Bitcoin Forum
September 08, 2025, 07:56:59 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 29.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: How far will this leg take us?
$110K - 9 (8.3%)
$120K - 19 (17.6%)
$130K - 17 (15.7%)
$140K - 9 (8.3%)
$150K - 19 (17.6%)
$160K - 2 (1.9%)
$170K+ - 33 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 108

Pages: « 1 ... 5204 5205 5206 5207 5208 5209 5210 5211 5212 5213 5214 5215 5216 5217 5218 5219 5220 5221 5222 5223 5224 5225 5226 5227 5228 5229 5230 5231 5232 5233 5234 5235 5236 5237 5238 5239 5240 5241 5242 5243 5244 5245 5246 5247 5248 5249 5250 5251 5252 5253 [5254] 5255 5256 5257 5258 5259 5260 5261 5262 5263 5264 5265 5266 5267 5268 5269 5270 5271 5272 5273 5274 5275 5276 5277 5278 5279 5280 5281 5282 5283 5284 5285 5286 5287 5288 5289 5290 5291 5292 5293 5294 5295 5296 5297 5298 5299 5300 5301 5302 5303 5304 ... 34897 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26837170 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 1 users with 9 merit deleted.)
derpinheimer
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 896
Merit: 1000


View Profile
March 15, 2014, 10:16:57 PM

Wow, this volume..

Im no TA guy but it looks like it wants to shoot down.

As always, hope I'm wrong.
mb300sd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000

Drunk Posts


View Profile WWW
March 15, 2014, 10:19:48 PM

they actually lost coins?? loaded and risto? a large percentage?

Yes they lost coins, so they said. Do not know how much. I imagine Loaded is still loaded and Risto apparently just bought a big house he likes to call a castle, so they both seem to be chugging along OK.


It was not sizable enough to warrant a flight to Japan. However, it is sizable enough to ruin my weekend.

Less than the cost of a flight to japan, i don't know how much a weekend is to him though. Mine have been around 10 btc lately... spring break 14! Grin
arepo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 448
Merit: 250


this statement is false


View Profile
March 15, 2014, 10:20:36 PM

Wow, this volume..

Im no TA guy but it looks like it wants to shoot down.

As always, hope I'm wrong.

low volume is not necessarily bearish, but we're sure as hell not going to be able to break above the mid-term resistance on this slow boat.
manfred
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 966
Merit: 1001


Energy is Wealth


View Profile
March 15, 2014, 10:43:32 PM

they actually lost coins?? loaded and risto? a large percentage?

Yes they lost coins, so they said. Do not know how much. I imagine Loaded is still loaded and Risto apparently just bought a big house he likes to call a castle, so they both seem to be chugging along OK.
Dont know about loaded, but Risto lost some small change (BTC 250) by the looks of things when gox went down.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=178336.msg5355884#msg5355884
somewhere else he mentioned that he lost BTC 400....
podyx
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2338
Merit: 1035



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 11:09:35 PM

holy shit, i have never seen this low volume

this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe
meanig
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 531
Merit: 501


View Profile
March 15, 2014, 11:26:46 PM

holy shit, i have never seen this low volume

this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe

Stock up on the Red Bull and get some sleep. The fireworks always start when you least expect it.
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 11:37:28 PM

holy shit, i have never seen this low volume

this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe

Looking at Huobi (whose volume seems less "random" than Bitstamp), the volume was this low on Feb/06, Feb/19, and Mar/02 (UTC; may be 1 less in your local time)

The first two low-volume dates were followed by large price drops: 110 USD (on Bitstamp, 800 to 690) and 70 USD (630 to 560).  The third date was follwed by a large price increase: 110 USD (~560 to ~670)
FTWbitcoinFTW
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 476
Merit: 250



View Profile
March 15, 2014, 11:40:31 PM

2 firsts we're waiting for some news from gox
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 4200
Merit: 12849


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to "non-custodial"


View Profile
March 15, 2014, 11:50:28 PM

holy shit, i have never seen this low volume

this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe

Looking at Huobi (whose volume seems less "random" than Bitstamp), the volume was this low on Feb/06, Feb/19, and Mar/02 (UTC; may be 1 less in your local time)

The first two low-volume dates were followed by large price drops: 110 USD (on Bitstamp, 800 to 690) and 70 USD (630 to 560).  The third date was follwed by a large price increase: 110 USD (~560 to ~670)



Let us say for example that the lull were to be followed by more lull?   Then when the more lull is over, you would describe the situation that the lull was "followed by" ___(choose one: "Increase" or "decrease"), and "more lull" would NOT be one of the options that you provide... right?



mb300sd
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000

Drunk Posts


View Profile WWW
March 15, 2014, 11:55:20 PM

holy shit, i have never seen this low volume

this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe

Its spring break. Half the normal traders are out gettin hammered, I know I am.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 16, 2014, 12:02:18 AM


Explanation
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 16, 2014, 12:39:50 AM

Let us say for example that the lull were to be followed by more lull?   Then when the more lull is over, you would describe the situation that the lull was "followed by" ___(choose one: "Increase" or "decrease"), and "more lull" would NOT be one of the options that you provide... right?
I see what you mean  Wink  But today is not merely a "lull" in the price (of which there have been many in a row), it is one of 4 minimum volume days at Huobi since the New Year Week; the 3 previous being well-separated, and followed by large, sudden and persistent price changes.

[ in the first two we were ] waiting for some news from gox
Indeed, for the first and second press releases, due Feb/10 and Feb/20; the drops were clearly due to disappointment  and the claim of "bug in bitcoin"  (Although the tense wait for the first was on Sun Feb/09 not  Thu Feb/06, right?).

There seems to be no consensus about the causes of the third minimum-volume day Mar/02 and the rally on Mar/03.  The immediate cause of the latter was a huge buy in Bitstamp.  However I recall that there were big expectations about an upcoming Bloomberg TV announcement; could that be it? (But that was a flop, and yet the price rallied...)

Its spring break. Half the normal traders are out gettin hammered, I know I am.
Ah! "Fundamentals"!  Cheesy
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2660
Merit: 2364


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
March 16, 2014, 01:02:17 AM


Explanation
Richy_T
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2870
Merit: 2614


1RichyTrEwPYjZSeAYxeiFBNnKC9UjC5k


View Profile
March 16, 2014, 01:24:44 AM

holy shit, i have never seen this low volume

this is truly the calm before the storm i've been waiting for, i believe

Looking at Huobi (whose volume seems less "random" than Bitstamp), the volume was this low on Feb/06, Feb/19, and Mar/02 (UTC; may be 1 less in your local time)

The first two low-volume dates were followed by large price drops: 110 USD (on Bitstamp, 800 to 690) and 70 USD (630 to 560).  The third date was follwed by a large price increase: 110 USD (~560 to ~670)



Let us say for example that the lull were to be followed by more lull?   Then when the more lull is over, you would describe the situation that the lull was "followed by" ___(choose one: "Increase" or "decrease"), and "more lull" would NOT be one of the options that you provide... right?





I did it for the lulls.
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 16, 2014, 01:46:17 AM

I did it for the lulls.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramon_Llull
JorgeStolfi
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 1003



View Profile
March 16, 2014, 01:50:07 AM

Quote
"Specifically, [ Ramon Llull ] realized three intentions: to die in the service of God while converting Muslims to Christianity, to see to the founding of religious institutions that would teach foreign languages, and to write a book capable of overcoming any objection when using it to convert someone."
PoolMinor
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1845
Merit: 1348


XXXVII Fnord is toast without bread


View Profile
March 16, 2014, 01:52:41 AM

Something to stare at: Off Topic

adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
March 16, 2014, 01:55:03 AM

Something to stare at: Off Topic



thats so tripy
adamstgBit
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1904
Merit: 1038


Trusted Bitcoiner


View Profile WWW
March 16, 2014, 01:57:58 AM

i wonder what the market has been up to all day.

not surprising...

 Cheesy
aminorex
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1596
Merit: 1030


Sine secretum non libertas


View Profile
March 16, 2014, 01:58:23 AM

I'm adjusting my volatility channel downward to about 3.25 USD/diem to track the vwap since the post-spike low 8 Mar.  It seems we will break the short-term downtrend resistance,  and I estimate reaching the all-time downtrend resistance on the 19th near 650.  The new vol channel slope corresponds to the moving-average-of-active-wallets growth trend model better than the all-history log trend line at this point.
Pages: « 1 ... 5204 5205 5206 5207 5208 5209 5210 5211 5212 5213 5214 5215 5216 5217 5218 5219 5220 5221 5222 5223 5224 5225 5226 5227 5228 5229 5230 5231 5232 5233 5234 5235 5236 5237 5238 5239 5240 5241 5242 5243 5244 5245 5246 5247 5248 5249 5250 5251 5252 5253 [5254] 5255 5256 5257 5258 5259 5260 5261 5262 5263 5264 5265 5266 5267 5268 5269 5270 5271 5272 5273 5274 5275 5276 5277 5278 5279 5280 5281 5282 5283 5284 5285 5286 5287 5288 5289 5290 5291 5292 5293 5294 5295 5296 5297 5298 5299 5300 5301 5302 5303 5304 ... 34897 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!