ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1799
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 09:00:46 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
zimmah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 09:06:11 AM |
|
My theory is that there is going to be an attempt to keep prices below $582 by the end of the weekly candle.
My theory is that you could not prevent it if you tried. Really? The close of the Weekly MACD candle is only about two days from now, and BTC prices in the last about 24 hours have been floating between $580 and $600, and as I type at $586. It does NOT seem that it would be too difficult to keep the price below $582-ish... I am NOT sure about the exact number to keep the candle red. Now, I agree that next week would be another story, though.... but this week seems totally manipulable. and doable and I think that there is going to be a pretty vigorous attempt at such.. to keep the candle red. but why would anyone even WANT to do that? also, the candle of the past week at huobi and bitfinex were already green, so bitstamp is already lagging a week behind on the MACD. And even that it pretty late considering it could easily have turned green 2 weeks ago, but missed it by a hair due to a sudden mini-panic or whatever the hell happened two weeks ago.
|
|
|
|
madmat
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 966
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 09:28:01 AM |
|
Stamp is moving up.
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 09:46:54 AM |
|
Stamp is moving up.
Coin supply seems unlimited and is getting refreshed in 50-150 BTC batches all the time. Satoshi cashin out?
|
|
|
|
majakn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 09:49:30 AM |
|
when we will see BTC on +1000$?
July?
|
|
|
|
TERA
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 09:52:45 AM |
|
Stamp is moving up.
Coin supply seems unlimited and is getting refreshed in 50-150 BTC batches all the time. Satoshi cashin out? These piecemeal trades are a common characteristic of low volume. Try not to analyze it too much.
|
|
|
|
edwardspitz
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 09:56:44 AM |
|
My theory is that there is going to be an attempt to keep prices below $582 by the end of the weekly candle.
My theory is that you could not prevent it if you tried. Really? The close of the Weekly MACD candle is only about two days from now, and BTC prices in the last about 24 hours have been floating between $580 and $600, and as I type at $586. It does NOT seem that it would be too difficult to keep the price below $582-ish... I am NOT sure about the exact number to keep the candle red. Now, I agree that next week would be another story, though.... but this week seems totally manipulable. and doable and I think that there is going to be a pretty vigorous attempt at such.. to keep the candle red. but why would anyone even WANT to do that? also, the candle of the past week at huobi and bitfinex were already green, so bitstamp is already lagging a week behind on the MACD. And even that it pretty late considering it could easily have turned green 2 weeks ago, but missed it by a hair due to a sudden mini-panic or whatever the hell happened two weeks ago. I have been thinking that I would target Stamp if I wanted to try and manipulate price on grand scale (Stamp being the most dominant exchange). I don't know if this is what is going on. It could just as well be because miners prefer to sell their coins on Stamp. Also the short selling possibilities at Finex (and the Chinese exchanges?) gives a different dynamic that is not found on exchanges like Stamp and Kraken. It is too bad that they cut the link between Finex and Stamp. I think we need more inter exchange arbitraging. Someone should setup a public and professional service dedicated to this. Something that everyone could invest a little BTC in, and that more or less guaranties not to cause losses. I can't see why this would be impossible. Of course it is already being done on a small scale by bots or traders doing it manually (just did a little arbitraging myself the other day ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ). I definitely prefer a situation with many arbitraging exchanges instead of very few very dominant exchanges.
|
|
|
|
majakn
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 47
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 09:57:15 AM |
|
Stamp is moving up.
Coin supply seems unlimited and is getting refreshed in 50-150 BTC batches all the time. Satoshi cashin out? no satoshi, just me ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) What is unlimited in +11.000.000,00 coins? maybe NSA started to sell
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3822
Merit: 10728
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 10:00:44 AM |
|
My theory is that there is going to be an attempt to keep prices below $582 by the end of the weekly candle.
My theory is that you could not prevent it if you tried. Really? The close of the Weekly MACD candle is only about two days from now, and BTC prices in the last about 24 hours have been floating between $580 and $600, and as I type at $586. It does NOT seem that it would be too difficult to keep the price below $582-ish... I am NOT sure about the exact number to keep the candle red. Now, I agree that next week would be another story, though.... but this week seems totally manipulable. and doable and I think that there is going to be a pretty vigorous attempt at such.. to keep the candle red. but why would anyone even WANT to do that? also, the candle of the past week at huobi and bitfinex were already green, so bitstamp is already lagging a week behind on the MACD. And even that it pretty late considering it could easily have turned green 2 weeks ago, but missed it by a hair due to a sudden mini-panic or whatever the hell happened two weeks ago. You may be correct that I am giving too much importance to whether someone would want the candle to be red or green.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1799
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 10:00:47 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
zimmah
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1106
Merit: 1005
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 10:57:11 AM |
|
My theory is that there is going to be an attempt to keep prices below $582 by the end of the weekly candle.
My theory is that you could not prevent it if you tried. Really? The close of the Weekly MACD candle is only about two days from now, and BTC prices in the last about 24 hours have been floating between $580 and $600, and as I type at $586. It does NOT seem that it would be too difficult to keep the price below $582-ish... I am NOT sure about the exact number to keep the candle red. Now, I agree that next week would be another story, though.... but this week seems totally manipulable. and doable and I think that there is going to be a pretty vigorous attempt at such.. to keep the candle red. but why would anyone even WANT to do that? also, the candle of the past week at huobi and bitfinex were already green, so bitstamp is already lagging a week behind on the MACD. And even that it pretty late considering it could easily have turned green 2 weeks ago, but missed it by a hair due to a sudden mini-panic or whatever the hell happened two weeks ago. I have been thinking that I would target Stamp if I wanted to try and manipulate price on grand scale (Stamp being the most dominant exchange). I don't know if this is what is going on. It could just as well be because miners prefer to sell their coins on Stamp. Also the short selling possibilities at Finex (and the Chinese exchanges?) gives a different dynamic that is not found on exchanges like Stamp and Kraken. It is too bad that they cut the link between Finex and Stamp. I think we need more inter exchange arbitraging. Someone should setup a public and professional service dedicated to this. Something that everyone could invest a little BTC in, and that more or less guaranties not to cause losses. I can't see why this would be impossible. Of course it is already being done on a small scale by bots or traders doing it manually (just did a little arbitraging myself the other day ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) ). I definitely prefer a situation with many arbitraging exchanges instead of very few very dominant exchanges. I have been thinking about setting this up months ago, but the main bottleneck would be getting the funds out of one exchange and into the other in a reasonably short timeframe. If you can some sort of agreement on swapping IOUs between exchanges than smooth arbitrage could prove possible and profitable for investors.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1799
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 11:00:47 AM |
|
|
|
|
|
ShroomsKit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 11:02:45 AM |
|
Stamp is moving up.
No it isn't. When China goes down they start dumping like crazy, whrn China goes up nothing happens. Something's odd about stamp lately. I don't trust them.
|
|
|
|
elebit
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 12:00:16 PM |
|
If you can some sort of agreement on swapping IOUs between exchanges than smooth arbitrage could prove possible and profitable for investors.
A federated inter-exchange arbitrage would have the added benefit as an early warning system for gox:ings. If an exchange started having trouble honoring its IOUs on time, that would be a signal to move your funds out. No panacea of course and it would still cause a bank run, but at least it would be better than the slow 12 month Gox fiasco where no one knew they were illiquid (except for the ones who got away with it..).
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1799
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 12:00:48 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
dnaleor
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1470
Merit: 1000
Want privacy? Use Monero!
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 12:13:08 PM |
|
when we will see BTC on +1000$?
July?
I think it is possible in july yes: when the silk road coins are sold, and people see the coins don't move after they are sold, price will go up ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif)
|
|
|
|
conspirosphere.tk
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1064
Bitcoin is antisemitic
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 12:19:45 PM |
|
If you can some sort of agreement on swapping IOUs between exchanges than smooth arbitrage could prove possible and profitable for investors.
A federated inter-exchange arbitrage would have the added benefit as an early warning system for gox:ings. If an exchange started having trouble honoring its IOUs on time, that would be a signal to move your funds out. No panacea of course and it would still cause a bank run, but at least it would be better than the slow 12 month Gox fiasco where no one knew they were illiquid (except for the ones who got away with it..). That would imply exchanges trusting each other's IOUs. Can't happen, and rightly so (otherwise one single scam could cause a chain reaction).
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2282
Merit: 1799
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/lamp.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 01:01:33 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
woof
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 6
Merit: 0
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 01:08:14 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
pandacoin
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1554
Merit: 1000
|
![](https://bitcointalk.org/Themes/custom1/images/post/xx.gif) |
June 24, 2014, 01:10:49 PM |
|
It's always time to buy, at least until Bitcoin reaches to 1k $. China is only based on pure speculation.
|
|
|
|
|