Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[Kakmakr]

I have not visited the Stake chat for some time, because it got a bit too toxic, but on Saturday I decided to give it another try. I was shocked by the amount of beggars that were flooding the chat with money requests.

The chat mods must have a hard time dealing with this, but I think I might have a solution. Why can the developers not create a "community" police user and link that to a "auto" mute function?

The community police users can be verified by the mods to identify users that will not abuse this system and "auto mute" can only be done if say 10 community police members flag a user to be muted.

The "auto mutes" can be audited to see if someone are abusing their powers... and then they lose those rights. The mutes by the Community Police can also not exceed say 2 to 4 hours.

What do you think?

[3kpk3]

I have not visited the Stake chat for some time, because it got a bit too toxic, but on Saturday I decided to give it another try. I was shocked by the amount of beggars that were flooding the chat with money requests.

The chat mods must have a hard time dealing with this, but I think I might have a solution. Why can the developers not create a "community" police user and link that to a "auto" mute function?

The community police users can be verified by the mods to identify users that will not abuse this system and "auto mute" can only be done if say 10 community police members flag a user to be muted.

The "auto mutes" can be audited to see if someone are abusing their powers... and then they lose those rights. The mutes by the Community Police can also not exceed say 2 to 4 hours.

What do you think?

This is a great idea, but I feel it's pointless since the Stake team is lazy as hell and they might not even bother thinking about your idea. Am guessing that many people made similar suggestions in the past which fell on deaf ears.

They know damn well that there are many, many beggars in their chatroom, but they clearly don't care which is the harsh truth.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

I have not visited the Stake chat for some time, because it got a bit too toxic, but on Saturday I decided to give it another try. I was shocked by the amount of beggars that were flooding the chat with money requests.

The chat mods must have a hard time dealing with this, but I think I might have a solution. Why can the developers not create a "community" police user and link that to a "auto" mute function?

The community police users can be verified by the mods to identify users that will not abuse this system and "auto mute" can only be done if say 10 community police members flag a user to be muted.

The "auto mutes" can be audited to see if someone are abusing their powers... and then they lose those rights. The mutes by the Community Police can also not exceed say 2 to 4 hours.

What do you think?

This is a great idea, but I feel it's pointless since the Stake team is lazy as hell and they might not even bother thinking about your idea. Am guessing that many people made similar suggestions in the past which fell on deaf ears.

They know damn well that there are many, many beggars in their chatroom, but they clearly don't care which is the harsh truth.

Well, his idea is a very good one but I feel his wordings made the idea a bit too complicated or confusing to understand.
In a more simple terms, I would say the Stake team introduce a bot, the same way it is done on telegram, they assign some words to the bot that the bot should detect as a ban word, when ever any user in the chat used any word that is in the list of the ban word, the bot can automatically warn that user to desist from using such word, and also list out all the words that are banned, this warning can be two or three times per user, and after the third time, if the user still makes use of any word that is a ban word, then the bit can automatically mute such for let's say, 3 hours, and if after 3 hours the user is unmuted, if the user uses a ban word again, the bot will again mute him or her for 6 hours, and if after that, the same user offend again, the bot will mute the user for 9 hours, next - 12 hours, next again - 15 hours and so on until the user can be muted for even 1 whole year if he or she continues to offend.

I think implementing such chat security feature will help the clean the stake community off every begger..
But on the other, Stake is really a big casino, and one thing about casinos that have become this big is that, it's always difficult for them to listen and implement ideas from their community, pretty hard and I don't think it has anything to do with laziness.

[xxjumperxx]

Can Stake maybe at least for "big" Soccer Game also include Player Props?
Im talking Shots on Goal/Shots on Target kind of plays, that would really make me place more bets at stake.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

Can Stake maybe at least for "big" Soccer Game also include Player Props?
Im talking Shots on Goal/Shots on Target kind of plays, that would really make me place more bets at stake.

This is good idea and suggestion, as this made me remember just now that there was a time I wanted to bet on shot on Target for a football club match I was watching, I rushed down to stake which actually is one of my favorite casinos, and going to that match betting page, I could neither find shots on Target or shots in goal in the list of all available props to bet on.
So, personally, I also support this suggestion, adding this would be nice, gamblers have different reasons or aspect to which they choose to bet on a game, and different ways to, making things like this available to gamblers is always cool since it can attract players who like to bet on such type of props and so on.

Anways, let's hope that someone who is a top member of the stake board will comes across this suggestion, like it and take it up to the developers so that this can be implemented into qualifying games.

[xxjumperxx]

Can Stake maybe at least for "big" Soccer Game also include Player Props?
Im talking Shots on Goal/Shots on Target kind of plays, that would really make me place more bets at stake.

This is good idea and suggestion, as this made me remember just now that there was a time I wanted to bet on shot on Target for a football club match I was watching, I rushed down to stake which actually is one of my favorite casinos, and going to that match betting page, I could neither find shots on Target or shots in goal in the list of all available props to bet on.
So, personally, I also support this suggestion, adding this would be nice, gamblers have different reasons or aspect to which they choose to bet on a game, and different ways to, making things like this available to gamblers is always cool since it can attract players who like to bet on such type of props and so on.

Anways, let's hope that someone who is a top member of the stake board will comes across this suggestion, like it and take it up to the developers so that this can be implemented into qualifying games.

Yeah that would really be great, since I really like betting at stake und wouldnt want to split up my balance to just bet these kinds of bets elsewhere.
I mean it depends where they get their odds from and that service also would need to offer these bets.
We will see, sure hope this gets added!

[panjul07]

-snip-

What do you think?

The idea is basically good but I dont think it will work or I dont think Stake will implement it because I think is something complicated.
When it comes to "muting" users in chat, it is always become something debatable and there will be much complaints about it IMO.
When there are more than 70k users online at the same time, the chat goes like lightning and I'm sure no one can even monitor every single message on the chatroom.
Not quite sure how to control those beggars but I think they need to increase the wagering requirement to be able to chat in the global room as an alternative option.

[Coin_trader]

I have not visited the Stake chat for some time, because it got a bit too toxic, but on Saturday I decided to give it another try. I was shocked by the amount of beggars that were flooding the chat with money requests.

The chat mods must have a hard time dealing with this, but I think I might have a solution. Why can the developers not create a "community" police user and link that to a "auto" mute function?

The community police users can be verified by the mods to identify users that will not abuse this system and "auto mute" can only be done if say 10 community police members flag a user to be muted.

The "auto mutes" can be audited to see if someone are abusing their powers... and then they lose those rights. The mutes by the Community Police can also not exceed say 2 to 4 hours.

What do you think?

Why just create an AI that will automatically delete post that with contains keywords for begging. This is much simpler and neat approach to fight this beggar post but having the report to mods feature on chat is a nice additional feature to raise immediately the concern to mods.

Also does anyone here can use the chat box properly to discuss with other players since most post there is just a troll post which is same no value with begging post. 

[SATWAT]

I have not visited the Stake chat for some time, because it got a bit too toxic, but on Saturday I decided to give it another try. I was shocked by the amount of beggars that were flooding the chat with money requests.

The chat mods must have a hard time dealing with this, but I think I might have a solution. Why can the developers not create a "community" police user and link that to a "auto" mute function?

The community police users can be verified by the mods to identify users that will not abuse this system and "auto mute" can only be done if say 10 community police members flag a user to be muted.

The "auto mutes" can be audited to see if someone are abusing their powers... and then they lose those rights. The mutes by the Community Police can also not exceed say 2 to 4 hours.

What do you think?

Why just create an AI that will automatically delete post that with contains keywords for begging. This is much simpler and neat approach to fight this beggar post but having the report to mods feature on chat is a nice additional feature to raise immediately the concern to mods.

Also does anyone here can use the chat box properly to discuss with other players since most post there is just a troll post which is same no value with begging post. 

Most of the casino chats are having this problem with things are needed to fix and having some better things, but they are not caring about this all which is creating problems for the regular gamblers, and now they are usually avoiding these chats boxes after having complaints on one site they have done tough work and now things are normal so hopefully we will have some tough regulations from the Stake as well in near future because now this is serious community problem which needs to be fixed.

[bSpend]

-snip-

What do you think?

The idea is basically good but I dont think it will work or I dont think Stake will implement it because I think is something complicated.
When it comes to "muting" users in chat, it is always become something debatable and there will be much complaints about it IMO.
When there are more than 70k users online at the same time, the chat goes like lightning and I'm sure no one can even monitor every single message on the chatroom.
Not quite sure how to control those beggars but I think they need to increase the wagering requirement to be able to chat in the global room as an alternative option.

And don't you think that increasing the wager requirement for eligibility to participate in the chat room will also arouse another set of complaints? I am not an active player on stake, but I've sure played there a couple of times, if I am not mistaken, the current wager amount required for players to be able to participate in the chat is $1000 I think, or $500 dollars (not sure), there are many of stake users who are still struggling to achieve this wager requirement, and as a casino that wants more and more users, increasing the wager amount required to participate in the chat will only shut out the small gamblers completely, and this may also cause the to mover over to another casino where they are treated better.

Anyways, it's not in our hands to decide, I trust that if stake really wants to deal with the begging on the chat, they know whats best for them to do.
For me, I will still prefer muting a user for a certain amount of time.

[Symphonized]

[Over $3,000] Slots Forum Challenge | Week 42



Win a bet with 40x or higher multipliers on slot Kenneth Must Die.
Minimum bet is 20c (0.20 USD). Any bets that are on the fun play/with nothing staked will not count.

https://stakecommunity.com/topic/93829-over-3000-slots-forum-challenge-week-42/

[Warfare]

Does anyone else have issues with autobet on Stake Originals?
Their ddos protection always gets triggered just by using autobet.

Update: autobet is now working without getting rate limited, even with the instant bet option.

[danherbias07]

Max Win Baby!!! Thank you Stake.com.



Surprised and happy. This is my first time to get a max win and I didn't expect it. The multiplier just kept on adding and I had 2 more bonus spins that were not used. But that's okay. This is a lot of money and I appreciate it.
I wish every gambler on Stake.com could experience the same way someday.
Good luck everyone.

[ralle14]

Max Win Baby!!! Thank you Stake.com.

Congrats on getting that x5000 max win in Lab of Lunacy. I've never had one in any slot game, but the potential winnings from a good bonus round can always be surprising.

Also, don't forget to claim this month's monthly bonus link through their telegram channel or email. I've reduced my wagering and deposit in the last couple of weeks, but i'm still surprised that the bonus they gave went up from $14 to $22. 

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Gambling is using emotion.

In case the (AI) missed the chat deleted, while the message actually not about "begging" the user can be mad. So, you can think he on angry emotion due to the lose + got that problem. IMO, still using real people are the good one and just stick on it.
GOT MONTHLY BTW, but off course lose these on 2 bets ~xd.

[xLays]

Max Win Baby!!! Thank you Stake.com.

Congrats on getting that x5000 max win in Lab of Lunacy. I've never had one in any slot game, but the potential winnings from a good bonus round can always be surprising.

Also, don't forget to claim this month's monthly bonus link through their telegram channel or email. I've reduced my wagering and deposit in the last couple of weeks, but i'm still surprised that the bonus they gave went up from $14 to $22. 

First time seeing that slot game. What slot provider is this?

I've been playing on Stake since 2019 but have never experienced a max win. If I remember correctly, I won 600x on a slot and it wasn't on Stake. lol

I also claimed my monthly bonus. Same as you, my monthly bonus increased a little compared to last month. I don't know why my monthly bonus is lower compared to my last weekly bonus.

[bitbollo]

...
I don't know why my monthly bonus is lower compared to my last weekly bonus.

me too.. impressive... I just received more from the weekly bonus and not from the monthly bonus!
Literally I get the double amount from weekly... by the way, not bad at all, their bonus scheme is pretty generous even if all time I can't understand properly how it works

[Haunebu]

And don't you think that increasing the wager requirement for eligibility to participate in the chat room will also arouse another set of complaints? I am not an active player on stake, but I've sure played there a couple of times, if I am not mistaken, the current wager amount required for players to be able to participate in the chat is $1000 I think, or $500 dollars (not sure), there are many of stake users who are still struggling to achieve this wager requirement, and as a casino that wants more and more users, increasing the wager amount required to participate in the chat will only shut out the small gamblers completely, and this may also cause the to mover over to another casino where they are treated better.

Valid argument. Increasing wagering requirements is definitely not the solution to this particular problem since it would amplify some other issues that you stated yourself. Someone suggested an AI solution which could be feasible.

AI is taking over the world these days in so many ways which is why a proper Stake AI designed to deal with beggars and other sitewide issues would help them greatly.

[xxjumperxx]

And don't you think that increasing the wager requirement for eligibility to participate in the chat room will also arouse another set of complaints? I am not an active player on stake, but I've sure played there a couple of times, if I am not mistaken, the current wager amount required for players to be able to participate in the chat is $1000 I think, or $500 dollars (not sure), there are many of stake users who are still struggling to achieve this wager requirement, and as a casino that wants more and more users, increasing the wager amount required to participate in the chat will only shut out the small gamblers completely, and this may also cause the to mover over to another casino where they are treated better.

Valid argument. Increasing wagering requirements is definitely not the solution to this particular problem since it would amplify some other issues that you stated yourself. Someone suggested an AI solution which could be feasible.

AI is taking over the world these days in so many ways which is why a proper Stake AI designed to deal with beggars and other sitewide issues would help them greatly.

AI seems like a great idea and a solution if it can be implemented in such a way. I mean the AI can detect the "Begging" Attempt and give that user a timeout of x minutes and a warning.
3 Warnings and its a Perma Ban or such...

Begging is a problem on many sites, I wonder how many of the attempts are really succesful and they receive a tip... Im pretty sure, the chances are low...

[Betwrong]

I have been playing casino/slots for years and I think the provider that offers the highest multiplier is No limit City with multipliers up to x300000 but in fact I was wrong, I just realized that Stake.com with inhouse games offers crazy multipliers over 2,000,000 multipliers on the Mines game. last week one of the users in the chat room posted it and he won a multiplier x2,022,545 and I was even more surprised to find out that this was not the highest record because the highest record is x5,148,300 yeah maybe this is the max win because 3 users got it.

Yes, I remember when I learned about it first time several years ago I was shocked by how much you can win staking so little. There was a site where you could calculate the potential multiplier based on the number of mines and diamonds, but I don't remember the name. Yet, I just googled it, there's another such site currently, https://playonstake.eu/stake-mines-calculator.html, and here's how it works:



Yes, the highest multiplier possible is 5,148,297. I'd love to see the screenshots of people winning with it.