I am just not sure if it will necessarily take 15-20 years for 0.21BTC to have some kind of 1337 status.. For sure, you know that there are still so many normies poo pooing bitcoin, so they are NOT even creating accounts to get in while some other folks are hoarding and stacking BTC, even if they are not engaged in such hoarding and stacking at Michael Saylor levels.
Sure, some of these ideas are relative too, and other parts are just a matter of from which perspective we are describing the situation of both how much you have and how much you might have relative to others.
So sure, if we were to consider 1337 status as getting to fuck you status, then sure, you are likely correct that it may well take a bit longer than a short period of time to reach fuck you status with such quantity of 0.21 BTC whether we are talking about spot BTC prices or even the more conservative measures of BTC bottom prices.... and that would be presuming something like roughly $2 million in purchasing power for entry-level fuck you status.
Another easier to reach perspective would be that people become more and more 1337 status when they reach a level of savings/investments that are out of the reach of normies.
Sure, we already know that there are many normies who do not save sufficiently or even take matters to the level of investing into some assets that go beyond their purchase of their personal homes and maybe having some value that they have been able to build in their 401ks .. so through bitcoin's history the entry-level goals of stacking some BTC or sats have gone down and down and down.. and for sure each of us realize that part of that going down phenomena has to do with the value of BTC going up and up and up through the years.
Accordingly with the passage of time, the earlier BTC accumulation goals become more and more difficult to attain..
For example,
entry-level BTC accumulation goals through the years may be considered like this:
Prior to 2013: 100 BTC
2013-2016: 21 BTC
2017-2019: 10 BTC
2020: 1-5 BTC
2021: 0.21BTC to 1 BTC
We might consider those who have reached entry-level or higher 2017 or those above-listed earlier BTC accumulation goals as 1337 status - or even close to 1337 status, no?
Of course, I am not saying that anything is guaranteed or that we can rely upon history for our future BTC price trajectory, and sure we may well need to start measuring some of these goal posts in terms of how many satoshis that we might have accumulated into our control
21 million satoshis?
might sound like a lot, no?
1 million satoshis might also sound like a lot, but maybe we don't go straight down to 1 million satoshis before crossing higher thresholds that are more challenging based on dollar values, and instead suggest that 10 million satoshis is also a lot... and I heard that soon 21 million satoshis is going to be considered as 1337 status. #justsaying #justsaying
For sure, the tower that you depict is saying something similar too, so there is nothing wrong with that tower... even though it might be a wee bit bearish to suggest that it is going to take two more cycles to reach $1 million per BTC.. and probably even $10 million per BTC would be a more realistic goal for 2028/2029 - even while none of the UPpity matters are guaranteed, either.
Another thing might be that there are people who have decently large quantities of coins who might end up making a lot of mistakes with their coins, and surely neither of us are getting into those kinds of details, even though I did know some kinds of peeps who used to have plans to sell all of their coins in the $50k territory, but now some of those kinds of peeps have considered better BTC retention systems - yet not everyone who holds BTC is understanding the value of maintaining quite a bit of retention.. and I am not even chiding anyone who might sell less then 25% of his/her BTC, but it could be risky to be selling larger portions and surely there are quite a few current BTC HODLers who are planning on trying those strategies, and will it work or not is still to be found out.
What I know for sure is that you don't want to find yourself in the nocoiner hell... so BTFD or stay/become poor!
DCA is probably better than buy the dip because DCA is more basic in terms of NOT having to attempt to figure out if there is a dip or not.
Sure buy the dip can supplement DCA, but I don't like it as much as a primary BTC accumulating strategy, and sure the more aggressive that a person is with the DCA, then maybe the less funds that would be available for buying the dip, but there should be practical ways to attempt to accomplish both.
Poll
