Evolution is a hoax

[BADecker]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

There is no evidence to back on, in fact there is a creator who is behind all creations

There is no evidence for how things came into existence, within the things that are in existence. The evidence that is said to fit evolution, fits adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change better than it fits evolution. Evolution theory evolution has been shown to be impossible is some ways.

Go to the Scientific proof that God exists? thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0 - to see how God is the creator of all things.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

[Astargath]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

There is no evidence to back on, in fact there is a creator who is behind all creations

There is no evidence for how things came into existence, within the things that are in existence. The evidence that is said to fit evolution, fits adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change better than it fits evolution. Evolution theory evolution has been shown to be impossible is some ways.

Go to the Scientific proof that God exists? thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0 - to see how God is the creator of all things.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

To see how badecker's arguments are destroyed over and over*

[BADecker]

Why there are still monkeys around if they were part of our evolutionary beginnings ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cz0gFarCfBE

There is no evidence to back on, in fact there is a creator who is behind all creations

There is no evidence for how things came into existence, within the things that are in existence. The evidence that is said to fit evolution, fits adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change better than it fits evolution. Evolution theory evolution has been shown to be impossible is some ways.

Go to the Scientific proof that God exists? thread - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=737322.0 - to see how God is the creator of all things.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

To see how badecker's arguments are destroyed over and over*

But look in this thread to see how jokers can talk and talk evolution, without having any proof of it.

Evolution is a hoax.

[Moloch]

Whenever BADLogic ends his posts with his tagline and sunglasses, I think of Donald Trump saying, "believe me"... a clear indication that the preceding statement is a complete lie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDTeMNhuPTc

[BADecker]

Whenever BADLogic ends his posts with his tagline and sunglasses, I think of Donald Trump saying, "believe me"... a clear indication that the preceding statement is a complete lie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDTeMNhuPTc

No proof for evolution, there.

Evolution is still a hoax.



P.S.  Thanks for acknowledging the hoax by realizing you can't find any proof for evolution.

[Astargath]

Whenever BADLogic ends his posts with his tagline and sunglasses, I think of Donald Trump saying, "believe me"... a clear indication that the preceding statement is a complete lie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDTeMNhuPTc

No proof for evolution, there.

Evolution is still a hoax.



P.S.  Thanks for acknowledging the hoax by realizing you can't find any proof for evolution.

If you are looking for proof, you can google: ''proof of evolution'' plenty there

[NotoriousHodler]

I look at this threads, and ask myself a question: is this really happening, or is it some kind of trolling? A little bit of fingerwork on your keyboard will get you enough proof of evolution, but you had to create a thread to rile people up on many-many pages.
But just for you: yes, evolution is hoax, we are descendants o 900-year old people that were mostly inbred, and we are living on a flat earth too, that stands on 4 elephants.

[BADecker]

Whenever BADLogic ends his posts with his tagline and sunglasses, I think of Donald Trump saying, "believe me"... a clear indication that the preceding statement is a complete lie

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zDTeMNhuPTc

No proof for evolution, there.

Evolution is still a hoax.



P.S.  Thanks for acknowledging the hoax by realizing you can't find any proof for evolution.

If you are looking for proof, you can google: ''proof of evolution'' plenty there

All the so-called evolution proof listed in websites does one or both of two things:
1. It fits adaptation, like-begets-like, or simple change better than it does evolution;
2. It completely tries to use as proof things that have not been proven to be part of evolution = circular references.



Again, if we are talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), three of the basic requirements are:

1. The DNA of a critter known to be some thousands of years old that showed a verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of this critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a second verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of THIS critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a third verifiable DNA mutation.

2. Proof has to show that the mutations all were beneficial mutations.

3. There has to be proof of pure random mutations (pure random has never been found). Otherwise the changes are cause-and-effect, programmed-in changes that don't really qualify as ETE.

Again, common sense shows, and people who understand basic evolution know, that evolution can't be proven. This is why they suggest that it took hundreds of thousands, or millions, of years. This way they can acknowledge that it could exist, and the Theory could be kept alive, even though there will be no chance of proving it until a time machine can be built. Even with a time machine, the whole proof process would be extremely difficult.



All of the above might leave an opening for ETE to be possible, if it weren't for all the things you find when you Google "evolution is impossible."



The hoax of ETE exists because many thinking scholars have understood the above, yet have still suggested that ETE is possible. This is what makes ETE a hoax.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

[BADecker]

I look at this threads, and ask myself a question: is this really happening, or is it some kind of trolling? A little bit of fingerwork on your keyboard will get you enough proof of evolution, but you had to create a thread to rile people up on many-many pages.
But just for you: yes, evolution is hoax, we are descendants o 900-year old people that were mostly inbred, and we are living on a flat earth too, that stands on 4 elephants.

If evolution scientists were humble and honest, they would get up and say, "We don't know." Because they don't do this, they are simply making another religion. This one they call "evolution."

Science likes facts. The fact for evolution is that, at best, nobody knows... at worst, it is impossible.

Evolution is a hoax.

[afluence]

The insurmountable flaws in the theory of Evolution which were recognized at the time of writing persist to the present time, so in that regard this book can still be relevant and informative.

[exemplaar]

I look at this threads, and ask myself a question: is this really happening, or is it some kind of trolling? A little bit of fingerwork on your keyboard will get you enough proof of evolution, but you had to create a thread to rile people up on many-many pages.
But just for you: yes, evolution is hoax, we are descendants o 900-year old people that were mostly inbred, and we are living on a flat earth too, that stands on 4 elephants.

Of course if you believe that you live on a spinning ball flying through space with ridiculous speeds. 

Could not be more obvious...




bonus image

[twthmoses]

All the so-called evolution proof listed in websites does one or both of two things:
1. It fits adaptation, like-begets-like, or simple change better than it does evolution;
2. It completely tries to use as proof things that have not been proven to be part of evolution = circular references.



Again, if we are talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), three of the basic requirements are:

1. The DNA of a critter known to be some thousands of years old that showed a verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of this critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a second verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of THIS critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a third verifiable DNA mutation.

2. Proof has to show that the mutations all were beneficial mutations.

3. There has to be proof of pure random mutations (pure random has never been found). Otherwise the changes are cause-and-effect, programmed-in changes that don't really qualify as ETE.

Again, common sense shows, and people who understand basic evolution know, that evolution can't be proven. This is why they suggest that it took hundreds of thousands, or millions, of years. This way they can acknowledge that it could exist, and the Theory could be kept alive, even though there will be no chance of proving it until a time machine can be built. Even with a time machine, the whole proof process would be extremely difficult.



All of the above might leave an opening for ETE to be possible, if it weren't for all the things you find when you Google "evolution is impossible."



The hoax of ETE exists because many thinking scholars have understood the above, yet have still suggested that ETE is possible. This is what makes ETE a hoax.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

No they don’t, they (thinking scholars) understand that Evolution exists, is a fact, and a trillion species/individuals exists right now that proves it. But I do like you using “like-begets-like”, because it is exactly what evolution is. I just use the word Evolution instead.

Still find it interesting how, once in a while, a fetus “adapts” to produce 6 fingers on a hand or a third leg. More interesting it is maybe, that these are things you can see and it does happen; imagine how many smaller changes take place that you are unaware of and can’t see. Hmmmm…. its all adaptation, design and nothing random. Narrr almost hoaxed me there I’m taking door number two, says Evolution over the frame of it.

[Astargath]

All the so-called evolution proof listed in websites does one or both of two things:
1. It fits adaptation, like-begets-like, or simple change better than it does evolution;
2. It completely tries to use as proof things that have not been proven to be part of evolution = circular references.



Again, if we are talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), three of the basic requirements are:

1. The DNA of a critter known to be some thousands of years old that showed a verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of this critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a second verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of THIS critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a third verifiable DNA mutation.

2. Proof has to show that the mutations all were beneficial mutations.

3. There has to be proof of pure random mutations (pure random has never been found). Otherwise the changes are cause-and-effect, programmed-in changes that don't really qualify as ETE.

Again, common sense shows, and people who understand basic evolution know, that evolution can't be proven. This is why they suggest that it took hundreds of thousands, or millions, of years. This way they can acknowledge that it could exist, and the Theory could be kept alive, even though there will be no chance of proving it until a time machine can be built. Even with a time machine, the whole proof process would be extremely difficult.



All of the above might leave an opening for ETE to be possible, if it weren't for all the things you find when you Google "evolution is impossible."



The hoax of ETE exists because many thinking scholars have understood the above, yet have still suggested that ETE is possible. This is what makes ETE a hoax.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

No they don’t, they (thinking scholars) understand that Evolution exists, is a fact, and a trillion species/individuals exists right now that proves it. But I do like you using “like-begets-like”, because it is exactly what evolution is. I just use the word Evolution instead.

Still find it interesting how, once in a while, a fetus “adapts” to produce 6 fingers on a hand or a third leg. More interesting it is maybe, that these are things you can see and it does happen; imagine how many smaller changes take place that you are unaware of and can’t see. Hmmmm…. its all adaptation, design and nothing random. Narrr almost hoaxed me there I’m taking door number two, says Evolution over the frame of it.

Most religious people accept evolution, he knows it, the fucking pope knows it and even said it many times, even older popes said evolution was real. If god was real he would be wondering how did he fuck up so hard that his followers can't accept basic logic.

[BADecker]

All the so-called evolution proof listed in websites does one or both of two things:
1. It fits adaptation, like-begets-like, or simple change better than it does evolution;
2. It completely tries to use as proof things that have not been proven to be part of evolution = circular references.



Again, if we are talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), three of the basic requirements are:

1. The DNA of a critter known to be some thousands of years old that showed a verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of this critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a second verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of THIS critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a third verifiable DNA mutation.

2. Proof has to show that the mutations all were beneficial mutations.

3. There has to be proof of pure random mutations (pure random has never been found). Otherwise the changes are cause-and-effect, programmed-in changes that don't really qualify as ETE.

Again, common sense shows, and people who understand basic evolution know, that evolution can't be proven. This is why they suggest that it took hundreds of thousands, or millions, of years. This way they can acknowledge that it could exist, and the Theory could be kept alive, even though there will be no chance of proving it until a time machine can be built. Even with a time machine, the whole proof process would be extremely difficult.



All of the above might leave an opening for ETE to be possible, if it weren't for all the things you find when you Google "evolution is impossible."



The hoax of ETE exists because many thinking scholars have understood the above, yet have still suggested that ETE is possible. This is what makes ETE a hoax.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

No they don’t, they (thinking scholars) understand that Evolution exists, is a fact, and a trillion species/individuals exists right now that proves it. But I do like you using “like-begets-like”, because it is exactly what evolution is. I just use the word Evolution instead.

Still find it interesting how, once in a while, a fetus “adapts” to produce 6 fingers on a hand or a third leg. More interesting it is maybe, that these are things you can see and it does happen; imagine how many smaller changes take place that you are unaware of and can’t see. Hmmmm…. its all adaptation, design and nothing random. Narrr almost hoaxed me there I’m taking door number two, says Evolution over the frame of it.

Most religious people accept evolution, he knows it, the fucking pope knows it and even said it many times, even older popes said evolution was real. If god was real he would be wondering how did he fuck up so hard that his followers can't accept basic logic.

I want to thank you for this. It justifies everything that I say. Evolution is a religion. Like many of the other religions of the world, there is nothing to evolution.

So, let's get to the religion that has truth and proof behind it... Christianity. We can start by recognizing that God exists. From there we can go on to recognize that He has talked through the Bible.

So, thanks again for helping me show that...

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

All the so-called evolution proof listed in websites does one or both of two things:
1. It fits adaptation, like-begets-like, or simple change better than it does evolution;
2. It completely tries to use as proof things that have not been proven to be part of evolution = circular references.



Again, if we are talking evolution theory evolution (ETE), three of the basic requirements are:

1. The DNA of a critter known to be some thousands of years old that showed a verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of this critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a second verifiable DNA mutation, which transferred to many of THIS critter's descendants, one of which some thousands of years later had a third verifiable DNA mutation.

2. Proof has to show that the mutations all were beneficial mutations.

3. There has to be proof of pure random mutations (pure random has never been found). Otherwise the changes are cause-and-effect, programmed-in changes that don't really qualify as ETE.

Again, common sense shows, and people who understand basic evolution know, that evolution can't be proven. This is why they suggest that it took hundreds of thousands, or millions, of years. This way they can acknowledge that it could exist, and the Theory could be kept alive, even though there will be no chance of proving it until a time machine can be built. Even with a time machine, the whole proof process would be extremely difficult.



All of the above might leave an opening for ETE to be possible, if it weren't for all the things you find when you Google "evolution is impossible."



The hoax of ETE exists because many thinking scholars have understood the above, yet have still suggested that ETE is possible. This is what makes ETE a hoax.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

No they don’t, they (thinking scholars) understand that Evolution exists, is a fact, and a trillion species/individuals exists right now that proves it. But I do like you using “like-begets-like”, because it is exactly what evolution is. I just use the word Evolution instead.

Still find it interesting how, once in a while, a fetus “adapts” to produce 6 fingers on a hand or a third leg. More interesting it is maybe, that these are things you can see and it does happen; imagine how many smaller changes take place that you are unaware of and can’t see. Hmmmm…. its all adaptation, design and nothing random. Narrr almost hoaxed me there I’m taking door number two, says Evolution over the frame of it.

Most religious people accept evolution, he knows it, the fucking pope knows it and even said it many times, even older popes said evolution was real. If god was real he would be wondering how did he fuck up so hard that his followers can't accept basic logic.

I want to thank you for this. It justifies everything that I say. Evolution is a religion. Like many of the other religions of the world, there is nothing to evolution.

So, let's get to the religion that has truth and proof behind it... Christianity. We can start by recognizing that God exists. From there we can go on to recognize that He has talked through the Bible.

So, thanks again for helping me show that...

Evolution is a hoax.

''We can start by recognizing that God exists. From there we can go on to recognize that He has talked through the Bible.'' Solid evidence there, we have to start by saying god is real because he is (all your arguments for his existence were debunked in the other thread) and then we have to believe he talked through the bible because...

[yaayaa]

Evolution is truly a hoax because everything indicate that there is a creator of the universe and for that nothing came on it own.

[BADecker]

''We can start by recognizing that God exists. From there we can go on to recognize that He has talked through the Bible.'' Solid evidence there, we have to start by saying god is real because he is (all your arguments for his existence were debunked in the other thread) and then we have to believe he talked through the bible because...

In that other thread... you forgot the part about all your refutation refuting itself.

IF we were scientifically ignorant enough that we didn't have proof for God's existence, the best we could say is that we don't know where things came from. Why? Because we don't know enough about how things work, or what the history of the earth really is, to factually say that we know that evolution exists. The best that evolution can do is to suggest itself. All evolution things fit other events better than they fit evolution. And to top it all off, we have not even one proof of evolution. All we have is talk that there is proof.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

[Astargath]

''We can start by recognizing that God exists. From there we can go on to recognize that He has talked through the Bible.'' Solid evidence there, we have to start by saying god is real because he is (all your arguments for his existence were debunked in the other thread) and then we have to believe he talked through the bible because...

In that other thread... you forgot the part about all your refutation refuting itself.

IF we were scientifically ignorant enough that we didn't have proof for God's existence, the best we could say is that we don't know where things came from. Why? Because we don't know enough about how things work, or what the history of the earth really is, to factually say that we know that evolution exists. The best that evolution can do is to suggest itself. All evolution things fit other events better than they fit evolution. And to top it all off, we have not even one proof of evolution. All we have is talk that there is proof.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

Well the fact is that most scientists, even the ones that believe in god agree that evolution is real. If they thought scientific proof for god existed, they would have came up with a scientific theory for god already since 30% of scientists in america believe in it. It's quite strange how they support evolution theory but make no effort to create even a hypothesis for the existence of god. Yet at the same time you believe evolution is clearly fake and god clearly has scientific evidence to prove his existence. Really strange..

[BADecker]

''We can start by recognizing that God exists. From there we can go on to recognize that He has talked through the Bible.'' Solid evidence there, we have to start by saying god is real because he is (all your arguments for his existence were debunked in the other thread) and then we have to believe he talked through the bible because...

In that other thread... you forgot the part about all your refutation refuting itself.

IF we were scientifically ignorant enough that we didn't have proof for God's existence, the best we could say is that we don't know where things came from. Why? Because we don't know enough about how things work, or what the history of the earth really is, to factually say that we know that evolution exists. The best that evolution can do is to suggest itself. All evolution things fit other events better than they fit evolution. And to top it all off, we have not even one proof of evolution. All we have is talk that there is proof.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

Well the fact is that most scientists, even the ones that believe in god agree that evolution is real. If they thought scientific proof for god existed, they would have came up with a scientific theory for god already since 30% of scientists in america believe in it. It's quite strange how they support evolution theory but make no effort to create even a hypothesis for the existence of god. Yet at the same time you believe evolution is clearly fake and god clearly has scientific evidence to prove his existence. Really strange..

Even if your "statistics" are accurate, nobody has offered real proof that evolution exists. All of it, 100% of it, is based on the possibility that nature fits the evolution idea.

Most college-graduate, thinking scientists of our day have gone through some evolution courses. If evolution isn't their field, they agree with it only because they were required to take the classes. They haven't evaluated the other options - adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change... to say nothing about deeply considering C&E programming. So, there is nothing strange about the way they support evolution... almost absent mindedly.

Actually, I don't believe God clearly has scientific proof for His existence. I know it. The simplest proof is machine nature. Why would I believe when there is proof? Machines have makers.

Evolution is a hoax.

[Astargath]

''We can start by recognizing that God exists. From there we can go on to recognize that He has talked through the Bible.'' Solid evidence there, we have to start by saying god is real because he is (all your arguments for his existence were debunked in the other thread) and then we have to believe he talked through the bible because...

In that other thread... you forgot the part about all your refutation refuting itself.

IF we were scientifically ignorant enough that we didn't have proof for God's existence, the best we could say is that we don't know where things came from. Why? Because we don't know enough about how things work, or what the history of the earth really is, to factually say that we know that evolution exists. The best that evolution can do is to suggest itself. All evolution things fit other events better than they fit evolution. And to top it all off, we have not even one proof of evolution. All we have is talk that there is proof.

Evolution is a complete hoax.

Well the fact is that most scientists, even the ones that believe in god agree that evolution is real. If they thought scientific proof for god existed, they would have came up with a scientific theory for god already since 30% of scientists in america believe in it. It's quite strange how they support evolution theory but make no effort to create even a hypothesis for the existence of god. Yet at the same time you believe evolution is clearly fake and god clearly has scientific evidence to prove his existence. Really strange..

Even if your "statistics" are accurate, nobody has offered real proof that evolution exists. All of it, 100% of it, is based on the possibility that nature fits the evolution idea.

Most college-graduate, thinking scientists of our day have gone through some evolution courses. If evolution isn't their field, they agree with it only because they were required to take the classes. They haven't evaluated the other options - adaptation, like-begets-like, and simple change... to say nothing about deeply considering C&E programming. So, there is nothing strange about the way they support evolution... almost absent mindedly.

Actually, I don't believe God clearly has scientific proof for His existence. I know it. The simplest proof is machine nature. Why would I believe when there is proof? Machines have makers.

Evolution is a hoax.

''nobody has offered real proof that evolution exists.'' You keep saying that but a scientific theory cannot exist without proof, why would those 30-40% of scientists that believe in god accept evolution then?