Bitcoin Forum
June 27, 2024, 10:51:08 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Warning: One or more bitcointalk.org users have reported that they strongly believe that the creator of this topic is a scammer. (Login to see the detailed trust ratings.) While the bitcointalk.org administration does not verify such claims, you should proceed with extreme caution.
Pages: « 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 ... 182 »
  Print  
Author Topic: [Work in progess] Burnins Avalon Chip to mining board service  (Read 623982 times)
-Redacted-
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 501


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 03:40:40 PM
 #1061

Quote

Actually I think people were warned to specifically not insulate the top of the chip.  I can't remember where, but I distinctly remember reading that a heatsink on top of the chip can actually cause damage.  Maybe that was because the pressure of the heatsink can cause chips to come loose from the board or something, but I do remember being warned not to try to exhaust heat out of the top.

The packaging of these chips is tuned to have specific thermal gradient ranges they will operate correctly under - if you actively cool the tops of the chips it can actually end up damaging the chip/ripping loose lead bonds/fracturing the packaging because the temperature differential between the top and bottom of the chip is too large..
knedle
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 99
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 06:20:35 PM
 #1062

So in short for all those who think about applying some more radiators on top - if it says don't do something, it means don't do something. You can do that if you want, but it's your problem if something goes bad.
Sophokles
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 516


Eloncoin.org - Mars, here we come!


View Profile WWW
July 03, 2013, 06:59:43 PM
 #1063

So in short for all those who think about applying some more radiators on top - if it says don't do something, it means don't do something. You can do that if you want, but it's your problem if something goes bad.

Nobody suggested doing this. Question was, is it possible to stack them top towards top, with heatsinks on each bottom  side.









▄▄████████▄▄
▄▄████████████████▄▄
▄██
████████████████████▄
▄███
██████████████████████▄
▄████
███████████████████████▄
███████████████████████▄
█████████████████▄███████
████████████████▄███████▀
██████████▄▄███▄██████▀
████████▄████▄█████▀▀
██████▄██████████▀
███▄▄█████
███████▄
██▄██████████████
░▄██████████████▀
▄█████████████▀
████████████
███████████▀
███████▀▀
.
▄▄███████▄▄
▄███████████████▄
▄███████████████████▄
▄██████████
███████████
▄███████████████████████▄
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
█████████████████████████
▀█
██████████████████████▀
▀██
███████████████████▀
▀███████████████████▀
▀█████████
██████▀
▀▀███████▀▀
.
 ElonCoin.org 
.
████████▄▄███████▄▄
███████▄████████████▌
██████▐██▀███████▀▀██
███████████████████▐█▌
████▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄▄██▄▄▄▄▄
███▐███▀▄█▄█▀▀█▄█▄▀
███████████████████
█████████████▄████
█████████▀░▄▄▄▄▄
███████▄█▄░▀█▄▄░▀
███▄██▄▀███▄█████▄▀
▄██████▄▀███████▀
████████▄▀████▀
█████▄▄
.
"I could either watch it
happen or be a part of it"
▬▬▬▬▬
bigbeninlondon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 500



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 07:13:06 PM
 #1064

So in short for all those who think about applying some more radiators on top - if it says don't do something, it means don't do something. You can do that if you want, but it's your problem if something goes bad.

Nobody suggested doing this. Question was, is it possible to stack them top towards top, with heatsinks on each bottom  side.

Why not stack them according to the design?  The front page shows a schematic.
ujka
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 630
Merit: 500


View Profile
July 03, 2013, 07:24:08 PM
 #1065

Why not stack them according to the design?  The front page shows a schematic.
I still want to 'stack' them in a cube:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=223680.msg2362815#msg2362815

In that cube fans are positioned to ensure good airflow both inside the heatsink tunnel, and over the top of the boards.
It's a Klondike design, but I think it can work here, too.
grabber
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 67
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 03, 2013, 08:03:09 PM
 #1066

Youmare the man! Cant wait to pick up my boards Smiley

Changed that dammed chip and:

SUCCESS!







SebastianJu
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 2674
Merit: 1082


Legendary Escrow Service - Tip Jar in Profile


View Profile WWW
July 04, 2013, 12:35:18 AM
 #1067

I would like to see the overclocking abilities before i decide if i use burnin or klondike designs.

Please ALWAYS contact me through bitcointalk pm before sending someone coins.
burnin (OP)
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 243
Merit: 250

ALTCOM Ab9upXvD7ChnJxDRZgMmwNNEf1ftCGWrsE


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 01:14:20 AM
 #1068

Todays status update:

Overall Project status: Working hard to get the boards into Production & final touches to the order website

Development status:
Yesterdays 24hr Burn in was completed with 0,3% HW errors.
Implemented Temperature monitoring today and tested Overclocking capabilities a bit.
20x 256Mhz = 5.120Ghash/s - 36 Watts 142Mhash/W
20x 320Mhz = 6.400Ghash/s - 50 Watts 128Mhash/W

Talked to the guys from Anfi-Tec today to get the watercooling solution going.

>>>>And for all the CAD gurus out there: 3D MODELS<<<<
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wl0t2anb000tz8q/3dmodel.zip
AMD FTW
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 317
Merit: 250


GET IN - Smart Ticket Protocol - Live in market!


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 02:04:21 AM
 #1069

Todays status update:

Overall Project status: Working hard to get the boards into Production & final touches to the order website

Development status:
Yesterdays 24hr Burn in was completed with 0,3% HW errors.
Implemented Temperature monitoring today and tested Overclocking capabilities a bit.
20x 256Mhz = 5.120Ghash/s - 36 Watts 142Mhash/W
20x 320Mhz = 6.400Ghash/s - 50 Watts 128Mhash/W

Talked to the guys from Anfi-Tec today to get the watercooling solution going.

>>>>And for all the CAD gurus out there: 3D MODELS<<<<
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wl0t2anb000tz8q/3dmodel.zip


Or one could build a custom aquarium for their rigs and stack the PCB's close and use some 3M Novec 7000 coolant. I need to find a cheaper source for this as last year it was around $275 a gallon and now its like $375 a gallon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z_X_hgtlJpA

GUTS | GET-Protocol ICO
smart-ticket protocol for events | live product with market traction!
BTC ANN | WEBSITE | BLOG | SANDBOX | WHITEPAPER | BOUNTY
Exoskeleton
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 338
Merit: 251


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 02:59:27 AM
 #1070

The 3M Novec 7000 coolant with a custom enclosure has been at the top of my list of cooling solutions for a while. If we can get a board tested in it and the results are good you can count me in for 2 gallons in a group buy. That is only if a group buy would lower the price by a reasonable amount. Id be curious what the cheapest rate we could get is and perhaps if someone could get a discount for us as well.
Bicknellski
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 924
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 04, 2013, 03:25:01 AM
 #1071

The 3M Novec 7000 coolant with a custom enclosure has been at the top of my list of cooling solutions for a while. If we can get a board tested in it and the results are good you can count me in for 2 gallons in a group buy. That is only if a group buy would lower the price by a reasonable amount. Id be curious what the cheapest rate we could get is and perhaps if someone could get a discount for us as well.


https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=248184.0

Add your ideas here or just lurk... we are trying to work out a solution for cooling for overclocking using submerged oil cooling.

Dogie trust abuse, spam, bullying, conspiracy posts & insults to forum members. Ask the mods or admins to move Dogie's spam or off topic stalking posts to the link above.
bezzeb
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 103
Merit: 10



View Profile
July 04, 2013, 06:39:00 AM
 #1072

Quote

Actually I think people were warned to specifically not insulate the top of the chip.  I can't remember where, but I distinctly remember reading that a heatsink on top of the chip can actually cause damage.  Maybe that was because the pressure of the heatsink can cause chips to come loose from the board or something, but I do remember being warned not to try to exhaust heat out of the top.

The packaging of these chips is tuned to have specific thermal gradient ranges they will operate correctly under - if you actively cool the tops of the chips it can actually end up damaging the chip/ripping loose lead bonds/fracturing the packaging because the temperature differential between the top and bottom of the chip is too large..

You're on the right track, but the risk is mechanical, not thermal.  We're not dealing with a huge amount of heat here like you would get with a high end CPU or GPU, and the temperature differential won't do anything exciting.  (Unless you were totally bonkers and were using liquid nitrogen or something...  badideadontdoit)

These chips are just designed to cool from the bottom, not the top.  You can't turn screws with hammers, use the right tools for the job.
tigerbit
Member
**
Offline Offline

Activity: 80
Merit: 10


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 07:15:15 AM
 #1073


Implemented Temperature monitoring today and tested Overclocking capabilities a bit.
20x 256Mhz = 5.120Ghash/s - 36 Watts 142Mhash/W
20x 320Mhz = 6.400Ghash/s - 50 Watts 128Mhash/W

Serious question to the overclockers: how do you determine your profitability? 

i.e. why bother if the efficiency drops off a cliff?  More efficient is better, right?

Thinking about it, I guess you could look at the ROI on the extra output against the power overhead.
By that I mean the first 5.1 Gh/s cost you 36W, the next 1.3 cost you 14W so whilst that is profitable at electricity and difficulty levels then its worth doing.  When its not, don't.

But how much is sensible to invest in cooling to achieve higher rates? Is there a rule of thumb?
You'd need to work out an ROI and set a profit expectation.  Has anyone looked at this?




If you found this useful modest tips welcome BTC: 15noAopoPUcA4D4dTJihgDVE8axZh8VWia
rethaw
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 378
Merit: 255



View Profile
July 04, 2013, 07:35:36 AM
 #1074


Implemented Temperature monitoring today and tested Overclocking capabilities a bit.
20x 256Mhz = 5.120Ghash/s - 36 Watts 142Mhash/W
20x 320Mhz = 6.400Ghash/s - 50 Watts 128Mhash/W

Serious question to the overclockers: how do you determine your profitability?  

i.e. why bother if the efficiency drops off a cliff?  More efficient is better, right?

Thinking about it, I guess you could look at the ROI on the extra output against the power overhead.
By that I mean the first 5.1 Gh/s cost you 36W, the next 1.3 cost you 14W so whilst that is profitable at electricity and difficulty levels then its worth doing.  When its not, don't.

But how much is sensible to invest in cooling to achieve higher rates? Is there a rule of thumb?
You'd need to work out an ROI and set a profit expectation.  Has anyone looked at this?


In general, increases in difficulty affect your ROI long before electricity costs.

EDIT: i.e. hashpower is worth more today than it is tomorrow. A flat 10% decrease in efficiency pales in comparison to the 10% difficulty changes 3 times a month.

sprint347
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 08:59:24 AM
 #1075

Burnin, please confirm you will still be building 10 chip miners
tarmi
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1218
Merit: 1010


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 09:00:35 AM
 #1076

yes, no words about 10 chip modules, and I was planning to buy few.
sprint347
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 09:07:12 AM
 #1077

I ordered chips for a Bitburner X 4 weeks ago.

If it turns out there will not be a 10 chip model anymore I'm screwed.
Schrankwand
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 224
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 09:09:20 AM
 #1078

Todays status update:

Overall Project status: Working hard to get the boards into Production & final touches to the order website

Development status:
Yesterdays 24hr Burn in was completed with 0,3% HW errors.
Implemented Temperature monitoring today and tested Overclocking capabilities a bit.
20x 256Mhz = 5.120Ghash/s - 36 Watts 142Mhash/W
20x 320Mhz = 6.400Ghash/s - 50 Watts 128Mhash/W

Talked to the guys from Anfi-Tec today to get the watercooling solution going.

>>>>And for all the CAD gurus out there: 3D MODELS<<<<
https://www.dropbox.com/s/wl0t2anb000tz8q/3dmodel.zip


Are you going to provide the water cooling solution with your shop, too?

I mean, if they can get it done as fast. That would be beyond awesome, actually. I am flipflopping on your normal and the air cooling solution variation. I guess the boards will increase their price with heatsink to around 90-100€ per piece (calculated from 80€ for bare solution and 100 for full solution with fan). Add a pump, a few cables and a radiator and we are done... Cheesy
Micky25
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 974
Merit: 1000



View Profile
July 04, 2013, 09:12:22 AM
 #1079

I ordered chips for a Bitburner X 4 weeks ago.

If it turns out there will not be a 10 chip model anymore I'm screwed.

why not buy some additional chips? They are cheap at the moment and a 20 chip model will be much more efficient and cost- effective.
sprint347
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 193
Merit: 100


View Profile
July 04, 2013, 09:20:10 AM
 #1080

I ordered chips for a Bitburner X 4 weeks ago.

If it turns out there will not be a 10 chip model anymore I'm screwed.

why not buy some additional chips? They are cheap at the moment and a 20 chip model will be much more efficient and cost- effective.

I've been trying to buy 10 chips from SebastianJu's 5th batch to complete a XX, with no success.

If I order any new chips they will come from the 6th batch which have not been ordered from Avalon yet. It doesn't make sense having 10 chips 'wait around' for another 10 to come from the following batch. I'm better off selling the 10 I've ordered and start again.

All I need is assurance that the 10x model is going ahead as per the first post. I've asked three times now, just need a yes/no!
Pages: « 1 ... 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 [54] 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 ... 182 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!