolfi
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 01:50:07 AM |
|
"Specifically, [ Ramon Llull ] realized three intentions: to die in the service of God while converting Muslims to Christianity, to see to the founding of religious institutions that would teach foreign languages, and to write a book capable of overcoming any objection when using it to convert someone."
|
|
|
|
PoolMinor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1845
Merit: 1348
XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 01:52:41 AM |
|
Something to stare at: Off Topic 
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 01:55:03 AM |
|
Something to stare at: Off Topic  thats so tripy
|
|
|
|
adamstgBit
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038
Trusted Bitcoiner
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 01:57:58 AM |
|
i wonder what the market has been up to all day. not surprising... 
|
|
|
|
aminorex
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030
Sine secretum non libertas
|
 |
March 16, 2014, 01:58:23 AM |
|
I'm adjusting my volatility channel downward to about 3.25 USD/diem to track the vwap since the post-spike low 8 Mar. It seems we will break the short-term downtrend resistance, and I estimate reaching the all-time downtrend resistance on the 19th near 650. The new vol channel slope corresponds to the moving-average-of-active-wallets growth trend model better than the all-history log trend line at this point.
|
|
|
|
|