stoicphoenix
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 26
Merit: 3
|
|
August 11, 2018, 11:02:59 AM |
|
Would it be more appropriate to allow an exit window for those who want out? e.g. the escrows setup a buy back for a limited period of time where people can voluntarily choose to stay or go. The remaining holders can then follow Imed or Ton by vote.
Wouldn't it be better to just do a complete buyback (or as *complete* as it can be), and then let those people decide whether they want to re-invest in current or future endeavors by Ton or Imed? Both of them could run some sort of crowdsale once the mess is over. This gives everyone involved absolute freedom. Solid plan, Ton couldn't lead a dog on a leash let alone a project of this magnitude.
|
|
|
|
cashclash
Member
Offline
Activity: 86
Merit: 11
|
|
August 11, 2018, 11:20:20 AM |
|
If there is really "any useful" code on either sides and we are close to the final product and even if it is beta i'd be willing to keep going but with each post and telegram banning it feels like we are getting played from both sides.
If a third party can clear up this mess why not go for it?
|
|
|
|
crypt0kid
|
|
August 11, 2018, 06:17:48 PM |
|
Would it be more appropriate to allow an exit window for those who want out? e.g. the escrows setup a buy back for a limited period of time where people can voluntarily choose to stay or go. The remaining holders can then follow Imed or Ton by vote.
Wouldn't it be better to just do a complete buyback (or as *complete* as it can be), and then let those people decide whether they want to re-invest in current or future endeavors by Ton or Imed? Both of them could run some sort of crowdsale once the mess is over. This gives everyone involved absolute freedom. This makes perfect sense! Do 100% buyback. Those that want back in can reinvest. The rest take their BTC and go on their way. Everyone is happy with this model.
|
|
|
|
crypt0kid
|
|
August 11, 2018, 06:22:48 PM |
|
Impressive, Cool4y and some other guys were basically right since the beginning. The promises were too good to be true and there were so many red flags. I was so naive to trust them.
A refund of barely 40 % (in BTC I hope? Not just in USD) is disappointing, but still better than 0 %. Let's be refunded soon and forget that disaster.
@Cool4y is the real hero. He tried to warn all of us, but we didn't listen. There's always some truth to every conspiracy. I disappointed in myself that I didn't cash out when NVO hit $4 in bull run.
|
|
|
|
Revelations86
|
|
August 11, 2018, 11:19:40 PM |
|
What is the telegram channel? and What is the process for the refund?
|
|
|
|
|
Ton eats Laudas fartbox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
August 12, 2018, 05:05:15 AM |
|
[quote au thor=BTCMILLIONAIRE link=topic=1917456.msg43918675#msg43918675 date=1534049218] What is the telegram channel? and What is the process for the refund?
https://t.me/joinchat/Ff92WUidI54g8rv2NdRr1AGood luck not getting banned by the Stasi, err, by Tonbi. [/quote] Ton does seem to be heavily censoring this telegram and banning people from it The main reasons being, A - Questioning his version of events B - Questioning his sheer imcompetence C- Not in line with his narrative, or D - Direct questions he wont answer as it will prove him to be dishonest and fraudulent. If you couldnt trust him before due to his lack of leadership skills, lack of any business sense, his allegations against others with no proof or his immaturity well then this is the nail in the coffin. No one should trust this useless pathetic excuse for a human
|
|
|
|
BTCMILLIONAIRE
|
|
August 12, 2018, 05:34:59 AM |
|
Ton does seem to be heavily censoring this telegram and banning people from it The main reasons being, A - Questioning his version of events B - Questioning his sheer imcompetence C- Not in line with his narrative, or D - Direct questions he wont answer as it will prove him to be dishonest and fraudulent.
If you couldnt trust him before due to his lack of leadership skills, lack of any business sense, his allegations against others with no proof or his immaturity well then this is the nail in the coffin. No one should trust this useless pathetic excuse for a human
I don't quite trust any CEO without notable technical skills, they're mostly parasites.
|
|
|
|
Ton eats Laudas fartbox
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 5
Merit: 0
|
|
August 12, 2018, 05:53:39 AM |
|
In a reddit post from Ton he refers to a prelim vote and actually links to it to gauge investor feedback. Then when results are in clearly against him he calls the vote and its result nonsense.
Give everyone their remaining money back ton bi you horrible little grub (as per main consensus)- you are a meaningless plebe and you have destroyed your reputation forever in relation to crypto. As for continuing "your project" - no one trusts you, then nvo brand is trashed and you are the main culprit for your own undoing, you are nothing but a bum.
|
|
|
|
cocoadreamboy
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 5
|
|
August 12, 2018, 11:45:06 AM |
|
Would it be more appropriate to allow an exit window for those who want out? e.g. the escrows setup a buy back for a limited period of time where people can voluntarily choose to stay or go. The remaining holders can then follow Imed or Ton by vote.
Wouldn't it be better to just do a complete buyback (or as *complete* as it can be), and then let those people decide whether they want to re-invest in current or future endeavors by Ton or Imed? Both of them could run some sort of crowdsale once the mess is over. This gives everyone involved absolute freedom. Yes I second this
|
I virgin. I pure boy! I dicboy!
|
|
|
cocoadreamboy
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 5
|
|
August 12, 2018, 11:58:05 AM |
|
Lauda,
Shouldn't the simple fact that one of the founders is missing entirely be enough to issue the buyback? I invested in a project with the expectation that the founders would continue it. This dissolution of these people is in violation of the white paper. I did not invest in a project that had a missing founder, and 2 other founders that are fighting. Yanni was a driving force for the project, and he left without a word.
Thank you
|
I virgin. I pure boy! I dicboy!
|
|
|
cocoadreamboy
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 5
|
|
August 12, 2018, 02:56:28 PM |
|
To All: I have done a calculation on the amount of USD spent by the NVO team over this past year. NVO raised 3055 BTC (with ALTs equivalent at the time of ICO end), and there is around 1143 BTC remaining (this is not the final amount the true amount has not been tabulated). The 1143 is located here: https://www.blockchain.com/btc/address/36Uh2ine6UzWGPTDYdENqS6pj6Rzx4Q67RRoughly speaking that means that around 159.33 BTC were spent per month over 12 months of the project. Here is the back of the envelope calculation for the amount of money spent by NVO team (apologies for the formatting): julio 2500 398.325,00 $ agosto 2874 457.914,42 $ septiembre 4776 760.960,08 $ octubre 4303 685.596,99 $ noviembre 6440 1.026.085,20 $ diciembre 9865 1.571.790,45 $ enero 14080 2.243.366,40 $ febrero 10169 1.620.226,77 $ marzo 11044 1.759.640,52 $ abril 6561 1.045.364,13 $ mayo 9000 1.433.970,00 $ junio 7558 1.204.216,14 $ julio 6387 1.017.640,71 $ Added up together they have spent $15.225.096,81 There are a few questions in this calculation such as when exactly the money was converted, and if the alt coins appreciated at the same rate as BTC, but it holds. The team had 3055 BTC (including Altcoin equivalents) at the start and there is 1143 BTC left. There has been no expense report released by the founders accounting for the spent funds. The only product released is the beta wallet. Ton has stated that ICO funds were "wasted" on something called Xenio. And when I brought this up on the TG group I was cussed at and insulted by Ton the CEO on the chat. For these reasons I believe a buyback is the only correct solution to this problem.
|
I virgin. I pure boy! I dicboy!
|
|
|
bluelogic
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 33
Merit: 1
|
|
August 12, 2018, 03:34:42 PM |
|
All- I suggest that the escrow follow through with the weighted vote they wanted to do. Ton is currently pushing for the use of parallel voting tokens so larger holders will not be able to have a stronger community vote. This makes sense from his view because of course, he doesn't want the project to end. You can see the voting token here: https://xcpdex.com/asset/NVSTVOTING
|
|
|
|
centersmissing
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 111
Merit: 3
|
|
August 12, 2018, 05:28:12 PM |
|
Anyone with half a brain can see from both the preliminary vote and from general consensus across all chats that a refund is the overwhelming winner of any vote that will and has ever been done. Stop with the useless time wasting and just proceed with the refund already.
|
|
|
|
didnottell
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 13
Merit: 0
|
|
August 12, 2018, 05:51:13 PM |
|
Would it be more appropriate to allow an exit window for those who want out? e.g. the escrows setup a buy back for a limited period of time where people can voluntarily choose to stay or go. The remaining holders can then follow Imed or Ton by vote.
Wouldn't it be better to just do a complete buyback (or as *complete* as it can be), and then let those people decide whether they want to re-invest in current or future endeavors by Ton or Imed? Both of them could run some sort of crowdsale once the mess is over. This gives everyone involved absolute freedom. Would be perfect! I want to clarify that it would be perfect, but that I see no chance of getting a 100% refund - so I would like to see a refund of remaining funds.
|
|
|
|
saminer
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 71
Merit: 7
|
|
August 12, 2018, 06:46:17 PM Last edit: August 16, 2018, 05:15:33 PM by saminer |
|
Would it be more appropriate to allow an exit window for those who want out? e.g. the escrows setup a buy back for a limited period of time where people can voluntarily choose to stay or go. The remaining holders can then follow Imed or Ton by vote.
Wouldn't it be better to just do a complete buyback (or as *complete* as it can be), and then let those people decide whether they want to re-invest in current or future endeavors by Ton or Imed? Both of them could run some sort of crowdsale once the mess is over. This gives everyone involved absolute freedom. I agree 100%. Anything else is just a delay of the inevitable. I know this much: there will not be a Dex by either of them after the buyback. Both Ton and Imed will eventually disappear because of lack of funds. Anyone that wants to back their "candidate" afterwards put your money, not ours, where your mouth is. You can contribute to their projects as you see fit.
|
|
|
|
vlom
Legendary
Offline
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1117
|
|
August 12, 2018, 07:12:42 PM |
|
Ton on Telegram after pretending not to know the amount collected. Ton is a liar. The total funds raised per currency: BTC: 1590.919664 LTC: 7807.588 XRP: 1325280.390 ETH: 6477.095 MAID: 765482 DASH: 1916.643 WAVES: 31145.630 DOGE: 23577240.970 ETC: 4126.090 Conversion rates per currency into BTC*: BTC: 1 LTC: 0.01688190 XRP: 0.00010822 ETH: 0.12242700 MAID: 0.00019581 DASH: 0.07139310 WAVES: 0.00167559 DOGE: 0.00000109 ETC: 0.00760768 Total BTC raised (at these exchange rates): 3055.120324 Total USD raised at the BTC-USD price (Bitstamp): 7790556.826 This means that any price changes for you, as an investor, no longer matter. You can use these numbers to estimate the number of tokens that you will receive.
|
|
|
|
notanvstwhale
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
August 13, 2018, 10:31:28 AM |
|
Can we get an official update on where things are going currently, just roughly speaking. Is more time needed, are more things being collected as information. A lot of things have been said, but the end of the day there's still a bigger question waiting for its final words.
Can we guys (heh), Lauda, expect a decision by Friday? Does that seem plausible?
|
|
|
|
abyssallord
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 4
Merit: 0
|
|
August 13, 2018, 10:35:48 AM |
|
Great! First time i am seeing actual project with real working product.
|
|
|
|
cocoadreamboy
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 378
Merit: 5
|
|
August 13, 2018, 11:00:18 AM |
|
I was just blocked and removed from the telegram group after I asked what the millions were spent on. I believe Nixims is Ton in disguise because he is brand new and has only appeared recently and is very against knowing what the money was spent on. This reeks of scam as well as censorship. I have been active on telegram and slack since the beginning. There was no reason to remove me from the group.
|
I virgin. I pure boy! I dicboy!
|
|
|
|