JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11126
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:42:11 PM |
|
... I have already explained that I do NOT stupid. ... Classic YEAH.. you are wonderful and intelligent NOT not porkchop.. at some point, maybe you should just skiddadly out of here with your non-contributions.
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:44:30 PM |
|
..attempts to denigrate... Racist
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11126
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:45:29 PM |
|
Buying all the way down from $1200 must have felt bloody horrible. Like silver stackers who started at $50 an ounce. So many cheap coins!
Nope. It did NOT feel that bad, and part of the reason is because of the quantity being invested was NOT very high. Surely, there were a few moments that i was a little concerned about the value of my overall BTC portfolio, but overall, I did NOT feel badly or have trepidations or second thoughts.. again probably because I had allocated the quantities of my investment towards bitcoin, and I considered dollar cost averaging to be the best of the available options.. especially in order to continue to accumulate coins in the event that the market prices would begin to reverse. But you said earlier that you had a lot invested in BTC. Also, you've been buying since $1200 and haven't caught the hint, yet. You must be in way over your head by this point. Yes, too many details for little minds like yours to keep track, yet enough details for little minds like yours to grasp onto some irrelevant details in order to attempt silly-ass and distracting holes. I also said that I have less than 10% of my total quasi-liquid investments in BTC... and that I had doubled down around $600... Accordingly, a lot is relative and a lot is doubling down at $600 which had caused more difficulties to bring down the average price per BTC while BTC prices had continued to fall from $600 but have been largely stuck in the $340 to $420 range for a couple of months. Do you plan to double down again if we hit $150? And $75? Serious question If we hit $150... I would double down. I think this guy shot all his bullets, though. It sounds like it. Otherwise his number wouldn't be in the $550s... he would have doubled down in the low $300s. He's cooked. I doubt that this guy is "cooked." This guy had a lot of fiat come available in May and June and then the question was about how much to invest at that time and whether BTC prices would go lower? I was of the assessment at that time, that prices were heading up, and NOT down.. so I invested a considerable chunk at that time (over those two months approximately, and NOT everything as you seem to imply).
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11126
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:48:48 PM |
|
I did NOT try to make you mad, bro. You mad??
YEAH.. right.. .. you are trolling, and one of the goals of trolls is to cause illogic and distractions and to engage in personal attacks, which you are doing... and yes, you would love it to cause posters to become mad. This poster is NOT mad, just responding to some of the ridiculousness to put it in a context. You have anymore one liners that are non-substantive attempts at "contribution" to get others to do all the work, in other words trolling while you sit back and muse that you have an effect in this interweb world?
|
|
|
|
NotLambchop
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:50:22 PM |
|
...I was of the assessment at that time...
Much sophisticate!
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:50:35 PM |
|
Buying all the way down from $1200 must have felt bloody horrible. Like silver stackers who started at $50 an ounce. So many cheap coins!
Nope. It did NOT feel that bad, and part of the reason is because of the quantity being invested was NOT very high. Surely, there were a few moments that i was a little concerned about the value of my overall BTC portfolio, but overall, I did NOT feel badly or have trepidations or second thoughts.. again probably because I had allocated the quantities of my investment towards bitcoin, and I considered dollar cost averaging to be the best of the available options.. especially in order to continue to accumulate coins in the event that the market prices would begin to reverse. But you said earlier that you had a lot invested in BTC. Also, you've been buying since $1200 and haven't caught the hint, yet. You must be in way over your head by this point. Yes, too many details for little minds like yours to keep track, yet enough details for little minds like yours to grasp onto some irrelevant details in order to attempt silly-ass and distracting holes. I also said that I have less than 10% of my total quasi-liquid investments in BTC... and that I had doubled down around $600... Accordingly, a lot is relative and a lot is doubling down at $600 which had caused more difficulties to bring down the average price per BTC while BTC prices had continued to fall from $600 but have been largely stuck in the $340 to $420 range for a couple of months. Do you plan to double down again if we hit $150? And $75? Serious question If we hit $150... I would double down. I think this guy shot all his bullets, though. It sounds like it. Otherwise his number wouldn't be in the $550s... he would have doubled down in the low $300s. He's cooked. I doubt that this guy is "cooked." This guy had a lot of fiat come available in May and June and then the question was about how much to invest at that time and whether BTC prices would go lower? I was of the assessment at that time, that prices were heading up, and NOT down.. so I invested a considerable chunk at that time (over those two months approximately, and NOT everything as you seem to imply). HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Between May and June was the very peak of the proximate high... you invested at the top of both bubbles. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I would say you just don't know when to stop shooting yourself in the foot, but that was already obvious based on your "trading strategy." Buy high, sell low!!
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11126
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:51:44 PM |
|
... Probably doesn't feel as stupid as someone like me that sold hundreds in the 5-10 range. I sold plenty of coin below today's price. Feel like a boss--I made money. Our friend, the intrepid investor, lost it. Though technically, the money wasn't lost--it simply went to those who happened to be smarter than JayJuanGee. In his case, @$1200, that meant "everyone." You gotta work on your reading skills NOT Not pork. Yes I believe I bought 1.24 BTC at $1,200. So the fuck what. It's universally agreed that you are the lowest IQ of the bunch. Give it up. I am NOT trying to compete with anyone regarding IQ; however, I already know that i have a decently high IQ based on a variety of factors and I am neither insecure in my assessment of my IQ nor do I feel that I need to defend myself in the IQ department. Interesting use of the phrase "universally agreed?" You and NOTNOT porkchop and possibly a few other asshole spam tolls who have little to NO substantive value to add to the thread have gotten on the "universally agreed" bandwagon about some topics that you have little to no clue. Dude, what's a "spam toll"? I can see why you are "NOT trying to compete with anyone regarding IQ." You can look in the mirror, and that may give you a clue. I cannot answer all of your questions, and some of them you will have to answer for yourself.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:52:27 PM |
|
I did NOT try to make you mad, bro. You mad??
YEAH.. right.. .. you are trolling, and one of the goals of trolls is to cause illogic and distractions and to engage in personal attacks, which you are doing... and yes, you would love it to cause posters to become mad. This poster is NOT mad, just responding to some of the ridiculousness to put it in a context. You have anymore one liners that are non-substantive attempts at "contribution" to get others to do all the work, in other words trolling while you sit back and muse that you have an effect in this interweb world? No, I'm good for now. Thanks tho
|
|
|
|
fonzie
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:53:08 PM |
|
it just means you have a gambling problem.
Would you mind telling us how many times you have been short(long) squeezed in the last months? I remember at least 6-7 times . Haven´t you gone full short yesterday @~37x$ before we went upt to 390$ on Finex. And haven´t you said BTC is done(fucking dead, dead as a doornail..) for the 50th time this year but changed your mind today(again) before we broke down through 380$ that BTC might reach new highs in the next months? I remember when you also went full short when LTC hit it´s lowest point this year just before it almost doubled up to 5-6$. I don´t know anyone in here who has been dead wrong so many times as you were. You should probably think twice before you accuse an "average down + holder"(even if it´s JayJuanGee ) of gambling. No personal offense, but to hear this from your mouth is beyond ridiculous. PS: Don´t forget to go full short again if we should go near 365-370$ . You should use OKcoin.com, they offer 20x leverage !
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:53:41 PM |
|
I did NOT try to make you mad, bro. You mad??
YEAH.. right.. .. you are trolling, and one of the goals of trolls is to cause illogic and distractions and to engage in personal attacks, which you are doing... and yes, you would love it to cause posters to become mad. This poster is NOT mad, just responding to some of the ridiculousness to put it in a context. You have anymore one liners that are non-substantive attempts at "contribution" to get others to do all the work, in other words trolling while you sit back and muse that you have an effect in this interweb world? No, I'm good for now. Thanks tho Be careful... he might try to charge you a "spam toll." Hahahaha
|
|
|
|
ShroomsKit
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:54:07 PM |
|
Enjoying the pump and dump everyone?
Bitcoin, the revolution of money which will take over the world financial system is nothing more than a pump and dump scheme in control of a few whales who play the market as they please.
He's back!
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11126
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:54:15 PM |
|
... Probably doesn't feel as stupid as someone like me that sold hundreds in the 5-10 range. I sold plenty of coin below today's price. Feel like a boss--I made money. Our friend, the intrepid investor, lost it. Though technically, the money wasn't lost--it simply went to those who happened to be smarter than JayJuanGee. In his case, @$1200, that meant "everyone." You gotta work on your reading skills NOT Not pork. Yes I believe I bought 1.24 BTC at $1,200. So the fuck what. Took one for the team. Good on you, bro! I did NOT take any for the team. I had been intending to look at bitcoin in October and November 2013, and I did NOT get around to it until mid to late November. By the time I figured out how to invest and to get started, I went through Local Bitcoins for my first purchase. I realized that prices had been going up, so I decided to invest $30k into bitcoin over the first 6 months, and to start out with a $1,500 purchase. I had seen that bitcoin prices had gone up by 8x in the previous month and I had seen that BTC prices had gone up by more than 20x over the previous year, so I was fairly skeptical of its ability to continue to go up from $1200; however, I wanted to have a little bit of skin in the game, just in case BTC prices went up further.. which was NOT out of the question. Accordingly, I figured that I could continue to study bitcoin while I had some skin in the game. Please, for the love of God... please tell me you haven't invested $30k+ starting from $1200. I might actually die of laughter. Maybe you have to learn to absorb what you are reading? I used to have that problem in high school.... all words just went in and I did NOT understand them. If you read the paragraph that you cited, then you will find (hopefully if you are NOT too imbecilian) find the answer to your question contained therein. I highlighted a portion to help you out because I realize that you are probably NOT very quick.
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:55:19 PM |
|
it just means you have a gambling problem.
Would you mind telling us how many times you have been short(long) squeezed in the last months? I remember at least 6-7 times . Haven´t you gone full short yesterday @~37x$ before we went upt to 390$ on Finex. And haven´t you said BTC is done(fucking dead, dead as a doornail..) for the 50th time this year but changed your mind today(again) before we broke down through 380$ that BTC might reach new highs in the next months? I remember when you also went full short when LTC hit it´s lowest point this year just before it almost doubled up to 5-6$. I don´t know anyone in here who has been deadly wrong so many times like you did. You should probably think twice before you accuse an "average down + holder"(even if it´s JayJuanGee ) of gambling. No personal offense, but to hear this from your mouth is beyond ridiculous. PS: Don´t forget to go full short again if we should go near 365-370$ . You should use OKcoin.com, they offer 20x leverage ! How do you define a squeeze? Margin called? Never. Lost a bit... small amounts here and there, one play that actually did cost me a fair amount, but I'm overall up on the past few months by about 10%. Yes, I am a gambler! At least I don't try to call it an "investment strategy." It's f---ing gambling.
|
|
|
|
BlindMayorBitcorn
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1116
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:56:35 PM |
|
I did NOT try to make you mad, bro. You mad??
YEAH.. right.. .. you are trolling, and one of the goals of trolls is to cause illogic and distractions and to engage in personal attacks, which you are doing... and yes, you would love it to cause posters to become mad. This poster is NOT mad, just responding to some of the ridiculousness to put it in a context. You have anymore one liners that are non-substantive attempts at "contribution" to get others to do all the work, in other words trolling while you sit back and muse that you have an effect in this interweb world? No, I'm good for now. Thanks tho Be careful... he might try to charge you a "spam toll." Hahahaha I heard somewhere he used to be all sophisticated in the Reptile thread before his leader went mad with Moneros
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:57:53 PM |
|
... Probably doesn't feel as stupid as someone like me that sold hundreds in the 5-10 range. I sold plenty of coin below today's price. Feel like a boss--I made money. Our friend, the intrepid investor, lost it. Though technically, the money wasn't lost--it simply went to those who happened to be smarter than JayJuanGee. In his case, @$1200, that meant "everyone." You gotta work on your reading skills NOT Not pork. Yes I believe I bought 1.24 BTC at $1,200. So the fuck what. Took one for the team. Good on you, bro! I did NOT take any for the team. I had been intending to look at bitcoin in October and November 2013, and I did NOT get around to it until mid to late November. By the time I figured out how to invest and to get started, I went through Local Bitcoins for my first purchase. I realized that prices had been going up, so I decided to invest $30k into bitcoin over the first 6 months, and to start out with a $1,500 purchase. I had seen that bitcoin prices had gone up by 8x in the previous month and I had seen that BTC prices had gone up by more than 20x over the previous year, so I was fairly skeptical of its ability to continue to go up from $1200; however, I wanted to have a little bit of skin in the game, just in case BTC prices went up further.. which was NOT out of the question. Accordingly, I figured that I could continue to study bitcoin while I had some skin in the game. Please, for the love of God... please tell me you haven't invested $30k+ starting from $1200. I might actually die of laughter. Maybe you have to learn to absorb what you are reading? I used to have that problem in high school.... all words just went in and I did NOT understand them. If you read the paragraph that you cited, then you will find (hopefully if you are NOT too imbecilian) find the answer to your question contained therein. I highlighted a portion to help you out because I realize that you are probably NOT very quick. Note I stated "starting from" and I've also bolded the relevant section. It appears the only thing you are worse at than investing is parsing your own writing.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11126
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 29, 2014, 07:59:26 PM |
|
Buying all the way down from $1200 must have felt bloody horrible. Like silver stackers who started at $50 an ounce. So many cheap coins!
Nope. It did NOT feel that bad, and part of the reason is because of the quantity being invested was NOT very high. Surely, there were a few moments that i was a little concerned about the value of my overall BTC portfolio, but overall, I did NOT feel badly or have trepidations or second thoughts.. again probably because I had allocated the quantities of my investment towards bitcoin, and I considered dollar cost averaging to be the best of the available options.. especially in order to continue to accumulate coins in the event that the market prices would begin to reverse. But you said earlier that you had a lot invested in BTC. Also, you've been buying since $1200 and haven't caught the hint, yet. You must be in way over your head by this point. Yes, too many details for little minds like yours to keep track, yet enough details for little minds like yours to grasp onto some irrelevant details in order to attempt silly-ass and distracting holes. I also said that I have less than 10% of my total quasi-liquid investments in BTC... and that I had doubled down around $600... Accordingly, a lot is relative and a lot is doubling down at $600 which had caused more difficulties to bring down the average price per BTC while BTC prices had continued to fall from $600 but have been largely stuck in the $340 to $420 range for a couple of months. Yea, but what sort of s---coin do you have the other 90% in? Is that other 90% still 90% or is it now 10% http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIcnBccjgMwI mean, you do realize that you are telling us that you not only bought at the absolute high, but also the proximate high. =S More than 99.5% of my crypto investment is in BTC, so I do NOT really count any of the alts that I have as being significant in the whole scheme of things. Therefore I have less than 10% of all of my total quasi-liquid investments in BTC. The 90% of NON-BTC are largely in a variety of diversified index funds.. some are tax deferred and some are NOT... with some I have the ability to draw a quasi passive income and to potentially move around and with others I choose to merely let those investments sit (at least for the time being). If BTC becomes a larger portion of my portfolio due to appreciation (which I anticipate to happen at some point), then I will have to assess the extent I will consider reallocation and even potentially adding asset classes to the mix. Probably will NOT be a bad problem to have (once it occurs). If BTC does NOT significantly appreciate (which seems to be a fairly unlikely scenario), then I will just have to continue with my remaining assets, which are well within my ability to live comfortably off such other NON-BTC assets. (1) Using the word "quasi" doesn't make you seem smarter; (2) You spend 90% of your day, here, so it is safe to assume that BTC makes up more than 10% of your investments; (3) You clearly don't work for a living because you spend 90% of your day, here; (4) Thus, maybe you do have that much money -- probably a trust funder; (5) Are you seriously pissing away all of daddy's money on a pump and dump scheme? All of that s--- talking aside, honestly, if you plan on holding, why aren't you buying more, here? This price isn't going to break below the 300s for at least a few months and will probably spike up after that. If your "investment strategy" is just the Martingale and you've got money to burn, how and why is your number so high? Also, the Martingale is not actually an "investment strategy" -- it just means you have a gambling problem. NOT even worth responding to the substance of this latest post of yours because it contains a large number of purported factual evidence based on faulty logic and faulty inferences. Probably, you need to learn how to gather various relevant facts (better and more completely) before you attempt to come to inferential conclusions based on your faulty and inadequate logic. Furthermore, when you misstate some facts that are already established in order to attempt to tailor your theories, then you further project your conclusions into fantasy landia.
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
November 29, 2014, 08:00:43 PM |
|
it just means you have a gambling problem.
Would you mind telling us how many times you have been short(long) squeezed in the last months? I remember at least 6-7 times . Haven´t you gone full short yesterday @~37x$ before we went upt to 390$ on Finex. And haven´t you said BTC is done(fucking dead, dead as a doornail..) for the 50th time this year but changed your mind today(again) before we broke down through 380$ that BTC might reach new highs in the next months? I remember when you also went full short when LTC hit it´s lowest point this year just before it almost doubled up to 5-6$. I don´t know anyone in here who has been dead wrong so many times as you were. You should probably think twice before you accuse an "average down + holder"(even if it´s JayJuanGee ) of gambling. No personal offense, but to hear this from your mouth is beyond ridiculous. PS: Don´t forget to go full short again if we should go near 365-370$ . You should use OKcoin.com, they offer 20x leverage ! Oh, and I'm up 3% in the past two days. Thanks for your concern.
|
|
|
|
ChartBuddy
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2352
Merit: 1803
1CBuddyxy4FerT3hzMmi1Jz48ESzRw1ZzZ
|
|
November 29, 2014, 08:01:00 PM |
|
|
|
|
|
Newbie1022
|
|
November 29, 2014, 08:01:57 PM |
|
Buying all the way down from $1200 must have felt bloody horrible. Like silver stackers who started at $50 an ounce. So many cheap coins!
Nope. It did NOT feel that bad, and part of the reason is because of the quantity being invested was NOT very high. Surely, there were a few moments that i was a little concerned about the value of my overall BTC portfolio, but overall, I did NOT feel badly or have trepidations or second thoughts.. again probably because I had allocated the quantities of my investment towards bitcoin, and I considered dollar cost averaging to be the best of the available options.. especially in order to continue to accumulate coins in the event that the market prices would begin to reverse. But you said earlier that you had a lot invested in BTC. Also, you've been buying since $1200 and haven't caught the hint, yet. You must be in way over your head by this point. Yes, too many details for little minds like yours to keep track, yet enough details for little minds like yours to grasp onto some irrelevant details in order to attempt silly-ass and distracting holes. I also said that I have less than 10% of my total quasi-liquid investments in BTC... and that I had doubled down around $600... Accordingly, a lot is relative and a lot is doubling down at $600 which had caused more difficulties to bring down the average price per BTC while BTC prices had continued to fall from $600 but have been largely stuck in the $340 to $420 range for a couple of months. Yea, but what sort of s---coin do you have the other 90% in? Is that other 90% still 90% or is it now 10% http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZIcnBccjgMwI mean, you do realize that you are telling us that you not only bought at the absolute high, but also the proximate high. =S More than 99.5% of my crypto investment is in BTC, so I do NOT really count any of the alts that I have as being significant in the whole scheme of things. Therefore I have less than 10% of all of my total quasi-liquid investments in BTC. The 90% of NON-BTC are largely in a variety of diversified index funds.. some are tax deferred and some are NOT... with some I have the ability to draw a quasi passive income and to potentially move around and with others I choose to merely let those investments sit (at least for the time being). If BTC becomes a larger portion of my portfolio due to appreciation (which I anticipate to happen at some point), then I will have to assess the extent I will consider reallocation and even potentially adding asset classes to the mix. Probably will NOT be a bad problem to have (once it occurs). If BTC does NOT significantly appreciate (which seems to be a fairly unlikely scenario), then I will just have to continue with my remaining assets, which are well within my ability to live comfortably off such other NON-BTC assets. (1) Using the word "quasi" doesn't make you seem smarter; (2) You spend 90% of your day, here, so it is safe to assume that BTC makes up more than 10% of your investments; (3) You clearly don't work for a living because you spend 90% of your day, here; (4) Thus, maybe you do have that much money -- probably a trust funder; (5) Are you seriously pissing away all of daddy's money on a pump and dump scheme? All of that s--- talking aside, honestly, if you plan on holding, why aren't you buying more, here? This price isn't going to break below the 300s for at least a few months and will probably spike up after that. If your "investment strategy" is just the Martingale and you've got money to burn, how and why is your number so high? Also, the Martingale is not actually an "investment strategy" -- it just means you have a gambling problem. NOT even worth responding to the substance of this latest post of yours because it contains a large number of purported factual evidence based on faulty logic and faulty inferences. Probably, you need to learn how to gather various relevant facts (better and more completely) before you attempt to come to inferential conclusions based on your faulty and inadequate logic. Furthermore, when you misstate some facts that are already established in order to attempt to tailor your theories, then you further project your conclusions into fantasy landia. I could do this all day. Your buffoonery is like the gift that keeps on giving.
|
|
|
|
JayJuanGee
Legendary
Online
Activity: 3892
Merit: 11126
Self-Custody is a right. Say no to"Non-custodial"
|
|
November 29, 2014, 08:04:25 PM |
|
Buying all the way down from $1200 must have felt bloody horrible. Like silver stackers who started at $50 an ounce. So many cheap coins!
Nope. It did NOT feel that bad, and part of the reason is because of the quantity being invested was NOT very high. Surely, there were a few moments that i was a little concerned about the value of my overall BTC portfolio, but overall, I did NOT feel badly or have trepidations or second thoughts.. again probably because I had allocated the quantities of my investment towards bitcoin, and I considered dollar cost averaging to be the best of the available options.. especially in order to continue to accumulate coins in the event that the market prices would begin to reverse. But you said earlier that you had a lot invested in BTC. Also, you've been buying since $1200 and haven't caught the hint, yet. You must be in way over your head by this point. Yes, too many details for little minds like yours to keep track, yet enough details for little minds like yours to grasp onto some irrelevant details in order to attempt silly-ass and distracting holes. I also said that I have less than 10% of my total quasi-liquid investments in BTC... and that I had doubled down around $600... Accordingly, a lot is relative and a lot is doubling down at $600 which had caused more difficulties to bring down the average price per BTC while BTC prices had continued to fall from $600 but have been largely stuck in the $340 to $420 range for a couple of months. Do you plan to double down again if we hit $150? And $75? Serious question If we hit $150... I would double down. I think this guy shot all his bullets, though. It sounds like it. Otherwise his number wouldn't be in the $550s... he would have doubled down in the low $300s. He's cooked. I doubt that this guy is "cooked." This guy had a lot of fiat come available in May and June and then the question was about how much to invest at that time and whether BTC prices would go lower? I was of the assessment at that time, that prices were heading up, and NOT down.. so I invested a considerable chunk at that time (over those two months approximately, and NOT everything as you seem to imply). HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Between May and June was the very peak of the proximate high... you invested at the top of both bubbles. HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I would say you just don't know when to stop shooting yourself in the foot, but that was already obvious based on your "trading strategy." Buy high, sell low!! I have NOT sold, yet.. maybe under your theory, I will be selling in the $0 to $550 arena, and I doubt that I will do that.. but anything is possible. Further, maybe you should consider providing some contemporary details of your strategy, but people got too bored with your illogic, so you converted to full-fledged troll (rather than half-fledged troll). Congratulation in joining the ranks of NOT not porkchop.
|
|
|
|
|