minefarmbuy
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 221
We are not retail.
|
|
August 19, 2018, 04:18:25 PM |
|
Awesome! Seems we favor morning blocks a fair amount. At least for those of us in the US.
|
|
|
|
faheshang
Member
Offline
Activity: 99
Merit: 16
|
|
August 19, 2018, 04:49:17 PM |
|
And another block!! 537,528
|
|
|
|
gcanelson
Member
Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 56
|
|
August 19, 2018, 04:52:07 PM |
|
Awesome! Seems we favor morning blocks a fair amount. At least for those of us in the US.
... and we'll double your pleasure today... here comes \o/ Block Two \o/ woot!
|
The block, an obstacle in the path of the weak, became a stepping-stone in the path of the strong.
|
|
|
minefarmbuy
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 221
We are not retail.
|
|
August 19, 2018, 05:23:21 PM |
|
Awesome! Seems we favor morning blocks a fair amount. At least for those of us in the US.
... and we'll double your pleasure today... here comes \o/ Block Two \o/ woot! Some sick shit. Is this philips 32% block?
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
August 19, 2018, 09:13:55 PM |
|
And another block!! 537,528
[2018-08-19 16:37:09.793] Possible block solve diff 43364473479640.625000 ! [2018-08-19 16:37:09.872] BLOCK ACCEPTED! [2018-08-19 16:37:10.092] Solved block 537528 by 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc41x163 [2018-08-19 16:37:10.093] User 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP:{"hashrate1m": "76.3P", "hashrate5m": "75.6P", "hashrate1hr": "75.4P", "hashrate1d": "75.3P", "hashrate7d": "68.4P"} [2018-08-19 16:37:10.093] Worker 3Cy7rpWHSzEJ42XRjUkACUdWE3KHiu3puP.xc41x163:{"hashrate1m": "16.3T", "hashrate5m": "16.8T", "hashrate1hr": "16.6T", "hashrate1d": "16.8T", "hashrate7d": "16.4T"} [2018-08-19 16:45:07.824] Hash for block height 537528 confirms block was CONFIRMED
"diff": 7.6 https://btc.com/block/537528
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
flippintwit
Member
Offline
Activity: 62
Merit: 10
|
|
August 19, 2018, 11:08:22 PM |
|
There's still time for a triple!!
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4312
Merit: 8849
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
August 19, 2018, 11:46:00 PM |
|
It is 745pm here in New Jersey gives me more then 4 hours to do 3 in a day
|
|
|
|
grinbuck
|
|
August 20, 2018, 06:46:52 AM |
|
I've got about 70 Th of power and I'm looking desperately to improve the profitability of my S9's for obvious reasons.
I have no problems with variance. I'm quite patient. It's the returns I'm after.
I don't have the guts to try solo mining with my measly hashrate but I LOVE the idea that IN CASE my little litter finds a high difficulty share, i'm rewarded proportionately higher. From my understanding standard PPLNS does not offer this.
Few questions:
1) Am I right about the fact that standard PPLNS doesn't give you proportionately higher rewards for finding shares of higher difficulty? 2) Does CKPool (not solo) pay out higher if I'm lucky and find shares of higher difficulty? Is it worth the wait in terms of variance? 3) Am I too small a player to be consistently paid? I mean I don't want to wait for blocks on end till the revolving 50 tail enders are paid.
Any input greatly appreciated.
|
BTC: 37x5L8wq3pRxjDof6g2CnwgSrt34C5cFHy
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
August 20, 2018, 07:09:19 AM |
|
I've got about 70 Th of power and I'm looking desperately to improve the profitability of my S9's for obvious reasons.
I have no problems with variance. I'm quite patient. It's the returns I'm after.
I don't have the guts to try solo mining with my measly hashrate but I LOVE the idea that IN CASE my little litter finds a high difficulty share, i'm rewarded proportionately higher. From my understanding standard PPLNS does not offer this.
Few questions:
1) Am I right about the fact that standard PPLNS doesn't give you proportionately higher rewards for finding shares of higher difficulty? 2) Does CKPool (not solo) pay out higher if I'm lucky and find shares of higher difficulty? Is it worth the wait in terms of variance? 3) Am I too small a player to be consistently paid? I mean I don't want to wait for blocks on end till the revolving 50 tail enders are paid.
Any input greatly appreciated.
1. Yes 2. But they're so small it's only relevant to minuscule miners. At your size it will even out in no time 3. At 70TH it puts you in the top 50 miners and after mining here for a few days you will be getting payouts with every block.
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
grinbuck
|
|
August 20, 2018, 09:48:31 AM |
|
I've got about 70 Th of power and I'm looking desperately to improve the profitability of my S9's for obvious reasons.
I have no problems with variance. I'm quite patient. It's the returns I'm after.
I don't have the guts to try solo mining with my measly hashrate but I LOVE the idea that IN CASE my little litter finds a high difficulty share, i'm rewarded proportionately higher. From my understanding standard PPLNS does not offer this.
Few questions:
1) Am I right about the fact that standard PPLNS doesn't give you proportionately higher rewards for finding shares of higher difficulty? 2) Does CKPool (not solo) pay out higher if I'm lucky and find shares of higher difficulty? Is it worth the wait in terms of variance? 3) Am I too small a player to be consistently paid? I mean I don't want to wait for blocks on end till the revolving 50 tail enders are paid.
Any input greatly appreciated.
1. Yes 2. But they're so small it's only relevant to minuscule miners. At your size it will even out in no time 3. At 70TH it puts you in the top 50 miners and after mining here for a few days you will be getting payouts with every block. Thanks CK.
|
BTC: 37x5L8wq3pRxjDof6g2CnwgSrt34C5cFHy
|
|
|
Fugio
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 15
|
|
August 20, 2018, 02:59:33 PM |
|
Back under 100PH Fewer blocks, higher pay outs
|
|
|
|
pavesi
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 12
|
|
August 20, 2018, 03:09:05 PM |
|
Back under 100PH Fewer blocks, higher pay outs That's weird.. I still see 172ph listed as pool hashrate..
|
|
|
|
Fugio
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 50
Merit: 15
|
|
August 20, 2018, 03:11:49 PM |
|
Back under 100PH Fewer blocks, higher pay outs That's weird.. I still see 172ph listed as pool hashrate.. Look at the 1 and 5 minute rates on the dashboard http://ckpool.org/#/dashboard
|
|
|
|
pavesi
Member
Offline
Activity: 83
Merit: 12
|
|
August 20, 2018, 03:49:45 PM |
|
Back under 100PH Fewer blocks, higher pay outs That's weird.. I still see 172ph listed as pool hashrate.. Look at the 1 and 5 minute rates on the dashboard http://ckpool.org/#/dashboardgotcha.. 115ph now.. and going up.. maybe just halong/inno just taking testing units off shelves and replacing..
|
|
|
|
minefarmbuy
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 221
We are not retail.
|
|
August 20, 2018, 04:45:19 PM |
|
Burn in's and shipouts I guess? Wasn't too worried about waiting a little longer to celebrate. Just makes it all more exciting/fun when we do hit a block.
|
|
|
|
gcanelson
Member
Offline
Activity: 110
Merit: 56
|
|
August 20, 2018, 05:31:57 PM |
|
Back under 100PH Fewer blocks, higher pay outs That's weird.. I still see 172ph listed as pool hashrate.. Look at the 1 and 5 minute rates on the dashboard http://ckpool.org/#/dashboardgotcha.. 115ph now.. and going up.. maybe just halong/inno just taking testing units off shelves and replacing.. 1 minute rate just broke 200... it's a really small (too small) sample size of course, but we're back to normal... Happy hashing...
|
The block, an obstacle in the path of the weak, became a stepping-stone in the path of the strong.
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4312
Merit: 8849
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
August 20, 2018, 07:39:00 PM Last edit: August 20, 2018, 08:16:57 PM by philipma1957 |
|
my innosilicon t2turbo has arrived. shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase go to bottom of this link http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1", "hashrate1m": "21.8T", "hashrate5m": "17T", "hashrate1hr": "2.8T", "hashrate1d": "125G", "hashrate7d": "17.9G", "lastshare": 1534794072, "shares": 2534795, "bestshare": 4768300.0, "lns": 2533888.463873493, "luck": 1.05, "herp": 2649546.48057697 } It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tunethe power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th. I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
|
|
|
|
minefarmbuy
Full Member
Offline
Activity: 1022
Merit: 221
We are not retail.
|
|
August 20, 2018, 08:31:29 PM |
|
my innosilicon t2turbo has arrived. shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase go to bottom of this link http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1", "hashrate1m": "21.8T", "hashrate5m": "17T", "hashrate1hr": "2.8T", "hashrate1d": "125G", "hashrate7d": "17.9G", "lastshare": 1534794072, "shares": 2534795, "bestshare": 4768300.0, "lns": 2533888.463873493, "luck": 1.05, "herp": 2649546.48057697 } It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tunethe power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th. I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts Looks promising, excited for the unit review. I should have my exhaust upgrade done this month, work to get a pdu, and start adding a unit in a couple more. I want to close in on 100th by year end. . . I hopes.
|
|
|
|
philipma1957
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4312
Merit: 8849
'The right to privacy matters'
|
|
August 20, 2018, 09:27:10 PM |
|
my innosilicon t2turbo has arrived. shout out to minefarmbuy for easy pleasant purchase go to bottom of this link http://ckpool.org/users/16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr "workername": "16yLHLoeyuCLPMXkVpC3gyrRYvwRGwjKJr.turbo1", "hashrate1m": "21.8T", "hashrate5m": "17T", "hashrate1hr": "2.8T", "hashrate1d": "125G", "hashrate7d": "17.9G", "lastshare": 1534794072, "shares": 2534795, "bestshare": 4768300.0, "lns": 2533888.463873493, "luck": 1.05, "herp": 2649546.48057697 } It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tunethe power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th. I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts Looks promising, excited for the unit review. I should have my exhaust upgrade done this month, work to get a pdu, and start adding a unit in a couple more. I want to close in on 100th by year end. . . I hopes. yeah it appears to be a really nice unit I will be getting another tomorrow. Be sure to give me your link in a pm for referral. efficiency mode has stayed in the 1444 to 1457 watt mode at my meter and about 17.2 to 18.4 th. I was hoping for a little better power number but i have multiple meters and will test them all.
|
|
|
|
-ck (OP)
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 4284
Merit: 1645
Ruu \o/
|
|
August 20, 2018, 09:41:20 PM |
|
It is on factory setting doing 21.8 and about 2085 watts or 95.6 watts a th Please note this means nothing as gear has to settle in and auto tune
the power draw seems to be close to 2100 watts on factory setting not a number i want unless of course gear was doing 28 or 30 th.
I dropped to efficiency and power draw is only 1457 watts more what I like
unit is doing about 17.6 to 18.4 th so 79.03 watts a th at best and 82.78 watts a th at worst. these are meter numbers on a 240 volt circuit putting out 236.8 volts
For what it's worth, when I DID have to communicate with the Inno guys (who created the Halong hardware under contract), we constantly argued about how best to tune them and the balanced and efficiency modes are what I invented and they had their own tuning which they were sure was better so I let them have the "factory" option as a tuning setting. It was garbage. Not long after that I stopped being contracted to help on anything to do with their hardware (since I was working indirectly for Halong, NOT Inno.)
|
Developer/maintainer for cgminer, ckpool/ckproxy, and the -ck kernel 2% Fee Solo mining at solo.ckpool.org -ck
|
|
|
|