Bitcoin Forum
June 26, 2019, 06:58:15 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 0.18.0 [Torrent] (New!)
 
   Home   Help Search Login Register More  
Pages: « 1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 ... 309 »
  Print  
Author Topic: The Movement DAO | Fully Decentralized Organization | Borderless Collaboration  (Read 177251 times)
Piggy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 1356



View Profile WWW
October 11, 2017, 11:45:36 AM
 #3421

when will the tokens distribution ? It's been a couple of months since the idea was born ,what did dev want to do !


"The nature of Bitcoin is such that once version 0.1 was released, the core design was set in stone for the rest of its lifetime." -- Satoshi
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction. Advertise here.
1561532295
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561532295

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561532295
Reply with quote  #2

1561532295
Report to moderator
1561532295
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561532295

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561532295
Reply with quote  #2

1561532295
Report to moderator
1561532295
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 1561532295

View Profile Personal Message (Offline)

Ignore
1561532295
Reply with quote  #2

1561532295
Report to moderator
Münzpräger
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 826
Merit: 326


View Profile
October 11, 2017, 12:12:49 PM
 #3422

it would be nice to setup a  masternode for this coin what do you think guys?  dev let us know if that would give the project better value for the future. Waiting for the distributions .

I like the ideia of MN. Is it possible with ERC20 tokens?

Not has of now... The only remote possible thing close to that is the POS system that is beeing used by other ERC20 project...

Someone needs to make masternodes on the ethereum chain will be amazing

We could code some system that does that.

How would that work and what would even be the purpose of it?
The Ethereum miners keep the entire network safe.
testadimerlo
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 840
Merit: 263


QuarkChain.io


View Profile
October 11, 2017, 12:16:00 PM
 #3423

when will the tokens distribution ? It's been a couple of months since the idea was born ,what did dev want to do !

C'mon, just a little bit of patience!
Piggy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 1356



View Profile WWW
October 11, 2017, 12:23:07 PM
 #3424

it would be nice to setup a  masternode for this coin what do you think guys?  dev let us know if that would give the project better value for the future. Waiting for the distributions .

I like the ideia of MN. Is it possible with ERC20 tokens?

Not has of now... The only remote possible thing close to that is the POS system that is beeing used by other ERC20 project...

Someone needs to make masternodes on the ethereum chain will be amazing

We could code some system that does that.

How would that work and what would even be the purpose of it?
The Ethereum miners keep the entire network safe.

i think that would need to be decided by us, but at the moment i don't see any purpose or need for it. Nevertheless if needed we can do it.

evergrow
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 421
Merit: 256


View Profile WWW
October 11, 2017, 06:15:21 PM
 #3425

Looking forward to the distribution and beyond! The thread has 90869 views already, approaching 100k. Tokens should be arriving in our wallets shortly and this is the beginning

The real work and fun may begin
^BuTcH^
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 584
Merit: 101


Get crypto-backed loans on Biterest


View Profile
October 11, 2017, 07:29:18 PM
 #3426

Looking forward to the distribution and beyond! The thread has 90869 views already, approaching 100k. Tokens should be arriving in our wallets shortly and this is the beginning

The real work and fun may begin

I don't care very much about the tokens, I care about decentraland and VR implementation!

niklasmato
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 574
Merit: 263


View Profile
October 11, 2017, 07:48:05 PM
 #3427

Looking forward to the distribution and beyond! The thread has 90869 views already, approaching 100k. Tokens should be arriving in our wallets shortly and this is the beginning

The real work and fun may begin

I don't care very much about the tokens, I care about decentraland and VR implementation!

The decentraland and vr implementation sound really cool. I'm eagerly awaiting updates regarding these Wink
gawlea
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 756
Merit: 579



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 06:43:05 AM
 #3428

Is that necessary to post on daily basis into this thread to increase the amount of tokens from upcoming distribution. How OP will calculate the token for any person that is a little bit confusing for me some people are posting off topic into this thread.

The total share of the tokens will be calculated upon the activity/contribution to the project of each member, not based on the posts from this thread.

At a certain point, when shit get real, we will need to add to that spreadsheet abot skills that anybody can bring into play to help the movement.

@Droper I think we must change or think to another ticker for The Movement DAO token because TAO is taken, see here: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/tao/

the tokens exist already, somebody found it on etherscan few pages back:

https://etherscan.io/token/0x6ec3b3dd8c9676e2098666f5a58968ba83542d08

or at least we believe this is it

Yes I belive that is The Movement DAO token too, the supply is 3 millions like it should be. Well the good think is that Tao coin ticker is XTO and we use the name TAO as ticker.
Big Naturals
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 672
Merit: 267


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 06:56:36 AM
 #3429

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!
qiwoman2
Legendary
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 1778
Merit: 1014


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 07:01:30 AM
 #3430

I have been a bit out of the woods lately but is there anything we need to do right now or we are awaiting for further instructions? Anyway in which we can help build this project let me know. I can do a blog review if that will help. I have been a bit out of the loop as I have been learning to trade a bit etc but I will be around as I think this could really become like the next NEM of crypto. I remember how big NEM was back in the day so this could become the NEXT one, maybe even better who knows.  Smiley
pinoycash
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 1148
Merit: 512


Free Crypto in Stake.com Telegram t.me/StakeCasino


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 07:31:51 AM
 #3431

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

I think they want to reward the real active airdrop participants while those free loaders will get less, but for me -70% is too high for punishment for inactivity for the movement. 

But lets carry on and support the dev team on all their decision and plans.

DarkTrollCoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 102



View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 07:54:01 AM
 #3432

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

-70% wasn't to "spank" anyone... That penalty isn't applied to those who lack activity.
-70% is applied to those who failed to do the 2 mandatory votes as it was explained in the OP (i believe there's no explanation anymore in the OP as the applications are over)

There's no penalty for those who lack activity. Only for those who didn't vote.
We are building a DAO. We have a voice to govern it by voting and 3/4 of the people who went in for a quick buck are not reading or doing anything and expecting to have the whole cake...

It was stated since the beginning that if you don't vote, you'll be penalized.
Don't spread fake infos please  Wink

The Movement  🌱  Unstoppable Organization
▂▃▅▆ ⌠  Connect and Create  |  Join the movement  ⌡ ▆▅▃▂
Trade  Whitepaper  Bounties  Github  Twitter  Reddit  Telegram  Blog
AlexSimion
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 467
Merit: 121



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 08:14:03 AM
 #3433

Did we come with an agreement on the 2nd vote , the one with the bonus for the first registered ? Quite curious about it.

EARN FREE 25 $ https://nauticus.io/?aff=ALEXANDER     
AdobeWriter
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 358
Merit: 252


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 08:20:30 AM
 #3434

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

They weren't waiting for direction, they just signed up without taking a look if anything is needed from them and without returning to the thread. The dev gave a direction. It was to achieve consensus on the first vote, so we can decide when to close the airdrop. Good thing more than 50% of the participants figured it out or we'd still be stuck on the first vote and the airdrop would still be open to new participants. As far as I remember the dev even pushed the deadline 24 hours, to give them one more chance.

Look at it this way. Nobody got penalized. Just the people who actualy participated and helped the vote go through got a +70% bonus for not being a liability to the project. Nobody has any money invested in this anyway, so I don't see much reason for complaining.
DarkTrollCoin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Activity: 217
Merit: 102



View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 08:23:17 AM
 #3435

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

They weren't waiting for direction, they just signed in without taking a look if anything is needed from them and without returning. The dev gave a direction. It was to achieve consensus on the first vote, so we can decide when to close the airdrop. Good thing more than 50% of the participants figured it out or we'd still be stuck on the first vote and the airdrop would still be open to new participants. As far as I remember the dev even pushed the deadline 24 hours, to give them one more chance.

Look at it this way. Nobody got penalized. Just the people who actualy participated and helped the vote go through got a +70% bonus for not being a liability to the project.

I just realized that only the 1st vote is mandatory to escape the -70%

The Movement  🌱  Unstoppable Organization
▂▃▅▆ ⌠  Connect and Create  |  Join the movement  ⌡ ▆▅▃▂
Trade  Whitepaper  Bounties  Github  Twitter  Reddit  Telegram  Blog
Piggy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 770
Merit: 1356



View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 08:52:53 AM
 #3436

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

I think they want to reward the real active airdrop participants while those free loaders will get less, but for me -70% is too high for punishment for inactivity for the movement. 

But lets carry on and support the dev team on all their decision and plans.

^
This, which is very good

zneww
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 434
Merit: 250



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 09:43:33 AM
 #3437

I can't find any exact date in the roadmap.
What's the next move?
Ramone Estavez
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Activity: 55
Merit: 0


View Profile
October 12, 2017, 10:40:24 AM
 #3438

I did both votes, but still got a -70%, who can fix this?
samantadegrenet
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Activity: 686
Merit: 500



View Profile
October 12, 2017, 11:36:42 AM
 #3439

What happens with the distributions seems dev  has stopped since few days ago, hope we will get soon ours tokens.  Project look amazing to me
SlowGrowth
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Activity: 490
Merit: 264


| Privacy Advocate | Game Theory | Free Thinker |


View Profile WWW
October 12, 2017, 12:26:28 PM
 #3440

All the -70% activity spanking doesn't do much for community building, too early for punishment. The history of airdrop coins being successful without innovation is very poor, there's so much competition now, and when more than 50% of the community realise while they were waiting for direction from the dev they had their pants pulled down and their bums smacked for lack of 'activity', many will stop paying attention here.

For better or worse the dev must lead and show direction, at least at the start. When I see people getting enthusiastic and evangelising an 'unknown' project I smell insincerity and BS. @dev, you lead first and then spank the inactive community members later, not before the fucking project has even started!

-70% wasn't to "spank" anyone... That penalty isn't applied to those who lack activity.
-70% is applied to those who failed to do the 2 mandatory votes as it was explained in the OP (i believe there's no explanation anymore in the OP as the applications are over)

There's no penalty for those who lack activity. Only for those who didn't vote.
We are building a DAO. We have a voice to govern it by voting and 3/4 of the people who went in for a quick buck are not reading or doing anything and expecting to have the whole cake...

It was stated since the beginning that if you don't vote, you'll be penalized.
Don't spread fake infos please  Wink


I completly agree... The minimum that was asked from people was to vote and let their voice heard... They were capable of signing up to the airdrop but unable to write a message for the 1 vote? We could be talking about the 70% if its fair or not but in my point of view the hard penalty is a must...
Pages: « 1 ... 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 [172] 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 ... 309 »
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Sponsored by , a Bitcoin-accepting VPN.
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!