-

[Bargraphics]

Those PSU's are just dangling there?

zipties!

[CumpsD]

Those PSU's are just dangling there?

zipties!

Living on the edge! :p Your setup frightens me

[Bargraphics]

Those PSU's are just dangling there?

zipties!

Living on the edge! :p Your setup frightens me

It gets the job done, I probably would have done it a little bit better but I plan on selling the miners bit by bit so I have to have them easily available to take off and package up.

Alright now back on topic!

[Lab_Rat]

For stability and cooling, wire racks are perfect and to avoid shorts you put them on their side, which does 2 things.  It stabilizes all 16 cards to the rack instead of having them standing individually balanced on the M-board slots and allows for air to be blown top to bottom or bottom to top with excellent airflow.

I'll post pics of a rack when the first one is built out.

I know a thing or two about chilies as well :p  Assembled/assembling 31 of them for someone in the midst of all the chaos (between 1 and 4 AM when I'm done thinking for the day).

[M31]

Hey Lab_Rat

Check out this thread. It might be something you are interested in
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=269941.0

Dave and I discussed the best way to set up the rigs and we came up with the perfect way to do it cost effectively and those cases would increase cost a lot when were talking 250 rigs at some point.

I figured you had something planned already, figured with a bulk order you could get pricing down much more.

Either way I'm excited to see what you have in store. I tried setting up ~60 "Chili" Miners and it took about 2 days, so I understand somewhat of what a painful process it is hah.

If you can, I would love to see some pictures of your setup. It can't be any worse than mine (see below)

Bargraphics:

That's is a hideously great setup you have there!  I want to decorate it and use it as a Christmas tree!

[Bargraphics]

Bargraphics:

That's is a hideously great setup you have there!  I want to decorate it and use it as a Christmas tree!

Someone already decorated

[M31]

That cracked me up!  Not often a LOL really means a LOL, but in this case it caught me by surprise in a milk-exploding-from-my-nose kinda way.

[John122]

Someone already decorated

[img ]https://i.imgur.com/PWHrMOz.jpg[ /img]

Haha, awesome!  

[Lab_Rat]

Updated list : https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BwZCh0jtSZkwQXhYSVhzaWZUcmc&usp=sharing

[Ashitank]

Updated list : https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BwZCh0jtSZkwQXhYSVhzaWZUcmc&usp=sharing

Alright , so

Total number of shares sold : 55207

Verified : 43928   ->  ~0.80%  

Failed : 4139  ->  ~0.07%

Not Received : 7140 ->  ~0.13%

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1KEvdgpXYIYQ3lGNk80R3FseFk/edit?usp=drive_web

[||bit]

Updated list : https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BwZCh0jtSZkwQXhYSVhzaWZUcmc&usp=sharing

Alright , so

Total number of shares sold : 55207

Verified : 43928   ->  ~0.80%  

Failed : 4139  ->  ~0.07%

Not Received : 7140 ->  ~0.13%

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1KEvdgpXYIYQ3lGNk80R3FseFk/edit?usp=drive_web

You should drop the leading "0." from the percentages. At least there is an approximate 7% improvement from the first value of those 'Not Received' a while ago. It was 20.7% the other day. Ukyo or whoever at Bitfunder could send out a email to all Labrat accounts to help out with that.

One concern could be that anyone with access at Bitfunder could claim the bonds of addreses that were automatically generated from Bitfunder.

[fractal02]

Updated list : https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BwZCh0jtSZkwQXhYSVhzaWZUcmc&usp=sharing

Alright , so

Total number of shares sold : 55207

Verified : 43928   ->  ~0.80%  

Failed : 4139  ->  ~0.07%

Not Received : 7140 ->  ~0.13%

https://docs.google.com/file/d/0B1KEvdgpXYIYQ3lGNk80R3FseFk/edit?usp=drive_web

Do the math based on share isn't accurate...
It doesn't represent LabRat work.

1 bondholder can have 10 bonds and 1 other 1000.
So according to your calculation if LabRat verify only 1 bondholder with 1000 bonds per day he make a great improvement ?
Calculation weighetd by share for a verification process isn't accurate.Number of Verified/failed/Not receive address is the way to go.

So here :

10-24-2013 (US format)                          10-26-2013                                   Improvement  /  Percent

Verified                146                            Verified                 197                      + 51            +     34.92  %
Failed                    42                            Failed                    20                      + 22             +    110     %
Did Not Receive    170                            Did Not Receive    141                      + 29             +     20.56 %


Total                    358                                                       358                       102

[maqifrnswa]

double entry bookkeeping FTW

10-24-2013 (US format)                          10-26-2013                                   Change  /  Percent

Verified                146                            Verified                 197                      + 51            +     35  %
Failed                    42                            Failed                    20                      - 22             -    52     %
Did Not Receive    170                            Did Not Receive    141                      - 29             -     17 %


Total                    358                                                       358                       0



it's interesting to note that 40% of the bondholders didn't contact LR, but they account for only 13% of bonds.

EDIT: Weighting by shares is very important, it tells you what percentage of assets are being "absorbed" by LRM. Both % of accounts and % of shares are important, for different reasons.

[John122]

double entry bookkeeping FTW

10-24-2013 (US format)                          10-26-2013                                   Change  /  Percent

Verified                146                            Verified                 197                      + 51            +     35  %
Failed                    42                            Failed                    20                      - 22             -    52     %
Did Not Receive    170                            Did Not Receive    141                      - 29             -     17 %


Total                    358                                                       358                       0



it's interesting to note that 40% of the bondholders didn't contact LR, but they account for only 13% of bonds.

Thanks for correcting the values, I was about to do it myself if no one else had done it!
And thank you, fractal02, for coming up with most of the work done to begin with!

[mboehler]

Due to issues with people not having THEIR OWN bitcoin addresses on BitFunder, I will be postponing this weeks dividends in an attempt to help give people more time to get their address situated.

This means the dividends due to go out Oct. 19th and Oct. 26th will BOTH go out on Oct. 26th.

What time should we expect to receive our dividends today (Oct. 26th)?

[Lab_Rat]

Updated the list before paying divs (why they were late today)
https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=0BwZCh0jtSZkwQXhYSVhzaWZUcmc&usp=sharing

Verified:  51939
DNR:  3533
Failed:  0

Mined:  BTC154.21549824
Payout:  BTC115.6616237
Per Bond:  BTC0.00208505

Payout - DNR = BTC108.29515922

Remaining to be held until confirmed: BTC7.36646448

Bonus info:

TX Size: 9489 Bytes

[CumpsD]

Is the current payout for everyone? Is there a fee for this payout?

[Lab_Rat]

Is the current payout for everyone? Is there a fee for this payout?

Everyone who was confirmed with me, you being one of them, received divs.  8 confirms already.

NO FEES as I stated previously.  Last payout was the only one...

[CumpsD]

Is the current payout for everyone? Is there a fee for this payout?

Everyone who was confirmed with me, you being one of them, received divs.  8 confirms already.

NO FEES as I stated previously.  Last payout was the only one...

Thanks, nice to see we're leaving the BitFunder story slowly behind us

[Lab_Rat]

It appears that some of the individuals who changed their addresses may not have been copied over correctly, let me know if you did not receive dividends via email.

I have now fixed the problem, but would like to make sure everyone got their Dividends.