Stake.com - The Leading Crypto Casino - Drake, UFC, Everton, Stake F1 Team

[Symphonized]

Congratulations to the following winners for being correct! 🥳
The answer is Stake Eddie

@noreen21X
@ne_kocat
@TobiasReicher12

$100 of Stake credit coming your way 🤑

https://x.com/Stake/status/1792025786603786477

[xLays]

Just want to give some feedback on the Poker Freeroll Tournament. I see the tournament takes 2 hours to finish. Ngl It is quite good experience. I have already managed to join 4 tournaments. There are times at the beginning of the tournament when I experience lag. But overall, the experience is smooth. It is just so annoying with players who are AFK and who take too long to make decisions. Hopefully, they lower the time to make decisions in this tournaments.

Another new poker free tournament will start in the next 30 minutes: https://stake.com/casino/games/poker/play?mode=real

[Symphonized]

[$3,000] Royal Club of Originals Week 84|Video Poker



Win a bet on Video Poker by hitting 4 OF A KIND (with any cards)

0.03 USD minimum bet amount (in any currency).

Giveaway's Topic: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/93828-%F0%9F%92%B03000-royal-club-of-originals-week-84video-poker-%E2%98%B8%EF%B8%8F/

[dimonstration]

It is just so annoying with players who are AFK and who take too long to make decisions. Hopefully, they lower the time to make decisions in this tournaments.

How come does an AFK is still in the table? Does this player is not active since the start and still there until they lose all their chips on the small blinds? This is really annoying if this AFK player will be on the table for that long and keep using all the decision time.

Stake should automatically remove players that are not online since it’s considered as forfeit for not being on the table when it starts. I do a lot of Blackjack tournaments in the past but no AFK player allowed, I’m skeptical on how freeroll tournament for poker works because they allow AFK players which means they are still allowed to enter even the tournament is already in session.

[wiss19]

-snip-

In my opinion.

They don't share the news and others for the game is already being deploy, testing the game first with freeroll + to avoid people overload access the game. That's why, they want to make sure the server or dashboard poker can handle a huge visitor/player. But still even they not announcement the game, total people who already joined the freeroll over 2,000 user.

Plus they are probably not even sure if it is working as well as they hope it would, so they want to first consider this stage as open beta, that way they would still have some people playing there, they would get to watch and see if people are having trouble of not. That way it would be quite good and would result with something much better.

Obviously it is not going to be easy, and a lot of people will not see the benefit of this, but the truth be told I think it is quite obvious that we are going to see this open beta be fine. That way they can fix whatever issues that they have, and it will get a lot better on the long run, they will move along while fixing all the issues and will not face with any trouble on the long run.

[xLays]

It is just so annoying with players who are AFK and who take too long to make decisions. Hopefully, they lower the time to make decisions in this tournaments.

How come does an AFK is still in the table? Does this player is not active since the start and still there until they lose all their chips on the small blinds? This is really annoying if this AFK player will be on the table for that long and keep using all the decision time.

Stake should automatically remove players that are not online since it’s considered as forfeit for not being on the table when it starts. I do a lot of Blackjack tournaments in the past but no AFK player allowed, I’m skeptical on how freeroll tournament for poker works because they allow AFK players which means they are still allowed to enter even the tournament is already in session.

If the player goes AFK, other players will wait until his turn is over. He won't be disconnected or even kicked from the table, just pure waste of time. While if a player is disconnected, he will also stay at the table, but bets will be placed automatically and he will automatically fold. He will be removed from the table once his balance goes to zero. I know other online poker once you go AFK you will be kick in the next round and if you want to join again wait for another round.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

-snip-

In my opinion.

They don't share the news and others for the game is already being deploy, testing the game first with freeroll + to avoid people overload access the game. That's why, they want to make sure the server or dashboard poker can handle a huge visitor/player. But still even they not announcement the game, total people who already joined the freeroll over 2,000 user.

Plus they are probably not even sure if it is working as well as they hope it would, so they want to first consider this stage as open beta, that way they would still have some people playing there, they would get to watch and see if people are having trouble of not. That way it would be quite good and would result with something much better.

Obviously it is not going to be easy, and a lot of people will not see the benefit of this, but the truth be told I think it is quite obvious that we are going to see this open beta be fine. That way they can fix whatever issues that they have, and it will get a lot better on the long run, they will move along while fixing all the issues and will not face with any trouble on the long run.

You can't really call it a beta anymore.
They tested it for at least 6 months on their .us site, and it still looks like a college kid made this software in 1 evening in his dorm. 
There are so many flaws, it amazes me a big site like stake would publish this as a finished product. Reminds me of the Cyberpunk 2077 release, hahaha.
I thought I would use stake again when they finally publish poker but it seems like this ship has sailed, totally not worth it!

[fullhdpixel]

-snip-

The reason was simple.

It's because (STAKE-POKER) it's not being updated on Stake Originals List Games. You can check by your self, there is no (STAKE POKER GAMES). People needed to search manually with the type word (POKER) on the search function.

No wonder everyone doesn't know anything about these ones. I don't even know, I search them once you told these

Agree on this that they should put it in original list or at the homepage when you go to the casino section.

However it was listed on the home menu under the baccarat but I doubt regular Stake user will notice it since it’s on the bottom part while no one is aware on this new addition. It’s easy to notice it if Stake will highligh it on the home page as new game.

Also I can’t fully view the freeroll tournament details via handheld device.

To be fair it looks like they are not marketing poker all that much at the moment, not saying that they do not want players or anything, but they are not making a big deal out of it just yet.

I bet that when they are ready, they are going to get some amazingly famous poker player, maybe a few, and make them do the marketing and play in some ad or something and put all their name there etc and even make them who knows stream playing poker (which is a little weird if it happens considering someone might be playing against them) so all in all, we could see them do a lot more.

Plus, they will do these huge reward poker tournaments as well, with rewards being as high as hundreds of thousands of dollars, and that would then be the point where they expect everyone to know about it.

[Warfare]

Indeed, their poker game design is not the best.
The players circles at the table are kinda small, players cards and my own cards have some issues with transparency over the circle and username (especially when you fold).

[o48o]

Indeed, their poker game design is not the best.
The players circles at the table are kinda small, players cards and my own cards have some issues with transparency over the circle and username (especially when you fold).

I agree with that transparency, as it isn't clear to read at all...


But it's an easy fix, and i love the other simplistic / minimalistic design on the table. Throwin tomatoes etc taunting seems reallty unnecessary, but i suppose it's a matter of perspective and can just turn it off.

And maybe i just haven't used it enough, but i tried to add a poker table before my freeroll game started dealing cards just to see what that button does. I was instantly lost in gui for a while and took a while to find my table. That didn't seem like intuitive design, but maybe it's just confusion of a first timer.

Setting notes and and color rings on players is a good idea and i was using that a lot. I didn't go all in at the start even though i had a winning hand because i didn't want to accidentally lose before looking around and figuring out how everything works, and now i am annoyed i didn't. But there's always next time.

And i haven't played online poker for a while but is that option to choose from predefined text bubbles in a chat, as only form of communicating a thing? Or is this just some kind of placeholder before they get things working?.

[panjul07]

Indeed, their poker game design is not the best.
The players circles at the table are kinda small, players cards and my own cards have some issues with transparency over the circle and username (especially when you fold).

I have to agree that their poker table is not the best, I think they can create/develop much better poker table.
Currently their poker freerolls are played by many users but I'm wondering once they open the ring games, will it get the same average number of active players?
We have seen many poker sites that failed in the past, when they open freerolls = there are many users but when they stop freeroll, there was so small numbers of active players.
Without a doubt, Stake has a big player based but I'm not sure how many of them who are really poker players who will be willing to play in ring games.

[dimonstration]

It is just so annoying with players who are AFK and who take too long to make decisions. Hopefully, they lower the time to make decisions in this tournaments.

How come does an AFK is still in the table? Does this player is not active since the start and still there until they lose all their chips on the small blinds? This is really annoying if this AFK player will be on the table for that long and keep using all the decision time.

Stake should automatically remove players that are not online since it’s considered as forfeit for not being on the table when it starts. I do a lot of Blackjack tournaments in the past but no AFK player allowed, I’m skeptical on how freeroll tournament for poker works because they allow AFK players which means they are still allowed to enter even the tournament is already in session.

If the player goes AFK, other players will wait until his turn is over. He won't be disconnected or even kicked from the table, just pure waste of time. While if a player is disconnected, he will also stay at the table, but bets will be placed automatically and he will automatically fold. He will be removed from the table once his balance goes to zero. I know other online poker once you go AFK you will be kick in the next round and if you want to join again wait for another round.

This is the worst experience. You’re right that AFK player should be removed with just 1 turn of being offline since the decision time is too long to be consumed consistently every round.

I’m not a regular poker player but I have experienced playing poker app like pokerstar which automatically kick out user that doesn’t do decision in a turn. Maybe this poker table is still under ongoing improvement that’s why Stake doesn’t market it full blast or else we should be seeing this game frequently advertised here.

Stake signature code is not even updated with this latest supposedly a power house game for them.

[Fivestar4everMVP]

-snip-

In my opinion.

They don't share the news and others for the game is already being deploy, testing the game first with freeroll + to avoid people overload access the game. That's why, they want to make sure the server or dashboard poker can handle a huge visitor/player. But still even they not announcement the game, total people who already joined the freeroll over 2,000 user.

Plus they are probably not even sure if it is working as well as they hope it would, so they want to first consider this stage as open beta, that way they would still have some people playing there, they would get to watch and see if people are having trouble of not. That way it would be quite good and would result with something much better.

Obviously it is not going to be easy, and a lot of people will not see the benefit of this, but the truth be told I think it is quite obvious that we are going to see this open beta be fine. That way they can fix whatever issues that they have, and it will get a lot better on the long run, they will move along while fixing all the issues and will not face with any trouble on the long run.

You can't really call it a beta anymore.
They tested it for at least 6 months on their .us site, and it still looks like a college kid made this software in 1 evening in his dorm. 
There are so many flaws, it amazes me a big site like stake would publish this as a finished product. Reminds me of the Cyberpunk 2077 release, hahaha.
I thought I would use stake again when they finally publish poker but it seems like this ship has sailed, totally not worth it!

I am not a poker player, and neither do I even know how to play, but one thing we need to also consider here is that, the US version of that site is not the same as the global site, for one sure thing first is that, number users of the US site and number of users of the global site can't be compared, and we know that tech products always have issues when hit with the type of traffic it wasn't designed for.

And Secondly, you don't expect stake to just take the software from their US site and implement into the global site without tweaking some line of codes, adding and removing some stuffs, and as long as this is done, the software automatically considered new and in beta test mode since those code thats been updated may not have gone through a normal rigorous test phase or process to guarantee not just usability, but durability, reliability as well.

Anyways, I am not here to defend stake for releasing a poorly crafted piece of tech to their users, i am just stating some possible reasons that could have lead to the low rating and dissatisfaction of users on the newly launched poker game on the site.

[Symphonized]

[$3,000] Royal Club of Originals Week 85|Blue Samurai



Win a bet on Blue Samurai with a minimum 90x multiplier.
 
0.03 USD minimum bet amount (in any currency).

Giveaway's Topic: https://stakecommunity.com/topic/94186-%F0%9F%92%B03000-royal-club-of-originals-week-85blue-samurai-%E2%98%B8%EF%B8%8F/

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

US and.COM

Have different total users, did (US) are facing the same lag with .com ? I don't think soo, even they're sharing the same system, bandwidth server and other. US have more steady rather than .com. Basically, it's not the same.

Poker required created a room, there also has some tournaments. Total number user who are accessing the dashboard, people are joined in the room, and how many room they can created are quite different with .US.

The dashboard can crash on .COM meanwhile in US is not.

[AHOYBRAUSE]

-snip-

US and.COM

Have different total users, did (US) are facing the same lag with .com ? I don't think soo, even they're sharing the same system, bandwidth server and other. US have more steady rather than .com. Basically, it's not the same.

Poker required created a room, there also has some tournaments. Total number user who are accessing the dashboard, people are joined in the room, and how many room they can created are quite different with .US.

The dashboard can crash on .COM meanwhile in US is not.

What are you even talking about?
The sites softwares are 1:1 the same. You can't tell anybody otherwise. The software is the same and the games run the same way. Only difference is money and user base, that's it.
I don't know why you even bother defending/explaining their terrible poker software. It's a total unfinished product, everybody can see that and reddit as well as the forum is full of that.

Why you even talk about lags, crashes and other nonsense if beyond me. I am solely talking about poker here.

[Betwrong]

$300 ⏩ $424k

A CRAZY win on Dice! 🤯

https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1790502599793508780

From what I see, he hit 99.99, so, the guy could win more, actually.



It happens to me too. When I set the target multiplier to 999x and hit 99.99, I win, but I always think: "Why didn't I aim for 99.99? I would win 10 times more then!"

BTW, does anyone know, how to look up a bet on Stake? Searching for this bet to get a better picture quality I wrote "DICE ID 228,441, 536,570" in the search box



but it didn't work for me. Is it possible at all?

[ryzaadit]

-snip-

Have you tried (casino:number bet id) in the chat: https://stake.ac/casino/home?iid=house%3A228441536570&modal=bet?
Here are some videos for hitting 4990x on youtube: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6deQQsriN0. I also really want to hit those ~xd In my opinion people needed to make a bait bet with 0 dollars bet to spin/bet with around 2000-5000 bet. Then tried to start betting 1 cent and increase around 100-200% every 500-750 bet. Worth to tried, for people who are looking legacy.

-snip-

Mate, the website accessing resource and other is also factor for the smooth of their product. US and .COM have a big gaps user base, probability they also have different bandwidth or resource system. Now, you talk everything are same did you even can confirm they have the same bandwidth system and other things on US with .COM ? we all know most of service online is always updating their bandwidth, server and other things once they reached the peeks like (Lagging) and other. Bad for you, doesn't mean bad for other. Each person have their own taste. Perhaps, WSOP are perfect for you because you want a perfect product with good dashboard looking and other.

[Cointxz]

$300 ⏩ $424k

A CRAZY win on Dice! 🤯

https://twitter.com/Stake/status/1790502599793508780

From what I see, he hit 99.99, so, the guy could win more, actually.



It happens to me too. When I set the target multiplier to 999x and hit 99.99, I win, but I always think: "Why didn't I aim for 99.99? I would win 10 times more then!"

BTW, does anyone know, how to look up a bet on Stake? Searching for this bet to get a better picture quality I wrote "DICE ID 228,441, 536,570" in the search box

I can’t imagine how huge the bankroll of this user and the steel balls he is wearing for having a 300$ bet on 0.07% winning chance. I’d rather bet it on slot games that gives partial return on my bet rather than doing it on Dice game that doesn’t have any partial return per bet.

I’m pretty sure that he consume almost close to the winning amount or over just to hit that win with that low win chance rate.

[panjul07]

BTW, does anyone know, how to look up a bet on Stake? Searching for this bet to get a better picture quality I wrote "DICE ID 228,441, 536,570" in the search box



but it didn't work for me. Is it possible at all?

Of course it will never work because you use the search feature which is created to search for games, correct me if I'm wrong.
The best way to look up a bet at Stake is by using the chat room as posted by ryzaadit above.

I can’t imagine how huge the bankroll of this user and the steel balls he is wearing for having a 300$ bet on 0.07% winning chance. I’d rather bet it on slot games that gives partial return on my bet rather than doing it on Dice game that doesn’t have any partial return per bet.

I’m pretty sure that he consume almost close to the winning amount or over just to hit that win with that low win chance rate.

If you are sure that his bankroll is close to the winning amount, I'll say that his bankroll is more than the winning amount (can be something like at least 2x of the winning amount).
Just guessing of course, I will not imagine too much because it will be an amount which is something that I'll never see in my casino account.