Bitcoin Forum
April 28, 2024, 06:10:53 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Poll
Question: What happens first:
New ATH - 43 (69.4%)
<$60,000 - 19 (30.6%)
Total Voters: 62

Pages: « 1 ... 32978 32979 32980 32981 32982 32983 32984 32985 32986 32987 32988 32989 32990 32991 32992 32993 32994 32995 32996 32997 32998 32999 33000 33001 33002 33003 33004 33005 33006 33007 33008 33009 33010 33011 33012 33013 33014 33015 33016 33017 33018 33019 33020 33021 33022 33023 33024 33025 33026 33027 [33028] 33029 33030 33031 33032 33033 33034 33035 33036 33037 33038 33039 33040 33041 33042 33043 33044 33045 33046 33047 33048 33049 33050 33051 33052 33053 33054 33055 33056 33057 33058 33059 33060 33061 33062 33063 33064 33065 33066 33067 33068 33069 33070 33071 33072 33073 33074 33075 33076 33077 33078 ... 33304 »
  Print  
Author Topic: Wall Observer BTC/USD - Bitcoin price movement tracking & discussion  (Read 26368767 times)
This is a self-moderated topic. If you do not want to be moderated by the person who started this topic, create a new topic. (174 posts by 3 users with 9 merit deleted.)
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3844



View Profile
February 17, 2024, 12:53:39 AM

[edited out
I agree with almost everything, including the vibe, but Microstrategy in SP500? This is not going to happen for at least 10 years, maybe never.
Why? For the same reason as why GLD is not in SP500. Basically, very small earnings (in MSTR case).
MSTR is almost like a no fee leveraged bitcoin ETF.
Do I wish that I bought it in my retirement account?
Sure...but it ain't a SP500 destined entity, imho.

Count on Biodom to be a party poop.


Better than being at the poop party...haha.

That said, we are steadying for the next burst up, imho, with nary a dip.
1714284653
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714284653

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714284653
Reply with quote  #2

1714284653
Report to moderator
1714284653
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714284653

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714284653
Reply with quote  #2

1714284653
Report to moderator
1714284653
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1714284653

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1714284653
Reply with quote  #2

1714284653
Report to moderator
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 01:01:17 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10180


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 01:03:37 AM
Merited by AlcoHoDL (2)

[edited out]
One thing I feel is certain: this year and the next will be among the most entertaining, exciting, fun years since the beginning. 6 digits = fuck you status for many WOers who aren't there yet, and there is a big difference between a $2M fuck you and a $10M fuck you.

In terms of BTC, I am not sure if there is a big difference between $2 million and $10 million, especially if you might be close to reaching the lower one of the two based on the 200-week moving average rather than based on spot price, then the next level up (even though 5x greater) is not that far off... and for sure, if you had not noticed, I am not much of a fan for measuring entry-level or even higher up fuck-you status with BTC's spot price even though surely the high rises in BTC spot price, even if going up in a short period of time will have UPpity dragging effects upon the 200-week moving average (right now the 200WMA) is going up about $33 per day, and during the doldrums of our mid-2022 to October 2023 bearish period, there were times in which the 200-WMA was going up ONLY around $10-ish per day. Times are good, right now to be getting that ongoing pulling up.

Personally, I think that some of my sustainable withdrawal theories, including the tool powered by bitmover and even my outline of our anticipated timeline for reaching entry-level fuck you status in my chart, provide a pretty decent sense that even if we were to be able to employ a fairly conservative withdrawal of our BTC (such as in the ballpark of 4% annualized) once we reach actual entry-level fuck you status based on the 200-week moving average rather than spot price, then the value of our BTC holdings may well continue to grow in value at enough of a sustainable pace (going by the rate of the increase of the bottom - the 200-week moving average) that the value of our holdings may well end up going from $2 million to $10 million in a matter of a few years, merely by employing a conservative withdrawal strategy

So if you look at the tool, right now it takes around 64 BTC to put you into entry-level fuck you status, so of course, if we want to consider 5x of that amount as our cushion or whatever or further aspirational goal, the if we divide 64 by 5 then we get right around 13 BTC, which my fuck you status chart shows that it would take until right around mid 2031 before those guys with 13 BTC will be entering into entry-level fuck you status. .which would mean that the 64 BTC would be right around $10 million - except if you had been withdrawing around 0.1 to 0.2 BTC per month over the next 7 years that would add up to right around 12 BTC withdrawn (0.15 * 12 * 7), then our 64 BTC - 12 BTC = 52 BTC / 5 would be right around 10.4 BTC, which my fuck you status chart shows 2032 for that.. so add another year... and yet the point is that with decent management of the stash, the stash is likely to continue to grow in value. if you are already in entry-level fuck you status based on the 200-week moving average rather than based on spot price.. and because if you are going by spot price then 20 BTC is not as much of a cushion to work with.. but if you were to have double that, then even if you are not quite yet at the current 64 BTC that is necessary, then if you had 40BTC, you are getting a lot closer.. yet I am not much of a fan of the idea of pulling the fuck you lever too early, even though it is my own theory that if you keep your value in BTC and if you are measuring your value from the 200-week moving average, you are going to be in way better shape in terms of dealing with reality rather than going by spot price, since I have some concerns about anyone withdrawing too much too soon..

In other words, I hate to be a party poop like Biodom, but personally, I believe that it is not such a great idea to cheat in your valuation of your closeness to entry-level fuck you status by using BTC spot price and then to end up overly withdrawing BTC prior to being place to be truly ready, because where are you going to put BTC that would be better than keeping it in BTC.. because we are not going to work with any presumption that if we sell BTC that we will be able to buy it back, are we?  For me, I imagine any BTC that I sell is NOT going to have any expectation of being able to buy it back, even if sometimes we know that being able to buy it back does end up playing out, especially if the BTC price shoots up more rapidly than buying support can keep up..

$100k/coin and even $1M/coin are unpredictable certainties. Got coin?


I am a party poop.  I agree that they are unpredictable certainties, but how much coin you going to sell at those prices.. if you only have 20 coin in the case of BTC price reaching $100k or if you ONLY have 2 BTC in the case of BTC reaching $1 million..   So maybe by the time BTC reaches $100k, then maybe ONLY around 60 BTC will be needed to be at entry-level fuck you status, which is presuming that BTC price going up to $100k in the next 2-4-ish months would end up dragging the 200-WMA from its current $31k level and up to $33.5k-ish.. so then at that point, you ONLY need 60 BTC rather than 64 BTC to be at entry-level fuck you status, and sure maybe if BTC prices went up to $1 million quickly, then it is not going to draw the 200-week moving average up to its level but it is still going to drag the 200-WMA up a lot and fast. but the BTC price has to stay up somewhat for a while for eh 200-week moving average to double or some other extreme that might be considered that might cause the current 64 BTC needed to go down to 32 BTC needed..

Whatever you are doing AlcoHoDL, (for your own good, as far as I can assess it from a distance.. to the extent that we are not giving financial advice or second-guessing the judgement of others) I hope that you are not getting too overly reliant on BTC spot prices to determine what to do and how to treat your BTC holdings.

[edited out]
I continue to study and follow the things written here, this topic and reading the things written here is a A true lesson for those seeking knowledge.

Well hopefully it all works out for you. 

Many of us here consider a kind of importance of getting through a whole cycle, and probably that would include a lot of just continuing to buy, yet of course, ONLY you are in a position in which you are going to be able to assess the extent that you might have enough BTC and if you might be in a position to start to transition out of a more strict BTC accumulation stage and to perhaps start to get into more of maintenance stage.

There is a lot of power in compounding value, which was part of a theme of a discussion that I was posting about in another thread, and here is a relevant part of that discussion:

.........So, let's look at the historical numbers and the timeline from 2015 to present again.

1) 0) $250  (2015)                                    1X
2)  1) $500  (2015-2016)                           2X
3) 2) $1,000    (2016-2017)        2X * 2 = 4X
4)  3) $2,000  (2017)                  4X * 2 = 8X
5)  4) $4,000  (2017-2020)          8X * 2 = 16X
6)  5) $8,000   (2017-2020)        16X * 2 = 32X
7)  6) $16,000  (2017-2022)       32X * 2 = 64X
8 )  7) $32,000  (2021-2023?)      64X * 2 = 128X
9)  8 ) $64,000  (2021-?)             128X * 2 = 256X
10)  9) $128,000  (?)                    256X * 2 = 512X

You can likely see that if you are shaving off profits at the earlier stages, then you are going to eat into the compounding (and/or exponential) component in regards to how your value would have had grown through that period of time.

So in this particular factual example the guys who bought in 2015 and had a base of $250 per BTC and who did not sell any of their BTC, they would have had experienced 8 doublings that would have brought their holdings up to 256x for a short period of time during the period that BTC was priced at more than $64k, and so then their amount of value would have come back down to 6 doublings when the BTC price dropped back down to around $16k (which would have been around 64x) and then now they are currently in the supra 7 doublings that would have been 128x when the BTC prices were at $32k, and they will be back to 256x once (or if) the BTC price gets back to supra $64k, and then if the BTC  price goes above $128k, then they will get into the supra 512x territory..

So each doubling now has much much greater magnifying effects as compared to the kind of smaller magnifying effects that would have had been felt in the first few of doublings.. so the power of the doublings tend to come later down the line, so long as the asset continues to go up in value and to have a kind of persistent effect.. .. something like a Lindy effect that suggest that the longer that something non-perishable (like an idea or a technology) is in existence and maintaining itself the more likely it is going to continue to be in existence.  

Of course, the bitcoin maximalist argument would assert that the Lindy effect applies to bitcoin more than it does to various shitcoins, but the theoretical idea of the Lindy effect is not completely absent from various shitcoins, even if some of the ideas and/or innovations of shitcoins (if they come up with any that involve anything worthwhile besides scamming people) may well have decently good chances to get absorbed into bitcoin. 

I dunno if it’s just me but seeing some the bullish new morph a bit over the last week or so, general topic remains the same but just slight tweaks across the different sources.

- Investor funds have to wait 30,60 or 90 days before investing in etf’s
- Etf finding it harder to buy otc at x price(last story was just under 100k from large holders)

Is this normal, like I notice it because i read things daily. Are these half truths aimed at bringing in the retail investors for example?

I wasn’t here for the start of the last bull/pre-halving. Is this something I should just get used to from now on?

Onwards and upwards,
Greyhats

Who knows what to make of it or if you should act more bulllish because of that information, but it is extremely bullish.. and it may well even be true.. not just a pumpening attempt.

I am pretty sure that the investor funds (The RIAs - Registered investment advisors) can still put people into ETFs, but they cannot solicit for 90 days.. .. something like that..  but who cares.. whether there is a pump of everyone else, and then when the 90 days run out around the halvening then maybe there will be a dump, but in the meantime, maybe prices shoot up to $100k before dumping back to $70k.. I am not going to claim to know shit, except that my own practice is to always attempt to prepare for either direction (and both directions) simultaneously, so the price is always coming to me rather than my chasing the price, but still sometimes if any of us might not have enough BTC in order to frontrun some of the BIGGER players, it might not hurt to buy a bit extra, just in case.. . but yeah, maybe you already did that and you don't have any money left.. what you going to do start dipping into your emergency fund and leveraging your house..  I personally don't tend to play like that, but each person has some things that he might be able to do in order to get more BTC price exposure..
Biodom
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3738
Merit: 3844



View Profile
February 17, 2024, 01:16:02 AM
Last edit: February 17, 2024, 01:40:51 AM by Biodom


6 digits = fuck you status for many WOers who aren't there yet, and there is a big difference between a $2M fuck you and a $10M fuck you.

$100k/coin and even $1M/coin are unpredictable certainties. Got coin?



You probably meant 7 digits for 2mil, for example...sorry  Grin.
I can't think of any 6 digit number to be a fu situation...a nice chunk of "change", but hardly a fu, even in the heartland and forget about it on the coasts.


So in this particular factual example the guys who bought in 2015 and had a base of $250 per BTC and who did not sell any of their BTC, they would have had experienced 8 doublings that would have brought their holdings up to 256x for a short period of time during the period that BTC was priced at more than $64k, and so then their amount of value would have come back down to 6 doublings when the BTC price dropped back down to around $16k (which would have been around 64x) and then now they are currently in the supra 7 doublings that would have been 128x when the BTC prices were at $32k, and they will be back to 256x once (or if) the BTC price gets back to supra $64k, and then if the BTC  price goes above $128k, then they will get into the supra 512x territory..

So each doubling now has much much greater magnifying effects as compared to the kind of smaller magnifying effects that would have had been felt in the first few of doublings.. so the power of the doublings tend to come later down the line, so long as the asset continues to go up in value and to have a kind of persistent effect.. .. something like a Lindy effect that suggest that the longer that something non-perishable (like an idea or a technology) is in existence and maintaining itself the more likely it is going to continue to be in existence.  

Of course, the bitcoin maximalist argument would assert that the Lindy effect applies to bitcoin more than it does to various shitcoins, but the theoretical idea of the Lindy effect is not completely absent from various shitcoins, even if some of the ideas and/or innovations of shitcoins (if they come up with any that involve anything worthwhile besides scamming people) may well have decently good chances to get absorbed into bitcoin.

Yea, the thought occurred that if you had been through several doublings (since, for example, 2015), then you don't really need much of those to make bank, so to speak.
Each new doubling becomes very sweet.

It's one thing to double from $500 to $1000 (or even $5000 to $10000) and a completely different story to double from, say, $50 mil to $100mil in an extreme case (a 750 btc theoretical guy/gal with about $50 mil at ATH in 2021 will be at $100 mil when btc would be at 133K, a very doable price point).

750 btc was a bit less than $10K in early 2013, affordable to many, but only a few people got that then.
I am sure, only few hundreds to few thousands individuals, worldwide, not more than that.

JimboToronto
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 3990
Merit: 4460


You're never too old to think young.


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 01:43:42 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1)

Another day in the books (UTC) and another green candle. That's 11 of the last 12 days.

Gee. Are we in a bull market yet?  Roll Eyes
depends on the timeframe
Short term (days) Yes
Mid term(weeks) not sure
Long term(months/years) Yes.

Short term (days) yes
Midterm (months) yes
Long term (years/decades) yes.

no first we must get into the top 100 see thread link:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=138109.msg58617278#msg58617278

number 55375 is in 100th place

so we are close but not there.

What you're describing is a peak market, not a bull market. Of course it would also be part of a bull market.

Where did you come up with the top 100 days list as an arbitrary definition of a bull market?
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 02:01:15 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
philipma1957
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 4102
Merit: 7768


'The right to privacy matters'


View Profile WWW
February 17, 2024, 02:06:23 AM

Another day in the books (UTC) and another green candle. That's 11 of the last 12 days.

Gee. Are we in a bull market yet?  Roll Eyes
depends on the timeframe
Short term (days) Yes
Mid term(weeks) not sure
Long term(months/years) Yes.

Short term (days) yes
Midterm (months) yes
Long term (years/decades) yes.

no first we must get into the top 100 see thread link:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=138109.msg58617278#msg58617278

number 55375 is in 100th place

so we are close but not there.

What you're describing is a peak market, not a bull market. Of course it would also be part of a bull market.

Where did you come up with the top 100 days list as an arbitrary definition of a bull market?

Well this pretty simple reason. A bull market means profits are happening left and right and up and down.

Technically we are bull for almost all.

But in 60 days miners drop to bear due to the 1/2 ing. Plus all people that got in in 2021 at 55k or more are still losers.

So we are kind of bull.  True bull is everyone one is up.

Right now we are close. 

And 55.5k number 100 on the list would be short.
72 maybe 80k  which I think JJG calls wake me up is true bull.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 03:03:30 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10180


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 03:05:09 AM

Some bitcoiners bristle at ETFs...not me.
Bought into a couple a few days ago (in Roth)...not taxable, haha.
A path: from some strange swedish bitcoin ETP (Bitcoin XBT tracker One or something like that) and straight into US-based.
An expensive tx (they REALLY fleece you), but it was up about 10X since 2020, so, no biggie.
I grabbed some too. I went with FBTC for the custody diversification. Also tossed it in a Roth IRA. Bitcoin is cool and holding your own is respectable, but long term Bitcoin gains without having to self custody or pay taxes on gains… That’s just too good to avoid for any reason. I’m up 25% already.
I use a roth as part of my emergency fund sources, I restacked the ratio's when the etf's came out, and have some allocated to ibit.

Its not well publicised but you can withdraw your roth contribtions without any penalty/tax so long as its only the contribution amount and not any profit.

Sounds a bit reckless to be using retirement funds as your "emergency funds."

Another day in the books (UTC) and another green candle. That's 11 of the last 12 days.

Gee. Are we in a bull market yet?  Roll Eyes
no first we must get into the top 100 see thread link:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=138109.msg58617278#msg58617278

number 55375 is in 100th place

so we are close but not there.

The essence of the matter is that we have been in a bull trend since November 2022 - at least that was the bottom, but we might not have had realized it until around March of 2023 when BTC price went from the mid $20ks to the lower $30ks but still failed/refused to break above $32k until October 2023.. so it cannot always be easy to call or to know.. and so bull trend versus bull market can be a bit ambiguous both in terms of if we are in it and when it might have had started.

How far it is going to take us, and when it might end may well be additional questions that are not easy to figure out.. even though right now we should be able to identify quite strong UPpity BTC price pressures, even if there are potentially various sticky resistance points along the way and even if we might experience some decently large corrections at various points.. and so even since October, we have only had around 3 corrections that were more 10%.. and a couple of them just barely with only one correction taking us 21%.. so seems a lot of UPpity.. even though there have been various pauses in the UPpity... but so far not giving too many opportunties to buy back. .which also might end up causing us to be able to go through noman's zone.. though I am still a bit nervous if we were to get into noman's zone now in terms of being able to completely make it through within 2-6 weeks, which surely would end up being fairly rapidly with any of those kinds of scenarios. .. .but not completely out of the question.. and difficult to really place time and price on something like that... even though the UPpity pressure seems to be ongoing.

[edited out
I agree with almost everything, including the vibe, but Microstrategy in SP500? This is not going to happen for at least 10 years, maybe never.
Why? For the same reason as why GLD is not in SP500. Basically, very small earnings (in MSTR case).
MSTR is almost like a no fee leveraged bitcoin ETF.
Do I wish that I bought it in my retirement account?
Sure...but it ain't a SP500 destined entity, imho.
Count on Biodom to be a party poop.
Better than being at the poop party...haha.

That said, we are steadying for the next burst up, imho, with nary a dip.

How can guys, like uie pooie, express so much confidence. and maybe I am not quite at 60/40 in terms of my thought so Up versus down.. maybe 57% 43%... .. .. (of course if we put sideways in there it gets even more complicated, so let's just talk about breaking up or down) but then if we are still in the "don't wake me up zone",** then why do I even care until if we were to get above $55k, then for this here cat that would constitute UP... .. so I would not really be counting $53k or $54k as up, even though technically they would be UP, and probably I would not even count $55k as up, either unless the BTC price were to keep going UPpity and kind of gets caught above something like a $55k price point... but then.. where would we be.. scary territory (which by the way is within about 20% of the ATH.. which why it get's such a reference)..


** by the way, I think that I have to officially move the bottom of don't wake me up zone from $35k and up to $38k. maybe even $40k, even though I am a bit hesitant to come right out and say $40k.. especially since I hate getting overly excited and then being called names (such as an irrational bulltard.. even if it might be true).
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 04:01:15 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Toxic2040
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1792
Merit: 4141



View Profile
February 17, 2024, 04:12:33 AM


I like those eyes.  Nice touch.

JayJuanGee
Legendary
*
Online Online

Activity: 3696
Merit: 10180


Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 04:45:39 AM

6 digits = fuck you status for many WOers who aren't there yet, and there is a big difference between a $2M fuck you and a $10M fuck you.

$100k/coin and even $1M/coin are unpredictable certainties. Got coin?

You probably meant 7 digits for 2mil, for example...sorry  Grin.
I can't think of any 6 digit number to be a fu situation...a nice chunk of "change", but hardly a fu, even in the heartland and forget about it on the coasts.

I am pretty sure that he was referring to BTC prices reaching $100k would contribute towards many WO members getting into FU status, so that would mean only 20 BTC if we are talking about spot price.. so it is a bit bothersome for me because he seemed to be including himself in that group.. even though I thought that we was on board using the bottom price rather than the top price in order to figure out when some of us might be reaching entry-level fuck you status.. referring to the current $2 million default/reference level.

So in this particular factual example the guys who bought in 2015 and had a base of $250 per BTC and who did not sell any of their BTC, they would have had experienced 8 doublings that would have brought their holdings up to 256x for a short period of time during the period that BTC was priced at more than $64k, and so then their amount of value would have come back down to 6 doublings when the BTC price dropped back down to around $16k (which would have been around 64x) and then now they are currently in the supra 7 doublings that would have been 128x when the BTC prices were at $32k, and they will be back to 256x once (or if) the BTC price gets back to supra $64k, and then if the BTC  price goes above $128k, then they will get into the supra 512x territory..

So each doubling now has much much greater magnifying effects as compared to the kind of smaller magnifying effects that would have had been felt in the first few of doublings.. so the power of the doublings tend to come later down the line, so long as the asset continues to go up in value and to have a kind of persistent effect.. .. something like a Lindy effect that suggest that the longer that something non-perishable (like an idea or a technology) is in existence and maintaining itself the more likely it is going to continue to be in existence.  

Of course, the bitcoin maximalist argument would assert that the Lindy effect applies to bitcoin more than it does to various shitcoins, but the theoretical idea of the Lindy effect is not completely absent from various shitcoins, even if some of the ideas and/or innovations of shitcoins (if they come up with any that involve anything worthwhile besides scamming people) may well have decently good chances to get absorbed into bitcoin.
Yea, the thought occurred that if you had been through several doublings (since, for example, 2015), then you don't really need much of those to make bank, so to speak.
Each new doubling becomes very sweet.

Doublings are amazing ways to achieve compounding, and even if you shave BTC off along the way, you still would achieve a lot of compounding, especially if you are shaving off way less than 50% of your stash for every doubling.. so if you were shaving off in the ballpark of 10% for every doubling, then you have 40% compounding each time, and sure it is not as good as having a full stash, but it is still pretty amazing, especially since many times regular investing probably tends to ONLY perform in the range of 5% to 12% per years, so it has historically taken 6-10 years to double.. and even if BTC has not doubled every year, but it came pretty damned close in the last 8-9 years it had right around 7-8 doublings, retraced back to 6 yet is still in a pretty solid territory of 7 doublings and coming upon 8.

Now there might be some guys who might have started in those same areas, but still would rather start with something like a $300 -$500 starting point, so that would throw things off a bit and maybe even take away an additional doubling, but it still ends up being amazing performance even if the doublings of value end up being every few years rather than every year.

It's one thing to double from $500 to $1000 (or even $5000 to $10000) and a completely different story to double from, say, $50 mil to $100mil in an extreme case (a 750 btc theoretical guy/gal with about $50 mil at ATH in 2021 will be at $100 mil when btc would be at 133K, a very doable price point).

There surely are some WO members (maybe even historical) who might have had those kinds of numbers, but even if we try to be a bit more realistic with stack sizes of around 100 BTC.. if we use spot price, then those guys would have reached $6.9 million in 2021, and then corrected back down to $1.6 million and then currently be back to around $5.2 million and surely you are not going to be sneezing at $10 million for $100k BTC prices, are you?  Maybe you, personally, feel that you would need more cushion than that, but even another doubling from $100k to $200k is surely doable, too. .whether it is in this cycle or having to wait another cycle.. and it seems that a guy should be able to work with $20 million..

Even though I am seeming to be the party poop in this particular case, because even though I would likely not be afraid to be shaving off some of those BTC, even for a guy with a measly 100 BTC, but I am also not going to be valuing that at spot price when it comes to the determination that it has either reached entry level fuck you status or some amount above that in order to get started.

So even with 100 BTC (which surely is a nice round number that we should be able to easily work with and even attempt to make it a bit more relatable for guys of more modest means), we even had a regular WO member who continued to tell us that he had 100 BTC, but he has not been coming around in recent times, so that kind of sucks.. easy come, easy go... or maybe it is not so easy come, and easy go, if you are not careful? which many of us likely realize that is not easy to be your own bank.. even if we take a lot of precautions..

So getting back to fair valuations, I surely would consider the 100 BTC to be well into entry level fuck you status and somewhat free to be engaging in various levels of sustainable withdrawal.. including that current bottom prices are still going to put the 100 BTC guy at 3.11 million and bottom price values going up at a pace of about $3,300 per day.. so there is a lot of cushion to even be spending at relatively low withdrawal rates if there might be some concerns that there are desires to get the principle value up to something closer to $10 million, so that would be around another 3x increase in the 200-week moving average.. and the higher the spot price goes the more that the spot price draws the 200-week moving average upwardly.

Even my entry level fuck you status chart projects 100 BTC to be worth $10million, in terms of bottom BTC prices by early 2029.. so that really is not that far away.. 5 years from now..

I am not sure where you are at Biodom, but I get the sense that even you are more inclined to want to keep your wealth in BTC rather than me, since you talk about not wanting to sell any, and there is nothing really wrong with that, yet I get the sense that not very large amounts of BTC need to be shaved off, except surely we have to try to live with more prudence if the BTC prices are way closer to the 200-WMA versus if they are quite a bit above the 200-WMA... like now with BTC spot prices aroudn 67% above the 200-WMA.. and maybe that is more or less a fair range, even though maybe in the future, we might consider 25% above the 200 WMA to be more reasonable on a regular basis versus how erratic that BTC spot tends to get.

750 btc was a bit less than $10K in early 2013, affordable to many, but only a few people got that then.
I am sure, only few hundreds to few thousands individuals, worldwide, not more than that.

The fact that so few own that many coins seem like a reason to not be fantasizing about them, even if some of them might be present in this thread... One thing is accumulating that many coins and another thing is still having that number of coins and being able to manage them right now.

Even my fuck you status chart shows that level of coins entering into fuck you status in mid-to-late 2018... although back then we were still considering $1 million as entry level fuck you status which would have gotten him into entry level fuck you status in late 2017... but surely the 2090-week moving average continued to move up quite rapidly in those days.. and probably we still consider the 200-week moving average to be moving up rapidly but the quantity of coins that it takes to reach entry level fuck you status has ongoingly tended to change quite dramatically - and yeah in the ongoing and persistent downward direction.

72 maybe 80k  which I think JJG calls wake me up is true bull.

You surely are getting my own terms mixed up.

And, currently I  am considering $55k to $82k to be within no man's land or maybe bat country.. which largely is 20% on each side of the current ATH, which means that it is not too likely that the BTC price will be hanging around in those territories.. and sure it could take a few weeks to get through that whole zone, but relatively speaking it is not a place to be selling or a place that there should be much resistance.. but sure, anything can end up happening, but the odds are not really in favor of spending very much time between around 20% below and 20% above the current ATH.

Sure I could be wrong.. even though I find it a bit retarded for some people to be planning to sell BIGGEDly within that zone or even to be getting excited about it.. and yeah people can do what they like and they can get excited over what they like.. and yeah, don't get me wrong, I am likely to be getting excited too.. but I still won't be expecting to be hangin around those prices for very long... even if it might seem like a long time while we are going through it, but it is quite likely that when we look back at that price range after we get through it, it may well end up not being a lot of time that we had been hanging out there.... but hey, it surely is not 100% and anything can happen.. but you still need to consider in terms of what is more likely to happen... and hopefully act accordingly.. .

I don't really change my system very much even when I have some predictions, so I will still have sales in that area that are tending to be a bit smaller than usual.. but really the sales still exist for me.. even though I don't expect to be able to buy back for any of those sales.. even though sometimes we will have quickie ups and downs in those areas (do they call that fake-outs?) and sometimes there will end up being a lot of drying up of liquidity so the price moves a lot up and the buy orders do not keep up, so then it drops a lot and then the sell orders do not keep up and then it shoots back up because there are hardly any sell orders.. and so that is just typically what ends up happening when the BTC price moves fast in one direction.
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 05:03:22 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 06:03:26 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
Zwei
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 487
Merit: 536


All I need's a win.


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 06:16:41 AM

wtf
bitcoinPsycho
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2464
Merit: 2066


$120000 in 2024 Confirmed


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 06:24:44 AM
Merited by Hueristic (1), JayJuanGee (1)




https://www.tomsguide.com/computing/malware-adware/first-ever-ios-trojan-discovered-and-its-stealing-face-id-data-to-break-into-bank-accounts

"Once installed on either an iPhone or an Android phone, GoldPickaxe can collect facial recognition data, identity documents and intercepted text messages, all to make it easier to siphon off funds from banking and other financial apps. To make matters worse, this biometric data is then used to create AI deepfakes to impersonate victims and access their bank accounts."
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 07:01:15 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
DirtyKeyboard
Sr. Member
****
Online Online

Activity: 252
Merit: 448


Fly free sweet Mango.


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 07:23:27 AM

ChartBuddy's 24 hour Wall Observation recap
..
All Credit to ChartBuddy
ChartBuddy
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2156
Merit: 1745


1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 08:01:16 AM


Explanation
Chartbuddy thanks talkimg.com
AlcoHoDL
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2352
Merit: 4138


Addicted to HoDLing!


View Profile
February 17, 2024, 08:45:15 AM
Merited by JayJuanGee (1), bitmover (1)

[...]

6 digits = fuck you status for many WOers who aren't there yet, and there is a big difference between a $2M fuck you and a $10M fuck you.

$100k/coin and even $1M/coin are unpredictable certainties. Got coin?



You probably meant 7 digits for 2mil, for example...sorry  Grin.
I can't think of any 6 digit number to be a fu situation...a nice chunk of "change", but hardly a fu, even in the heartland and forget about it on the coasts.

[...]

Jay has already explained it -- 6 digits = $100k+/coin. Assuming a 20 BTC stash, this is entry-level spot price f.u. status (whatever the implications of spot price vs. 200 WMA may be). You seem to be describing a situation where a mere couple of coins can achieve this, so then, yes, a 7-digit spot price would be needed.

In any case, I quite like the $2M as the entry-level f.u. status threshold, but I tend to multiply it by about 5, in order to secure it against unforeseeable events that may affect spot price. Basically this is very roughly equivalent to using the 200 WMA (my beloved indicator) as a basis for any calculations/predictions when it comes to spot price mega-pumps that are not likely to affect the 200 WMA value much in the short term. IOW, the 200 WMA acts as a filter, shaving off any spikes (up or down), effectively setting a (quite reliable IMHO) lower bound envelope for spot price (although that envelope has been broken a few times, esp. during the mid-2022 to mid-2023 bear period).

How big must the upcoming pump be, in order for the 200 WMA to reach $100k? Looking at past cases of spot vs. 200 WMA prices during pumps, it seems that the spot/WMA ratio tends to go down with time.

End of 2013: 28x
End of 2017: 16x
End of 2021: 4x
End of 2025: ???x

For the purpose of this exercise, let's SOMA-guess that it's going to be around 3x. This would mean that the spot price at the end of 2025 would be around $300k. So, 20 BTC would be right at the entry-level f.u. status threshold (according to the 200 WMA of $100k), with the added cushion of 3x f.u. status of $6M (based on spot price).

Looking forward to filling the green part of my post... Cheesy
Pages: « 1 ... 32978 32979 32980 32981 32982 32983 32984 32985 32986 32987 32988 32989 32990 32991 32992 32993 32994 32995 32996 32997 32998 32999 33000 33001 33002 33003 33004 33005 33006 33007 33008 33009 33010 33011 33012 33013 33014 33015 33016 33017 33018 33019 33020 33021 33022 33023 33024 33025 33026 33027 [33028] 33029 33030 33031 33032 33033 33034 33035 33036 33037 33038 33039 33040 33041 33042 33043 33044 33045 33046 33047 33048 33049 33050 33051 33052 33053 33054 33055 33056 33057 33058 33059 33060 33061 33062 33063 33064 33065 33066 33067 33068 33069 33070 33071 33072 33073 33074 33075 33076 33077 33078 ... 33304 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!