size_m
Jr. Member
 Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 1
|
 |
January 22, 2018, 08:08:21 PM |
|
i set up the desktop wallet today (on windows) and also received my coins from the exchange but it doesn't start staking.
i have waited the whole day now but it just doesn't stake.
in the options menu the "enable staking" is checked.
and the lock button in the upper right corner is also turned to orange (for staking only).
what else could be the reason for not staking?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin mining is now a specialized and very risky industry, just like gold mining. Amateur miners are unlikely to make much money, and may even lose money. Bitcoin is much more than just mining, though!
|
|
|
Advertised sites are not endorsed by the Bitcoin Forum. They may be unsafe, untrustworthy, or illegal in your jurisdiction.
|
|
|
|
|
Peppo
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 12
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2018, 08:28:49 PM |
|
i set up the desktop wallet today (on windows) and also received my coins from the exchange but it doesn't start staking.
i have waited the whole day now but it just doesn't stake.
in the options menu the "enable staking" is checked.
and the lock button in the upper right corner is also turned to orange (for staking only).
what else could be the reason for not staking?
Hover over staking-symbol. What does it say? Coins take about 8 hours to mature. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nebell
|
|
January 22, 2018, 09:08:09 PM |
|
Add it to COSS exchange? Decentralized exchange + privacy coin is a good combo  |
|
|
|
KryptoBonya
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
January 22, 2018, 11:02:32 PM |
|
Does anyone know how to find my Spectre wallet Private Key? Thanks.
Go to options/debug/console. Type in "dumpprivkey Address or public key". This will show you your private key. On request, "dumpprivkey Address" issues a private key, but on request "dumpprivkey public key" answers "Invalid SpectreCoin address (code -5)". Why is that? |
|
|
|
|
size_m
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 146
Merit: 1
|
|
January 23, 2018, 12:32:53 AM |
|
Does anyone know how to find my Spectre wallet Private Key? Thanks.
Go to options/debug/console. Type in "dumpprivkey Address or public key". This will show you your private key. On request, "dumpprivkey Address" issues a private key, but on request "dumpprivkey public key" answers "Invalid SpectreCoin address (code -5)". Why is that? because as far as i understand it you gotta insert your wallet adress (also called "public key") instead of the word "adress" or "public key". so type in: "dumpprivkey <yourwalletaddress>" |
|
|
|
|
SushiShifter
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 1
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 06:36:17 AM |
|
Looks like the only active dev right now is jbg. What is jbg's background?
|
|
|
|
|
heratys111
Member
Offline
Activity: 164
Merit: 71
|
|
January 23, 2018, 07:40:22 AM |
|
Looks like the only active dev right now is jbg. What is jbg's background?
Someone who knows what he's doing backwards-and-forwards (and is methodical and meticulous) from what I've seen. Let the evidence/product speak for itself; he shouldn't be compelled to produce an extensive curriculum vitae nor should the public renown of the dev be the main motivating factor regarding a privacy coin. How many Monero developers are widely/publicly known, for example? |
▐▐▐▐ CrocodileCash ▐▐▐▐ Fast and cheap ^_^ ▐ Aggressive, non-hyperinflationary 12% PoS ("Strength in Basking") ▐ 4.4 million current supply ▐ SHA-256 PoW -- Making old ASICs great again |
|
|
KryptoBonya
Newbie
Offline
Activity: 10
Merit: 0
|
|
January 23, 2018, 10:11:49 AM |
|
Does anyone know how to find my Spectre wallet Private Key? Thanks.
Go to options/debug/console. Type in "dumpprivkey Address or public key". This will show you your private key. On request, "dumpprivkey Address" issues a private key, but on request "dumpprivkey public key" answers "Invalid SpectreCoin address (code -5)". Why is that? because as far as i understand it you gotta insert your wallet adress (also called "public key") instead of the word "adress" or "public key". so type in: "dumpprivkey <yourwalletaddress>" I certainly did so |
|
|
|
|
moongoat_
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 42
Merit: 5
sockpuppet of wosch76
|
|
January 23, 2018, 11:18:21 AM |
|
Add it to COSS exchange? Decentralized exchange + privacy coin is a good combo decentralized exchanges will rise in volume in 2018 I would like to see it on cryptobridge as well https://crypto-bridge.org/ |
|
|
|
|
|
koYnsta
|
|
January 23, 2018, 03:06:38 PM
Last edit: January 25, 2018, 07:36:08 PM by koYnsta |
|
Looks like the only active dev right now is jbg. What is jbg's background?
they are two, JBG and another dev (I think bryce is his name) who is a skilled cryptographer. He is working in the background, no social media acivities as I know. JBG as lead dev has many years experience in software development. you can meet him in slack. |
|
|
|
|
bekkioPEK
Member
Offline
Activity: 356
Merit: 12
|
|
January 23, 2018, 05:04:44 PM |
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
|
|
|
|
|
Domp1
|
|
January 23, 2018, 08:31:14 PM |
|
new wallet 1.3.5 is working very well now thanks to the team and jbg. Expecting very good things and growth in 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
allthebitandbobs
|
|
January 23, 2018, 08:36:10 PM |
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever |
|
|
|
|
Nebell
|
|
January 23, 2018, 09:07:42 PM |
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private. If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody. Every coin need recognition for success. If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at. |
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
January 23, 2018, 09:15:16 PM |
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private. If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody. Every coin need recognition for success. If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at. How about Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto certainly didn't want his identity revealed even after success probably relevant to to that of a nobel prize. JBG is anonymous for legal reasons. I certainly wouldn't want to put my face next to the only cryptocurrency that works in TOR blocked regions. Cryptography and Identity could not be more polar opposite. Think about it. |
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
|
EleanorZ
|
|
January 23, 2018, 10:54:14 PM
Last edit: January 23, 2018, 11:12:50 PM by EleanorZ |
|
What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private.
If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody.
Every coin need recognition for success.
If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at.
There's more than one way to define success. Verge, for example, has been successful from an investment perspective, yet arguably has been very unsuccessful at being a good privacy coin. Who knows how it will do in the longer term once the hype dies down. As has been said many times on this forum, XSPEC is trying to let the product speak for itself, for better and for worse. This means that it will take longer for the product to develop and gain users based on reputation alone, which can be frustrating for short-term investors. It is what it is. |
|
|
|
|
|
Nebell
|
|
January 24, 2018, 01:11:09 AM |
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private. If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody. Every coin need recognition for success. If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at. How about Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto certainly didn't want his identity revealed even after success probably relevant to to that of a nobel prize. JBG is anonymous for legal reasons. I certainly wouldn't want to put my face next to the only cryptocurrency that works in TOR blocked regions. Cryptography and Identity could not be more polar opposite. Think about it. You're comparing apples and oranges. Bitcoin was the first. It didn't have any competition, it didn't need to be promoted. It was the new shit. SpectreCoin is a privacy coin in a sea of privacy coins. What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private.
If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody.
Every coin need recognition for success.
If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at.
There's more than one way to define success. Verge, for example, has been successful from an investment perspective, yet arguably has been very unsuccessful at being a good privacy coin. Who knows how it will do in the longer term once the hype dies down. As has been said many times on this forum, XSPEC is trying to let the product speak for itself, for better and for worse. This means that it will take longer for the product to develop and gain users based on reputation alone, which can be frustrating for short-term investors. It is what it is. The quality of a privacy coin doesn't matter if nobody is willing to use it. The short or long term makes no difference. If people see this as a long-term coin, great, but remember, if this is used as an excuse for not promoting the coin, not attempting to move it more by getting it on better exchanges, and crawling development, then people will get bored of holding it. There will be other privacy coins which will have better tech, will be better promoted, people will jump ship and we will end up with a dead coin. |
|
|
|
|
sirsplashalot
|
|
January 24, 2018, 01:42:49 AM |
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private. If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody. Every coin need recognition for success. If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at. How about Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto certainly didn't want his identity revealed even after success probably relevant to to that of a nobel prize. JBG is anonymous for legal reasons. I certainly wouldn't want to put my face next to the only cryptocurrency that works in TOR blocked regions. Cryptography and Identity could not be more polar opposite. Think about it. You're comparing apples and oranges. Bitcoin was the first. It didn't have any competition, it didn't need to be promoted. It was the new shit. SpectreCoin is a privacy coin in a sea of privacy coins. What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private.
If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody.
Every coin need recognition for success.
If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at.
There's more than one way to define success. Verge, for example, has been successful from an investment perspective, yet arguably has been very unsuccessful at being a good privacy coin. Who knows how it will do in the longer term once the hype dies down. As has been said many times on this forum, XSPEC is trying to let the product speak for itself, for better and for worse. This means that it will take longer for the product to develop and gain users based on reputation alone, which can be frustrating for short-term investors. It is what it is. The quality of a privacy coin doesn't matter if nobody is willing to use it. The short or long term makes no difference. If people see this as a long-term coin, great, but remember, if this is used as an excuse for not promoting the coin, not attempting to move it more by getting it on better exchanges, and crawling development, then people will get bored of holding it. There will be other privacy coins which will have better tech, will be better promoted, people will jump ship and we will end up with a dead coin. Heres what is very important to recognize about the Spectrecoin roadmap. Spectrecoin is the only POS cryptocurrency that aims to release default stealth address staking. This means the richlisst will become irrelevant and the blockchain will become obsolete. Many people don't understand just how significant this is in cryptocurrency. This means, for all we know, 1 address could be staking 99% of the supply and 1% could be on exchanges for trading. Whether this is the case or not, no one will know. We will know the amount in circulation but have no idea where the supply is coming from. People are starting to criticize Spectrecoin for this being almost too magical to be true. Now that jbg is getting funding from 1.3.5, the Q2 release of this update is really not too far away. Whether your willing to take the risk and hold on till then is your choice, but if this update is made, we will see a $100 coin and a milestone in cryptocurrency and Spectrecoin will be the best anonymous cryptocurrency, hands down. If you can name a POS coin that has this in their pipeline, please let me know. You can't, because there isn't. This type of anonymity is unheard of. |
Worried about my trust rating? I am too. Bitcointalk users ‘Lauda’ and ‘gmaxwell’ have abused their superior powers in trust system to align their views with the ‘correct views.’ In no legal system in any jurisdiction do we have a definition for what Bitcoin is, they do not have the power to tell us what it is based on the rule of law.
|
|
|
Wicking
Jr. Member
Offline
Activity: 104
Merit: 1
|
|
January 24, 2018, 04:14:28 PM |
|
simple question: XSPEC is a cripto that used tor for stay anonymus. this fact makes it difficult to be listed in bigger and bester exchange. or i'm wrong?
Yes certain big exchanges requires the devs to share there personal info in order for the coin to get listed .So dont expect spectre to bet listed on bittrex ever What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private. If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody. Every coin need recognition for success. If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at. How about Bitcoin? Satoshi Nakamoto certainly didn't want his identity revealed even after success probably relevant to to that of a nobel prize. JBG is anonymous for legal reasons. I certainly wouldn't want to put my face next to the only cryptocurrency that works in TOR blocked regions. Cryptography and Identity could not be more polar opposite. Think about it. You're comparing apples and oranges. Bitcoin was the first. It didn't have any competition, it didn't need to be promoted. It was the new shit. SpectreCoin is a privacy coin in a sea of privacy coins. What difference does that make? I'm not interested in a privacy coin to keep the developers identity private.
If he wanted to stay anonymous, why even create this coin? Could've just stayed as nobody.
Every coin need recognition for success.
If this kind of attitude persists I probably will dump my SpectreCoin once it goes back to the same price I purchased it at.
There's more than one way to define success. Verge, for example, has been successful from an investment perspective, yet arguably has been very unsuccessful at being a good privacy coin. Who knows how it will do in the longer term once the hype dies down. As has been said many times on this forum, XSPEC is trying to let the product speak for itself, for better and for worse. This means that it will take longer for the product to develop and gain users based on reputation alone, which can be frustrating for short-term investors. It is what it is. The quality of a privacy coin doesn't matter if nobody is willing to use it. The short or long term makes no difference. If people see this as a long-term coin, great, but remember, if this is used as an excuse for not promoting the coin, not attempting to move it more by getting it on better exchanges, and crawling development, then people will get bored of holding it. There will be other privacy coins which will have better tech, will be better promoted, people will jump ship and we will end up with a dead coin. Heres what is very important to recognize about the Spectrecoin roadmap. Spectrecoin is the only POS cryptocurrency that aims to release default stealth address staking. This means the richlisst will become irrelevant and the blockchain will become obsolete. Many people don't understand just how significant this is in cryptocurrency. This means, for all we know, 1 address could be staking 99% of the supply and 1% could be on exchanges for trading. Whether this is the case or not, no one will know. We will know the amount in circulation but have no idea where the supply is coming from. People are starting to criticize Spectrecoin for this being almost too magical to be true. Now that jbg is getting funding from 1.3.5, the Q2 release of this update is really not too far away. Whether your willing to take the risk and hold on till then is your choice, but if this update is made, we will see a $100 coin and a milestone in cryptocurrency and Spectrecoin will be the best anonymous cryptocurrency, hands down. If you can name a POS coin that has this in their pipeline, please let me know. You can't, because there isn't. This type of anonymity is unheard of. Great, reasoned response. Totally agree with You. |
|
|
|
|
|
