obmen.es
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 60
Merit: 0
|
|
July 01, 2017, 07:59:01 PM |
|
in Windows10 - wallet falls when I try to encrypt the wallet (((
|
|
|
|
pisko
|
|
July 02, 2017, 11:37:37 AM |
|
anyone can help me to start mining netko with my 1080 ti please? i use ubuntu 16.04 i compiled ccminer 2.0 tpruvot and i starting it with ./ccminer -a blake2s -o stratum+tcp://netko.suprnova.cc:3714 -O pisko.cpu:cpu something wrong? i have still : [2017-07-02 13:36:50] GPU #0: scanhash_blake2s unknown error [2017-07-02 13:36:51] GPU #0: unknown error [2017-07-02 13:36:51] GPU #0: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads [2017-07-02 13:36:53] GPU #0: scanhash_blake2s unknown error [2017-07-02 13:36:54] GPU #0: GeForce GTX 1080 Ti, 0.00 H/s [2017-07-02 13:36:55] GPU #0: unknown error [2017-07-02 13:36:55] GPU #0: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads [2017-07-02 13:36:56] GPU #0: scanhash_blake2s unknown error [2017-07-02 13:36:57] GPU #0: unknown error [2017-07-02 13:36:57] GPU #0: Intensity set to 28, 268435456 cuda threads
|
|
|
|
andylittleton
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
July 02, 2017, 03:18:19 PM |
|
this is what I have with windows 10 cc miner 2.0 mining on suprnova pool working fine with my 1080ti with a 6400 mh/s hash rate
ccminer-x64 -a blake2s -d 0 -o stratum+tcp://netko.suprnova.cc:3714 -myusername.myworkername -p mypassword
|
|
|
|
jk_14
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1292
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 04, 2017, 04:08:21 AM |
|
There is nothing update for a long time...So i sold all and good luck to your guys
Hello we are preparing IoT platform also webshop and some other things, and as we said this is a longterm relationship Im sure we Will not keep all the rest disappointed... patience is a virtue .... regards Grega very close to PoS right now... even in a longterm relationship - some info would be nice, betweenwhiles... (e.g. about IoT platform progress)
|
|
|
|
netko (OP)
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2017, 05:26:52 AM |
|
Hello, sorry to keep you waiting IOT platform will be ready in approx 3 weeks, there is a lot of testing to do, since we use GET and MQTT protocol to send data we have a scalable solution with multiple servers running on mongodb.
when testing phase is done we will publish a link, and NETKO coin holders, will have some free testing period /access to try it. We are trying our best.. thanks for supporting us
regards Grega
|
|
|
|
jk_14
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1292
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 04, 2017, 07:09:32 AM |
|
Hello, sorry to keep you waiting IOT platform will be ready in approx 3 weeks, there is a lot of testing to do, since we use GET and MQTT protocol to send data we have a scalable solution with multiple servers running on mongodb.
when testing phase is done we will publish a link, and NETKO coin holders, will have some free testing period /access to try it. We are trying our best.. thanks for supporting us
regards Grega
Thank you for your quick (and precious ) update
|
|
|
|
andylittleton
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 27
Merit: 0
|
|
July 04, 2017, 11:57:54 PM |
|
Thanks for the update as well. Was losing faith about to swap for xrp, but now I'm gonna HODL!
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
July 05, 2017, 06:39:13 AM |
|
something wrong with the math about the circulating coins, why there are only 3 millions coins after pow end, if the block numbers is 12960 and each day there are 40k coins mined? what is the block time here, but even if the block time is 1 block per day still 12960 x 259 is more than 3 million, lol something wrong
|
|
|
|
staysecure
|
|
July 05, 2017, 07:40:42 AM |
|
something wrong with the math about the circulating coins, why there are only 3 millions coins after pow end, if the block numbers is 12960 and each day there are 40k coins mined? what is the block time here, but even if the block time is 1 block per day still 12960 x 259 is more than 3 million, lol something wrong
Hi not shure what you are talking about. Current supply: 3,313,646 NETKO Proof of work stage: 12960 blocks x 259 NETKO blockreward = 3,356,640 NETKO Block at time of writing : 12794 Block time is 10min, but because of the heavy spikes in hashrate and difficulty on some occasions chain got stuck for an hour or more. So please redo your math as everything is fine. Cheers.
|
|
|
|
Ayers
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 2744
Merit: 1024
Vave.com - Crypto Casino
|
|
July 05, 2017, 08:41:45 AM |
|
something wrong with the math about the circulating coins, why there are only 3 millions coins after pow end, if the block numbers is 12960 and each day there are 40k coins mined? what is the block time here, but even if the block time is 1 block per day still 12960 x 259 is more than 3 million, lol something wrong
Hi not shure what you are talking about. Current supply: 3,313,646 NETKO Proof of work stage: 12960 blocks x 259 NETKO blockreward = 3,356,640 NETKO Block at time of writing : 12794 Block time is 10min, but because of the heavy spikes in hashrate and difficulty on some occasions chain got stuck for an hour or more. So please redo your math as everything is fine. Cheers. so 144 block a day per 259 is like 37k a day, yes it make sense now, less than 100 days of mining lead to current 3.3 millions of coin, i think i was confusing because the block time was unknown
|
|
|
|
staysecure
|
|
July 05, 2017, 10:27:53 AM |
|
something wrong with the math about the circulating coins, why there are only 3 millions coins after pow end, if the block numbers is 12960 and each day there are 40k coins mined? what is the block time here, but even if the block time is 1 block per day still 12960 x 259 is more than 3 million, lol something wrong
Hi not shure what you are talking about. Current supply: 3,313,646 NETKO Proof of work stage: 12960 blocks x 259 NETKO blockreward = 3,356,640 NETKO Block at time of writing : 12794 Block time is 10min, but because of the heavy spikes in hashrate and difficulty on some occasions chain got stuck for an hour or more. So please redo your math as everything is fine. Cheers. so 144 block a day per 259 is like 37k a day, yes it make sense now, less than 100 days of mining lead to current 3.3 millions of coin, i think i was confusing because the block time was unknown Correct yes we need to publish more info on chain parameters. Appologies for the confusion. Have an awesome week.
|
|
|
|
mirny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 05, 2017, 11:04:24 AM |
|
Hi dev, can you please check out this issue for me? I'm trying to compile wallet in ubuntu 14.04, but I'm getting this error. src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_init0’: src/blake2s-ref.c:136:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( int i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) S->h[i] = blake2s_IV[i]; ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:136:3: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_init_param’: src/blake2s-ref.c:148:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_compress’: src/blake2s-ref.c:214:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 16; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:15: error: redefinition of ‘i’ for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:214:15: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here for( size_t i = 0; i < 16; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:261:15: error: redefinition of ‘i’ for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:15: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:261:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_final’: src/blake2s-ref.c:320:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( int i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) /* Output full hash to temp buffer */ ^ make: *** [build/blake2s-ref.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... I have clean installation, I'm trying to compile with these steps: https://github.com/netkotech/netko/blob/master/doc/readme-qt.rstCan you help me, sort out this thing? cheers e: tried with gcc 4.8.4 and 4.9.4 Did you manage to solve this? I have no problems on 16.04 or 14.04 1. git clone https://github.com/netkotech/netko.git2. cd netko 3. qmake 4. make Finally, got it working with Ubuntu 16.04, not sure why It wasn't working with 14.04. DEV, have you got an example of proper config, for staking?
|
This is my signature...
|
|
|
illseey
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 55
Merit: 0
|
|
July 05, 2017, 02:24:40 PM |
|
Hello,
Quick noob question;
I'm currently trying mine this coin on Supernova pool and I'm kinda confused. Block reward is something 250 NETKO.
Do I get paid only for the blocks I have found? or besides blocks, do I also get paid for shares?
|
|
|
|
SnoopCn
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 184
Merit: 100
The All-in-One Cryptocurrency Exchange
|
|
July 05, 2017, 04:08:06 PM |
|
Hello,
Quick noob question;
I'm currently trying mine this coin on Supernova pool and I'm kinda confused. Block reward is something 250 NETKO.
Do I get paid only for the blocks I have found? or besides blocks, do I also get paid for shares?
Google is your friend https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/21769/how-do-mining-pools-work
|
|
|
|
ox1337
|
|
July 05, 2017, 04:40:51 PM |
|
Hi dev, can you please check out this issue for me? I'm trying to compile wallet in ubuntu 14.04, but I'm getting this error. src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_init0’: src/blake2s-ref.c:136:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( int i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) S->h[i] = blake2s_IV[i]; ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:136:3: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_init_param’: src/blake2s-ref.c:148:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_compress’: src/blake2s-ref.c:214:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 16; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:15: error: redefinition of ‘i’ for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:214:15: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here for( size_t i = 0; i < 16; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:261:15: error: redefinition of ‘i’ for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:15: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:261:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_final’: src/blake2s-ref.c:320:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( int i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) /* Output full hash to temp buffer */ ^ make: *** [build/blake2s-ref.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... I have clean installation, I'm trying to compile with these steps: https://github.com/netkotech/netko/blob/master/doc/readme-qt.rstCan you help me, sort out this thing? cheers e: tried with gcc 4.8.4 and 4.9.4 Did you manage to solve this? I have no problems on 16.04 or 14.04 1. git clone https://github.com/netkotech/netko.git2. cd netko 3. qmake 4. make Finally, got it working with Ubuntu 16.04, not sure why It wasn't working with 14.04. DEV, have you got an example of proper config, for staking? I am having the same problem and cant manage to make it work. I am quite lost
|
|
|
|
gtzanap
|
|
July 05, 2017, 08:03:59 PM |
|
Hello,
Quick noob question;
I'm currently trying mine this coin on Supernova pool and I'm kinda confused. Block reward is something 250 NETKO.
Do I get paid only for the blocks I have found? or besides blocks, do I also get paid for shares?
Seriously, why bother? The PoW phase will be over by tomorrow and it will be a couple of days before the few coins you get on suprnova mature so you can withdraw them. Better just buy some
|
|
|
|
CjMapope
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1820
Merit: 1092
~Full-Time Minter since 2016~
|
|
July 05, 2017, 08:15:16 PM |
|
Hello,
Quick noob question;
I'm currently trying mine this coin on Supernova pool and I'm kinda confused. Block reward is something 250 NETKO.
Do I get paid only for the blocks I have found? or besides blocks, do I also get paid for shares?
Seriously, why bother? The PoW phase will be over by tomorrow and it will be a couple of days before the few coins you get on suprnova mature so you can withdraw them. Better just buy some Nooo, help us bust this damn 2 hour block first hahaha THEN just buy some while you can as yes, there's like 50 blocks till end of PoW
|
~Got this girl in my bed, a roof over my head, i mint a couple coins a week, and thats how i make bread~ ~On the 12th day of Hatzvah, OGminer said to me: "compute root of the merkle hash tree!"~ Prohashing -- Simply the best Multipool!
|
|
|
Lercker
|
|
July 05, 2017, 08:40:31 PM |
|
65 blocks till the start of PoS. 125 blocks until the end of PoW.
|
|
|
|
mirny
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1108
Merit: 1005
|
|
July 05, 2017, 08:43:29 PM |
|
Hi dev, can you please check out this issue for me? I'm trying to compile wallet in ubuntu 14.04, but I'm getting this error. src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_init0’: src/blake2s-ref.c:136:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( int i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) S->h[i] = blake2s_IV[i]; ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:136:3: note: use option -std=c99 or -std=gnu99 to compile your code src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_init_param’: src/blake2s-ref.c:148:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_compress’: src/blake2s-ref.c:214:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 16; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:15: error: redefinition of ‘i’ for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:214:15: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here for( size_t i = 0; i < 16; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:261:15: error: redefinition of ‘i’ for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:217:15: note: previous definition of ‘i’ was here for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c:261:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( size_t i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) ^ src/blake2s-ref.c: In function ‘blake2s_final’: src/blake2s-ref.c:320:3: error: ‘for’ loop initial declarations are only allowed in C99 mode for( int i = 0; i < 8; ++i ) /* Output full hash to temp buffer */ ^ make: *** [build/blake2s-ref.o] Error 1 make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... I have clean installation, I'm trying to compile with these steps: https://github.com/netkotech/netko/blob/master/doc/readme-qt.rstCan you help me, sort out this thing? cheers e: tried with gcc 4.8.4 and 4.9.4 Did you manage to solve this? I have no problems on 16.04 or 14.04 1. git clone https://github.com/netkotech/netko.git2. cd netko 3. qmake 4. make Finally, got it working with Ubuntu 16.04, not sure why It wasn't working with 14.04. DEV, have you got an example of proper config, for staking? I am having the same problem and cant manage to make it work. I am quite lost I have made it like this. Install fresh copy of ubuntu16.04, then get dependencies: sudo apt-get install qt5-default qt5-qmake qtbase5-dev-tools qttools5-dev-tools build-essential libboost-dev libboost-system-dev libboost-filesystem-dev libboost-program-options-dev libboost-thread-dev libssl-dev libdb++-dev libminiupnpc-dev and then this: 1. git clone https://github.com/netkotech/netko.git2. cd netko 3. qmake 4. make This worked for me for first try, hope it help.
|
This is my signature...
|
|
|
Geenstijl
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1232
Merit: 1000
|
|
July 05, 2017, 09:03:32 PM |
|
So after PoW the monthly inflation is going to drastically decrease right?
|
|
|
|
|