Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2019, 06:34:41 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 [173] 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 ... 309 »
  Print  
Author Topic: The Movement DAO | Fully Decentralized Organization | Borderless Collaboration  (Read 174883 times)
pinoycash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1134
Merit: 512


Free Crypto in Stake.com Telegram t.me/StakeCasino


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 07:31:51 AM
 #3441

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

I think they want to reward the real active airdrop participants while those free loaders will get less, but for me -70% is too high for punishment for inactivity for the movement. 

But lets carry on and support the dev team on all their decision and plans.

PLAY OVER 3000 GAMES
LIGHTNING FAST WITHDRAWALS
PLAY NOW
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1558895681
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558895681

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558895681
Reply with quote  #2

1558895681
Report to moderator
1558895681
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1558895681

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1558895681
Reply with quote  #2

1558895681
Report to moderator
DarkTrollCoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 102



View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 07:54:01 AM
 #3442

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

-70% wasn't to "spank" anyone... That penalty isn't applied to those who lack activity.
-70% is applied to those who failed to do the 2 mandatory votes as it was explained in the OP (i believe there's no explanation anymore in the OP as the applications are over)

There's no penalty for those who lack activity. Only for those who didn't vote.
We are building a DAO. We have a voice to govern it by voting and 3/4 of the people who went in for a quick buck are not reading or doing anything and expecting to have the whole cake...

It was stated since the beginning that if you don't vote, you'll be penalized.
Don't spread fake infos please  Wink

The Movement  🌱  Unstoppable Organization
▂▃▅▆ ⌠  Connect and Create  |  Join the movement  ⌡ ▆▅▃▂
Trade  Whitepaper  Bounties  Github  Twitter  Reddit  Telegram  Blog
AlexSimion
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 462
Merit: 121



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 08:14:03 AM
 #3443

Did we come with an agreement on the 2nd vote , the one with the bonus for the first registered ? Quite curious about it.

EARN FREE 25 $ https://nauticus.io/?aff=ALEXANDER     
AdobeWriter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 358
Merit: 252


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 08:20:30 AM
 #3444

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

They weren't waiting for direction, they just signed up without taking a look if anything is needed from them and without returning to the thread. The dev gave a direction. It was to achieve consensus on the first vote, so we can decide when to close the airdrop. Good thing more than 50% of the participants figured it out or we'd still be stuck on the first vote and the airdrop would still be open to new participants. As far as I remember the dev even pushed the deadline 24 hours, to give them one more chance.

Look at it this way. Nobody got penalized. Just the people who actualy participated and helped the vote go through got a +70% bonus for not being a liability to the project. Nobody has any money invested in this anyway, so I don't see much reason for complaining.
DarkTrollCoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 102



View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 08:23:17 AM
 #3445

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

They weren't waiting for direction, they just signed in without taking a look if anything is needed from them and without returning. The dev gave a direction. It was to achieve consensus on the first vote, so we can decide when to close the airdrop. Good thing more than 50% of the participants figured it out or we'd still be stuck on the first vote and the airdrop would still be open to new participants. As far as I remember the dev even pushed the deadline 24 hours, to give them one more chance.

Look at it this way. Nobody got penalized. Just the people who actualy participated and helped the vote go through got a +70% bonus for not being a liability to the project.

I just realized that only the 1st vote is mandatory to escape the -70%

The Movement  🌱  Unstoppable Organization
▂▃▅▆ ⌠  Connect and Create  |  Join the movement  ⌡ ▆▅▃▂
Trade  Whitepaper  Bounties  Github  Twitter  Reddit  Telegram  Blog
Piggy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 742
Merit: 1325



View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 08:52:53 AM
 #3446

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

I think they want to reward the real active airdrop participants while those free loaders will get less, but for me -70% is too high for punishment for inactivity for the movement. 

But lets carry on and support the dev team on all their decision and plans.

^
This, which is very good

zneww
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 09:43:33 AM
 #3447

I can't find any exact date in the roadmap.
What's the next move?
Ramone Estavez
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 54
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 10:40:24 AM
 #3448

I did both votes, but still got a -70%, who can fix this?
samantadegrenet
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 11:36:42 AM
 #3449

What happens with the distributions seems dev  has stopped since few days ago, hope we will get soon ours tokens.  Project look amazing to me
SlowGrowth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 264


| Privacy Advocate | Game Theory | Free Thinker |


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 12:26:28 PM
 #3450

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

-70% wasn't to "spank" anyone... That penalty isn't applied to those who lack activity.
-70% is applied to those who failed to do the 2 mandatory votes as it was explained in the OP (i believe there's no explanation anymore in the OP as the applications are over)

There's no penalty for those who lack activity. Only for those who didn't vote.
We are building a DAO. We have a voice to govern it by voting and 3/4 of the people who went in for a quick buck are not reading or doing anything and expecting to have the whole cake...

It was stated since the beginning that if you don't vote, you'll be penalized.
Don't spread fake infos please  Wink


I completly agree... The minimum that was asked from people was to vote and let their voice heard... They were capable of signing up to the airdrop but unable to write a message for the 1 vote? We could be talking about the 70% if its fair or not but in my point of view the hard penalty is a must...
testadimerlo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 263


QuarkChain.io


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 01:00:02 PM
 #3451

I did both votes, but still got a -70%, who can fix this?

First of all was your account created before the time terms? I don't remember the exactly date right now, maybe August 31th ( I hope other menbers correct if I'm wrong). If it's all right, try to send a message to the dev with the proof of your vote, your messages or something like that.
Jaroslav2007x
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 779
Merit: 291


40% is 40%


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 01:04:43 PM
 #3452

What's gotten quiet, is there any news?

            ▄▄████▄▄
        ▄▄██████████████▄▄
      ███████████████████████▄▄
      ▀▀█████████████████████████
██▄▄       ▀▀█████████████████████
██████▄▄        ▀█████████████████
███████████▄▄       ▀▀████████████
███████████████▄▄        ▀████████
████████████████████▄▄       ▀▀███
 ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
     ▀▀██████████████████████▄▄
▄▄        ▀██████████████████████▄
████▄▄        ▀▀██████████████████
█████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████████
█████████████▄▄        ▀▀█████████
██████████████████▄▄        ▀▀████
▀██████████████████████▄▄
  ▀▀████████████████████████
      ▀▀█████████████████▀▀
           ▀▀███████▀▀



.SEMUX
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
  Semux uses 100% original codebase
  Superfast with 30 seconds instant finality
  Tested 5000 tx per block on open network
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
█ █
Darwin02
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 714
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 01:07:50 PM
 #3453

I did both votes, but still got a -70%, who can fix this?

First of all was your account created before the time terms? I don't remember the exactly date right now, maybe August 31th ( I hope other menbers correct if I'm wrong). If it's all right, try to send a message to the dev with the proof of your vote, your messages or something like that.
i dont thinks its needed there are forms that see if you already vote or not. i think you voted late .



             ▄█
            ██  ██
           ██  ████
          ██  ██  ██
         ██  ██    ██
        ██  ██  ██  ██
       ██  ██    ██  ██
      ██  ██  ██  ██  ██
     ██  ██  ████  ██  ██
    ██  ██  ██  ██  ██  ██
   ██  ██  ██    ██  ██  ██
  ██  ██  ██████████  ██  ██
 ██                    ██  ██
█████████████████████▄  ██  █
                         ██
▀███████████████████████████




█████ █   █ █████      ███          █████████████▄▄    ████            ████     ▄▄██████████      ▄▄██████████
  █   █   █ █         █████         ████████████████    ████          ████     █████████████     █████████████
  █   █████ █████    ███████        ███         ▀███     ████        ████     ███▀              ███▀
  █   █   █ █        ███ ███        ███          ███      ████      ████      ███               ███
  █   █   █ █████   ███   ███       ███          ███       ████    ████       ███               ███
                    ███   ███       ███         ▄███        ████  ████        ███▄              ███▄
                   ███     ███      ██████████████▀          ████████          ██████████▄▄      ██████████▄▄
                   ███     ███      ██████████████▄           ██████            ▀▀██████████      ▀▀██████████
                  ███       ███     ███         ▀███           ████                      ▀███              ▀███
                  █████████████     ███          ███           ████                       ███               ███
                 ███████████████    ███          ███           ████                       ███               ███
                 ███         ███    ███         ▄███           ████                      ▄███              ▄███
                ███           ███   ████████████████           ████           ██████████████    ██████████████
                ███           ███   █████████████▀▀            ████           ███████████▀▀     ███████████▀▀

█  █
█  █
█  █
█  █
█  █
█▄▄
▀▀█
█  █
█  █
█  █
█  █
█  █

█  █
█  █
█  █
█  █
█  █
█▄▄
▀▀█
█  █
█  █
█  █
█  █
█  █
.TOKEN SALE. Apr 16 2018
      .DAICO.      May 16 2018

ANN Thread  ■  Whitepaper
■  Twitter
■  Telegram
■  Facebook
BitcoinPicasso
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 131
Merit: 100



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 01:15:05 PM
 #3454

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

Most of those are farmed accounts. Once those accounts get removed from the distribution list then we'll see screaming happening.
Xsinx
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 784
Merit: 250


SINOVATE - WELCOME TO THE FUTURE


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 01:55:41 PM
 #3455

What's gotten quiet, is there any news?

Nothing yet so far, but you should be aware that the developer prefer to work silently and he do works on the spread sheet from time time cleaning farmed accounts and updating tokens of each participants daily.

forensick
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 379
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 05:09:47 PM
 #3456

Just read the white paper also good cant wait for the future of the movement!!
bitwonder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 373
Merit: 250


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 06:20:46 PM
 #3457

What happens with the distributions seems dev  has stopped since few days ago, hope we will get soon ours tokens.  Project look amazing to me

you guys need to follow Telegram to get any news , Dev already said :

We gearing up for distribution of tokens.

I believe it should happen this week.

only 3 days from now, could be anytime

bobq
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 910
Merit: 302



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 06:28:10 PM
 #3458

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

-70% wasn't to "spank" anyone... That penalty isn't applied to those who lack activity.
-70% is applied to those who failed to do the 2 mandatory votes as it was explained in the OP (i believe there's no explanation anymore in the OP as the applications are over)

There's no penalty for those who lack activity. Only for those who didn't vote.
We are building a DAO. We have a voice to govern it by voting and 3/4 of the people who went in for a quick buck are not reading or doing anything and expecting to have the whole cake...

It was stated since the beginning that if you don't vote, you'll be penalized.
Don't spread fake infos please  Wink



And what's the penality for the devs if THEY lack in the activity? Wink
By the way, is there another vote now? I have been away one week or so...

FreshB
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 308
Merit: 250


The Movement DAO


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 06:37:54 PM
 #3459

What happens with the distributions seems dev  has stopped since few days ago, hope we will get soon ours tokens.  Project look amazing to me

you guys need to follow Telegram to get any news , Dev already said :

We gearing up for distribution of tokens.

I believe it should happen this week.

only 3 days from now, could be anytime



That wasn't dev. I said that, in response to someones question as to what was the latest.. I believe it should happen soon based on the time frame giving to us.

Cheers!

           ▀██▄ ▄██▀
            ▐█████▌
           ▄███▀███▄
         ▄████▄  ▀███▄
       ▄███▀ ▀██▄  ▀███▄
     ▄███▀  ▄█████▄  ▀███▄
   ▄███▀  ▄███▀ ▀███▄  ▀███▄
  ███▀  ▄████▌   ▐████▄  ▀███
 ███   ██▀  ██▄ ▄██  ▀██   ███
███   ███  ███   ███  ███   ███
███   ███   ███████   ███   ███
 ███   ███▄▄       ▄▄███   ███
  ███▄   ▀▀█████████▀▀   ▄███
   ▀████▄▄           ▄▄████▀
      ▀▀███████████████▀▀
DeepOnion
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
███
   Anonymity Guaranteed
   Anonymous and Untraceable
   Guard Your Privacy
      ▄▄██████████▄▄
    ▄███▀▀      ▀▀█▀   ▄▄
   ███▀              ▄███
  ███              ▄███▀   ▄▄
 ███▌  ▄▄▄▄      ▄███▀   ▄███
▐███  ██████   ▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███  ███▄███▀   ▄███▀
███▌ ███   ████▀   ▄███▀
███▌  ███   █▀   ▄███▀  ███
▐███   ███     ▄███▀   ███
 ███▌   ███  ▄███▀     ███
  ███    ██████▀      ███
   ███▄             ▄███
    ▀███▄▄       ▄▄███▀
      ▀▀███████████▀▀
jukKas
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 364
Merit: 100


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 06:38:00 PM
 #3460

Is there any info for how long this determination period lasts?

Also my rank updated, so is it still possible to change that in spreadsheet?

Thanks, and good luck!

Bitcoin
Pages: « 1 ... 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 [173] 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 ... 309 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!